Who?

We just have different opinions on this I guess. I choose to come here. I come here knowing that one of the inherent qualities of a message board is that there are going to be people I think are idiots. So, if I'm that annoyed (thin skinned) and refuse to not read his posts then it's my own fault.
I teach my kids to ignore the class idiot, not go tattle every time the idiot causes an inconvenience for the class.

Well then this thread should be titled "Should we allow him to come back" because he shouldn't be here in the first place. The ban should be enforced and not removed because someone circumvented it.

Bunch of ignorant fools with the "you guys want to ban him just for disagreeing with you?"

The guy has threatened legal action against another member.

He has been banned multiple times previously and just makes a mult and keeps posting the same stuff he was banned for.

He spams threads (spamming is against the tos, too) with post after post of the worst takes in the history of Internet NFL message boards.

The theory is these guys like a good dumpster fire.

Yup.

Pipe the **** down noob.

I don't care really, I'm more voting on principal. Having said that, if the guy gets banned, then knowmo should as well. Talk about spamming the board with worthless takes

I'm not thin skinned. I've been here for 12 years.

Your analogy just simply doesn't work. To use your analogy, while I can certainly ignore the class idiot, the class idiot is preventing any learning from taking place. He's hijacking the classroom and being loud enough that you cant actually get anything done.

It's not that people can't ignore him, it's that you can't have a football discussion without him bombarding the thread with ridiculousness. And it's not just that he's an idiot. He's a stubborn idiot. He posts stuff over and over and over.

For the record, nobody tattled on anybody.

I'm opposed to any banning if rules aren't actually broken.

He's broken the rules multiple times.

He's up for banning because the mods are re-thinking their act of goodwill.

They gave him a 2nd chance and he chose to revert to form.

I don't have a dog in the fight, nor have I read any of his posts. However, if he is annoying isn't that what ignoring is for? The famous don't feed the troll line seems to be appropriate. As for the legal action...trust the judicial system and police in America to handle it... hHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHahahahh....wow, i just peed. +1 to my post count. lol

All analogies aside, I can't see why people don't just ignore his posts and talk with the members they choose to talk to. It's that way in real life. Every community has people that make it run less smoothly or efficiently. People deal with it. I'm done with this, but I wish you well in dealing with idiots in the future. FTR, I wasn't insinuating that you have thin skin, but rather the collective board seems to as of late.

Dude, you can't ignore him. He posts so much shit so often that it overwhelms a thread.

You don't think people have TRIED to ignore him? It didn't come to this overnight.

Furthermore, good users here shouldn't have to maintain their ignore list all the time just because he creates mults, which is against the forum TOS.

No. no rules have been broken. wtf

So we're allowed to make mults?

Oh really?

:facepalm:


Some of you mother****ers need to pay attention.

And those who haven't need to shut the **** up.

Which one are you?

IIRC, he admitted that this is his 4th account since September.

He's been banned and come back under a new username at least once.

Rules absolutely HAVE been broken. However, the mods decided to give him a pass and let him stay since he appealed to their mercy and promised to be a good citizen.

He broke his promise so there's no reason they should have to let his earlier transgressions slide.

This one bothers the **** out of me. See it all the time with Tom as well. If a mother****er has been banned, then they've been banned. If they want to come back, then they need to submit to come back and be allowed back by formal appeal to the mods. This bullshit of creating a mult and being allowed back in while the mods turn the other way and pretend not to notice is crap.

Banned at least twice, been on miserable user iirc.

The guy just doesn't stop. It's strange
Posted via Mobile Device

I don't understand it either. If something isn't going to be enforced, don't issue the initial ban in the first place.

Well, he was outed, so the mods didn't ignore him. They just didn't notice he was back until they were alerted to it.

And they didn't pretend not to notice. He DID appeal to them and they allowed him to come back under those auspices.

Since it has been decided that 51% is the point in which his dickless ****ball is banned, I've decided to create as many duplicate accounts as possible in order to see him banned.

I have until 7:59pm, PST, to create 50 new usernames.

I mean, what the ****? Bannings are apparently not really bannings, right?

:LOL:

Sometimes people change. Everybody deserves a second chance I think.

He begged and pleaded and promised to be good. They tried to do the right thing.

He didn't.

He's had 4 chances.

I would like you banned for saying that to me. Set the example. :clap:

Dane you're just another pussy who runs his mouth only when you know you don't, can't, wouldn't ever ****ing dream of backing it up.

My point is, go **** yourself you dickless shitbag I'm sick of reading your "ba" bullshit. I swear to God. I'd shut your shit down if I had the chance.


everyone has an opinion, that's mine.

Shit, am I a blackbob mult?

Get him man!! Woohoo!!

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_p2_8aZ7hon...or-500x400.jpg

That isn't enough.

You know, free speech, neighbors, the universe, four bannings, pissing off mods and just being a good person! Let him stay.

He's not in any way a liar, slimy douche****, whistleblower dickhead.

Actually, he's a saint.

St. Rambozo from Olathe.

He also sucked his uncle's dick.

Lol
Posted via Mobile Device

And the baby sitters too
Posted via Mobile Device

oops, cross thread eff up. good luck on your fight bros.

Hey people who voted you don't care,

If you really don't care, consider changing your vote to "no." Think about it.

Thanks,

Rambozo

:clap:

[QUOTE=Sorter;9356903]He also sucked his uncle's
Why didn't you just say that. Ban his asss!

[QUOTE=tooge;9356921]ROFL

Sorry, all votes are final.

:)

Your opinion, eh?

So, who do you think I am? Do you think that I am a man without principles? A man who wouldn't defend his family at all costs? A man that would defend his own honor or the honor of his wife and chlildren, let alone his own reputation?

I'd you think ANY of the above, bring it ****ing ON, you classless, piece of shit, Mother****er.

I'll PM my address. My house was on the member map for YEARS, so I have no where to hide.

Man up or shut the **** up. I'll even buy your plane ticket because I'm sure you don't have the jack to buy it on your own.

Lol. They probably did think about it when they voted. And I don't think they can change their votes either
Posted via Mobile Device

So who is he?

Create a mult.

:clap:

Can you buy me my plane ticket, just cause.

I need to take a trip.

Oh, and I won't be coming to your house.

I could just drive there.

Dude why not just shut the **** up at this point. You obviously haven't been paying attention. Hell you told me I was wrong about something he typed word for word
Posted via Mobile Device

Yep... I'm all for 2nd chances, members policing themselves, etc; but I've always been a fan of dumping the completely useless members.... those who are just here to make every thread about themselves, troll, hijack threads, etc. There was a little while with blackbob, LAC, and a few others when I just quit reading the discussion, because it was the same few people hijacking every thread... it's not a matter of ignoring a user (unless every single person ignores them), because the entire discussion is about their crap.

Granted, you once said LAC was one of the best posters here, so complaining so much about this guy is kind of amusing... in the end, the only difference between the two is blackbob posts more.

He had 4 mults.

BlackBob, Woodchuck, another I can't remember but he posted it in the MOB thread, and finally Rambozo.

I thought for a while Driving Wheel was another mult but I think that was debunked by a mod. He hasn't posted in a while though.

I can't figure out how
Posted via Mobile Device

This is exactly what we would have done in the old days. This kind of poll is how it worked then. We were scared of pissing off the wrong group of people and causing yet another board split if we banned the wrong strong personality. Plus we were fostering an environment where everybody felt like they were contributing to important decisions.

Additionally, Driving Wheel was in favor of Geno. Which means he's not BlackBob or Bob is taking extensive measures against his personal beliefs in order to keep another account here. FTR, I don't think Driving Wheel is a BB mult at this time.

Yep.

The mods here need to be commended. There isn't a better-run forum anywhere.

As long as you to agree to babysit 8 hours a day.

:p

I've long believed we should vote off one member per month as our own acknowledgement of the power and importance of natural selection.

Dude, slow your roll THAT comment is ban worthy.

Meh, I've been breathing. You?

They can't change their votes.

And there aren't enough regular posters left to save you.

Sorry.

As BlackBob would say, "no hard feelings."

can I go first?
Posted via Mobile Device

That was an honest question. Some people who called him Knowmo seem to have been wrong. I don't recall if you were one of them.

And I do pay attention in the threads that I participate. No I don't live in all threads. Actually less so since I have come back.

And speaking of that, I do realize that I have been more active than I wanted to the 2nd time around. Thanks for reminding me.

Nah.

LMAOLMAOLMAO Holy shit. Are you mad?

who and why?

I'll give him the chance.

LAC used to be funny as hell. At some point he became super bitter.

No it wasn't a question. You told me you thought I was wrong about his opinion when you hadn't even seen his opinion. Then I told you exactly where to look and you obviously didn't
Posted via Mobile Device

The difference is that LAC wasn't banned, nor did he sign up with multiple accounts.

You're talking out of your ass:

That's the only rule he has broken that is listed in the rules section.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/faq.p...able#faq_mults

Yeah, he actually was ultimately banned.

He didn't come back afterwards though, if that's what you are getting at. At least not to my knowledge.

He did it more than once.

And he should be banned for making 4 mults.

Maybe he's saying multiple accounts = multiple infraction's.

Correct.

He didn't create 4 accounts all at once. He repeatedly created new accounts, specifically to circumvent being previously banned.

Well, he was banned ever so briefly. The thread that lead to his banning was actually and ironically true, so he was quickly unbanned.

I hate to speak for him but I will relay that he's decided to take a leave of absence from CP.

If that's what his post meant, then I do apologize. My reading comprehension=0.

I can't sleep these days so I'll test that.

Seriously, I'll make 50 accounts tonight. Vote. Banned.

Really?

I guess I missed all the drama except for the banning itself.

You shouldn't even have formed an opinion since you're ****ing clueless about this subject.

And seriously, no one gives a ****ing **** about the ****ing Rams.