He put up 30 points on the road against a very good defense.

Alex ain't doing that anytime soon.

The girl singing it is catchy. :)

Well accept for that Super Bowl they won before Flacco got to town.

WTF are you talking about?

Flacco caught on absolute fire when it counted the most.


I see nothing wrong with paying him to have a chance at doing it again. The downside: If he doesn't produce you are where you would have been anyway.

Luck had a great game. :rolleyes:

The 2001 to 2008 years for the Ravens. Stacked team in Ray Lewis, Ed Reed and Suggs's prime. Never won jack shit in that period.

Do you have any clue what Flacco's playoff numbers looked like before last season?

But when the Chiefs...

**** it. Not worth the time of day.

They were a pile of shit.

when are defensive coordinators going to learn prevent defense does not work

They'll probably still revel in the SB they won.

Really, if a guy wins you a SB, he's pretty much untouchable.

If Alex Smith leads us to a SB, he's never leaving this team. It just won't happen.

If he does what Flacco did, I will accept him with open arms the next 3 years.

If we win with nasty defense and he keeps playing like he has, I won't be so welcoming.

5 playoff wins, 4 on the road.

It wouldn't matter either way.

A QB that wins a SB, regardless of him riding the coattails of a great defense will always get the benefit of the doubt.

I hate ****ing Alex Smith, but if he wins the Super Bowl for the Chiefs the SOB can get paid whatever he wants. I really wouldn't care.

Because in a year where they went 13-3 then lost to Peyton Manning in his prime they were clearly a worse team than the year they went 10-6 and watched Rahim Moore blow coverage.

The 2006 Ravens would've crushed the 2012 version.

But again, I'm fine with how history's going to go on this one. The Ravens are going to be irrelevant until they can get the hell out from under that Flacco deal.

You go ahead and take your side - that the Ravens will be a better team going forward for having Joe Flacco and that absurd contract on their team - and I'll stick with mine.

LMAO we put up 26 against the same team won by 11 and the passing stats were almost identical. You are such a ****ing idiot.

You are right.


Most fans are reeruned.

So as long as you QB the win it counts? Sweet. 29-6-1.

1-1 in the playoffs with a road win.

If Alex Smith won a SB and then signed the deal Joe Flacco just signed, every person in this thread swing from Flacco's nuts would be in open !@#$ing revolt.

Hell, I would be as well.

Oh yea, it would be hilarious.

It's worth "gambling" the next 3 years to give your average QB a chance to do it again.


If he sucks, so what, at least you gave yourself the best chance. It's not like there are a lot of QB's just laying around that have shown they can win a SB.

Yeah, this is a pretty pathetic trolling effort, even for Clay.

He'd get that offer anyhow.

If you win the big one, you're going to get paid.

Regardless of skill-set.

No, we wouldn't. If Alex Smith DOMINATES on the road to a SB championship (With soul-crushing wins AT Denver and AT New England) you will see even the biggest haters accept it.

This is true.

I'll give Alex credit for the playoff win. He played pretty good in that one.

Trent Dilfer got shit canned for Elvis Grbac. By the Ravens.

Think about that.

Wrong.

The offense only put up 19.

They didn't gamble the next 3, they gambled the next 4 and in year 4 they'll likely have to restructure it to spread that out even longer or take a dead cap number in year 5 that could keep them from extending whatever young talent they may bring in between now and then.

They absolutely cannot even consider cutting him until 2016 and in that year he'd carry either a $28 million cap hit or he'd put $26 million in dead money on the cap. You can virtually guarantee they re-structure that deal and in so doing, just lengthen the pain. Alternatively they play through it, cut him in 2017 rather than deal with the $31.5 million cap hit and then eat $15 million in dead money instead.

That's not just a 3 year gamble; it's a reckless signing that could have consequence that ring for half a decade or more.

They're significantly worse off for it and it was apparent from the moment the deal was signed.

I think that Alex is capable of catching fire in the playoffs and taking us to the promise land.

I agree with the catching fire part.

Most likely in a dumpster.

And yet when the Colts 'drive' 20 yards after Devin Wylie runs into his own guys ass on a kick return and fumbles, that's clearly wholly attributable to the offense.

You're a clown.

Wiley gave the Colts the ball inside the 20. Keep going boy keep going.

You didn't even watch this game did you? Admit it.

Oh, I agree with you that they overpaid him. They should have franchised his ass.

They bought a marginal investment at it's absolute peak. Pretty stupid, but it is what it is.

7 were from a st turnover, so that doesn't count, that's only 23.

LMAO

And he is entirely capable of that, too.

Clays been shit on in like 4 threads today, mig as well put a cherry on top of another drivel filled day

We're ****ing undefeated through 9 weeks and the vast majority of these idiots do nothing but bitch every week.

No, they won't just accept anything. If we did the exact same thing the Ravens just did, all we'd hear about is how much money Rahim Moore made Alice.

I like Luck as player but I cant help but think of the Geico Caveman commercials when I watch him and hear him talk.

"QB of the Colts- So easy a caveman could do it". Then a cutaway to 5 head.

I think there would be one guy that we all know and love/loath yell the loudest.

Seriously, how high would a KC QB's stock be if he beat Denver and New England in the playoffs? :eek:

He's the goofiest looking and sounding ungodly athletic guy you'll ever see.

Everything about his countenance is so bizarre that you kinda lose sight of the fact that he's just an insane athlete. He's huge. He's smart.

I ****ing hate that the Colts got him after Manning. It's just not fair.

And even so, their offense scored all 30 points.

When our offense actually does that, I'll credit them for it.

They haven't.

this
Posted via Mobile Device

I think you take Clay too much to heart.

We all want a winning football team and are elated as hell to see that on the field. You'd have a few naysayers here and there, but the vast majority wouldn't complain about a Flacco type performance in the playoffs.

You're acting like the Chiefs drove the length of the field for every score.

They didn't.

Great point Clay, when the defense has an INT or fumble and are about to score we will make them stop at the 5 yard line so the offense can get the points.

LMAO

And you're acting like you know anything about football.


You don't.

And milkman and aturnis and several others.

There are some truly miserable mother****ers roaming these halls...

This is true.

I just found myself mocking his tone after he talked.

And then I realized he's a ****ing second year football God and I'm a tard.

Don't worry, he'll come back with a PFF stat tomorrow to prove to you that he does.

You act like the Colts did, they didn't.

You act like you know something about the NFL and then you continually prove you don't.

I hope you have been getting some OT so you can pay up on our bet.

That's fine. I have no doubt about it.

And by the way, I'm still a bit upset about being called a baseball ass in the STL thread. So I'll consider this an apology.

I am not saying that at all.

But they did actually score 30 points. With their offense.

The Chiefs did not. Not even close.

Had they done so, I would have given them credit for it.

End of discussion.

Colts offense > our poverty bullshit

Give the guy a chiseled jaw and a Fouts voice/snarl and we'd never ever forget that he's essentially a prototype.

But because he looks/sounds funny and is conventionally articulate (instead of merely football articulate), we say stupid things like "well he's just such a cerebral QB..."

No, we are dumb. He's not a 'cerebral' QB. He is, as you say, a football God. He's a broad-shouldered, cannon-armed, lightening quick genius of a gunslinger that will win a SB any season his team is 80% as good as the next best team available.

!@#$.

!@#$ you football Gods, for not making us suck a single year earlier. Goddammit, why do you hate us so!?!?!?

LMAO really? End of discussion? A 12 yard drive is the same as a 80 yard drive and less like a defensive score?

You are spinning yourself into the ground dude.

I feel like the best way to merge a thread is to stop a conversation mid-stream and then insult the person I was speaking with.

It tends to keep things moving. It's like taking your first deuce in a new home...

Looks like:

http://greece.greekreporter.com/file...caveman-lg.jpg

Sounds like:

http://www.wowhall.org/sites/default...ian_posehn.jpg

How many games have the Colts had in which they score less than 10?

Yeah, that makes sense.

Plays like this:

http://l1.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/b3...jpg_221153.jpg

****ing asshole Colts

Sucked a Year earlier, or lucks dad holding him out of kindergarten for a year? Yeah, **** me.

Luck as our qb right now, we'd potentially be looking at a pats type dynasty

I am using the same standard for the Chiefs as I am for the Colts.

Very nice job by the Colts to put up 30 points with their offense. A short field for sure, but they took advantage of it with the TD.

For the Chiefs, thank god they eked out 19 points with theirs. You will notice they too had a pair of short fields, but did not get a TD off either of them.

Colts offense clearly superior.

Thank you, come again.

**** Indy.

Can't believe we're using the Titans game as a barometer. That was the game where we blew a lead... game looked over in the 4th quarter... and Alex led a 10 play drive for a TD to re-take the lead. And that was in miserable weather conditions. That was a solid win.

If you want to look at it another way, the Chiefs had three scoring drives of at least 50 yards.

The Colts had four.

The fact the Colts were also able to take advantage of a short field and turn it into a TD (the Chiefs were not) clearly also adds to their edge.

This is not rocket science but I have to ****ing explain everything to you.

Both teams averaged 5.3 yards a play offensively. And the Chiefs did it in much more difficult weather conditions. This is nitpicking.

In another universe where Oliver Luck didn't have the career that he did, his son Andrew would not have been surrounded by football so much growing up. Instead, you take his inner dork and put him on a more suitable path.

He likely would have become the world's greatest LARPer to ever exist. With that athletic ability? ****, man. Dude would have made an unbelievable paladin.

Almost as good as Jeremy Maclin, amiright?

I just wish the Chiefs could put up 30 points at some point.

Big win by the Colts.

Maclin can go **** himself immediately after the Colts get retracted by Goodell for being complete ****ing dumbasses and getting rewarded for it

Colts gave up a first round pick for a guy getting beat out by a RB that was buried on the depth chart by Ballard and Bradshaw to start the season

that is sad

Are you depressed? Your posting habits have really gone downhill. You're obsessed. You're nitpicking at small details and making a mountain out of them. There are very small differences in the offensive performances you're comparing and you're sitting here hammering on post after post like there's some great travesty going on. I'd never take Smith over Andrew Luck but I wouldn't complain about that game.

That was a solid game for the Chiefs. The weather conditions were not favorable for offense. I was at the game. Receivers for both sides had a real difficult time getting clean separation and maintaining their footing on the field. I think they changed up cleats so the 2nd half offensive performance was better. At least that's my assumption... both offenses had a real hard time finding a rhythm in the first half. Still, Alex led a TD drive to give the Chiefs the lead in that game, and had multiple 20+ yard completions, which is your big thing. That was a game where he made plays when they absolutely had to be made and contributed to the team's victory.

You seem very starved for attention. Even more than normal.

No it's not, because

11 points seems huge.

He's gonna be a good wr for us next year though.

For at least two games until he gets injured.

****Thursday Night Football Colts vs Titans****
 

? Don't want to answer this one because it doesn't fit the narrative?

His daddy raised him right.

http://coltsauthority.com/images/sto...YHiltonTDb.gif