I'm getting to where I can't stand watching the college game and its because of the NBA.
|
Quote:
|
im not a fan of college BB myself. Ill watch the tail end of the tournament though. I totally agree, the passing the ball to 2 guys behind the 3 point line until the clock winds down is ****ing boring.
|
Watching the Spurs pass the ball around in last years finals was beautiful
I think the 3pt line is an obvious one. It does so many beneficial things. Makes the 3 less efficient, the mid-range 2 less of a terrible shot, opens up the court a bit. I'm not sure the shot clock is really a problem but more a victim of that fact teams can't find good looks to take on a lot of possessions. I think they call the moving screen in a truly bizarre way. To me, it should be similar to charging. Were you holding your position or moving into the other players path? Yet a guy will set a legal screen, the defender will jump right side to take away the three, the defender will go to roll left (without obstructing the defensive player) towards the basket and they call it. |
Anyone who doesn't enjoy the modern NBA is stuck in the wrong decade. NBA has been excellent the past few years. Better defense, far more ball movement, big guys who space the floor vs. in the past where they soaked up the paint. And the last few playoffs have been outstanding.
|
College basketball is an absolutely horrific product.
And while Cuban is a bloviating douche, but he's right about this one. The NBA is a tremendous product and has gotten far, far better over the last 20 years, while college basketball has progressively declined in quality. The college shot clock should be 24, the timeline should be eight seconds without a reset on a timeout, and the three point line should be moved back to 22 feet in the corners and 23'9" at the top of the key, same as the NBA. |
Right or wrong, I like this man's style.
|
Quote:
HERM WAS RIGHT jebus I am so flamed now |
The NBA has a very entertaining product.
But over half the league has a losing record. They dont have enough talent to field 30 teams, and thats even with the game becoming more international now. |
Quote:
|
The NBA is loaded with talent.
|
As someone who watches a metric ton of college hoops, I think a lot of these suggestions are absolutely terrible. Reducing a shot clock to 30 is fine, but 24? You'll see bad possessions constantly. Putting the 3-point line out further is an even worse idea because 3pt % isn't that high right now (35% ish?) and if it's moved back NOBODY will go out to guard it. It'll be even more packed than it is today.
A couple simple fixes: (1) reduce TO from 5 to 2 per half. These egomaniac coaches don't need any more micro-managing and idle hands are the devil's playthings. You get 5 breaks anyway, talk to them then. (2) No TO when the ball is in play. Get trapped? Find a way out. (3) 1 review per half, like the NFL coaches' challenge. (4) Eliminate the ability to foul under 10 seconds up 3. It's the most exciting play in the game and douchebags always foul with 5 seconds to kill any thrill. Foul under 10 and it's 2-shots and the ball. |
Quote:
Replace that with: call intentional fouls when teams foul intentionally late in the game. There is nothing is sports worse than the foulfests at the end of games. |
Quote:
:30, yes. I really wish teams would get back to running some motion. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.