Just to be sure he's not being taken out of context, we're assuming here that Russell Wilson is on our roster. Or since he wins and doesn't lose, Russeww Wiwson.

My bad, for some reason I didnt read the OP.

My apologies tyton75.

We didn't draft him so who cares?

Hey, hey, hey. That kind of attitude didn't help us unlock the secrets of the atom.

I think anyone could of done better for us last year, Stanzi included, KC didn't give the young Stanzi a shot, why do you think they would of Wilson?

Because he's Russell Wilson! He would have grabbed them by the collar, lifted them up while throwing a 30-yard touchdown pass, and yelled in their faces the German equivalent of "Start me! I'm your quarterback!"

Or actually, I doubt they would have given him a shot, too. So this is kind of a double hypothetical. We draft him and then we play him. The odds against that are astronomical.

If you had a time machine you could only use once would u A.. go back 1 year and draft russel wilson or B... Go back 4 years and hire someone besides 'Team-killer' 'Team-killer' 'Team-killer' 'Team-killer' Pioli?
I vote B


***LOL every time I edit adds another "team Killer"

Because Stanzi is horrible. Wilson had talent. Watch the preseason games, stanzi was clueless on where to go with the ball and missed easy throws.

'Team-killer' is added every time you type "P i o l i" so you don't actually have to type it yourself.

Be happy for Rain Man polls. They are gifts from the CP gods.

If we had drafted Wilson, we're not picking #1.

If Wilson had been coached by this coaching staff we might be. But then the poll wouldn't be nearly as interesting.

BINGO !!:thumb:

If your QB is 5'11" and runs the ball regularly, you'd better have a spare.

They look the same size to me..

http://seahawks.net/download/file.php?id=1989