RealSNR |
09-14-2014 06:36 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pawnmower
(Post 10910482)
Theres not much difference between spanking your kid with a hand and spanking him with some sort of implement..IF you dont do EITHER to the point where it leaves a mark...
I personally think the implement route (belt, paddle..etc..) is more of a psychological trick than something to 'increase the pain'
I was DEATHLY afraid of the belt of my father even though I only ever got it one time.....I NEVER acted up around him.....I was on my best behavior....My mom, never laid a finger on me and barely punished me for anything and I was a little shit and took advantage of it...
I had both ends of the spectrum.....and I can tell you there is no "right" or "wrong" for these things...(obviously excepting things that break laws like leaving marks etc)...
I would just be wary of making broad generalizations, thats all....I am SUPER lucky with my kid...He literally asks to go to bed..I barely ever have to even give him time outs , let alone spank him...Ive only ever had to give him a swat like 4 times..mainly for running out quickly towards the street and dangerous things like that....
But I know parents who have kids who are just a handful, and don't listen at all.....so I dont judge anyone who uses forms of corporal punishment.
|
Why were you deathly afraid of your dad's belt? Probably because it was pretty painful when your father used it on you that one time? And if you're going to use a tool to discipline your kids, but you don't want it to leave a mark, why make the act of disciplining such a harrowing experience? Is the tool really necessary? Of course it's not. I don't buy that it's healthy psychology either. This isn't the "Haw haw I ate all your Halloween candy" kind of psychological mind game we're talking about. It's shit that children remember and harbor for their entire lives.
Spanking at least acknowledges some restraint. We can go back and forth all day about its effectiveness, but we don't need to, and I don't want to have that conversation. Spanking DOES stop short of ritualizing the discipline. It's in REACTION to something the child did wrong, like running out into the street. I refuse to spank my children under any circumstances if/when I have kids, but I know better than to question a parent's judgment if they use spanking and it gets the desired effect.
If you need to use a tool to discipline your child, you're either uninformed, you refuse to actually consider what you're doing to your kid just because the culture and environment you grew up in told you it's right, or you have anger/emotional issues. Or a mixture of all three. And again, I'm not calling anybody's parents who used that stuff bad people. In our parents' time, there wasn't research out there. The culture was different. Some of those parents probably were deranged assholes, but 95% of them probably did it because that's what they knew and because they believed it was only for the best. The times are certainly different now, where you have all kinds of resources available to understand what using that shit on kids will do. If you're a parent today and won't at least CONSIDER not whipping your kids with shit because you believe they'll get spoiled, that's sad. Yes, those kinds of people are WRONG. And they need to change their parenting.
I consider myself fairly open-minded, Pawn. I can see things from a lot of different perspectives, and I like to think I'm fairly empathetic on most issues. This is not one of them. I'm well aware of that. You can call it generalizing all you want, but I'm not budging. They're ****ing children. It's immoral to treat them that way.
|