ChiefsPlanet
Page 4 of 5 123 4 5
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Charles cannot continue to touch the ball 30+ times per game (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=264778)

King_Chief_Fan 10-08-2012 06:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCharles1981 (Post 8991134)
I am not holding my breath just yet. We saw the train wreck that was Tyler Palko early last season, and a less than stellar effort from the mid-season replacement Kyle Orton. Any QB who gets injured on the first play that he is brought in after the starter goes out cannot be that dependable. If Pioli had any sense in his head, he would have kept Tyler Thigpen instead of investing so many millions in Cassell.
and if you had any sense, you wouldn't have said Thigpen

Pasta Little Brioni 10-08-2012 11:48 AM
20 carries and 5 catches a game.

Molitoth 10-08-2012 11:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCharles1981 (Post 8991128)
The truth is that the Chiefs need an Offensive Coordinator who is going to balance out rushing and passing plays. The OC we had just before Todd Haley came in to coach completely wore out former RB Larry Johnson with an overabundance of running plays, and as a result, he eventually became a "2 season" wonder. You don't stick with primarily running plays unless the QB is literally incapable of executing most passes.
This is exactly what we have in Matt Cassel you inept turd. LMAO

DeezNutz 10-08-2012 01:24 PM
Regarding running 75-80% of the time, RAC says, "Would you rather see a competitive game or see a 40-10 game?"

FFS. If that's not a glaring comment about the state of Pioli's Chiefs, I don't know what is.

htismaqe 10-08-2012 01:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 8992354)
Regarding running 75-80% of the time, RAC says, "Would you rather see a competitive game or see a 40-10 game?"

FFS. If that's not a glaring comment about the state of Pioli's Chiefs, I don't know what is.
He seriously said that?

DeezNutz 10-08-2012 02:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8992462)
He seriously said that?
Yes. No bullshit.

It's staggering. The question started with (paraphrasing), "Do you believe running 75-80 percent of the time is a viable offensive strategy in a passing league?"

RAC: "It is when you're gaining yards like we were yesterday."

Reporter: "Yes, but you didn't score any points. You had all that success and still scored only 6 points..."

And that's when RAC came with the competitive/40-10 game bullshit. Herm-io indeed.

Hammock Parties 10-08-2012 02:23 PM
Just read that we had 35 yards rushing in the second half against the Ravens. LMAO

- Jamaal Charles’ yards per carry dropped from 6.3 in the first half to 1.5 in the second half.

Deberg_1990 10-08-2012 02:56 PM
I can kind of see RACs point. He knew he was outgunned, so he tried to play conservative to avoid a shootout and protect Cassel. Fine. He should have adjusted in 2nd half when the Ravens did. Dude is a crappy head coach.
Posted via Mobile Device

DeezNutz 10-08-2012 02:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 8992674)
I can kind of see RACs point. He knew he was outgunned, so he tried to play conservative to avoid a shootout and protect Cassel. Fine. He should have adjusted in 2nd half when the Ravens did. Dude is a crappy head coach.
Posted via Mobile Device
When Quinn entered the game, the team threw on third down. Why?

RAC is a gutless pussy whom Pioli controls.

Deberg_1990 10-08-2012 03:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 8992689)
When Quinn entered the game, the team threw on third down. Why?

RAC is a gutless pussy whom Pioli controls.

I've mentioned before, this is a gig to stuff Crennels retirement account. He doesn't want to do anything that will "rock the boat"
Posted via Mobile Device

HemiEd 10-08-2012 03:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 8989006)
**** off. Running our best offense player into the ground to cover Cassel's deficiencies is not ok.
He learned it from Herm.

HemiEd 10-08-2012 03:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 8990084)
There used to be a lot of fans who would argue endlessly if a poster had the temerity to suggest that Pioli was nothing but a fluffer in NE.
Some of us are slow learners and need to see for ourselves. I never thought it would happen, but my give a shit meter is below red.

Easy 6 10-08-2012 04:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 8990084)
There used to be a lot of fans who would argue endlessly if a poster had the temerity to suggest that Pioli was nothing but a fluffer in NE.
I was one of them, you guys were right... he sucks ass... the fact that he has yet to say a word about any of this & is atleast tacitly giving the media permission to destroy the character of the hands that feed him, is simply, totally enraging.

What form of obeisance would you like, shall i get you a fruit platter, or perhaps a cold drink?

:D

JCharles1981 10-09-2012 11:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan (Post 8991228)
and if you had any sense, you wouldn't have said Thigpen
Right, because the moment we have a QB that begins showing real potential, we trade him. Does Rich Gannon ring a bell?

Pasta Little Brioni 10-09-2012 11:29 AM
It's Herm ball without LJ stretching out the center's arsehole ramming full speed ahead.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:14 AM.
Page 4 of 5 123 4 5
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.