ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Jaworski rates Chiefs QB at No. 20 among NFL starters (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=274325)

BigMeatballDave 07-07-2013 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9797310)
At the time, people were saying Cassel was better.

Yeah, stupid people.

aturnis 07-07-2013 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9797284)
What's the excuse for only winning 27 games the previous 5 seasons?

That's the problem - there's always an excuse, and it's never the players.

Do talented teams have a down year every 5-10 years? Sure.

Talented teams don't have 6 years stretches where they only win 29 games.

But it's easier to find another reason instead of considering that the team isn't nearly as talented as you like to think they are. I mean, FFS, people STILL act as if guys like Moeaki and McCluster are these can't-miss talents when they've done nothing in the league to give that impression.

And to say this roster is more talented than the roster of a team that just went 13-3?

C'mon, man.

Really? Which QB that was supposed to make the Chiefs competitive over those 6 years?

Which coach was worth a shit?

How is a team supposed to succeed when they don't attack on offense OR defense?

Schemes, and systems designed to play it safe don't typically work unless they are being carried by another part of the football team. When was the last time a timid, play it safe offensive and defensive team did anything of note?

Pasta Little Brioni 07-07-2013 05:52 PM

I'll say it nice and slow again, so Knowmo can send me another rep.....

Andy Reid is the best coach in the division. KC has the most individual talent outside of QB. We'll see how that translates onto the field.

aturnis 07-07-2013 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9797310)
At the time, people were saying Cassel was better.

No they weren't.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-07-2013 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 9797319)
No they weren't.

That's bullshit.

BigMeatballDave 07-07-2013 06:02 PM

Pawnmower really pimped Cassel.

He went down with that ship.

Odd that he doesn't like Smith.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-07-2013 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrueFanDave (Post 9797334)
Pawnmower really pimped Cassel.

He went down with that ship.

Odd that he doesn't like Smith.

That is strange. Pawn is an enigma though....

MagicHef 07-07-2013 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9797300)
Interesting, considering teams like the Jets, Oakland, Cleveland, Buffalo, etc have all won more games in the last 6 years than we have, with inferior QB's.*

*According to CP, 2009-2012

It's entirely the fault of whoever isn't on the team anymore.

OnTheWarpath15 07-07-2013 06:08 PM

This place has "pimped" every QB we've carried at some point or another.

Palko, Huard, Thigpen, Cassel, Orton.

Hell, people try to make out Stanzi, Daniel and Bray as great options and they have a combined 9 NFL snaps between them.

Bottom line?

Chiefs QB's are awesome, and unless your name is Manning, Brady, Rodgers or Brees, you ****ing suck.

SAUTO 07-07-2013 06:12 PM

I was wrong. **** otwp are you ever going to let me live it down?
Posted via Mobile Device

SAUTO 07-07-2013 06:13 PM

But I never liked huard or Palko
Posted via Mobile Device

Pasta Little Brioni 07-07-2013 06:13 PM

I always found it funny when Hootie went balls deep on Downfield Big Game Huard

Hammock Parties 07-07-2013 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9797342)
This place has "pimped" every QB we've carried at some point or another.

Palko, Huard, Thigpen, Cassel, Orton.

Ironically, Orton got the most hate, and was the best of that group, simply because the GM didn't want him, and people really wanted to defend that GM!

In the end there are people who are going to defend what the Chiefs do, regardless of what it is.

OnTheWarpath15 07-07-2013 06:14 PM

And this place has pimped every coach as well.

Haley was going to be more aggressive than Herm's RRPP.

Jim Zorn was going to be great for Cassel's development.

Romeo was going to be the mastermind of a Top 5 defense.


Then when none of those things came anywhere close to happening, they all took the blame - it has to be their fault with all this "talent", right?

OnTheWarpath15 07-07-2013 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9797352)
I was wrong. **** otwp are you ever going to let me live it down?
Posted via Mobile Device

LMAO

houstonwhodat 07-07-2013 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9797300)
Interesting, considering teams like the Jets, Oakland, Cleveland, Buffalo, etc have all won more games in the last 6 years than we have, with inferior QB's.*

*According to CP, 2009-2012



QB/HC combination.

Brees couldn't do it last year without Sean Payton.

And SP couldn't do it without Brees.

It's like a good director and leading actor.

They feed off each other.

aturnis 07-07-2013 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9797326)
That's bullshit.

Media sure. They just spout off based on numbers and you know it. The only time most ever had anything good to say about Cassel was post 2010, and most said they were cautiously optimistic.

Sandy Vagina 07-07-2013 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9797356)
In the end there are people who are going to defend what the Chiefs do, regardless of what it is.

Just as there will always be pussies (like yourself) that incessantly spew a quitter's attitude... no matter what the Chiefs do. :moon:

OnTheWarpath15 07-07-2013 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by houstonwhodat (Post 9797362)
QB/HC combination.

Brees couldn't do it last year without Sean Payton.

And SP couldn't do it without Brees.

It's like a good director and leading actor.

They feed off each other.

http://oi41.tinypic.com/2gwgp4j.jpg

Drew Brees threw for over 5,000 yards and 43 TD's last year.

I'd say he did just fine.

houstonwhodat 07-07-2013 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9797371)
http://oi41.tinypic.com/2gwgp4j.jpg

Drew Brees threw for over 5,000 yards and 43 TD's last year.

I'd say he did just fine.


They didn't win.

They were a rudderless ship in the ocean with no direction.

aturnis 07-07-2013 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by houstonwhodat (Post 9797378)
They didn't win.

They were a rudderless ship in the ocean with no direction.

How poetic of you.

BigMeatballDave 07-07-2013 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9797355)
I always found it funny when Hootie went balls deep on Downfield Big Game Huard

That was funny.

Clay was the biggest homer here not long ago.

Now he's just a big hypocrite.

Chief Roundup 07-07-2013 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9796588)
Basically reasonable = agreeing with me.

So you admit that you are not reasonable then.
Reasonable is not an extreme. Reasonable is not that there is only one way.
It wouldn't have mattered what this front office did short of drafting a QB that was not worthy of our 1st overall that would have made you or many others happy.

Hammock Parties 07-07-2013 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrueFanDave (Post 9797395)
That was funny.

Clay was the biggest homer here not long ago.

Now he's just a big hypocrite.

That was 4-5 years ago.

I'm not a hypocrite because I recognize that I was indeed a homer once, and wrong for it.

BigMeatballDave 07-07-2013 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9797422)
That was 4-5 years ago.

I'm not a hypocrite because I recognize that I was indeed a homer once, and wrong for it.

I made a thread last year admitting my faux pas, yet you still label me a homer.

Hammock Parties 07-07-2013 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrueFanDave (Post 9797431)
I made a thread last year admitting my faux pas, yet you still label me a homer.

Do you agree with Marcellus?

Rams Fan 07-07-2013 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by houstonwhodat (Post 9797362)
QB/HC combination.

Brees couldn't do it last year without Sean Payton.

And SP couldn't do it without Brees.

It's like a good director and leading actor.

They feed off each other.

Or, you know, the Saints had a historically bad defense last year. Yeah, that has nothing to do with it, does it?

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-07-2013 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrueFanDave (Post 9797291)
Quarterback. Plain and simple. That's the difference.

No shit, Sherlock. Wish we had one.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9797422)
That was 4-5 years ago.

I'm not a hypocrite because I recognize that I was indeed a homer once, and wrong for it.

It's okay to grow and learn. And it's definitely okay to be mistrustful of EVERY ****ing thing this organization does, until the day it wins a Super Bowl.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-07-2013 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9797435)
Do you agree with Marcellus?

Anytime one agrees with Lil' Marcellus, you KNOW the homer-vision glasses are in full swing.

houstonwhodat 07-07-2013 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 9797436)
Or, you know, the Saints had a historically bad defense last year. Yeah, that has nothing to do with it, does it?

Worst defense in history.

I mean how bad do you have to be if you lose to the Chiefs in your own stadium.

That's why Spags got canned as soon as HEAD COACH SP came back.

You need both a good QB and a good coach.

You think the Ravens won because of Dilfer?

Then again Brees won 7 games last year without a HC.

We're winning it all this year.

Bank it.

BigMeatballDave 07-07-2013 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9797446)
No shit, Sherlock. Wish we had one.


It's okay to grow and learn. And it's definitely okay to be mistrustful of EVERY ****ing thing this organization does, until the day it wins a Super Bowl.

You are lost and clueless.

Per usual.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-07-2013 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrueFanDave (Post 9797470)
You are lost and clueless.

Per usual.

Coming from an acknowledged TF, I'll take that as the Compliment Of The Day.

BigMeatballDave 07-07-2013 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9797484)
Coming from an acknowledged TF, I'll take that as the Compliment Of The Day.

More idiocy from the resident reerun.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-07-2013 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrueFanDave (Post 9797501)
More idiocy from the resident reerun.

How do my nuts taste and feel, Dave? You certainly like swinging about from them.

Chief Roundup 07-07-2013 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9797446)
No shit, Sherlock. Wish we had one.


It's okay to grow and learn. And it's definitely okay to be mistrustful of EVERY ****ing thing this organization does, until the day it wins a Super Bowl.

If it is so bad. If this organization is not worthy of your fan trust and they are a ****ing POS then why in the **** don't you stop following them? Why don't you just leave this board and stop being a douche because no one worth a shit wants to keep hearing your stupid ass bantering on about your ****ing hatred.
DON'T GO AWAY MAD!!!!!! JUST GO AWAY!!!!!!!!

Sandy Vagina 07-07-2013 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 9797542)
If it is so bad. If this organization is not worthy of your fan trust and they are a ****ing POS then why in the **** don't you stop following them? Why don't you just leave this board and stop being a douche because no one worth a shit wants to keep hearing your stupid ass bantering on about your ****ing hatred.
DON'T GO AWAY MAD!!!!!! JUST GO AWAY!!!!!!!!


:clap:

( and it is because he is a loser that is desperate to spread his misery to everyone else... a quitter...a pussy... )

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-07-2013 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 9797542)
If it is so bad. If this organization is not worthy of your fan trust and they are a ****ing POS then why in the **** don't you stop following them? Why don't you just leave this board and stop being a douche because no one worth a shit wants to keep hearing your stupid ass bantering on about your ****ing hatred.
DON'T GO AWAY MAD!!!!!! JUST GO AWAY!!!!!!!!

You don't get to make that call, **** face.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs (Post 9797559)
:clap:

( and it is because he is a loser that is desperate to spread his misery to everyone else... a quitter...a pussy... )

Go back to your own team's board. No one loves you and suck so very hard.

King_Chief_Fan 07-07-2013 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 9797542)
If it is so bad. If this organization is not worthy of your fan trust and they are a ****ing POS then why in the **** don't you stop following them? Why don't you just leave this board and stop being a douche because no one worth a shit wants to keep hearing your stupid ass bantering on about your ****ing hatred.
DON'T GO AWAY MAD!!!!!! JUST GO AWAY!!!!!!!!

:LOL:ROFL:LOL: SDH just got his face punched in!!!

Chief Roundup 07-07-2013 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9797565)
You don't get to make that call, **** face.

No I don't I was asking you the question. Then giving my opinion. So answer the question.

aturnis 07-07-2013 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan (Post 9797566)
:LOL:ROFL:LOL: SDH just got his face punched in!!!

:spock: Go away.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-07-2013 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 9797581)
No I don't I was asking you the question. Then giving my opinion. So answer the question.

I believe I have made my position quite clear. And frankly, I don't give two flying shits if you get tired of hearing my bitching. This is sports. It's a sports team message board. People bitch.

And, just you wait until the season actually starts. You might find yourself doing some bitching as well. This club has a good beginner's story, if not one of the best. But the post-Stram years do not tell a glorious tale overall. If you can't see this, then I really don't know what the **** to tell you.
It is my hope that this franchise will someday pull it's head from it's ass and exceed both the Marty and Dickie-doo years, and actually be worthy of some thing more in this league than being "respectable" and "snake-bitten"(which is an absolute ****ing myth perpetrated by ignorant assholes who refuse to acknowledge that this club has all but led the division if not the league in bad decision-making for DECADES).

So forgive me if don't just hop right on the latest Mr. Rodgers Trolley to the merry ****ing Land of Make-Believe.

Chief Roundup 07-07-2013 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9797623)
I believe I have made my position quite clear. And frankly, I don't give two flying shits if you get tired of hearing my bitching. This is sports. It's a sports team message board. People bitch.

And, just you wait until the season actually starts. You might find yourself doing some bitching as well. This club has a good beginner's story, if not one of the best. But the post-Stram years do not tell a glorious tale overall. If you can't see this, then I really don't know what the **** to tell you.
It is my hope that this franchise will someday pull it's head from it's ass and exceed both the Marty and Dickie-doo years, and actually be worthy of some thing more in this league than being "respectable" and "snake-bitten"(which is an absolute ****ing myth perpetrated by ignorant assholes who refuse to acknowledge that this club has all but led the division if not the league in bad decision-making for DECADES).

So forgive me if don't just hop right on the latest Mr. Rodgers Trolley to the merry ****ing Land of Make-Believe.

Bitching about something for a little while is one thing. But it has been 3 months of constant nothing but bitching and bashing from you. You damn right I will bitch here and there but that is all.
It will do no good. I am not in control of this team in anyway. I can either accept that and know that the Chiefs are just entertainment. Entertainment is suppose to be fun. Bitching and acting the way you have been cannot be fun. If it isn't fun then how can it be entertaining.

Chiefs Pantalones 07-07-2013 09:08 PM

I don't think there's anyone here that doesn't want Smith to succeed. We've seen before though so it's hard to go all in.

Marcellus 07-07-2013 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9797342)
This place has "pimped" every QB we've carried at some point or another.

Palko, Huard, Thigpen, Cassel, Orton.

Hell, people try to make out Stanzi, Daniel and Bray as great options and they have a combined 9 NFL snaps between them.

Bottom line?

Chiefs QB's are awesome, and unless your name is Manning, Brady, Rodgers or Brees, you ****ing suck.

So there is no way any Chief QB can succeed especially if we didn't draft him. As soon as we draft a guy in the 1st round its only a matter of time before the SB trophies and the Hall of Fame become reality.

Marcellus 07-07-2013 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 9797728)
I don't think there's anyone here that doesn't want Smith to succeed. We've seen before though so it's hard to go all in.

Yea thats complete bullshit. There are a ton of people more concerned in how the Chiefs win than the team winning.

Marcellus 07-07-2013 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 9797542)
If it is so bad. If this organization is not worthy of your fan trust and they are a ****ing POS then why in the **** don't you stop following them? Why don't you just leave this board and stop being a douche because no one worth a shit wants to keep hearing your stupid ass bantering on about your ****ing hatred.
DON'T GO AWAY MAD!!!!!! JUST GO AWAY!!!!!!!!

He just enjoys the attention and thinks its cool. I m pretty sure he is 12.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-07-2013 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 9797725)
Bitching about something for a little while is one thing. But it has been 3 months of constant nothing but bitching and bashing from you. You damn right I will bitch here and there but that is all.
It will do no good. I am not in control of this team in anyway. I can either accept that and know that the Chiefs are just entertainment. Entertainment is suppose to be fun. Bitching and acting the way you have been cannot be fun. If it isn't fun then how can it be entertaining.

It's fun for me. And that......is good enough.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9797730)
So there is no way any Chief QB can succeed especially if we didn't draft him. As soon as we draft a guy in the 1st round its only a matter of time before the SB trophies and the Hall of Fame become reality.

It's a start. And the facts and stats don't lie, homeboy.

MagicHef 07-07-2013 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 9797728)
I don't think there's anyone here that doesn't want Smith to succeed. We've seen before though so it's hard to go all in.

Me. I don't want Smith to succeed.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-07-2013 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 9797842)
Me. I don't want Smith to succeed.

ROFL The chances are not very good in any event.

Chief Roundup 07-07-2013 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9797752)
It's fun for me. And that......is good enough.

Seek professional help. That is not mentally healthy.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-07-2013 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 9797886)
Seek professional help. That is not mentally healthy.

Actually, it's very healthy. By bringing my inner jackass to a pointless message board, I'm able to leave him at home when I venture out in to the real world.

Chief Roundup 07-07-2013 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9797890)
Actually, it's very healthy. By bringing my inner jackass to a pointless message board, I'm able to leave him at home when I venture out in to the real world.

Ok we have a person that is admitting to being a psychotic personality.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-07-2013 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 9797893)
Ok we have a person that is admitting to being a psychotic personality.

:spock: Thanks, Lucy. Shall I PayPal you the .5 cents now or later?

Rasputin 07-08-2013 08:09 AM

Jaws rated Phyllis Rivers @17. Didn't say much good about him, a pocket passer that depends on good solid line blocking to be productive. Struggles when trying to do too much. Didn't have a good out look for him with the Chargers for 2013 season.

HemiEd 07-08-2013 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter (Post 9794626)
I'll say it first:

If Smith stays healthy, he'll break into the top ten, or close, in Reid's offense.

:LOL:ROFL

HemiEd 07-08-2013 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 9794968)
neither is randomly grabbing a semi-available QB because nothing else is available

it's like taking home a 3 because the bar is closing and you admit you are too desperate to wait until tomorrow to have a chance at an 8

This team has been "Going Ugly Early" for over 30 years now, it is what they do.

duncan_idaho 07-08-2013 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 9797728)
I don't think there's anyone here that doesn't want Smith to succeed. We've seen before though so it's hard to go all in.

My order of preference:

1) Smith proves everyone wrong and is BETTER in Andy Reid's offense than he was in Jim Harbaugh's. His efficiency holds up when asked to do more, and his atrocious performance on 3rd down becomes a distant memory. He becomes a near-elite/top 15/borderline top 10 QB.

2) Smith is WORSE than he was in Harbaugh's offense, preventing the Chiefs from tying themselves to him long-term.

3) Smith is about the same as he was in Harbaugh's offense, though his efficiency numbers drop when asked to throw more often and be more aggressive with the football. He remains somewhere between the 15th and 22nd best QB in the NFL, good enough to make the playoffs with a strong defense and running game but probably not good enough to win at a significant level when matched up against teams with elite QBs.

If I was to rank them in order of what I think is likely, I put about a 75 percent chance on 3, 20 percent on 2 and 5 percent on 1.

I have a feeling we see an extension if 3 is what ends up happening. And I don't think that's really a good thing (unless they draft the heir apparent in the background and have him ready to take over by 15 or 16).

ChiefAshhole20 07-08-2013 10:30 AM

Even if Smith gets an extension, I doubt it will be anywhere near a legitimate "starter" contract, and instead will be around 7 a year for maybe 2 or 3 years at most. Reid isn't the kind of coach to be ok with mediocre QB play, and will only keep Smith around until a better option arises.

Mr. Laz 07-08-2013 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefAshhole20 (Post 9798348)
Even if Smith gets an extension, I doubt it will be anywhere near a legitimate "starter" contract, and instead will be around 7 a year for maybe 2 or 3 years at most. Reid isn't the kind of coach to be ok with mediocre QB play, and will only keep Smith around until a better option arises.

no way Smith gets a contract that small.

It's another way the Smith trade could cost us big.

Smith plays average this year but it's contributed to being on a new team,new scheme and new players etc.

Next year Smith plays average until the final few games. He has a really good 2 or 3 games to finish the season and everyone talks about how they team has now settled in etc and this is the "real" thing.

Alex Smith's contract is now up ... do you really think they can/will not give him a new contract based on those last 2/3 games instead of the rest of the average ones?

boom ... 6 years/60 million

We as much as we traded for Smith the only way(s) we get a franchise QB is if:

1. Smith is a franchise QB
2. we get lucky with a low round guy (ie Bray etc)

either is a long shot imo

L.A. Chieffan 07-08-2013 11:38 AM

Smith should really be in the top ten or so. Jaws has something against the chiefs for some reason.

Garcia Bronco 07-08-2013 11:41 AM

I wonder who number 1 will be

Pasta Little Brioni 07-08-2013 11:42 AM

IR: P. Manning

rico 07-08-2013 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9798502)
IR: P. Manning

LMAO

houstonwhodat 07-08-2013 11:55 AM

Jesus,

I shudder the thought of Drew Brees retiring.

el borracho 07-08-2013 11:57 AM

Las Vegas has the over/under on KC at 6.5 this year. Hooray for spending valuable draft picks to acquire the 20th-rated passer, to accomplish nothing in the short term, and not build for the future. Congratulations, KC!

Pasta Little Brioni 07-08-2013 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rico (Post 9798533)
LMAO

I'm only going to get worse as our little buddy is back.

Marcellus 07-08-2013 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho (Post 9798543)
Las Vegas has the over/under on KC at 6.5 this year. Hooray for spending valuable draft picks to acquire the 20th-rated passer, to accomplish nothing in the short term, and not build for the future. Congratulations, KC!

You would be wise to dump some money on the over.

HemiEd 07-08-2013 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho (Post 9798543)
Las Vegas has the over/under on KC at 6.5 this year. Hooray for spending valuable draft picks to acquire the 20th-rated passer, to accomplish nothing in the short term, and not build for the future. Congratulations, KC!

Mediocrity has it's price.

Garcia Bronco 07-08-2013 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 9798680)
Mediocrity has it's price.

I think the Chiefs have 7 solid wins with that scheduled. None against the Broncos, but 7 solid wins.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-08-2013 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 9798788)
I think the Chiefs have 7 solid wins with that scheduled. None against the Broncos, but 7 solid wins.

We'll take you at home at least once. But yes, 7 is the top-out.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-08-2013 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9798798)
We'll take you at home at least once. But yes, 7 is the top-out.

10-11 wins is a possibility

Sandy Vagina 07-08-2013 06:54 PM

9-7 in 2013

11-5 in 2014


http://i712.photobucket.com/albums/w.../dancing_9.gif

SAUTO 07-08-2013 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 9798327)
My order of preference:

1) Smith proves everyone wrong and is BETTER in Andy Reid's offense than he was in Jim Harbaugh's. His efficiency holds up when asked to do more, and his atrocious performance on 3rd down becomes a distant memory. He becomes a near-elite/top 15/borderline top 10 QB.

2) Smith is WORSE than he was in Harbaugh's offense, preventing the Chiefs from tying themselves to him long-term.

3) Smith is about the same as he was in Harbaugh's offense, though his efficiency numbers drop when asked to throw more often and be more aggressive with the football. He remains somewhere between the 15th and 22nd best QB in the NFL, good enough to make the playoffs with a strong defense and running game but probably not good enough to win at a significant level when matched up against teams with elite QBs.

If I was to rank them in order of what I think is likely, I put about a 75 percent chance on 3, 20 percent on 2 and 5 percent on 1.

I have a feeling we see an extension if 3 is what ends up happening. And I don't think that's really a good thing (unless they draft the heir apparent in the background and have him ready to take over by 15 or 16).

I agree
Posted via Mobile Device

Setsuna 07-08-2013 08:51 PM

Romo is #15 apparently. Only because of his inconsistency though. I'd take Romo for 2 seconds before I took Alex Smith.

Chiefs Pantalones 07-08-2013 09:03 PM

I'm optimistic about this year. Every year I am though. If we surpass two wins I'm celebrating. Baby steps.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-08-2013 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9799402)
10-11 wins is a possibility

Me telling my boss to **** off tomorrow is a possibility.

Mac-Niners becoming halfway intelligent and/or interesting is also a possibility.

The Universe is filled with possibilities!

Pablo 07-08-2013 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9799402)
10-11 wins is a possibility

LMAO

Yeah. Sure thing.

MagicHef 07-08-2013 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9798798)
We'll take you at home at least once. But yes, 7 is the top-out.

At least once? You only play us at home once.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-08-2013 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 9800225)
At least once? You only play us at home once.

I meant Arrowhead.

Mav 07-08-2013 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clayton Bibsby (Post 9799897)
Romo is #15 apparently. Only because of his inconsistency though. I'd take Romo for 2 seconds before I took Alex Smith.

Ive never understood this. Tony Romo has choked in EVERY SINGLE big time game he has been in. Yet people fawn over him. I would NOT take him over Alex Smith, in any game that matters. Never.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.