![]() |
Quote:
there is nothing to argue...the only question is: are you reeruned or super reeruned? and how are you going to make a bet about a bench player? bench player's don't play, because they suck compared to the starters... |
Quote:
siler could have missed the same tackle, we would never know because he would be STUCK ON THE BENCH. Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
McGraw is a guy with questionable coverage skills who sucks at tackling so, he's gone. And if you question this post, I have another post ready to rape you for doing so. Want to test me, Lack Bob? |
Quote:
I'm saying you are knocking DJ for missing a tackle when the scrub you say is a better tackler would have been five yards away and not gotten the opportunity to miss the same tackle Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
He is missing tackles a guy like siler wouldn't even have the opportunity to miss because he wouldn't get there. DJ makes the routine tackle as often as siler. Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
BTW, no Mults. Man up and bet. P.S. I am going to watch TV for a while. Just letting you know before ten of you bitches accuse me of slinking off because you got nothing else. |
Quote:
i don't even know how one could make the comparison given siler's paltry stats and lack of playing time...shouldn't being good enough to actually play be a precondition for being 'better' at anything? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Which makes me feel bad for you. Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
And yet at the same time you also are trying to use the eye test to measure the elusive quickness (i.e. missed tackle forcing ability) of Jamaal Charles and a slow midget who couldn't outjuke a 12 year old who needs Ritalin. In either case the eye test overwhelmingly proves you wrong, yet you cling to it like it's your only saving grace in this argument. Oh, and in both cases, they focus on the same thing- MISSED TACKLES. Which you apparently can't spot. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
goddamn you are slow. Posted via Mobile Device |
shouldn't the idiots claiming siler is a better tackler be able to provide proof of such a painfully ****ing stupid claim?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
DJ is making the spectacular plays, and missing on some of the tackles that would be spectacular. Now people are knocking him due to that and propping up siler because he isn't missing tackles he never has a chance to miss because he sucks Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
I'm done with this thread. If anyone wants to partake in the bet, send me a pm.
|
Quote:
I wonder why he won't. In fact, if DJ can't play on Sunday, it's going to be Cory Greenwood who gets the start. |
Quote:
does that prove siler is a better tackler? Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
You? The guy who couldn't tell the difference between Stanzi and Tanney? The guy who thought Pitoitua was playing NT? |
Quote:
DJ or Siler? LMAO you are rocketing up the charts of dumbest poster on the planet ever... |
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
You are a moron |
Quote:
http://www.hotflick.net/flicks/1988_...Foster_001.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But he's not. |
Quote:
as usual, we get to watch a dumbass condescend...not black bob, you... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Some of us actually watch these games. No offense but I would say you probably don't watch every snap ofevery chiefs game. Most of us do. You have been here long enough that you should know that if a member of every faction of chiefs planet are arguing and ON THE SAME SIDE you shouldn't saddle up the other side and ride into battle on their opinions in your white armor... Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
That's the whole ****ing point. And because Siler isn't even a starter, and in fact plays less than 40 percent of the snaps DJ plays in a given year, it's an even dumber comparison. If Siler played 1,000 snaps he might very well miss MORE tackles because he's not a guy who's good at making open-field tackles. He's a line-of-scrimmage thumper. The whole thing is ****ing stupid and based entirely on 2009 Derrick Johnson, who was a real shitty tackler. DJ isn't that guy anymore. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
here is the thing Black Bob doesn't want to address or talk about
the real issue: stops http://i47.tinypic.com/209sejb.gif |
Quote:
|
This black bob fellar is and idiot.
|
Quote:
Escobar and DJ fight the same problem illusion wise. Both get to the object when others wouldn't have a chance. Why knock them if sometimes they don't bring it in. If another player could get there they might miss and not finish either Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The ability to get to the runner is one thing. The ability to tackle the runner is another. You keep trying to equate them. They aren't the same. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think you are being willfully obtuse here Posted via Mobile Device |
So...who practiced today?
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
Couldn't resist...
http://uranus.ckt.net/~gochiefs/donks3/johnson.gif http://uranus.ckt.net/~gochiefs/donks3/johnson22.gif more coming soon |
Quote:
Have a great night. |
|
It's always good to know that a troll can unite us all. It's like Black Bob is the terrorists and DJ is the towers.
To 'merica. To Chiefsplanet. |
dj misses some tackles BUT also makes more stops -- and makes a ton of tackles --- because he is flying around the field.
Yes he misses some tackles but id rather have a dude get there 80% of the timeand have a 90% chance to make the tackle than a 45% chance to get there and a 93% tackle rate.... dumb argument imo |
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
I still can't get over this board being called a terrible bunch of homers. Not to mention from a guy saying Cassel is going to throw it down the field this year. Is there more of a homer thing than thinking Cassel is going to have a good year?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Try again. |
No amount of gifs will prove siler is a better tackler
Posted via Mobile Device |
1 Attachment(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
There isn't one. Never said there was. |
i'm still waiting for evidence that Siler is a better tackler than DJ
from either black reerun or cassel's cock ring... |
In no way did you ever say that.
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
And the 93% number is due to him only getting there 45% of the time...
(I know the% were just a random #) Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
Hell show us some siler MADE tackles... and like I said earlier no one here is going to bet like that with you. You have to earn the right to take someone's planet away for a year Posted via Mobile Device |
I like how we have gifs of arguably the best Chiefs linebacker, a pro bowler last year.
I can't wait for Brandon Siler gifs. Assuming these exist. |
Quote:
that Siler is ia better tackler than DJ? prove it you dipshit....we've been waiting all god damn night |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
proof, of course, that siler is a better tackler... |
Quote:
THOSE CLIPS ARE FROM 2009. YOU ARE A ****ING reerun. |
**** this troll
|
Quote:
http://uranus.ckt.net/~gochiefs/Sile...0big%20hit.gif |
the stops ARE a big factor if you as a player have a choice to:
1) take a risky angle where you may not be able to make the tackle, but make sure you get there and at least have a chance to make a play that stops them from getting yards on your ass or 2) take a pussy angle and make a sure tackle 5+ yards from the line It plays into missed tackles....to say it doesn't it just as bad as saying 'the guy with more tackles is a better player' |
Quote:
MORE GIFS FROM 2009 YOU ****TARD |
That's it guys...
Brandon Siler is a better block and special teamer than DJ. GC posted proof. |
It's not all Matt Cassel's fault you ****ing homers. Why doesn't Derrick Johnson execute on every single ****ing tackle attempt?
Sheesh, no wonder we lost to the Ravens in the playoffs! |
Quote:
yeah every one can tackle there. not. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Got it. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.