ChiefsPlanet
Page 43 of 120 « First 3339404142 43 444546475393 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Clark Hunt Statement (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=268256)

notorious 12-31-2012 12:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9259141)
Kent Babb ‏@kentbabb

@ArrowheadPride The question I have is whether Clark specifically targets a coach w/a Pioli tie so he doesn't have to fire his precious.
Yes.

Clark is going to get hammered if he sticks with his precious.

The media needs to keep the hammer down.

Raiderhater 12-31-2012 12:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 9259152)
I'm of the opinion that the Chiefs should go all in with Kelly; draft Geno - or whoever they deem as #1 - and run with it.

they need to innovate. **** it - nothing else has worked, might as well try something different.
This is my dream scenario.

Imon Yourside 12-31-2012 12:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 9259152)
I'm of the opinion that the Chiefs should go all in with Kelly; draft Geno - or whoever they deem as #1 - and run with it.

they need to innovate. **** it - nothing else has worked, might as well try something different.
Yes Yes Yes(orgasmicly)

Dayze 12-31-2012 12:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9259126)
Who cares.

He was obviously on board with the Kolb/Skelton/Lindley/Hoyer trainwreck.
yeah, that's where I was gonig with it. I just wasn't sure if I should include Leinart in the turd pile.

the Talking Can 12-31-2012 12:48 PM
mitch coming up on 810...wheeeeeeeeeee

FloridaMan88 12-31-2012 12:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raiderhader (Post 9259154)
I'm pretty sure even in today's win now NFL that a rebuilding process is expected to take at least a couple of years. My God, you guys need to take a chill pill. Clark fired King Carl when Lamar never did. Let's give him a chance here and now before we indict him. His record is short and not as bad as some of you are trying to paint it.
The Chiefs record under Clark is 29-68 in the 6 full seasons since Lamar's death.

29-68.

Enough said.

DJ's left nut 12-31-2012 12:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9258788)
So people want Clark to say something, anything, and when he does, it's not good enough.

This is seriously crazy.
No they don't.

They want Clark to fire that ****ing waste of human flesh. They want to see Pioli's head on a spike and there is not one single reason why they shouldn't.

"Something, anything" my ass - they want him to say one single thing "Scott Pioli has been relieved of all duties within the Kansas City Chiefs organization....blah blah blah, platitudes, blah"

That's it. And Hunt didn't say it because he's a coward.

O.city 12-31-2012 12:49 PM
It's all a big show to percieve to the fans that "we are making big changes", when in reality we will get another Patriot Tree staff, this time hire by "Hunt", a new QB and essentially told that the Patriot Way is the way my brotha and to go **** ourselves.

Messier 12-31-2012 12:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9259128)
Like TCC said, Clark loves Scott. This is his way of placating the fan base.



"I'll make the hire and the HC will determine the Gm's fate, but I'm gonna hire a cronie or someone I know will be ok with Scott".
I don't get that feeling at all. If Hunt came back with Ferentz, or McDaniels or someone like that, and Pioli just returned to his normal duties, then how was the fan base placated?

I really think Hunt is going outside the circle to get a real read on what outsiders think of Pioli, and that is a good thing, because I don't think many will be positive about him.

Munson 12-31-2012 12:49 PM
This "statement" just proves that Chunt is a giant pussy. This is exactly what many of us feared. What more evidence does he need to fire Pioli?

In the meantime, several teams have fired their GM's and are actively looking for a replacement. If Chunt waits forever to fire Pioli, all of the top candidates for future GM will have already taken jobs elsewhere. We'll be stuck with a GM that nobody else wanted.

Fire. Pioli. Now.

htismaqe 12-31-2012 12:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh Janus (Post 9259182)
The Chiefs record under Clark is 29-68 in the 6 full seasons since Lamar's death.

29-68.

Enough said.
He's not going anywhere. Why continue to be a fan then?

FloridaMan88 12-31-2012 12:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9259196)
He's not going anywhere. Why continue to be a fan then?
To expose dickless Chiefs homers such as yourself.

Your display on this message board today is quite frankly pathetic.

Raiderhater 12-31-2012 12:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh Janus (Post 9259134)
Apparently it does since dumbshits such as yourself are willing to hold Clark above all criticism for the trainwreck that has been the Chiefs under his reign as CEO.

This post is all kinds of face palm.

Let me say it loud and slow so maybe it sinks in for someone this time.....


IT. WAS. CONSIDERED. TO. BE. AN. ELITE. HIRE. AT. THE. TIME. VERY. VERY. FEW. TOOK. ISSUE. WITH. IT. WHEN. IT. HAPPENED.

stonedstooge 12-31-2012 12:51 PM
I wonder how long an interview will proceed if the coach being interviewed says he doesn't want to work with Fat Scott?

O.city 12-31-2012 12:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Messier (Post 9259192)
I don't get that feeling at all. If Hunt came back with Ferentz, or McDaniels or someone like that, and Pioli just returned to his normal duties, then how was the fan base placated?

I really think Hunt is going outside the circle to get a real read on what outsiders think of Pioli, and that is a good thing, because I don't think many will be positive about him.
Look who we are bringing in to interview. It's already started.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:46 PM.
Page 43 of 120 « First 3339404142 43 444546475393 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.