Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10020964)

Question: when she has to jam the catheter in a male does she feel empathy or joy?...

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10020871)

If you don't have that, what's this forum? What the **** is it? What does this forum look like in the Utopian CP Society mind of "just enjoy the ride" fan? I'll tell you what it looks like:

"3-0! WOOOO!"

"JAMAAL CHARLES! WOOO!"

"JUSTIN HOUSTON! WOOO!"

"I HATE DENVER! WOOO!"

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 10020967)

Damn, I was getting ready to install the stripper pole and everything.

Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN (Post 10020969)

What do you have against him?

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10020979)

His immaturity and inability to take his own future/career seriously.

I guess it'd be one of those "you can smell your own" moments...

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 10020970)

It's also the people who dislike Clay.

They argue the poster, instead of the post, say something stupid - and then others get involved.

Before you know it, it's a free for all and the Clay bashers have turned the argument into something completely different.

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 10020974)

LMAO not her role...

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 10020978)

Uh no, it's not like that LMAO

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 10020938)

I'm not sure why this is so hard for some to understand. Be excited for 3-0, I am. But be realistic that the offense (as a whole) is horrible and needs a lot of work.

Originally Posted by Wallcrawler (Post 10020902)

I don't like this subject much.

Game situation dictates playcalling quite a bit. You don't just go out and take shots to score points just to say you scored points on a drive if you've already got the lead.

The Berry pick 6 in Philly put the Chiefs up 10 points. Obviously youre not going to have super aggressive playcalls offensively with that. Why would you force the ball down field, maybe make a mistake, when you already have a 2 score advantage?

Keep in mind that this is the worst team in the league from last year, and we're running a brand new offense. Generally, this is a recipe for horrible starts, but thanks to the defense, and thanks in huge part to our quarterback not giving the football up, we're 3-0.

In the Cowboys game, and the Eagles game, when the chips were down and the offense had to stay on the football field, they did. Alex drove the team right down the field an answered the Cowboys with a TD to Bowe in the second half. Then another big drive for the FG to put us up scores.

That drive in the 4th quarter against the Eagles from the 5 yard line? Nails. That was a clock destroying, point scoring drive.

Offense isn't just about points. Its about killing the clock and keeping the other team incabable of putting up points of their own because their offense is riding the pine.

The O is good enough to be 3-0. They haven't peaked, and they will get better as the season goes on. That O-line certainly cant get much worse.

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10020985)

Deflection = dark future for you bro.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/__9UFe0zlhT...hasing+Amy.png

Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN (Post 10020982)

I think Reid will help him tremendously in that area, but I'll reserve judgement until a later date. :D

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 10020986)

It's more of a "Hey ladies, have a few shots of Jager. What?!? I have no idea where that pole came from."

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10020941)

I expected this in YEAR ONE.

I don't expect this year's team to be the norm.

And I think we'll upgrade the "QB surroundings" until we draft a QB (which I fully expect to happen.)

I don't expect it to be a QB this draft (2014) either...

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 10020993)

Kind of along the lines of the "just whip it out" strategy.
Could work.

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 10020987)

My thoughts, exactly.

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 10020998)

If you guys could shut the **** up about football, we are trying to have a conversation about bisexual women in here.

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10020990)

Always smart to defer to the expert...

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 10020998)

If you guys could shut the **** up about football, we are trying to have a conversation about bisexual women in here.

Originally Posted by Brainiac (Post 10020560)

Anyone who has watched the games should know that the Chiefs are lucky to be 3-0.

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 10020989)

:) sorry, I've already said too much

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 10020994)

I don't think we'll see it before 2016 or 2017. Even without an extension, they're fully invested in Alex Smith.

I also think they'll give Tyler Bray plenty of time, based on what I heard from camp.

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10020572)

The only problem I see with the running game is we don't use it enough.

Two good reasons to run more:

A) We have a ****ing fantastic HB.

B) Smith is an excellent play action passer. He's good selling the fake and he's not afraid to attempt deep passes on first down (out of play action.)

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10021008)

It's cool.

I'm a white guy that attended an HBC.

For 10 years (**** you GWB for ending my free ride.)

Studying Literature and Poetry (mostly 19th century European, which I was not fond of *but the Irish - as they always do - find a way to make it a ride.*)

Sadly, I isn't a prof.

I did spend a metric-phuq-ton of time with white gay men, black "down low" men, and mostly women (WINNING!)

So I'm pretty ok with my gay. I'm not so much up with the bi thing.

Not really for or against just ignorant of the whole deal...

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10020583)

Completely disagree. After we go 10-7 and get face raped in our 1st playoff game we need to trade up and get a solid 3-technique to replace Tyson Jackson (who we'll cut to sign a new FB and TE in free agency...)

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 10020911)

Chicago.

San Diego.

Philly.

All teams with new offensive philosophies, coaches and majority of new OLmen.

Also, all teams scoring 26+ PPG.

No excuses.

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 10021017)

Goddammit, people: The interior of the offensive line is complete and utter ASS. How many play have been run to the right, where Eric Fisher is getting his ass handed to him?

Until this offensive line plays better as a unit, the offense as a whole is going to struggle.

Do any of you guys even watch the games?

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 10021017)

Goddammit, people: The interior of the offensive line is complete and utter ASS. How many play have been run to the right, where Eric Fisher is getting his ass handed to him?

Until this offensive line plays better as a unit, the offense as a whole is going to struggle.

Do any of you guys even watch the games?

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 10020731)

You don't get extra points winning pretty or get less points for winning ugly. At the end of the day a win is a win. In the 90s we used to dominate teams in the regular season only to lose in the playoffs. How we win in the regular season means little as long as we win. Once the playoffs start then anything can happen.

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 10020619)

I can only assume you've never watched a AR coached team in Philly.

Top 10 offense in points scored in 8 of his last 11 seasons.

Top 8 in 4 of his last 5. Over 26 PPG.

AR teams are not "reserved". They score points - a lot of them.

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 10021017)

Goddammit, people: The interior of the offensive line is complete and utter ASS. How many play have been run to the right, where Eric Fisher is getting his ass handed to him?

Until this offensive line plays better as a unit, the offense as a whole is going to struggle.

Do any of you guys even watch the games?

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 10021044)

So, you thought a team that was near dead last in nearly every offensive category was going to magically and immediately turn that around in one season with four new offensive lineman, two broken tight ends off the street, no true slot receiver and limited camp time together due to the new CBA?

Seriously?

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10021039)

We are BETTER up the middle.

Albert is injured (again) but playing and Fish flat out sucks unless he can square up and just maul a guy. And yea, he can and has blown up defenders on running plays.

As far as the interior I completely disagree...

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 10021036)

I don't think you can just take away one team's defense points then re-insert them into the rankings while leaving in everyone else's defense points. How is that relevant?

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 10021044)

So, you thought a team that was near dead last in nearly every offensive category was going to magically and immediately turn that around in one season with four new offensive lineman, two broken tight ends off the street, no true slot receiver and limited camp time together due to the new CBA?

Seriously?

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 10021036)

Not reading through everything to see if this has been mentioned but this is stupid:




I don't think you can just take away one team's defense points then re-insert them into the rankings while leaving in everyone else's defense points. How is that relevant?

Yeah the offense is weak, but I hate stupid stats like this.

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 10021038)

I don't know about many of you, but I fully expected the offense to struggle a bit early in the year. It's a young line, and a new, complex offensive system. I'm really only surprised that the defense has been so lights out that we're 3-0. This bodes well, as I think the second half of the season the offense should be better than the first half.

Remember year one of Vermeil/Saunders? TrINT? Anybody think that offense would go on to do what it did in the next few seasons?

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 10021067)

Yes, actually. They absolutely blew up in the 3rd game of the 2001 season (IIRC...), on the road against the redskins.

Hopefully something similar happens with this offense...

And I do agree with you on expecting them to struggle (although not quite to the degree that they have). And I do expect them to improve at some point. But at this point, however, we can really only discuss what's happened on the field so far. Anything else is conjecture.

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 10021067)

Yes, actually. They absolutely blew up in the 3rd game of the 2001 season (IIRC...), on the road against the redskins.

Hopefully something similar happens with this offense...

And I do agree with you on expecting them to struggle (although not quite to the degree that they have). And I do expect them to improve at some point. But at this point, however, we can really only discuss what's happened on the field so far. Anything else is conjecture.

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 10021072)

That was because Saunders finally figure out that Holmes more than a third down back.

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 10020633)

Chicago has an entirely new OL. Only the center remains from last year's squad.

3/5 of the Chargers' line is new. Hardwick and Clary are the holdovers.


But our excuse is that we need time to "gel".

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 10021077)

Yep.

Also became pretty obvious later on that the in-season acquisition of Eddie Kennison was going to be great. That team did have perhaps the worst starting set of WRs I think I've ever seen through 10 or 12 weeks.

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 10021019)

Cool. My under grad was a double major in English/Psych. Be who you gotta beLMAO

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 10021081)

Good to know people can actually find success with that degree. Fairly certain I'm going to have to apply to be a fry cook aomewhere becaus it's impossible to find an entry level career job.

****ing wonderful economy.

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 10021050)

Allen sucks, Hudson has struggled, as has Asamoah.

They are in no way, shape or form "better".

Originally Posted by siberian khatru (Post 10021079)

I remember as soon as Kennison showed up it was like a light switch being flipped on.

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 10021085)

Pursue what you love, you'll never work a day in your life...

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10021093)

I have yet to make money off impregnating strangers and consuming large amounts of cheap domestic beer...

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10021093)

I have yet to make money off impregnating strangers and consuming large amounts of cheap domestic beer...

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10021093)

I have yet to make money off impregnating strangers and consuming large amounts of cheap domestic beer...

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 10021095)

I don't understand...

When we traded two second round picks for Alex Smith, and all of us complained... what did you think we were complaining about?

When Kyle Orton took over for this team and we saw what even a mildly competent quarterback looked like, what do you think we were saying about the rest of the talent on this team?

Alex Smith is not a game winner. We all know this. We knew this back in March.

The Chiefs are absolutely a playoff caliber team, because they have enough pieces on both sides of the ball.

I, for one, am capable of compartmentalizing my dissatisfaction with our quarterback situation and my relief and joy of having a QB who is capable enough to not lose us games and, if not lead, then shepherd us to victory.

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 10021095)

Alex Smith is not one of our eleven best players.

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 10021095)

But the other 21 guys are good enough to make up for it right now.

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 10021085)

I went to grad school after. And I'll admit I had a head start.
Pursue what you love, you'll never work a day in your life...

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 10021114)

Yeah well I love playing golf and videogames.

That doesn't pay very well so I'm going to need a real job.

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 10021114)

Yeah well I love playing golf and videogames.

That doesn't pay very well so I'm going to need a real job.

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10021089)

Allen does suck. I guess if I have to find a compliment he has made a play or 2 in the running game. Hudson has done his part in pass protection but gets little or no push in the running game. Big John is ****ing beastly when it comes to being squared up vs the defender in the running game. I'm not saying he's perfect but I'd argue he's BY FAR the best run blocker on this line.

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 10021125)

The bottom line is that Asamoah is not a complete lineman and at this point, four years in, it's unlikely that he ever reaches that goal.

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10021112)

If by "right now" you mean a rebuilding year after complete ineptitude then yes.

If by "right now" you think we can win a playoff game I completely disagree...

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 10021131)

A Kendrick Lewis injury or facing a killer passing attack that forces us to score at will...

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10021136)

Oh, so............**** me. Lewis is now a valued part of this defense?

Nice.

Nice to have someone else aboard...

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10021129)

Hopefully we found a gem in Kush.

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 10021147)

I like Demps. I really do. But Kendrick is playing like he did pre-shoulder right now. I'm growing more and more certain that he and Berry were nowhere near 100% last year, even when neither was on the injury list.

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 10021110)

Regarding Charles, he's actually touched the ball (and scored) more times in 2013 than he had in 2012 through three games, although he has 22 fewer yards:

70 touches for 375 yards and 3 TD
64 touches for 397 yards and 1 TD

He accounts for, right now, 57.8% of the teams rushes, 22.9% of the team's targets on passing plays, 28.1% of the team's receptions and 37.5% of the team's total yardage.

All this without a breakout game like NO in week 3 last year.

I think they know where their bread is buttered.

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10021136)

Oh, so............**** me. Lewis is now a valued part of this defense?

Nice.

Nice to have someone else aboard...

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 10021097)

Keep at it, giving single mothers their start is a noble calling...:)

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 10020883)

Was waiting patiently for this bullshit.

I love the attitude that because he's not turning the ball over, it's OK to not be able to score.

Geno Smith. 6 INT's.

YOU CAN'T WIN TURNING THE BALL OVER.

Drew Brees. 4 INT's.

YOU CAN'T WIN TURNING THE BALL OVER.

Matt Schaub. 4 INT's.

YOU CAN'T WIN TURNING THE BALL OVER.

Jay Cutler. Andy Dalton.

YOU CAN'T WIN TURNING THE BALL OVER.

Originally Posted by BigChiefTablet (Post 10021169)

Just ask any welfare leach with 10 kids from 6 different women.

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 10021152)

I've been saying for weeks (if you hadn't noticed) that my hope is that Kush is ready to take over the center spot in time for the Bye Week. Move Hudson to left and Schwartz to right.

One can dream...

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace (Post 10021157)

That is part of the problem that isn't discussed really at all.

There is absolutely no depth behind Charles. Well, hell, on offense there really isn't any depth anywhere.

I don't know and wont pretend to but every time Knile Davis touches the ball, I hold my breath that he doesn't fumble. And if Alex Smith isn't throwing to bowe or avery, or Charles. Who is he throwing to?

Hopefully certainly not McCluster.

Originally Posted by GoChargers (Post 10021172)

This is the most annoying argument from the Smiff slurpers. They don't understand that a few picks are an acceptable cost in exchange for the benefits of testing the other team's secondary, possibly drawing a couple of bullshit PI calls on the other team's defense, and putting lots of points on the board.