ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Things to consider upon last night's ending (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=294716)

TigeRRUppeRRcut 09-18-2015 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jonzie04 (Post 11739528)
You know Denver held Flacco to 38 yards in the first half, and 117 with two picks throughout the whole game? And that is behind a top 5 offensive line.

THIS. I agree that comparing your team to competition is all relative. Flacco looked like dump on Sunday. Denver has some big money spent on defense. Can they even afford Von Miller next season and continue to pay the offense the way they have been?

DaneMcCloud 09-18-2015 12:26 PM

Jamaal Charles fumbles twice, DAT fumbles once, Alex Smith throws two INT's. If even one of those event doesn't occur, the Chiefs win.

As mentioned in the thread starter, the Chiefs aren't going to give the ball away five times in a game. They'll be fine.

ThaVirus 09-18-2015 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 11739542)
It's funny how people underplay the significance of a fumble yet just want to castrate our QB for an INT behind that awful line.

QB's are expected to throw an INT from time to time.

You can't throw an INT from your own 20 with 2:30 in the half while you're up 7 and looking to get the ball back after half. You also can't throw an INT in the red zone.. Just like you can't fumble the ball in the red zone or fumble on the last play of the game.

Difference is, Jamaal contributed a TD. Alex contributed a 7.4 QBR.

jimidollar 09-18-2015 12:29 PM

They'll be fine. That's the pinnacle of success for the Chiefs.

BullJunkandIron 09-18-2015 01:16 PM

As long as the patrons are looking as big as Andy, Clark be so happy happy.

notorious 09-18-2015 01:19 PM

If half the turnovers don't happen, we win.

If Reid's nacho platter comes during a major decision in the game, and doesn't even make a decision we win.

If Sean Smith is plays, we win.



How much shit do we need to stack on the pile before we call it a pile of shit and move on?

If this failure was against any other team we would already be over it.

Pasta Little Brioni 09-18-2015 01:20 PM

It's the kind of bullshit luck Denver needs to win. Happened in week 1 too.

ToxSocks 09-18-2015 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcjayhawks5 (Post 11739027)
I thought it was awesome when we called a timeout with 40 seconds left in the game... When we were on defense... And gave Peyton Manning extra time... To throw the game-tying TD on the next play.

The clock was already stopped. I had no issue with it.

Reerun_KC 09-18-2015 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 11739653)
If half the turnovers don't happen, we win.

If Reid's nacho platter comes during a major decision in the game, and doesn't even make a decision we win.

If Sean Smith is plays, we win.



How much shit do we need to stack on the pile before we call it a pile of shit and move on?

If this failure was against any other team we would already be over it.

That's what Reid do....

Rain Man 09-18-2015 02:14 PM

The positives from last night:

1. Half of Denver's offense came against a guy who will be on the bench when our drunk cornerback returns.

2. Gary Kubiak stinks as a coach and Manning is about to get into a war with Elway and his little buddies.

3. No significant injuries, despite several late hits by Denver.

4. Jamaal might be more focused on hanging onto the ball after that debacle. Plus, he got over 20 carries (at 6 ypc), which means that he's being used.

5. The pass rush was pretty good early on, and will be great against most quarterbacks.

6. Denver's offense is nothing but Manning, and he'll be gone next year.

jimidollar 09-18-2015 02:16 PM

Cool. Next year.

Discuss Thrower 09-18-2015 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimidollar (Post 11739817)
Cool. Next year.

The Chiefs have been playing for next year since 2007.

Tell me I'm wrong.

Rain Man 09-18-2015 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimidollar (Post 11739817)
Cool. Next year.

There's always next year.

jimidollar 09-18-2015 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 11739823)
The Chiefs have been playing for next year since 2007.

Tell me I'm wrong.

Wrong. 1994.

Discuss Thrower 09-18-2015 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimidollar (Post 11739832)
Wrong. 1994.

<iframe src="//giphy.com/embed/6KAxgfdBLzzqM" width="480" height="320" frameBorder="0" class="giphy-embed" allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="http://giphy.com/gifs/reaction-dodgeball-white-goodman-6KAxgfdBLzzqM">via GIPHY</a></p>


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.