ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Why you should be scared... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=217767)

Hammock Parties 11-08-2009 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6246176)
Yeah, and Baltimore was a close loss too.

Christ, wake the **** up, dude.

Sorry, I don't see the comparison.

Did we block a punt today? Did we have a fluke interception?

We weren't outgained 2-to-1 like we were in Baltimore.

Average gain per offensive play: 5.4 vs 6.2

Not a huge difference when you get down to it.

If you want to call the late-game rally a fluke, so be it, but Chris Chambers and Dwayne Bowe have been making plays like that their entire NFL careers.

jwhit 11-08-2009 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6246151)
Pussies gather in large groups on an intraweb to bitch about our lack of production. Winners gather behind closed doors and think of new ways to stick our heads in the sand.

LOL!!! This is awesome! Consider it stolen.

WildTurkey 11-08-2009 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwhit (Post 6246187)
LOL!!! This is awesome! Consider it stolen.

as long as you don't use Egoli in every sentence than steal away :D

Mr. Flopnuts 11-08-2009 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwhit (Post 6246187)
LOL!!! This is awesome! Consider it stolen.

I'll settle for you trying to get "Deeznuts" by the editors.

Sweet Daddy Hate 11-08-2009 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6245747)
This is a fun thread. Who knew Whitlock was so lazy?

Oh, wait...

:eek: Oh God; talk about someone with absolutely NO room to talk, but we'll catch up down the post here...

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6245788)
How could I be satisfied with this team? However, I'm willing to give these guys a chance to fix the wrongs instead of selling them up the river like Whitlock and 60% of this board.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6245791)
I think some of his decisions are questionable and impulsive.

However, it's his 8th game.

If he does this shit next year at this time, flame away.

See here's the problem with that; let's assume the Haoli Chiefs can pull 5 wins next year. You know that result is shit, I know that result is shit. But alas, there will come the "Hey That's Improvement"!-Brigade as sure as the ****ing sun shall rise in the east and set in the west.
And all that does is bring us right back to this moment in time, in this very thread, arguing the same old shit.*
So my point is this:
When it comes to airing grievances against this regime and some of the players in it; there is no right or wrong time, and no better time than the present.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6245850)
I think they could definitely win those two games.

I bet you didn't think they would hold MJD under 100 yards today...

Progress.

*As GoChiefs has so aptly demonstrated for us just a few posts later.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6245929)

LMAO

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6245973)
why you should die in a gawd dam fire...


Seriously, a bunch a bitchy little girls bleeding into their fresh white panties for the first time. I hope you all get together and have a Jonestown party and drink up. :shake:

This post brought to you in part by...

"LAZ'S SUNSHINE SUPPOSITORIES"!
"Stick a Laz's up your ass and be "good fans"!

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwhit (Post 6246008)
special teams and field position kept the chiefs in the game. you don't know what you're watching.

ROFL

KC STAR: 7
WPI: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6246151)
Pussies gather in large groups on an intraweb to bitch about our lack of production. Winners gather behind closed doors and think of new ways to stick our heads in the sand.

"You got Rep"!

BossChief 11-08-2009 10:09 PM

Jason, if we were drafting tomorrow, who would you be hoping we would select?

Hammock Parties 11-08-2009 11:26 PM

Some of you baffle me.

You would have laughed your ****ing asses off during the week if I said MJD's longest carry would go for 10 yards.

smittysbar 11-08-2009 11:31 PM

We were talking at the bar last night, I thought they would hold him under 120, and a friend was willing to take bets on holding under 100, he was right, and won some money.

WildTurkey 11-08-2009 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6246685)
Some of you baffle me.

You would have laughed your ****ing asses off during the week if I said MJD's longest carry would go for 10 yards.

I really thought there were some positives on Defense today some of our younger players played pretty well, Dorsey and Jackson played well on the line, Morgan showed some good things... Flowers was good... even Hali did some good stuff today... so I am with you on this one I think the Defense showed some signs of being better today... still not the results you want but a little better

Direckshun 11-08-2009 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwhit (Post 6245292)
Pioli and Haley thought this team would be competitive. They thought we had a shot at winning eight games.

Everyone wants to talk about how bad the roster is and how we have to cut them slack because they're digging out from Peterson and Herm's mess. This is no different from the last Chiefs team. Peterson and Herm thought that roster was capable of being competitive. They thought we could win six or seven with last year's roster.

Pioli and Haley thought we could win eight or more with what they've put out there.

Do they know what it takes to win football games? It takes players. Not signs or media policies or Pentagon-like security or secrets or cursing at the players. Players win football games.

22 guys off the street could win two games. We're halfway home and the Chiefs have one victory.

This is, perhaps, the saddest thing I have ever seen.

WilliamTheIrish 11-08-2009 11:53 PM

I think the issue of defense, some people are mistaken:

IMO: They played hard and they never laid down. That's a +

The defense, while playing hard and not laying down like dogs, still gave up 400+.

It's an important distinction.

Mr. Arrowhead 11-09-2009 12:12 AM

I think todays game proved that Todd Haley hasnt lost this team like some have thought, they played hard til the end, but were just short on the comeback, even you chiefs haters have to admit that.

Hammock Parties 11-09-2009 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Arrowhead (Post 6246720)
I think todays game proved that Todd Haley hasnt lost this team like some have thought, they played hard til the end

Duh.

Anyone who thought this team had quit at all this year was just seeing what they wanted to see.

These guys play hard.

BossChief 11-09-2009 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6246685)
Some of you baffle me.

You would have laughed your ****ing asses off during the week if I said MJD's longest carry would go for 10 yards.

but his backup gashed us for a 28 yard td. Its the whole pic, not just the cropped part. I do agree we did better than expected, but thats where it ends.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Arrowhead (Post 6246720)
I think todays game proved that Todd Haley hasnt lost this team like some have thought, they played hard til the end, but were just short on the comeback, even you chiefs haters have to admit that.

I admit we would likely score 40/game if we got to play against the prevent/dogs called off defense we faced late in the game.

Hammock Parties 11-09-2009 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6246732)
I admit we would likely score 40/game if we got to play against the prevent/dogs called off defense we faced late in the game.

How many times does it have to be said?

Prevent defense generally PREVENTS long-ass bombs and quick scores.

Give the Chiefs some credit.

Mr. Arrowhead 11-09-2009 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6246732)

I admit we would likely score 40/game if we got to play against the prevent/dogs called off defense we faced late in the game.

were you watching the game? there is no way Jax was playing prevent

BossChief 11-09-2009 12:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Arrowhead (Post 6246738)
were you watching the game? there is no way Jax was playing prevent

183 total yards before garbage time (at the 2:41 point in the 4th)

After rewatching it, you are right. They werent. I stand corrected.

At that point of the game, my focus went to making sure all the kids running around didnt kill each other in my house and not so much on the game.

Being able to rewatch it without distractions, I can credit Cassel with making some great throws.

good call and rep is due!

jAZ 11-09-2009 01:02 AM

I just figured it out.

Jason Whitlock = Denise.

jAZ 11-09-2009 01:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwhit (Post 6245292)
... media policies or Pentagon-like security or secrets ...

There it is.

You are professionally and personally bitter over Pioli's "media policies" and "Pentagon-like security or secrets" and that frames everything petty thing you write about the Chiefs these days.

Have you ever listened to Colin Cowherd? From the frist days after he replaced Tony Kornheiser, and repeatedly over the years, he had the professional courage to drop the fascade and admit publicly that his job isn't to speak truth. His job is to generate controversy and create a buzz that hooks listeners.

You'd serve yourself well by writing a similar mea-culpa, owning up to your own role in the KC sports media and explalining how frustrated you are with the media policies of this new regime and how such policies cloud your judgement.

That sort of honesty from the media is incredibly refreshing. I'd like to see that from you.

Hammock Parties 11-09-2009 02:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwhit (Post 6245382)
That's right. I should've ignored the fact that KC's Pro Bowl offensive guard wanted to be traded after meeting with Haley and Pioli. That's no one's business. Hasn't affected Waters' play at all. It's a nonissue.

Surely Whitlock doesn't believe Waters is playing at a Pro Bowl level...or even in the same ballpark....let's hear it, jwhit.

Sweet Daddy Hate 11-09-2009 03:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6246817)
Surely Whitlock doesn't believe Waters is playing at a Pro Bowl level...or even in the same ballpark....let's hear it, jwhit.

"And reeeeach 2-3-4,
and grasp! 2-3-4"...
"C'mon GoChiefs, work that stretch"!!! LMAO:p

Hammock Parties 11-09-2009 03:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6246819)
"And reeeeach 2-3-4,
and grasp! 2-3-4"...
"C'mon GoChiefs, work that stretch"!!! LMAO:p

Who's reaching?

Waters has sucked this year. He leads the linemen in penalties.

So why is Whitlock on here qualifying him as a Pro Bowl guard as if it gives him some sort of credibility over Haley?

Does Whitlock believe Waters is playing at some sort of high level? Why else make that statement? He can't just swoop in here, make loaded statements and then jet out the back door scott free.

Explain yourself, jwhit.

Drew Bledsoe is gay!

Sweet Daddy Hate 11-09-2009 03:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6246821)
Who's reaching?

Waters has sucked this year. He leads the linemen in penalties.

So why is Whitlock on here qualifying him as a Pro Bowl guard as if it gives him some sort of credibility over Haley?

Does Whitlock believe Waters is playing at some sort of high level? Why else make that statement? He can't just swoop in here, make loaded statements and then jet out the back door scott free.

Explain yourself, jwhit.

Drew Bledsoe is gay!

:shrug: This looks pretty clear to me:


Quote:

Originally Posted by jwhit http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/image...s/viewpost.gif
That's right. I should've ignored the fact that KC's Pro Bowl offensive guard wanted to be traded after meeting with Haley and Pioli. That's no one's business. Hasn't affected Waters' play at all. It's a nonissue.



Now you could rightfully say that Waters never was "all that" to begin with, and that Roaf made him a Pro Bowler by proxy, and you'll get no argument from me.
But I believe a more honest take is that unlike Gonzales who is a major name the league over and who had the power to question these guys and be taken very seriously outside of KC, Waters didn't have that kind of pull and had to acquiesce to the situation presented to him.
The old "players don't get to dictate this and that"-trip.




Unless you're Gonzales.



And can make life uncomfortable down the road if the team isn't doing well.



Which it's not.


And Drew Bledsoe IS ghey.















Hammock Parties 11-09-2009 03:39 AM

Yes, Waters is going out and dogging it because he doesn't like Haley.

Utter bullshit.

Sweet Daddy Hate 11-09-2009 03:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6246826)
Yes, Waters is going out and dogging it because he doesn't like Haley.

Utter bullshit.

You've never worked for a boss you hated? Or for a company/situation you had no respect for?

And if he's dogging it, why the **** is he in the starting lineup?

Sweet Daddy Hate 11-09-2009 03:52 AM

I ask because I sincerely doubt he's being considered as part of the "Right 53".

And if he IS considered as such by Haoli, then **** us ALL with an industrial-sized mop handle.

Hammock Parties 11-09-2009 04:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6246829)
You've never worked for a boss you hated? Or for a company/situation you had no respect for?

And if he's dogging it, why the **** is he in the starting lineup?

He's not dogging it.

He's not the type.

HemiEd 11-09-2009 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6245655)
Saying that Todd Haley makes worse decisions than Herm is just downright ****ing laughable.

I agree, he just needs to run the ball more. They were actually getting the running game going a little yesterday, then abandoned it.

HemiEd 11-09-2009 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Got Grbac (Post 6245897)
MJD really wasn't that great today...he had 30 friggin' carries...

we lost because of the pass and the inability to make stops on 3rd down

and the fact that we just flat out suck offensively...

oh wait it's 3rd and 19 again

Yep, and Cassel holds on to the ball too long.

MahiMike 11-09-2009 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 6245579)
I dont know why Bowe is not getting looks. Probably has a lot to do with TG not being here. I cant blame that on Haley unless he is explicitly telling Cassel NOT to throw to Bowe:spock:

Cause he ain't as open as other WRs.

MahiMike 11-09-2009 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6245634)
JD is being nice the Giants game was a blowout...and the Ravens one was a borderline blowout.

Actually the Ravens game was anybody's game until the end.

Phobia 11-09-2009 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 6246993)
Cause he ain't as open as other WRs.

No, that's not possible. Cassel and Pioli have decided they're going to keep Bowe out of the pro-bowl this year because the Chiefs suck anyway and they can't be paying bonuses in a down decade.

Demonpenz 11-09-2009 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 6245633)
I think he'd flip out if they just told him that it's not an option, but I think he's already decided he doesn't want to do it next year. It's just too much work for a guy that is just learning the job.

I really think Haley will be a good coach. I think he's learning, and I've expected all of this. I hated this hire when it went down, but I do like some of the tactics he's taking.

I know I'm in the minority on this but I love the fact that he's cussing guys out. ****ing perform. And if you can't, get the **** out. When he has guys that will perform, he'll stop yelling and cussing.

what do you do when it's the head coach who isn't preforming

HemiEd 11-09-2009 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6246176)
Yeah, and Baltimore was a close loss too.

Christ, wake the **** up, dude.

You want a positive?

Here's two:

The OL played marginally better, though they were up against a team that hadn't gotten to the QB before today.

Morgan played pretty well.

Don't forget about Succop playing like a monster, Haley needs to try him out on the offense.

BigMeatballDave 11-09-2009 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6245634)
and the Ravens one was a borderline blowout.

ROFL Did you even watch that game? The Chiefs tied it at 24 with 5:20 left in the 4th. Its was a close game. Very entertaining. Sometimes you can be a tool...

Mr. Flopnuts 11-09-2009 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Demonpenz (Post 6247007)
what do you do when it's the head coach who isn't preforming

Beat yourself about the face and neck area?

BossChief 11-09-2009 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6246830)
I ask because I sincerely doubt he's being considered as part of the "Right 53".

And if he IS considered as such by Haoli, then **** us ALL with an industrial-sized mop handle.

you're wrong here buddy. Waters is as much a stand up man as anyone on the team. I have attended camp every year (except this last camp) and Waters impresses me every year with how he carries himself. He learned a lot about the game from Shields and doesnt deserve to be getting slammed by anyone.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6246835)
He's not dogging it.

He's not the type.

100% correct man. He doesnt deserve the gripe he gets after Jasons comments put him in the wrong light. LJ deserves every word he gets, Waters deserves to be mentioned in a good light with all the great linemen that have passed through KC!

BossChief 11-09-2009 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 6247018)
ROFL Did you even watch that game? The Chiefs tied it at 24 with 5:20 left in the 4th. Its was a close game. Very entertaining. Sometimes you can be a tool...

wasnt it still tied till just before the 2 minute warning? We were lucky to be in it though, we were killed in almost every stat except blocked kicks and "fluke plays" that likely wouldnt happen again if we played them ten more times. IMHO anyway.

BigMeatballDave 11-09-2009 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6247211)
wasnt it still tied till just before the 2 minute warning? We were lucky to be in it though, we were killed in almost every stat except blocked kicks and "fluke plays" that likely wouldnt happen again if we played them ten more times. IMHO anyway.

Yup. The Ravens went up 31-24 right before the 2-min warning. They scored a garbage TD in the final seconds.

They 'blew us out' in total yards. Who cares though, we still had a chance to win.

BigMeatballDave 11-09-2009 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6247211)
"fluke plays"

I dont call a blocked punt and an INT a 'fluke play'. I agree it was closer than it should have been. The Chiefs still made plays in that game. Something they havent done since. Something that troubles me in that game is Croyle looked better than Cassel has at any point this season.

BossChief 11-09-2009 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 6247269)
I dont call a blocked punt and an INT a 'fluke play'. I agree it was closer than it shound have been. The Chiefs still made plays in that game. Something they havent done since. Something that troubles me in that game is Croyle looked better than Cassel has at any point this season.

my definition of a fluke play is a play that likely wouldnt be repeated multiple time if we were in the same situation a few more times.

I fully agree with the comparison of Croyle and Cassel. I didnt want him before he was traded for and I dont like him now. I wonder what restraints are put on him that is restricting his play though, last year in NE, BB instructed him to take sacks while continueing to look downfield and I think a similar restraint is being utilized with him now. I hope Haley lets him open it up at one point and make some mistakes he can learn from, I firmly believe you learn alot more with that approach than being restricted to try and make plays.

I will gladly accept my crow if I am wrong.

Easy 6 11-09-2009 10:53 AM

I wonder what Jason would be saying if it was Herm or one of his other faves that had 1 win, would it be the same kind of harangues every frickin time?

Or would he, atleast once in a while, try to break things down like the pro he always trumpets himself as?

You need a new market Jason, if this is all you're ever going to do.

beach tribe 11-09-2009 11:04 AM

Wow!! Jwhit, you have proven what I have thought all along. You don't know shit.
NOBODY thought we were going to win 8 games with this roster. NOBODY.

Galileo Humpkins 11-09-2009 11:06 AM

Quote:

Why you should be scared...
You're going to be the centerfold for the November edition of Playgirl?

beach tribe 11-09-2009 11:08 AM

I guess you thought they would come out and say "pack it in ticket holders, we probably won't win more than 3-4 games. Just wait a few years and buy your tickets then"
Yeah. I'm real sure they want to tell media types like yourself that we are going to suck ass.

Sweet Daddy Hate 11-09-2009 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6246835)
He's not dogging it.

He's not the type.

Well, he'll be "not dogging it" somewhere else now.

wild1 11-09-2009 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 6247409)
I wonder what Jason would be saying if it was Herm or one of his other faves that had 1 win, would it be the same kind of harangues every frickin time?

Of course not.

Herm, Cryin' Waters, Larry Johnson, Dwayne Bowe earlier in the year - those folks get a pass.

Pioli and Haley better straighten up and fly right, or else.

Otter 11-09-2009 03:19 PM

You're butt hurt because they cut you off. End of story.

|Zach| 11-09-2009 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 6247409)
I wonder what Jason would be saying if it was Herm or one of his other faves that had 1 win, would it be the same kind of harangues every frickin time?

Or would he, atleast once in a while, try to break things down like the pro he always trumpets himself as?

You need a new market Jason, if this is all you're ever going to do.

Yes, because Herm was never criticized.

GloryDayz 11-09-2009 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwhit (Post 6245292)
Pioli and Haley thought this team would be competitive. They thought we had a shot at winning eight games.

Everyone wants to talk about how bad the roster is and how we have to cut them slack because they're digging out from Peterson and Herm's mess. This is no different from the last Chiefs team. Peterson and Herm thought that roster was capable of being competitive. They thought we could win six or seven with last year's roster.

Pioli and Haley thought we could win eight or more with what they've put out there.

Do they know what it takes to win football games? It takes players. Not signs or media policies or Pentagon-like security or secrets or cursing at the players. Players win football games.

22 guys off the street could win two games. We're halfway home and the Chiefs have one victory.

"Do they know what it takes to win football games?" Well, no!!

BIG_DADDY 11-09-2009 03:23 PM

STFU

Sweet Daddy Hate 11-09-2009 03:26 PM

"You're just mad at Carl, Scott, Larry, Moe and Curly, and you're being a BIG DOO-DOO HEAD ABOUT IT!!!!ELEVENTY TO THE SECOND QUANTUUM EQUATION OF PI!!!!!!@@@@1111

Easy 6 11-09-2009 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 6248279)
Yes, because Herm was never criticized.

Well it sure as hell wasnt Whitlock doing it, not at this level of consistency.

Mr. Flopnuts 11-09-2009 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 6249037)
Well it sure as hell wasnt Whitlock doing it, not at this level of consistency.

It's definitely more personal, and completely understandable. But draw a line. There's plenty of shit to stir up. Why stick to the same bitter topic over and over again? Move on and revisit it later. Much later.

Easy 6 11-09-2009 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 6249045)
It's definitely more personal, and completely understandable. But draw a line. There's plenty of shit to stir up. Why stick to the same bitter topic over and over again? Move on and revisit it later. Much later.

Agreed, try talking actual football a few times & people might not get so tired of his shtick.

MahiMike 11-10-2009 07:54 AM

Alright, I just spent a portion of my morning rummaging through this interesting thread. Here are my takes, FWIW:

- Nice to see the Planet visited by the media (even if it is Whitlock...lol)

- Jason, you used to be my favorite writer in KC. You were the only "No" man in a sea of "Yes" men writers during the King Carl days. I thank you for liberating us from Carl and Herm. That said, your schtick has now worn thin. You need a new one. Somehow, even Gretz has surpassed you for Chiefs enlightenment.

- Comparison to Gretz #2; how come Bob puts out 3 articles per day and you can only muster that many per month? Just sayin'.

- You guys can argue our run defense if you like, but MJD was stuffed for most of the day. I was stoked (especially since I played against him in FF) that he only had 66 yds and no TDs late in the 4th qtr.

- I love Haley but he has too much on his plate. He needs an OC to tell him to go for it on 4th and short. And to run up the gut on 3rd and short.

- For those of you Bowe lovers wondering why we don't look his way, try watching how (un)open he is from up in the stands. He makes a lot of circus catches because he's covered while making them. There's a reason why Cassel is looking other places (and why Haley keeps acquiring players).

- Pluses from Sunday; our D line had its best game of the year, our running game looked far superior to the LJ attack.

- Negatives from Sunday; Haley's 3rd/4th and short play calling, dump off passes galore, dropped/whiffed passes, big plays given up from defensive secondary, abandoning the run. (Again, needing an OC or someone to help point out to Todd what the actual stats are. I think he's so used to the running game not working, he automatically abandoned it).

- Bottom line, we should all be ecstatic that we look this bad right now. In a long term plan, who cares about progress this year? This entire season is simply one long preseason. We're just trying out players to see who we'll keep for next season. I'd be more scared if we were making progress with guys we don't really want.

SenselessChiefsFan 11-10-2009 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6245463)
No one likes to say it but Todd Haley is a worse coach than Herm, the guy is possibly the worst gameday coach I have ever seen.

This.

I hate it, but anyone objective person knows its true.

The Bad Guy 11-10-2009 09:01 AM

I really, really hope Haley turns it around so I can have endless fun bumping these threads with posts from sensiblejackass.

Herm Edwards was the worst coach I've ever seen. I'm glad all of you are ready to annoint Haley as the worst after 8 games.

The Bad Guy 11-10-2009 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6250745)
This.

I hate it, but anyone objective person knows its true.

What a load.

If Todd Haley is making the same stupid mistakes as Herm Edwards next year as a head coach, then this can be brought up.

jidar 11-10-2009 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6245414)
True enough, but I'm not going take being blasted for agreeing with JWhit when he's right by you or anyone else.

Assuming his take about The Great Haoli thinking they could go .500 with this roster is accurate, there is absolutely NOTHING to argue against his take.
Nothing.
Period.

You'll take whatever gets posted dipshit.

The Bad Guy 11-10-2009 09:24 AM

How can you argue a take of heresay?

HemiEd 11-10-2009 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6250796)
What a load.

If Todd Haley is making the same stupid mistakes as Herm Edwards next year as a head coach, then this can be brought up.

Yep, and another strong difference.

Todd Haley is accepting the blame, he must have said it 4 or 5 times at his PC yesterday. That will work, the first thing needed is an understanding of the problem. He is determined to correct it, and I believe him.

In Herm's entire time with the Chiefs, he was never, ever, part of any thing that was wrong. He was always, the reason why something was right.
There was NO HOPE for that situation, none.

Chiefnj2 11-10-2009 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 6250863)
Yep, and another strong difference.

Todd Haley is accepting the blame, he must have said it 4 or 5 times at his PC yesterday. That will work, the first thing needed is an understanding of the problem. He is determined to correct it, and I believe him.

In Herm's entire time with the Chiefs, he was never, ever, part of any thing that was wrong. He was always, the reason why something was right.
There was NO HOPE for that situation, none.

I don't care if Haley is accepting the blame or not. Haley has done a horrible job.

Sweet Daddy Hate 11-10-2009 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jidar (Post 6250827)
You'll take whatever gets posted dipshit.

No **** clown, no I won't.

Fish 11-10-2009 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 6250954)
I don't care if Haley is accepting the blame or not. Haley has done a horrible job.

Yeah. Pretty much. I'm glad Haley is accepting it, but beyond that it doesn't mean any difference in the results on the field. The players sure as shit aren't playing harder for Haley than they did for Herm, so I don't see how it matters any other than personal pride regarding the head coach.

CHIEFS58 11-10-2009 10:40 AM

"I was irresponsible, but I'm gonna keep bitching to hear myself talk."

The only people it didnt (and doesnt) take to see they are ineffective would be Marinelli and Mangini. If you lump Haley in with that crew youre more of an ass than I previously thought.

SenselessChiefsFan 11-10-2009 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6250795)
I really, really hope Haley turns it around so I can have endless fun bumping these threads with posts from sensiblejackass.

Herm Edwards was the worst coach I've ever seen. I'm glad all of you are ready to annoint Haley as the worst after 8 games.

You know what? I REALLY hope he does too. So far, he has been a HUGE dissapointment.

There are things that I have taken some encouragement from... but overall, the gameday coaching make Herm Edwards look like Vince Lombardi.

I have a lot of posts you can bump about how encouraged I was as the offseason unfolded..... that clearly look misguided now.

I hope that in the end, my initial impression is correct.

But, so far, he has sucked on game day. And, for the MOST part, the Chiefs don't look prepared to play. They came off a BYE week AND were coming off a horrible loss... and the Chiefs still played like a$$.

The Chiefs ran the ball well, and Haley ran it only 12 times. Charles had a great first drive, and had half his rushing attempts on that first drive.

Pathetic. Sorry if that hurts your feelings.

Now, one of the most encouraging things is that Haley has only coached 8 games. He should get better. I just hope he doesn't lose the team before he gets there.

BigChiefFan 11-10-2009 10:59 AM

Herm is the most conservative Head Coach there is. No way he is a better head coach. Herm thought scoring points was arena league-that doesn't instill confidence. That instills a loser's mentality and that's exactly what we got. Camp cupcake made the players soft.

SenselessChiefsFan 11-10-2009 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan (Post 6251122)
Herm is the most conservative Head Coach there is. No way he is a better head coach. Herm thought scoring points was arena league-that doesn't instill confidence. That instills a loser's mentality and that's exactly what we got. Camp cupcake made the players soft.


Yeah, Haley's 3-6 yard passing attack and third down draw plays, are the stuff of aggressive playcalling legend.

BigChiefFan 11-10-2009 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6251127)
Yeah, Haley's 3-6 yard passing attack and third down draw plays, are the stuff of aggressive playcalling legend.

The team doesn't roll over and die, like's Herm's teams. Hell, Herm couldn't even make a decision on who his starting QB was. He had annoited THREE STARTING QBs in THREE YEARS. Green, first, then Re-SIGNED Huard and made him starter in year two, final year, annoited Croyle as starter. That's some real solid direction, huh?

SenselessChiefsFan 11-10-2009 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan (Post 6251143)
The team doesn't roll over and die, like's Herm's teams. Hell, Herm couldn't even make a decision on who his starting QB was. He had annoited THREE STARTING QBs in THREE YEARS. Green, first, then Re-SIGNED Huard and made him starter in year two, final year, annoited Croyle as starter. That's some real solid direction, huh?


Herm's teams, even last year, were largely more competetive than this year's group.

Herm's teams actually had the lead many times going into half time.

I will say that I like Haley's approach to press conferences better.... so that's something.

Otter 11-10-2009 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6245463)
No one likes to say it but Todd Haley is a worse coach than Herm, the guy is possibly the worst gameday coach I have ever seen.

He's had eight games since the start of his head coaching career to clean up the shit stain left behind by Herm and Carl. I know you THINK you can make a fair comparison of the two careers at this point Mecca so I won't try to argue with you.

I just want to point out you continue to be a pimple on the ass of Chiefsplanet.

BigChiefFan 11-10-2009 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6251201)
Herm's teams, even last year, were largely more competetive than this year's group.

Herm's teams actually had the lead many times going into half time.

I will say that I like Haley's approach to press conferences better.... so that's something.

His team's record got WORSE, every year he coached in Kansas City. THREE years and every year was worse than the year before. That's not good coaching.

SAUTO 11-10-2009 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahiMike (Post 6250683)
- For those of you Bowe lovers wondering why we don't look his way, try watching how (un)open he is from up in the stands. He makes a lot of circus catches because he's covered while making them. There's a reason why Cassel is looking other places (and why Haley keeps acquiring players).

WHAT????? but some here say that bowe is open all the time and cassel just doesnt want to throw him the ball. hell some say we should force the ball to him and him only:rolleyes:


BTW thanks for the perspective

Brock 11-10-2009 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6251201)
Herm's teams, even last year, were largely more competetive than this year's group.

Herm's teams actually had the lead many times going into half time.

I will say that I like Haley's approach to press conferences better.... so that's something.

ROFL They had leads going into half time, only to piss them away over and over again, and that's the barometer of better coaching?

BossChief 11-10-2009 12:28 PM

Im not going to judge Herm vs Haley at this point because Haley doenst have the third down crutch Herm did.

I do agree that we should be trying to "force" the ball to Bowe. The fourth quarter of the Jags game shows that to be the case.

I think the biggest problem right now is that Cassel is scared to lift up his skirt, grab his balls and go and make a ****ing play. He seems content with 3 yard dumpoffs on third and 15 instead of taking a shot and trusting his ability. That scares me a lot.

SenselessChiefsFan 11-10-2009 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6251238)
ROFL They had leads going into half time, only to piss them away over and over again, and that's the barometer of better coaching?

Well, at this point it is like trying to figure out which turd stinks worse, but I think it is Todd Haley.

HemiEd 11-10-2009 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 6250954)
I don't care if Haley is accepting the blame or not. Haley has done a horrible job.

Are you ok today? You are not your usual sharp self. Did you miss the point entirely, or do you just refuse to acknowledge it?

Even he said he is doing a horrible job, gawd. Re-read my post then get back to me.

HemiEd 11-10-2009 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 6250971)
The players sure as shit aren't playing harder for Haley than they did for Herm, so I don't see how it matters any other than personal pride regarding the head coach.

BULL ****ING SHIT!!! Do you even watch these ****ing games? That is just reeruned, JFC

Amnorix 11-10-2009 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwhit (Post 6245292)
Pioli and Haley thought this team would be competitive. They thought we had a shot at winning eight games.

They did? Did they say that? Frankly, if they did think that it was only because they thought they were in a very weak division. Turns out that Denver is much, MUCH better than anyone expected.

I doubt, VERY MUCH, that Pioli/Haley would say, under truth serum, that they had "average" talent for an NFL team. This team is seriously undertalented, and that fact is obvious to everyone.

Quote:

Everyone wants to talk about how bad the roster is and how we have to cut them slack because they're digging out from Peterson and Herm's mess. This is no different from the last Chiefs team. Peterson and Herm thought that roster was capable of being competitive. They thought we could win six or seven with last year's roster.
I'm uncertain whether you saw Bill Belichick's quotes from a recent interview with Jason Cole. If not, here's the link:

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slu...yhoo&type=lgns

One quote in particular is VERY important for the Chiefs and their fans to understand:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Belichick
Here’s the only thing I’ll say: I think to have a really good team in this league, you have to make a lot, a lot of good decisions. You have to have a lot of good people, players, coaches, whatever. You need a lot of those. Conversely, to not be competitive, you would have to have a lot of bad decisions. One bad decision is not going to do it, one bad player is not going to do it, one bad coach is not going to do it. You’re going to have to collectively, over a cumulative period of time, make a long series of bad decisions and accumulate a lot of players who are substandard for their position. There have to be a multitude of things that go wrong.

Pioli and Haley are trying to rectify YEARS of bad decisions, and it's nearly impossible to do that in just one year.

Quote:

Do they know what it takes to win football games? It takes players. Not signs or media policies or Pentagon-like security or secrets or cursing at the players. Players win football games.
I tend to think, for some very odd reason, that Pioli has some sense of what it takes to win football games. His father in law is Bill Parcells and his mentor is Bill Belichick. Even a dumbass rock would learn a few things hanging around with those guys just by osmosis. Pioli is not a dumbass rock.

Quote:

22 guys off the street could win two games. We're halfway home and the Chiefs have one victory.
This is completely foolish, and you know it.

Full disclosure: I am a die-hard Patriots fan, not a Chiefs fan. FWIW.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.