ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Final cuts (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=213362)

Micjones 09-05-2009 05:41 PM

Cutting Pollard outright is a mistake. They're putting far too much faith in Mike Brown staying healthy. Something he hasn't been often in recent years. Pollard could've been traded. A 5th or 6th Round pick for a young, serviceable Safety isn't too much to ask. Pollard will begin fielding calls here very shortly. He can play in this league.

Lelie? Can't say that I understand this one either. He should've been one of just two candidates for the starting WR job opposite of Bowe. They're counting on Bradley dodging the injury bug. He hasn't been real successful at that during his NFL career. This is a pretty big gamble. Besides Bowe/Bradley you have no one else on this roster you can count on to produce. Engram's been a non-factor all off-season. Someone get me Matt Jones' number.

Darryl Harris had been one of the most consistent Offensive Linemen on the team. Can't say that I know why he was walked. If there's any position along the O-Line where we have more questions than answers (besides RT) it's RG. He should've been able to stick there. As if the Offensive Line depth wasn't paper thin already.

They had better get busy. This team doesn't look better after the cutdown to 53. It looks worse.

Hammock Parties 09-05-2009 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 6037878)
Cutting Pollard outright is a mistake. They're putting far too much faith in Mike Brown staying healthy.

Again, Brown's health is irrelevant. If he gets hurt, in comes Morgan, who showed a lot more than Pollard this preseason, no question.

Mecca 09-05-2009 05:44 PM

Considering whats been going on with Page I wouldn't be surprised if Morgan played FS which he's more suited to do anyhow...

SAUTO 09-05-2009 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6037894)
Considering whats been going on with Page I wouldn't be surprised if Morgan played FS which he's more suited to do anyhow...

what has been going on with paige?

raybec 4 09-05-2009 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6037883)
Again, Brown's health is irrelevant. If he gets hurt, in comes Morgan, who showed a lot more than Pollard this preseason, no question.

Morgan looked really good in the Lambs game, glad to see they kept Belcher at LB.

Tony Pashos from jacksonville should command some interest.

ArrowheadMagic 09-05-2009 05:45 PM

While undersized, thought Lokey held up better at NT than the other guys....oh well, wont miss any of those guys.

TEX 09-05-2009 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6037806)
So, our WRs are Bowe, Bradley, Engram, Copper, and Lawrence...

Cassel might be the first QB in NFL history to face 11 in the box on every down.

ROFL Yep. I was hoping that Ashley Lelie would make it. He looked like he played well enough to do so, especially when you consider the lack of talent at WR.

Mr. Krab 09-05-2009 05:48 PM

What's wrong with colin brown? I thought Lelie looks better than most our receivers.

booger 09-05-2009 05:52 PM

Tyree could take Copper's spot. He's kind of a Danan Hughes type WR, can cover kicks/punts but he is a better WR.

Cox, I want a new FB. He has good hands but no speed. to slow to cover kicks. Titans cut Casey Kramer 6'2 250 good lead blocker and good special teams tackler.

the McBride/Walters spot could go to a Darryl Blackstock who started out in AZ and could backup Tamba as he has some pass rush ability, or Travis Laboy if/when he gets healthy. or the Smith kid that the eagles cut the 3rd rounder last year.

5th CB spot, Coclough is an upgradeable spot.

Ryan is the best blocking TE, i could see a new guy to bring in there to replace Jake O'connel or Cottam.

Battle has been a good special teams guy and a tough runner i just think he lacks vision.

Oline is obviously not set and their are a few supprise cuts there, Forney and Merideth.

A nt to upgrade Edwards and a End to upgrade Gillberry is a possiblility too.

at ILB i worry about deep drops and poor coverage. Demo Williams sticks for that maybe as a Nickel LB.

booger 09-05-2009 05:55 PM

I think the Page being shopped stuff from Bill Williamsons blog on ESPN was BS.

He source the National Football post story which stated Brown was brought in to push pollard and page. That Pollard was being shopped not Page.

T-post Tom 09-05-2009 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 6037878)
Cutting Pollard outright is a mistake. They're putting far too much faith in Mike Brown staying healthy. Something he hasn't been often in recent years. Pollard could've been traded. A 5th or 6th Round pick for a young, serviceable Safety isn't too much to ask. Pollard will begin fielding calls here very shortly. He can play in this league.

Lelie? Can't say that I understand this one either. He should've been one of just two candidates for the starting WR job opposite of Bowe. They're counting on Bradley dodging the injury bug. He hasn't been real successful at that during his NFL career. This is a pretty big gamble. Besides Bowe/Bradley you have no one else on this roster you can count on to produce. Engram's been a non-factor all off-season. Someone get me Matt Jones' number.

Darryl Harris had been one of the most consistent Offensive Linemen on the team. Can't say that I know why he was walked. If there's any position along the O-Line where we have more questions than answers (besides RT) it's RG. He should've been able to stick there. As if the Offensive Line depth wasn't paper thin already.

They had better get busy. This team doesn't look better after the cutdown to 53. It looks worse.

I normally agree with your football posts, but not on this occassion. It was time to cut the chaff and that's what the coaches did. I trust their judgement as they work with the players everyday. Pollard missed the boat. The others will be replaced and this will be a better team than the last two years. Yeah, there's a few surprises there, but cuts have to be made. Evolution...

listopencil 09-05-2009 05:59 PM

Wow, Lelie couldn't even make it on to the Chiefs this year. I'm starting to feel a little sorry for him.

booger 09-05-2009 06:00 PM

Tony Pashos cut by Jags per PFT

Sully 09-05-2009 06:00 PM

Eventually we are all going to realize that this regime's method of evaluating players is quite a bit different from, a) the way we evaluate from our couches, and, b) the way other teams do.

SAUTO 09-05-2009 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by booger (Post 6037934)
Tony Pashos cut by Jags per PFT

he's our guy. get him

SAUTO 09-05-2009 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sully (Post 6037935)
Eventually we are all going to realize that this regime's method of evaluating players is quite a bit different from, a) the way we evaluate from our couches, and, b) the way other teams do.

yep. and that may not be a bad thing

booger 09-05-2009 06:02 PM

both OT's Wesley Britt and Ryan O'Callohan from the Pats cut

SAUTO 09-05-2009 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by booger (Post 6037942)
both OT's Wesley Britt and Ryan O'Callohan from the Pats cut

who played on the right for them?

MMXcalibur 09-05-2009 06:03 PM

Can't say I'm shocked about the Pollard cut. Looks like Haley and company were impressed enough with McGraw and Morgan in St. Louis compared to Pollard's shitty play vs Seattle.

The Franchise 09-05-2009 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by booger (Post 6037942)
both OT's Wesley Britt and Ryan O'Callohan from the Pats cut

www.rotoworld.com

Patriots waived OT Ryan O'Callaghan and S/WR Ray Ventrone.

O'Callaghan didn't have a bad camp, but second-round pick Sebastian Vollmer passed him to be New England's No. 3 offensive tackle. O'Callaghan could probably start for the Chiefs right away.

booger 09-05-2009 06:04 PM

O'Callohan. 6'7 335

riskrevival 09-05-2009 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 6037878)
-
Lelie? Can't say that I understand this one either. He should've been one of just two candidates for the starting WR job opposite of Bowe. They're counting on Bradley dodging the injury bug. He hasn't been real successful at that during his NFL career. This is a pretty big gamble. Besides Bowe/Bradley you have no one else on this roster you can count on to produce. Engram's been a non-factor all off-season. Someone get me Matt Jones' number.



Yea let's get Matt Jones's number...for what? So we can call and ask him what it's like to play for a winning team like the Titans?

SAUTO 09-05-2009 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by booger (Post 6037954)
O'Callohan. 6'7 335

damn thats a big dude, sign him too. **** it we need to sign 3-4 oline players

MMXcalibur 09-05-2009 06:06 PM

Our starting right tackle is out there somewhere......

booger 09-05-2009 06:08 PM

Hopefully Harris goes unclaimed and we stick him onthe PS and bump him to the 53 when we get C and RG figured out and the backup spots. Dane is right, he is one of the top 2 guards for us this TC and the best at getting out to pull and lead. Dissapointed to see him cut, hope he clears waivers.

Shag 09-05-2009 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCtotheSB (Post 6037963)
Our starting right side is out there somewhere......

FYP

T-post Tom 09-05-2009 06:17 PM

Philadelphia released last year's third-round pick, defensive end Bryan Smith, who might be better suited at linebacker in a 3-4 defense. ~ Adam Schefter

riskrevival 09-05-2009 06:19 PM

i hope we sign like ****ing 10 new guys and cut 10 more goons

Just Passin' By 09-05-2009 06:24 PM

Some guy named Meredith got axed by Green Bay.

DaneMcCloud 09-05-2009 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6037940)
yep. and that may not be a bad thing

Keep that in mind when the Chiefs go 1-15 or 0-16 this season

Hammock Parties 09-05-2009 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6038094)
Keep that in mind when the Chiefs go 1-15 or 0-16 this season

Oh my god, just stop. 1-15 is ludicrous and 0-16 is fantasy.

DBOSHO 09-05-2009 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6038094)
Keep that in mind when the Chiefs go 1-15 or 0-16 this season

weird. i thought the season was just about to start. i didnt know it was over already

go away

your not being a "realist" your being an ass.

it like you want the chiefs to lose JUST so u can say "i told you so"

DaneMcCloud 09-05-2009 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6038112)
Oh my god, just stop. 1-15 is ludicrous and 0-16 is fantasy.

Really?

Just who do you think the Chiefs outscore?

DaneMcCloud 09-05-2009 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBOSHO (Post 6038121)
weird. i thought the season was just about to start. i didnt know it was over already

go away

your not being a "realist" your being an ass.

it like you want the chiefs to lose JUST so u can say "i told you so"

Gee, I'm sorry I wounded your precious labia with my words.

TheGuardian 09-05-2009 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6038188)
Really?

Just who do you think the Chiefs outscore?

Even with the cluster **** of a team we had last year we won 2 games and were competitive in many other. We're not going 1-15 or 0-16 you fucking idiot.

splatbass 09-05-2009 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6038188)
Really?

Just who do you think the Chiefs outscore?

Raiders, Broncos. At least once each. That makes at least two wins. So how do you get 1-15 or 0-16? Do you really think the Raiders and Broncos can both beat us twice?

Mr. Krab 09-05-2009 07:13 PM

never mind i see his name now

DaneMcCloud 09-05-2009 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 6038198)
Even with the cluster **** of a team we had last year we won 2 games and were competitive in many other. We're not going 1-15 or 0-16 you fucking idiot.

They didn't teach you how to spell ****ing in JuCo, superstar?

LMAO

The Bad Guy 09-05-2009 07:13 PM

Yeah, claiming that this is a 1 win team is a huge, huge stretch. If Herm Edwards can lead a roster just as bad as this one to 2 wins, a blind ****ing monkey could do the same.

I understand the whole "the sky is falling" mentality around here, but that's just nuts.

DBOSHO 09-05-2009 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6038191)
Gee, I'm sorry I wounded your precious labia with my words.

shit gets old fast man give it up.

this isnt "****-the-chiefs" planet

JuicesFlowing 09-05-2009 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6038188)
Really?

Just who do you think the Chiefs outscore?

Raiders twice, Broncos maybe twice, Bengals, Browns.

*edit Oh and maybe Jacksonville, with their 4,000 fans in attendance.

TheGuardian 09-05-2009 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6038205)
They didn't teach you how to spell ****ing in JuCo, superstar?

LMAO

When you have to resort to playing the role of grammar po-po I know I've already won.

And I spelled fucking like that so that it wasn't ****** out dumbass. You truly are a fucking moron.

splatbass 09-05-2009 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6038206)
Yeah, claiming that this is a 1 win team is a huge, huge stretch. If Herm Edwards can lead a roster just as bad as this one to 2 wins, a blind ****ing monkey could do the same.

This.

kstater 09-05-2009 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6038094)
Keep that in mind when the Chiefs go 1-15 or 0-16 this season

Just remember, moves made today likely aren't made for this years team. This season is a wash regardless of what moves they make today.

DBOSHO 09-05-2009 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 6038210)
When you have to resort to playing the role of grammar po-po I know I've already won.

And I spelled fucking like that so that it wasn't ****** out dumbass. You truly are a fucking moron.

thats danes exit route when he knows hes beat. that or the predictable **** you...

DaneMcCloud 09-05-2009 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 6038210)
When you have to resort to playing the role of grammar po-po I know I've already won.

And I spelled fucking like that so that it wasn't ****** out dumbass. You truly are a fucking moron.

You didn't win shit in JuCo football and you sure as hell aren't "winning" anything now, Asswipe Superstar.

Go fuck Yourself.

DaneMcCloud 09-05-2009 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6038206)
Yeah, claiming that this is a 1 win team is a huge, huge stretch. If Herm Edwards can lead a roster just as bad as this one to 2 wins, a blind ****ing monkey could do the same.

I understand the whole "the sky is falling" mentality around here, but that's just nuts.

No, it's not.

Have you LOOKED at the schedule? Better yet, have you watched this team even once? They ARE worse than last season. They subtracted 1,000 yards receiving and 10 TD's and didn't replace them. They're trying to fit square pegs in round holes defensively. Their offensive line is a ****ing sieve and the $63 million dollar QB didn't even make it past 3 plays in the third game.

So many of you guys just aren't realistic in regards to your expectations.

Talk about nuts.

TheGuardian 09-05-2009 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6038219)
You didn't win shit in JuCo football and you sure as hell aren't "winning" anything now, Asswipe Superstar.

Go fuck Yourself.

Well that was predictable.

TheGuardian 09-05-2009 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6038223)
No, it's not.

Have you LOOKED at the schedule? Better yet, have you watched this team even once? They ARE worse than last season. They subtracted 1,000 yards receiving and 10 TD's and didn't replace them. They're trying to fit square pegs in round holes defensively. Their offensive line is a ****ing sieve and the $63 million dollar QB didn't even make it past 3 plays in the third game.

So many of you guys just aren't realistic in regards to your expectations.

Talk about nuts.

And 1-15 is realistic? Dumbest ****ing thing ever written here.

pr_capone 09-05-2009 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6038188)
Really?

Just who do you think the Chiefs outscore?



Games *I* think we will or at least can outscore the opponent.

Wk 2 Oakland
Wk 10 Oakland
Wk 13 Denver
Wk 14 Buffalo
Wk 15 Cleveland
Wk 16 Cincinnati

Games we have an outside shot to win

Wk 1 Baltimore
Wk 6 Washington
Wk 7 San Diego
Wk 9 Jacksonville
Wk 17 Denver

Games which I will JIMP if we win

Wk 3 Philly
Wk 4 New York
Wk 5 Dallas
Wk 11 Pittsburgh
Wk 12 San Diego

kcxiv 09-05-2009 07:27 PM

And there he goes! lol good reading material, you guys keep talking back to Dane. I enjoy this.

DBOSHO 09-05-2009 07:27 PM

i think we have a better chance at beating dallas than baltimore

kcxiv 09-05-2009 07:28 PM

Ya, i think we will win a few games, we wont be close to 500, but we will win 3-5 i would say. lol

TheGuardian 09-05-2009 07:31 PM

We're going to get spanked at Baltimore. Opening day in their house with the O-line in flux and either Brodie or Thigpen at QB. Recipe for disaster. However we will beat the Raiders the next week to start the season 1-1.

DBOSHO 09-05-2009 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6038223)
No, it's not.

Have you LOOKED at the schedule? Better yet, have you watched this team even once? They ARE worse than last season. They subtracted 1,000 yards receiving and 10 TD's and didn't replace them. They're trying to fit square pegs in round holes defensively. Their offensive line is a ****ing sieve and the $63 million dollar QB didn't even make it past 3 plays in the third game.

So many of you guys just aren't realistic in regards to your expectations.

Talk about nuts.

the defense looks miles better than last year.
larry looks better than last year.
the line(in the last game) looked as good if not better than last year.
we have a hc with a brain now
the fade havent got any better. thats 2 wins.
denver.....1-2 wins
san diego games are winnable. ask thigpen.
cinci is winnable
buffalo is winnable
jax is winnable

nancy

Mecca 09-05-2009 07:34 PM

Probably then they have Eagles Giants back to back which is ugly.

Just Passin' By 09-05-2009 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6038267)
Probably then they have Eagles Giants back to back which is ugly.

So, Brown got sent to IR and Meredith got cut............

riskrevival 09-05-2009 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 6038254)
We're going to get spanked at Baltimore. Opening day in their house with the O-line in flux and either Brodie or Thigpen at QB. Recipe for disaster. However we will beat the Raiders the next week to start the season 1-1.

and then we will lose the next 6 games

DaneMcCloud 09-05-2009 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 6038231)
And 1-15 is realistic? Dumbest ****ing thing ever written here.

Oh, just **** off.

For someone who touts themselves as having any type of insight, you really don't know jackshit.

Cockbag.

rambleonthruthefog 09-05-2009 07:38 PM

dane = know it all pr*ck = brock. but you're not gonna shut em' up, so just try to get under their skin a little.

DaneMcCloud 09-05-2009 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr_capone (Post 6038232)
Games *I* think we will or at least can outscore the opponent.

Wk 2 Oakland
Wk 10 Oakland
Wk 13 Denver
Wk 14 Buffalo
Wk 15 Cleveland
Wk 16 Cincinnati

Games we have an outside shot to win

Wk 1 Baltimore
Wk 6 Washington
Wk 7 San Diego
Wk 9 Jacksonville
Wk 17 Denver

Games which I will JIMP if we win

Wk 3 Philly
Wk 4 New York
Wk 5 Dallas
Wk 11 Pittsburgh
Wk 12 San Diego

Good for you, Dude.

I hope you're right and I'm wrong.

Sure-Oz 09-05-2009 07:46 PM

Luke Mccown traded to the Jags so there goes any shot of trading thiggy for a 7th rounder

The Bad Guy 09-05-2009 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6038223)
No, it's not.

Have you LOOKED at the schedule? Better yet, have you watched this team even once? They ARE worse than last season. They subtracted 1,000 yards receiving and 10 TD's and didn't replace them. They're trying to fit square pegs in round holes defensively. Their offensive line is a ****ing sieve and the $63 million dollar QB didn't even make it past 3 plays in the third game.

So many of you guys just aren't realistic in regards to your expectations.

Talk about nuts.

Yes, I have. And I've also watched enough NFL games to know that teams luck into 2-3 wins each year simply by having decent coaching, which I think we have.

I'll take Tony Gonzalez out of the equation if it means that I was able to also subtract Herman Edwards and Gunther.

Not realistic? There's one team in NFL history that went winless. One. Yet, you think that this team could 'realistically' not win a game.

Give me a break with that nonsense. I'll let games be played before I start talking about square holes and round pegs.

KC kid 09-05-2009 07:48 PM

When should we find out if the chiefs claim guys on waivers?

Just Passin' By 09-05-2009 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC kid (Post 6038339)
When should we find out if the chiefs claim guys on waivers?

Players face waivers for 24 hours before they can re-sign with their teams. I can't recall whether or not Sundays count, but that's your time frame.

stumppy 09-05-2009 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6038206)
Yeah, claiming that this is a 1 win team is a huge, huge stretch. If Herm Edwards can lead a roster just as bad as this one to 2 wins, a blind ****ing monkey could do the same.

I understand the whole "the sky is falling" mentality around here, but that's just nuts.


Thats what I was thinking. If the coaching abortion we had for the past few years managed to grease out a few wins goatboy could probably do it by using his Star Wars action figures to diagram game plans every week.

I damn sure don't expect to be watching any post season play but for this team to go 0-16 or 1-15 would be a complete failure of every aspect of the franchise. I just don't see that happening and I'd bet at least 80% of the people who follow football would agree.

Who knows? Maybe whats driving some of the doom and gloom crowds opinion has nothing to do with football whatsoever. Some people naturally look for and expect the worst in things.

Oh well, it doesn't matter anyway. They can think and post what they want it doesn't affect me. Water off a ducks back.

Tiger's Fan 09-05-2009 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 6038032)
Some guy named Meredith got axed by Green Bay.

JAMON MEREDITH GOT CUT!

You know Jamon Meredith, the single greatest OL prospect in the whole ****ing draft?????

How can this type of injustice exist in the world today?

Jamon Meredith is/was Wille Roaf x100000.

This is just ****ing crazy man. It really really is.

We should just fire our new GM anyway. He's an overrated assclown for not knowing that Jamon Meredith was almost god like in every possible way!!!!111111111!!!!!111!1!!!!

FringeNC 09-05-2009 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6038333)
Yes, I have. And I've also watched enough NFL games to know that teams luck into 2-3 wins each year simply by having decent coaching, which I think we have.

I'll take Tony Gonzalez out of the equation if it means that I was able to also subtract Herman Edwards and Gunther.

Not realistic? There's one team in NFL history that went winless. One. Yet, you think that this team could 'realistically' not win a game.

Give me a break with that nonsense. I'll let games be played before I start talking about square holes and round pegs.

Yeah, it's almost impossible to go 0-16 in the NFL. It takes a rare combination of bad talent and bad coaching. If this team could win two games with Herm Edwards....

I think Vegas has the season total for the Chiefs at 6.5 which seems about right.

DaneMcCloud 09-05-2009 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 6038484)

I think Vegas has the season total for the Chiefs at 6.5 which seems about right.

The line is 5.5, not 6.5.

I voted in the other thread that they'll be 2-14. The point is that 1-15 isn't out of the realm of reason and there's probably a 5% chance they could go 0-16, especially if Cassel misses a significant amount of the season.

DaneMcCloud 09-05-2009 08:40 PM

You know what's so ridiculous about the people that attack me for thinking the Chiefs will win 2 games or less?

I have multiple reasons for my reasoning. Those who disagree have none.

No one has told me how we're going to replace 1,000 yards receiving and 10 TD's.

No one's told me how we're going to stop the run, especially up the middle.

No one's told me how we're going to run the ball, score in the red zone and protect the QB with this offensive line.

No one's told me who's going to successfully return kicks and punts.

There are a TON of reasons why the Chiefs won't have a successful season. But there are many people that dispute that without any reasoning.

Unicorns and rainbows.

DBOSHO 09-05-2009 08:42 PM

you just love that slogan of yours. make some tshirts.

FringeNC 09-05-2009 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6038509)
The line is 5.5, not 6.5.

I voted in the other thread that they'll be 2-14. The point is that 1-15 isn't out of the realm of reason and there's probably a 5% chance they could go 0-16, especially if Cassel misses a significant amount of the season.

And there is about a 5% they win 11 games. So what.

Deberg_1990 09-05-2009 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6038531)
You know what's so ridiculous about the people that attack me for thinking the Chiefs will win 2 games or less?

I have multiple reasons for my reasoning. Those who disagree have none.

No one has told me how we're going to replace 1,000 yards receiving and 10 TD's.

No one's told me how we're going to stop the run, especially up the middle.

No one's told me how we're going to run the ball, score in the red zone and protect the QB with this offensive line.

No one's told me who's going to successfully return kicks and punts.

There are a TON of reasons why the Chiefs won't have a successful season. But there are many people that dispute that without any reasoning.

Unicorns and rainbows.

I think if they can find a way to keep Cassel healthy, then they will win 5 or 6 games.

1. Our division is weak
2. I think the run game will be improved


If we cant keep Cassel healthy then yes, we most likely will only win 2 games.

DaneMcCloud 09-05-2009 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBOSHO (Post 6038542)
you just love that slogan of yours. make some tshirts.

Considering your obsession with me, I'm surprised you're not wearing one right now.

DaneMcCloud 09-05-2009 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 6038555)
I think if they can find a way to keep Cassel healthy, then they will win 5 or 6 games.

1. Our division is weak
2. I think the run game will be improved


If we cant keep Cassel healthy then yes, we most likely will only win 2 games.

That's your opinion and you're certainly entitled to it. I just happen to disagree.

FWIW, isn't that why we're all here? To talk football?

Titty Meat 09-05-2009 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6038531)
You know what's so ridiculous about the people that attack me for thinking the Chiefs will win 2 games or less?

I have multiple reasons for my reasoning. Those who disagree have none.

No one has told me how we're going to replace 1,000 yards receiving and 10 TD's.

No one's told me how we're going to stop the run, especially up the middle.

No one's told me how we're going to run the ball, score in the red zone and protect the QB with this offensive line.

No one's told me who's going to successfully return kicks and punts.

There are a TON of reasons why the Chiefs won't have a successful season. But there are many people that dispute that without any reasoning.

Unicorns and rainbows.


Who gives a **** Dane? People bashed me for pointing out how shitty the o-line is. People also bashed my for what I said about Mike Brown and now look whos the starter.

stumppy 09-05-2009 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6038509)
The line is 5.5, not 6.5.

I voted in the other thread that they'll be 2-14. The point is that 1-15 isn't out of the realm of reason and there's probably a 5% chance they could go 0-16, especially if Cassel misses a significant amount of the season.


I'd agree thats an accurate statement but to put it in perspective theres probably a 5% chance that any one of a dozen teams could go 0-16 and a 2 or 3 % chance any of the rest of them could go winless.
On the other hand theres probably 2 or 3 % chance the Chiefs will win the SuperBowl. Not that much difference either way when you look at both ends of the scale.
Just a suggestion brother but when the glass is half full life in general is so much better.

Deberg_1990 09-05-2009 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6038563)
That's your opinion and you're certainly entitled to it. I just happen to disagree.

FWIW, isn't that why we're all here? To talk football?

Absolutely. Alot of guys lose site of the fact that of why we are all here in the first place:

We are all Chiefs fans and all want the team to succeed.

DBOSHO 09-05-2009 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6038531)
You know what's so ridiculous about the people that attack me for thinking the Chiefs will win 2 games or less?

I have multiple reasons for my reasoning. Those who disagree have none.

No one has told me how we're going to replace 1,000 yards receiving and 10 TD's.

No one's told me how we're going to stop the run, especially up the middle.

No one's told me how we're going to run the ball, score in the red zone and protect the QB with this offensive line.

No one's told me who's going to successfully return kicks and punts.

There are a TON of reasons why the Chiefs won't have a successful season. But there are many people that dispute that without any reasoning.

Unicorns and rainbows.

1.haleys offense isnt going to utilize the te so the first argument is almost a nonfactor. you act as if we dont have tony we will never have 1000yds and 10 tds ever again.

Archie F. Swin 09-05-2009 08:52 PM

I've just received a call from Scott Pioli....I'm being sent to the Chiefs' Fans practice squad.....he said something about a 'lost burst'
.
.
.
.
.
.





(((teardrop)))
(((sniff)))


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.