No Ronnie Hillman?

Adrian Peterson is Adrian Peterson, though. He's the best RB in the NFL for the last 5 years.

Adrian Peterson tore his ACL in week 15. Charles has had 3 and a half more months than Adrian to recover from his injury. Charles has a much better chance of being his old self than Adrian does.
Posted via Mobile Device

I think Foster and Tate should be # 2.

AP also has a ton of miles on him. He's not just going to bounce back from this injury the same way Charles did. It will take more time for him to make a full recovery.

For the most part, Charles is already there in terms of recovery. You can't say the same at all of Adrian Peterson until you evaluate him in a game situation. We could be looking at the Toby Gerhart and Shitfart Rapedick show in Minnesota for as much as half of the season.

I'd try and troll this thread but even I think that's reeruned.

I don't know why you would. Charles is a RB who greatly benefits from playing in the same system as Cassel, but there is still a clearly defined tier between Jamaal Charles/Peyton Hillis and Dexter McCluster/Thomas Jones/Julian Battle

https://twitter.com/SprowESPN Just look at the clown

I'm stealing that.

Mendenhall, Peterson, and Forte are coming off knee injuries, also.

I'm not saying JC and Hillis should be #1, but the fact that they're not on the list AT ALL is a ****ing travesty.

No one is arguing this point.

Doesn't change the fact that he IS coming off a knee injury. So is Mendenhall.

Its a reeruned list.

Hell, the simple fact that Rice is so low on it makes it shitty.