ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Preseason Power Rankings No. 21: Kansas City Chiefs PFT (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=261405)

O.city 07-14-2012 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 8740028)
Would you rather go to the SB and lose like my beloved Raiders did in 02 or would you rather not go at all?

Go and lose. For sure.

OnTheWarpath15 07-14-2012 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8740027)
Not that specifically, but would you not agree that it is generally 1 or 2 plays per game that end up making the difference?

Nope. That's cliche bullshit.

EVERY play makes a difference, and you never know how one seemingly innocent play (say, 4 minutes into the game) affects everything that happens after it.

Fans need a scapegoat, so they pinpoint one or two plays.

Christ, there are dumbasses that still blame Bowe for the Colts game. He dropped that TD midway through the 3rd quarter. There was still 20+ minutes of game after that. And even had he caught it, there's no guarantee we win that game.

Every play matters.

notorious 07-14-2012 02:54 PM

Sounds about right.


We would suddenly vault to the top 10 if we could change one position.

R8RFAN 07-14-2012 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8740032)
Go and lose. For sure.

I dunno man........

Hammock Parties 07-14-2012 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 8740034)
Christ, there are dumbasses that still blame Bowe for the Colts game. He dropped that TD midway through the 3rd quarter.

We lost that game 19-9.

Bowe's TD would have made it 19-16.

I am sure that, in a close game, Matt Cassel would have beaten Peyton Manning.

whoman69 07-14-2012 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 8739959)
If the Chiefs had a QB they would be a contender...

The Raiders are @ 23 in this same ranking..

If the Raiders can improve from damn near last on D to around 19-18 range...and DMC does not get hurt (big if) The Raiders will win the West..

You heard it here first.

Put down the bath salts.

OnTheWarpath15 07-14-2012 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toad King (Post 8740041)
We lost that game 19-9.

Bowe's TD would have made it 19-16.

I am sure that, in a close game, Matt Cassel would have beaten Peyton Manning.

I wasn't going to beat a dead horse, but you're right.

O.city 07-14-2012 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 8740034)
Nope. That's cliche bullshit.

EVERY play makes a difference, and you never know how one seemingly innocent play (say, 4 minutes into the game) affects everything that happens after it.

Fans need a scapegoat, so they pinpoint one or two plays.

Christ, there are dumbasses that still blame Bowe for the Colts game. He dropped that TD midway through the 3rd quarter. There was still 20+ minutes of game after that. And even had he caught it, there's no guarantee we win that game.

Every play matters.

Of course every play matters.


IMO, there are one or two plays per game that, if went the other way, would totally change the game. I guess you could say that about every play as well.

Quesadilla Joe 07-14-2012 03:02 PM

Sounds right to me. The Chiefs front seven is filled with backups aside from DJ and Tamba. Their secondary is good. Their OL is decent, RB's are good (assuming Charles is healthy), and if Bowe pulls a VJ the Chiefs have nothing at WR.

The Chiefs have a solid roster but no game changers aside from Jamaal Charles and who knows if he will ever be the same.

O.city 07-14-2012 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel>Manning (Post 8740053)
Sounds right to me. The Chiefs front seven is filled with backups aside from DJ and Tamba. Their secondary is good. Their OL is decent, RB's are good (assuming Charles is healthy), and if Bowe pulls a VJ the Chiefs have nothing at WR.

The Chiefs have a solid roster but no game changers aside from Jamaal Charles and who knows if he will ever be the same.

So whats that make the Broncos?

Chiefs Pantalones 07-14-2012 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel>Manning (Post 8740053)
Sounds right to me. The Chiefs front seven is filled with backups aside from DJ and Tamba. Their secondary is good. Their OL is decent, RB's are good (assuming Charles is healthy), and if Bowe pulls a VJ the Chiefs have nothing at WR.

The Chiefs have a solid roster but no game changers aside from Jamaal Charles and who knows if he will ever be the same.

He lost his burst.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-14-2012 03:09 PM

whether this roster needs a fundamental overhaul

Stopped right there. It needs an enema at one position dumb ****s.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-14-2012 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 8739959)
If the Chiefs had a QB they would be a contender...

The Raiders are @ 23 in this same ranking..

If the Raiders can improve from damn near last on D to around 19-18 range...and DMC does not get hurt (big if) The Raiders will win the West..

You heard it here first.

You're av will be mine and it sure won't be Chester

Sofa King 07-14-2012 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel>Manning (Post 8740053)
Sounds right to me. The Chiefs front seven is filled with backups aside from DJ and Tamba. Their secondary is good. Their OL is decent, RB's are good (assuming Charles is healthy), and if Bowe pulls a VJ the Chiefs have nothing at WR.

The Chiefs have a solid roster but no game changers aside from Jamaal Charles and who knows if he will ever be the same.

You're not even trying anymore.

Quesadilla Joe 07-14-2012 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8740057)
So whats that make the Broncos?

Frachise QB, Franchise LT, elite passrush, shutdown corner.... Denver has all of the tools that GM's look for when building a roster. Without Manning the Broncos would probably be ranked near where PFT has the Chiefs ranked, but with him they are a top 10 team.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.