ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs John Dorsey reportedly candidate for Packers GM (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=305034)

KCUnited 01-08-2017 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buns (Post 12667183)
Dorsey's wife is from Kansas so she would have to sign off on this. It doesn't seem like something Dorsey would do though.

LMAO

Can't imagine all the work he'd have to put in to pry his wife from Kansas.

COchief 01-08-2017 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 12667244)
LMAO

Some of you are really, really dumb. How do you know, in your own scenario, that Ballard isn't actually "Tom Brady" and "Belichick" is just riding off his work?

Oh yeah, you don't ****ing know.

Your brain is amazing, so "won't lose sleep" and "replacing with guy who feeds him all info" are OK to post as statements. And now "we just don't know"?

You just made my point for me: Current proven leader and winner with virtually zero F-ups with tons of scrap heap wins, draft wins, FA wins, and virtually nothing negative in 4 years. You absolutely do not replace that unless you have to with an "unknown", "unknowns" lead to scouting candy wrappers instead of QBs.

OnTheWarpath15 01-08-2017 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by COchief (Post 12667249)
This is so easy it hurts...

You're right. Making yourself look stupid is so easy it must hurt.

If you can't see the difference between hiring an outsider with a "reputation" versus a guy who has worked in the building for 4 years and supplied Dorsey with 90+% of the data that he used to make decisions, then I can't help you.

And people think I'm negative. Holy shit, the amount of vaginal bleeding in this thread is off the charts. If Dorsey wants to be here, and Clark wants him here, he'll sign an extension.

If Dorsey doesn't want to be here, or Clark prefers Ballard, he won't.

I'm confident that the organization won't miss a beat if Dorsey was to leave.

BryanBusby 01-08-2017 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by COchief (Post 12667265)
Your brain is amazing, so "won't lose sleep" and "replacing with guy who feeds him all info" are OK to post as statements. And now "we just don't know"?

You just made my point for me: Current proven leader and winner with virtually zero F-ups with tons of scrap heap wins, draft wins, FA wins, and virtually nothing negative in 4 years. You absolutely do not replace that unless you have to with an "unknown", "unknowns" lead to scouting candy wrappers instead of QBs.

Haha no, you have no point. You're ****ing stupid.

Otter 01-08-2017 10:20 AM

Hunt has simply got to find a way to retain Dorsey by any means necessary. Ether rag him and tie him up down in the basement of Arrowhead if need be.

BigRedChief 01-08-2017 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 12667180)
Maybe Ballard is the genius and Dorsey is just a guy....

The Chiefs know this is coming. That's why they refused to give Chris Ballard permission to talk to several teams about their open GM positions.

That's pretty rare in the NFL to block someone from taking a clearly better position. Unless some assurances have been made to Chris that the GM job is yours when Dorsey leaves. Then it makes sense.

BryanBusby 01-08-2017 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 12667274)
The Chiefs know this is coming. That's why they refused to give Chris Ballard permission to talk to several teams about their open GM positions.

That's pretty rare in the NFL to block someone from taking a clearly better position. Unless some assurances have been made to Chris that the GM job is yours when Dorsey leaves. Then it makes sense.

So rare they did it not long ago when Tampa called!

kcpasco 01-08-2017 10:24 AM

The timing on this article sucks. I wake up in a good mood hoping to read something good on the upcoming Chiefs playoff game. Now I wish the reporter who stirred this up would get tossed from the highest of buildings.

COchief 01-08-2017 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 12667270)
Haha no, you have no point. You're ****ing stupid.

Thanks for responding to "Can you logic?" in such a clear and concise manner.

TEX 01-08-2017 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcpasco (Post 12667285)
The timing on this article sucks. I wake up in a good mood hoping to read something good on the upcoming Chiefs playoff game. Now I wish the reporter who stirred this up would get tossed from the highest of buildings.

No coincidence of the timing, I'm sure. Even thought its a ,"kinda-maybe-possibly" story, distractions are not needed now...:shake:

milkman 01-08-2017 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 12667266)
You're right. Making yourself look stupid is so easy it must hurt.

If you can't see the difference between hiring an outsider with a "reputation" versus a guy who has worked in the building for 4 years and supplied Dorsey with 90+% of the data that he used to make decisions, then I can't help you.

And people think I'm negative. Holy shit, the amount of vaginal bleeding in this thread is off the charts. If Dorsey wants to be here, and Clark wants him here, he'll sign an extension.

If Dorsey doesn't want to be here, or Clark prefers Ballard, he won't.

I'm confident that the organization won't miss a beat if Dorsey was to leave.


The fact remains, while Ballard is a big part of the decision process, Dorsey has made the final decisions, and while Ballard is highly thought of in the building, he is an unproven commodity.

There is no wrong answer here.
You do what can if you are Hunt to retain the man that has done an outstanding job of team building, and if you can't get it done, you let the chips fall where they may and hope for the best.

BigRedChief 01-08-2017 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 12667279)
So rare they did it not long ago when Tampa called!

tampa, SF or 10 other teams doesn't matter, they are blocking one guy from upper mobility in his career. That's the "rare" part. The fact that he is still with the Chiefs tells us that he has received assurances that they are not holding him back but want you for the GM position with the Chiefs when Dorsey leaves.

Dinny Bossa Nova 01-08-2017 10:30 AM

Welp.

I say they dump Dorsey and Reid both after this season and bring in some guys that will cut Alex and draft a QB in the first round so we can finally get this team on the right track and start winning games the right way.

WHO'S WITH ME?????

Dinny

Otter 01-08-2017 10:31 AM

This stuff should really be held off until the season is over.

COchief 01-08-2017 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcpasco (Post 12667285)
The timing on this article sucks. I wake up in a good mood hoping to read something good on the upcoming Chiefs playoff game. Now I wish the reporter who stirred this up would get tossed from the highest of buildings.

Agreed, I would also say I'm a little pissed off that Clark allowed this situation to happen period. You find someone like Dorsey and you lock that shit down as long as you can. If Dorsey faps to Green and Gold on a nightly basis then fine nothing can be done about that, otherwise that man does not leave town.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.