ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Did Alex Smith change your mind. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=280394)

ClevelandBronco 01-05-2014 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 10348368)
You mean taking the sack and losing the yardage is better than the intentional grounding in some substantial way?

Exactly. The intentional grounding penalty basically just awards a defense the sack they were going to record anyway.

Chiefs=Champions 01-05-2014 08:38 PM

I think he changed my mind as far as his ceiling. Ive always been impressed with the way he elevates his play in big games, but this was another step. He has now shown that he can compete with some of the better qbs in the league. We just need to give him a few more weapons and improve the defense.

SullySparks 01-05-2014 08:46 PM

LOL
 
He was fantastic for one half of football and then fell flat when we needed him most in the second half. The defense had a colossal collapse but Smith and the offense did as well. I thought that trade stuck us in QB purgatory for the foreseeable future….after yesterday I am assured I was correct

SullySparks 01-05-2014 08:47 PM

6 of our 7 offensive drives were 3 minutes or less in the second half. Basically the defense was Alex Smith little brother who was getting punched in the nose repeatedly and he had no idea how to make the nosebleed stop.

Fritz88 01-05-2014 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 10348368)
You mean taking the sack and losing the yardage is better than the intentional grounding in some substantial way?

Didn't we get a loss of down as well?
Posted via Mobile Device

Mav 01-05-2014 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SullySparks (Post 10348404)
He was fantastic for one half of football and then fell flat when we needed him most in the second half. The defense had a colossal collapse but Smith and the offense did as well. I thought that trade stuck us in QB purgatory for the foreseeable future….after yesterday I am assured I was correct

When you needed him most huh?

How about without Avery, without Charles, and then without Knile.

Oh, and lets not admit how much better the COLTS defense played in the second half.

Mav 01-05-2014 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fritz88 (Post 10348409)
Didn't we get a loss of down as well?
Posted via Mobile Device

Its the same as a sack.

Essentially.

Rasputin 01-05-2014 08:50 PM

He didn't change my mind about drafting and developing a first round quarterback.

HonestChieffan 01-05-2014 08:52 PM

Alex has performed every game. Cp has more idiots and morons than a reerun ward

milkman 01-05-2014 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fritz88 (Post 10348409)
Didn't we get a loss of down as well?
Posted via Mobile Device

With the sack, the Chiefs would have been faced with a 3rd and roughly 17.

With the intentional grounding they faced a 3rd and 17.

The Bad Guy 01-05-2014 08:56 PM

No, Alex Smith does not keep you in QB purgatory unless you think the only sure way to get a QB is in the first round, but that's been proven lately not to be the case.

4 out of the 8 QBs still playing were drafted outside of the first round.

You also don't need a franchise QB to win a SB.

Rasputin 01-05-2014 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 10348430)
With the sack, the Chiefs would have been faced with a 3rd and roughly 17.

With the intentional grounding they faced a 3rd and 17.



The only thing I can say about throwing the ball away is that at least it's not a fumble or he risk fumble while going down. So intentional grounding is at least good for something.

EyePod 01-05-2014 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 10346848)
Never in a million years would I have thought this defense could choke away a lead like that... STILL trying to wrap my head around it.

What was the stat OTWP posted somewhere, Indy had a .9% chance of winning once we went up 28?

Un.believable.

Average Indy scoring drive was 2 minutes and 32 seconds. How ****ing ridiculous is that?

EyePod 01-05-2014 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 10348430)
With the sack, the Chiefs would have been faced with a 3rd and roughly 17.

With the intentional grounding they faced a 3rd and 17.

Man I bet he wishes he threw it away to his left. I do too.

OnTheWarpath15 01-05-2014 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EyePod (Post 10348470)
Average Indy scoring drive was 2 minutes and 32 seconds. How ****ing ridiculous is that?

They scored 45 points while only having the ball for 22 minutes.

Think TOP might be a tad overrated?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.