ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs 2012 Dexter McCluster touches thread (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=262599)

Pasta Little Brioni 09-11-2012 07:39 AM

I can just see the grimace on multiple poster's faces after every catch and first down he makes.

Hammock Parties 09-11-2012 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 8900870)
mccluster was in on 3rd and 1 at 1:38 PM on sunday

That's because they were running the no huddle.

He wasn't part of the play. It was a QB sneak.

BossChief 09-11-2012 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8900929)
I liked him pre-draft but I don't think he's shown anything in the NFL. He's been bad against good teams and good against bad teams. Thats ****ing Cassel. Would you spend a first round pick on Cassel?

JFC

Dalton was a ****ing rookie and Cassel is 30 years old.

Reerun_KC 09-11-2012 01:41 PM

Bawahahahahahahaha


So now if you line up on the field and you dont get the ball youre not part of the play...

All those years of football I played, all the coaches I had, all the kids I have taught football over time, it only matters if you are part of the play...

I dont think I have heard anything more pathetic in my life. CP's child molester never ceases to amaze us with his football knowledge.

Hammock Parties 09-11-2012 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8901673)
So now if you line up on the field and you dont get the ball youre not part of the play...

All those years of football I played, all the coaches I had, all the kids I have taught football over time, it only matters if you are part of the play...

He jogged about 3 steps as soon as the ball was snapped.

Didn't run a route, didn't block anyone, wasn't a decoy...

He wasn't part of the play.

BossChief 09-11-2012 01:44 PM

Why do you keep calling him a child molester?

I can see having spirited arguments, but don't you think that's a little over the line?

Lets say someone came on here and called you a child molester 5 or 6 times...how would you take that?

Reerun_KC 09-11-2012 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8901682)
He jogged about 3 steps as soon as the ball was snapped.

Didn't run a route, didn't block anyone, wasn't a decoy...

He wasn't part of the play.

YET he was in on the play... I guess since you never played the game, you dont understand the concepts.

Hammock Parties 09-11-2012 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8901711)
YET he was in on the play... I guess since you never played the game, you dont understand the concepts.

He was on the field because NO ONE left the field due to the hurry up offense. They didn't have a desire to change the package.

This isn't hard to understand...

Reerun_KC 09-11-2012 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8901718)
He was on the field because NO ONE left the field due to the hurry up offense. They didn't have a desire to change the package.

This isn't hard to understand...

You dont know what they were desiring....

Man you spout some funky shit.

Hammock Parties 09-11-2012 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8901724)
You dont know what they were desiring....

Man you spout some funky shit.

Pretty clear what they were doing, dumbass: keeping the defense from changing to a short yardage package so they could easily run a QB sneak.

Three7s 09-11-2012 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8901686)
Why do you keep calling him a child molester?

I can see having spirited arguments, but don't you think that's a little over the line?

Lets say someone came on here and called you a child molester 5 or 6 times...how would you take that?

You think he cares?

Hammock Parties 09-11-2012 02:00 PM

Reerun can call me whatever he wants...Reerun is my Chiefs brother and I know he hates this franchise and the failures running it as much as I do....

Reerun_KC 09-11-2012 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8901729)
Pretty clear what they were doing, dumbass: keeping the defense from changing to a short yardage package so they could easily run a QB sneak.

Wow that is some serious inside knowledge you have there...

Reerun_KC 09-11-2012 02:03 PM

So what was the play call before the sneak? And based on the results, what were there plans before the called the sneak?

BossChief 09-11-2012 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8901742)
So what was the play call before the sneak? And based on the results, what were there plans before the called the sneak?

they didnt have much beef on the field and we no huddled to take advantage of that.

Hammock Parties 09-11-2012 02:08 PM

Reerun, you light up my life.

Hammock Parties 09-11-2012 02:08 PM

I'M GLAD WE HAVE ANOTHER PLAYMAKER ON OFFENSE AND I HOPE LITTLE DEX KEEPS IT UP.

Reerun_KC 09-11-2012 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8901748)
they didnt have much beef on the field and we no huddled to take advantage of that.

:facepalm: Well that sums up what we all already knew...

Thanks.

QuikSsurfer 09-11-2012 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8901760)
I'M GLAD WE HAVE ANOTHER PLAYMAKER ON OFFENSE AND I HOPE LITTLE DEX KEEPS IT UP.

You serious Clark?

BossChief 09-11-2012 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8901774)
:facepalm: Well that sums up what we all already knew...

Thanks.

Then why ask the ****ing question?

Reerun_KC 09-11-2012 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8901782)
Then why ask the ****ing question?

:thumb:

Carry on scooter..

Deberg_1990 09-11-2012 02:22 PM

Not sure why anyone would actively root against a Chiefs player to perform badly? Dex isn’t perfect, but there are a lot more worthy underachievers to scream about on this team than him.

SAUTO 09-11-2012 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8901648)
That's because they were running the no huddle.

He wasn't part of the play. It was a QB sneak.

he was on the field no?


you said he wouldnt be.

Pasta Little Brioni 09-11-2012 03:15 PM

Good hands...check
Running good routes...check
Converting 3rd downs...check

That's exactly what you want out of your slot guy.

I don't see why there is still butthurt over the little man...other than the people that are angry they were wrong of course.

BossChief 09-11-2012 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 8901811)
Not sure why anyone would actively root against a Chiefs player to perform badly? Dex isn’t perfect, but there are a lot more worthy underachievers to scream about on this team than him.

Because people don't like to admit they are wrong.

Hammock Parties 09-11-2012 03:51 PM

I don't root against Dex.

I'm glad he had a nice game.

He's had nice games before.

whoman69 09-11-2012 03:58 PM

If only I had Dexter on my fantasy team last week instead of Bowe. I wouldn't have lost by nearly as much.

Chiefaholic 09-11-2012 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8900343)
Has to be a two-yard pass.

Has to be uncontested. No one trying to prevent the completion.

Why the *** would the opponent not try to prevent McCluster from making a reception on 3rd and 1? You told me that he wouldn't be on the field on 3rd and 1... PERIOD. You made no mention of a minimal gain or uncontested catch.

The problem with you jackass is that you pretend to be a football guru and make your internet reputation your life. Your ego is so ****ing large, that you actually root for particular players, coaches, and GM to fail miserably just so you can log onto the internet and say "I told you so" to people you'll likely never meet in real life.

**** that crap!!! I think Cassel sucks.. However, I WANT the Chiefs to win on Sundays, so I hope he plays well enough to not drag the rest of the team down with him. I know Romeo hasn't had much success as a head coach. However, I WANT him to do well enough to get this franchise over the hump and lead us to the playoffs.

Rooting for the Chiefs doesn't make me a "true fan", it means that I actually enjoy the game and won't root for individuals to fail just to say "I told you so" to people on the internet.

Hammock Parties 09-11-2012 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefaholic (Post 8902270)
Why the *** would the opponent not try to prevent McCluster from making a reception on 3rd and 1?

Because it was preseason.

And that exact scenario transpired.

I contended that such a scenario would never transpire in a real game.

It won't.

SAUTO 09-11-2012 04:54 PM

No one conceded a pass. Why would they do that even in preseason?
Posted via Mobile Device

Chiefaholic 09-11-2012 05:02 PM

You and I made no bet and I don't want to run you off the boards. HOWEVER, just because you decided to be such an ass about things. 3rd and 1 in the 3rd quarter with 13:51 on the clock, McCluster IS on the field in a 3 WR set when Cassel ran for a 1st on the QB sneak.

I have no beef with you, Clay. Just making a point that Dexter is a far better player than you give him credit for. If the Chiefs cut him today, he wouldn't last a week before another franchise picks him up.

Hammock Parties 09-11-2012 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefaholic (Post 8902320)
3rd and 1 in the 3rd quarter with 13:51 on the clock, McCluster IS on the field in a 3 WR set when Cassel ran for a 1st on the QB sneak.

And that is because they were in the no huddle offense.

They didn't put in a specific package for third and 1.

The whole point of that post is that it would be stupid to put Dex in such a package.

Hammock Parties 09-11-2012 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 8902304)
No one conceded a pass. Why would they do that even in preseason?
Posted via Mobile Device

The pass was most definitely conceded.

No one tried to cover Dexter, no one tried to make a play on the ball.

See for yourself, homer.

http://i.imgur.com/PZIxq.gif

Marcellus 09-11-2012 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8902324)
And that is because they were in the no huddle offense.

They didn't put in a specific package for third and 1.

The whole point of that post is that it would be stupid to put Dex in such a package.

So you admit you were wrong when you said he wouldn't be in on 1 3rd & 1 this year?

You haven't been correct yet on the subject of DMC, if I were you I would just STFU. But you aren't that smart.

O.city 09-11-2012 05:06 PM

It was a well designed play against the zone. Wrs cause the lbs to dip deep enought to get a first

Hammock Parties 09-11-2012 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 8902333)
So you admit you were wrong when you said he wouldn't be in on 1 3rd & 1 this year?
.

Being subbed in for a third and 1, and staying on the field because the team is running a no huddle, is not the same thing.

Hammock Parties 09-11-2012 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8902336)
It was a well designed play against the zone. Wrs cause the lbs to dip deep enought to get a first

I don't care why it happened.

It will NEVER HAPPEN in a regular season game.

EVER.

SAUTO 09-11-2012 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8902354)
Being subbed in for a third and 1, and staying on the field because the team is running a no huddle, is not the same thing.

I'm done with your stupid ass. Move them goalposts. You said it would never happen. It most definitely did.

It sucks but I think I'm going to have to put you on ignore...disingenuous bastard.

You are a different guy on arrowhead pride. Funny how that works
Posted via Mobile Device

Marcellus 09-11-2012 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8902354)
Being subbed in for a third and 1, and staying on the field because the team is running a no huddle, is not the same thing.

You are laughably transparent. You were very very adamant in your statements in this thread on DMC and have been 100% wrong on all of it.

As I predicted early on.

milkman 09-12-2012 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 8900919)
meh....hes ok, but i dont see much upside to him. If hes better than Cassel, it isnt by much.
Remember, Cassel has been carried by a team to 11 and 10 win seasons before.

FYP

jd1020 09-12-2012 11:26 AM

You would think that if the Chiefs were concerned about a drive being stopped because of McCluster on the field for 3rd and 1 then they would have subbed him out for a bigger body.

Pasta Little Brioni 09-12-2012 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 8902304)
No one conceded a pass. Why would they do that even in preseason?
Posted via Mobile Device

No shit. That is one of the dumbest things I've read on here.

SAUTO 09-12-2012 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 8904346)
No shit. That is one of the dumbest things I've read on here.

seems like there has been a shit ton of "dumbest things ever said" posts in the last few weeks.

WTF is going on?

Reerun_KC 09-12-2012 12:56 PM

this is the thread that will keep giving all year long.

Reerun_KC 09-12-2012 12:59 PM

http://cdn.styleforum.net/1/13/1315a...-face.bmp.jpeg

SAUTO 09-12-2012 01:03 PM

http://i.imgur.com/PZIxq.gif

looked like it was a zone and the players dropped back, probably both expecting each other to cover dex.

SAUTO 09-12-2012 01:04 PM

and im guessing it was either boss or maneri that drew them back, most likely just what the play was designed to do.

Marcellus 09-12-2012 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 8904529)
and im guessing it was either boss or maneri that drew them back, most likely just what the play was designed to do.

That can't be possible, that means they did something correctly.

SAUTO 09-12-2012 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 8904553)
That can't be possible, that means they did something correctly.

i know. lol
actually watching the GIF without an agenda shows that three defenders drop back to cover what looks like a tight end and that leaves mccluster wide open

Frosty 09-12-2012 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 8904576)
i know. lol
actually watching the GIF without an agenda shows that three defenders drop back to cover what looks like a tight end and that leaves mccluster wide open

Right. It wasn't conceded. It was just a blown coverage. No team lets another just pick up a first down on purpose. Otherwise, they might just as well stand there after the snap.

Hammock Parties 09-12-2012 02:35 PM

Keep telling yourself that.

It will never happen in a regular season game.

They defended a third and 1 like a third and 20.

Hammock Parties 09-13-2012 05:50 AM

Still sucks.

http://i.imgur.com/FNCiU.gif

Marcellus 09-13-2012 06:16 AM

Every post you make in this thread is vindication for DMC.

Rasputin 09-13-2012 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8905972)

Gif the play he broke a tackle and gained extra 7 yards before gang tackled by three other guys.

beach tribe 09-13-2012 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8902329)
The pass was most definitely conceded.

No one tried to cover Dexter, no one tried to make a play on the ball.

See for yourself, homer.

http://i.imgur.com/PZIxq.gif

So they just let him get a first down.
Wow. You are Hilarious. Another first converted by DMC.
The other targets cleared out the zone. I told you we had too many options for the D to key on DMC, and he would benefit from it. I have been right so far.
I'll more than likely have your sig for a year if he stays anywhere near his current pace, and that kicks in AFTER your bet with Boss runs out. You won't have your sig for 2 years. Two YEARS. Year and a half at the least.

beach tribe 09-13-2012 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 8906032)
Gif the play he broke a tackle and gained extra 7 yards before gang tackled by three other guys.

He won't do that. That's why I wasn't worried about missing out on Gifd up this year because he's only gonna gif the stuff that supports his agenda.

beach tribe 09-13-2012 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 8904529)
and im guessing it was either boss or maneri that drew them back, most likely just what the play was designed to do.



It was.

beach tribe 09-13-2012 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8902324)
And that is because they were in the no huddle offense.

They didn't put in a specific package for third and 1.

The whole point of that post is that it would be stupid to put Dex in such a package.

And yet he's the one who converted the first. Real stupid to have him in there.

beach tribe 09-13-2012 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8902324)
And that is because they were in the no huddle offense.

They didn't put in a specific package for third and 1.

The whole point of that post is that it would be stupid to put Dex in such a package.

Such a complete pussy, who is WRONG 99% of the time.

Rasputin 09-13-2012 08:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 8906113)
He won't do that. That's why I wasn't worried about missing out on Gifd up this year because he's only gonna gif the stuff that supports his agenda.

Oh I know ;)

He is too chicken shit. I've tried get him to gif Dex touchdown last game against the Donks, but he wouldn't do it.

http://i769.photobucket.com/albums/x...IT/chicken.gif

Reerun_KC 09-13-2012 09:02 AM

LMAO, Love this thread....

Mr. Laz 09-13-2012 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 8904522)
http://i.imgur.com/PZIxq.gif

looked like it was a zone and the players dropped back, probably both expecting each other to cover dex.

looks like DMC knew where to 'sit down' in the zone and get a first down.

I know that when receivers do that against us they get kudos all the time. :shrug:

Reerun_KC 09-16-2012 10:13 PM

Updated. Not looking good for fraudulent boy.

Hammock Parties 09-16-2012 10:16 PM

4 shitty, worthless ****ing touches today.

Sucked ****ing ass and played exactly the way I expect him to play.

When he got blown up, a shiver of ecstasy ran down my spine.

Reerun_KC 09-16-2012 10:17 PM

Excuses. .

WV 09-17-2012 12:26 AM

Hell they should have went to him more today....anything would have been better than the "product" they put out today.

Rausch 09-17-2012 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8919298)
4 shitty, worthless ****ing touches today.

Sucked ****ing ass and played exactly the way I expect him to play.

When he got blown up, a shiver of ecstasy ran down my spine.

Remind me when you're leaving...

Hammock Parties 09-17-2012 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 8919736)
Remind me when you're leaving...

As soon as we win 10 games.

Rasputin 09-17-2012 01:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8919298)
4 shitty, worthless ****ing touches today.

Sucked ****ing ass and played exactly the way I expect him to play.

When he got blown up, a shiver of ecstasy ran down my spine.

I don't & never expect DM to have great games each week. I do however think some games he can break out for those big plays we need. Wasn't there for this game. He is going get more opportunities to prove you wrong or me wrong either way.

I just figure if we got rid of him, he would tear our D up big time if we played against him on a sunday after noon. That would put a spin on CP lmao.

Rasputin 09-17-2012 01:11 AM

I wouldn't be surprised if JC doesn't get his shit going we will see Dexter at RB again at some point in games. Draughn has had some plays & got some yards. Hillis hasn't been exactly living up to expectations. They got to do something give the O a boost in the running game.

BossChief 09-17-2012 01:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 8919749)
I wouldn't be surprised if JC doesn't get his shit going we will see Dexter at RB again at some point in games. Draughn has had some plays & got some yards. Hillis hasn't been exactly living up to expectations. They got to do something give the O a boost in the running game.

:shake:

Hillis and Charles arent the problem with the offense.

Neither are Bowe, Baldwin, Breaston or DMC.

Our problem is that we have a backup quality QB masquerading around as a starting QB and EVERYONE knows it.

Especially the players on the team.

Hammock Parties 09-17-2012 01:15 AM

Well, the other problem is that our interior line is young and struggled today against a pretty badass defensive line.

That was bound to happen at some point. That's when you need a strong QB to fall back on.

Oops.

BossChief 09-17-2012 01:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8919752)
Well, the other problem is that our interior line is young and struggled today against a pretty badass defensive line.

That was bound to happen at some point. That's when you need a strong QB to fall back on.

Oops.

Cassel stares down the rush (thats why I chose that specific play for your sig) and takes FOREVER to get the ball out and if and when he does, his release point is as low as anybodies in the game so lots of his passes get tipped...if he tries to adjust his release point to get the ball out without getting tipped, he throws 3 feet too high and the ball comes off the receivers fingertips and gets tipped up for a pick in the secondary.

Buffalo got steamrolled by the Jets last week.

The interior lines inexperience was a very small part of the real problem.

Rasputin 09-17-2012 01:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8919751)
:shake:

Hillis and Charles arent the problem with the offense.

Neither are Bowe, Baldwin, Breaston or DMC.

Our problem is that we have a backup quality QB masquerading around as a starting QB and EVERYONE knows it.

Especially the players on the team.

I agree 100% he makes the team look bad around him. We can't get the best out of the team this way. That one pass to Dexter he had to dive for, that could have turned into big time yards if Cassel was accurate with his throw and Dex could have cought it in stride. The announcers even pointed that out. The WRs have to adjust to his throws all the time instead of getting it at the right time and spot. Would make huge difference if we had an accurate QB that could matriculate the ball down field.

Hammock Parties 09-17-2012 01:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8919757)
Cassel stares down the rush (thats why I chose that specific play for your sig) and takes FOREVER to get the ball out and if and when he does, his release point is as low as anybodies in the game so lots of his passes get tipped...if he tries to adjust his release point to get the ball out without getting tipped, he throws 3 feet too high and the ball comes off the receivers fingertips and gets tipped up for a pick in the secondary.

Buffalo got steamrolled by the Jets last week.

The interior lines inexperience was a very small part of the real problem.

I'm talking about the run blocking, mostly.

It wasn't good today, it wasn't good last week, it wasn't good in game two and three of preseason.

It's the elephant in the room.

Well, maybe the baby elephant.

If we had a good running game we wouldn't be getting the shit beaten out of us.

jd1020 09-23-2012 03:12 PM

3 catches for 28 yards.

1 run for 5 yards.

Cassel throws a terrible high pass and breaks McCluster.

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mamq0kGnrR1qg6z0o.gif /Clay

Chiefs win.

lewdog 09-23-2012 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8941997)

Cassel throws a terrible high pass and breaks McCluster.

.

Cassel's shit passes hurt McCluster and Hillis today. What a ****ing joke!

Hammock Parties 09-23-2012 11:06 PM

Looks like the balance has swayed in my favor, bitches. :D

htismaqe 09-24-2012 06:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8944758)
Looks like the balance has swayed in my favor, bitches. :D

Not cool.

Saul Good 09-24-2012 06:22 AM

Dex had the longest reception of the game.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.