ChiefsPlanet
Page 4 of 10 123 4 5678 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football PFF Ranks top 101 players of 2012 and No Jamaal Charles (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=272886)

morphius 05-08-2013 01:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 9668229)
PFF is a stat site. Doesn't mean that anyone there actually knows anything...though some would lead you to believe that they are the be-all, end-all when it comes to football knowledge. Not having Charles on that list shows one of two things. Either they're incompetent, or they completely forgot about our team...which is possible.
Can I forget about last season as well? Please!

ct 05-08-2013 01:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 9668133)
At least Tampa Bay's RB, Doug Martin, made the list. They didn't completely forget about running backs. :rolleyes:
Don't forget CJ Spiller #18, cause he was a 30 touch/game BEAST all year right? Not like he would do nothing for 10 touches and then explode for a couple big ones to make up for it.

Red Beans 05-08-2013 01:47 PM
**** PFF with a rusty AIDS fork.

Jerm 05-08-2013 01:51 PM
Never been a big PFF fan and never will be...**** them...

Sorter 05-08-2013 01:56 PM
Not a huge fan of PFF because the majority of their stats aren't accurate in regards to team-specific qualities (i.e. option routes, D/O responsibilities, sight adjusts, checks, hots, etc).

Some of the stuff they put out is okay if you know what the actual call is and the players responsibilities.

Rausch 05-08-2013 01:58 PM
Even kids that paint with their face can see JC is a top 5 NFL HB...

LoneWolf 05-08-2013 01:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief_For_Life58 (Post 9668201)
Jamals not in PFF's top 101 of 2012?!?!??!!NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

http://www.documentingreality.com/fo...indow_fall.gif
Still the best gif ever. :)

chefsos 05-08-2013 02:23 PM
I guess if Charles had just turned around and come halfway back and fallen down on those 19 long runs, he'd have been a better back. OK.

Just Passin' By 05-08-2013 02:43 PM
PFF sucks. For the record, though, FO had Charles at #12 in DYAR and #17 in DVOA for RBs, after having him at 1/1 in 2010.

Mother****erJones 05-08-2013 03:13 PM
ROFL **** PFF. How many times did teams stack 9 in the box and how many yards did he have this season?

Hammock Parties 05-08-2013 03:16 PM
101. Blair Walsh, K, Minnesota Vikings

Yay!

Hammock Parties 05-08-2013 03:18 PM
I think there's a hole in their system where Charles/speed backs are concerned. Mostly because he's so fast, he rarely gets a chance to break a tackle. He just runs by everyone that other backs would be juking/trucking.

Pasta Little Brioni 05-08-2013 03:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 9668478)
PFF sucks. For the record, though, FO had Charles at #12 in DYAR and #17 in DVOA for RBs, after having him at 1/1 in 2010.
****em. He's easily Top 3.

BlackHelicopters 05-08-2013 03:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice (Post 9668563)
101. Blair Walsh, K, Minnesota Vikings

Yay!
ROFL

Rausch 05-08-2013 03:21 PM
Charles should be rated on the Barry Saunders metric: he'll have 2 very unimpressive runs to each impressive one.

Then one OUTSTANDING run per game...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:50 PM.
Page 4 of 10 123 4 5678 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.