That chubby Kentucky trash is guilty

Omaha is Kiimo?

haha I'm not but careful with that filter bypass!

When I worked at IGA during high school it was a **** fest. Those milfs always cheated on their husbands. Best job I ever had (for the perks).

:hmmm:

Best grocery store pickup line?

"Don't bother doing self check out, because I'm already checking you out."

How bout "My Cucumber....it's bigger...."

Coworkers, customers or both?

Or you could play it cool with, "So...what's a nice girl like you doing near a bar code like this?"

Ooh, that's good.

I have a husband Dean Wormer at Faber.

Or you could drop trou, point at the social sirloin and say "Paper or Plastic??"

Marian Wormer was choice. Hot stuff in a garter belt!

I also liked her moxie. "You can take your thumb outta my ass any time now, Carmine..."

She's not terrible looking... For 47, or a GILF.

Yep. Casting in that movie was so good and I don't know shit about movie making.

Special-ed teacher arrested for throwing New Year's Eve party and letting kids drink alcohol and smoke pot

https://s3.yimg.com/lo/api/res/1.2/L...5ddf8d78794fc9

A special-education teacher was arrested for throwing a New Year’s Eve party for 40 people, including 14 underage guests who drank alcohol and smoked marijuana.

On Tuesday at 1 a.m., the Mount Washington police were called to the home of Lindsey E. Lewis, 36, a teacher at the Phoenix School of Discovery in Louisville, Ky., after a neighbor claimed that teens had destroyed her property while attending Lewis’s New Year’s Eve party, according to local news site WDRB.

A police representative did not return Yahoo Lifestyle’s request for comment. A police report sent to WDRB said 14 children were at the party. A few of the teens tried to leave when the police entered, and others said they had consumed alcohol and smoked pot. WDRB also reported that the smell of marijuana was obvious in Lewis’s home, cans and bottles of alcohol were present, and Lewis appeared to be under the influence.

According to WDRB, police say Lewis “knowingly hosted a party in which she knew or assisted” with the children getting impaired. She was charged with 14 counts of engaging in an unlawful transaction with a minor.

No sex. Not hot. GTFO.

Is this a serious question?

I'm not so sure of that...they never said what the 'transaction's were with 14 minors. Maybe it was a gang bang? :D

My thoughts exactly! ROFL

'Gimme that 14 year old D...I'll give you the HPV.'

Ok.......

2018 Sex Scandal Teacher Starting Lineup

https://www.barstoolsports.com/bosto...Gl2ZIf7IwrIWZo


https://chumley.barstoolsports.com/w...01/02/SSTa.jpg

Bet she cleans up alright

It's been a slow start to 2019. These female teachers need to pick up the pace and get better looking.......:D

https://6abc.com/police-nj-teacher-a...udent/5096788/

Police: NJ teacher arrested for having sex with student

Friday, January 18, 2019 11:30PM
PLEASANTVILLE, N.J. (WPVI) -- A Pleasantville high school teacher was arrested today on charges of having sex with a student.

The Atlantic County Prosecutor's Office says 30-year-old Jessica Gaeckle of Galloway Township engaged in sexual relations with an 18-year-old student.

And they say she told the student to destroy evidence upon learning of the investigation.

https://cdn.abcotvs.com/dip/images/5...vid.jpg?w=1280

In New Jersey that is actually a solid 9.

Kid was 18, how is this illegal? Unethical maybe, but illegal?

As has come up repeatedly in this thread, in some states it is ILLEGAL for a teacher to have relations with a student, even if he/she is of age. It's ridiculous and absurd, but the law in some places. F'ing stupid.

Yeah, that's stupid as hell. Thanks for clarifying.

From an ethical standpoint I can see it. You don't want someone in a position of power forcing a student to do something to get a grade. But one could argue that the same power differential exists in the workplace, and I think that's a civil issue and not a criminal issue.

So is your 'stupid' statement aimed at the fact that it's a criminal thing for teachers instead of civil? Or do you think it shouldn't even be a civil thing?

Or maybe I have no idea what I'm talking about. I guess I'm saying that I think it's a good idea to have some recourse against people abusing power in this way. I just don't really know the best way to do that.

Guilty...

If they showed her with makeup I bet the not guilty's would fly off the shelf!

I can't speak for the other posters, but you are 100% correct that it should not be accepted for a teacher to sleep with a student. If people want to argue that teachers shouldn't do jail time for sleeping with a student that is of legal age, I'd agree with that. Just take their teaching license. There is a definite power imbalance between teachers and students. Age shouldn't excuse it.

Yeah, hoes just ain't what they used to be these days...

:rolleyes:

ya, because getting laid by your teacher is really important to getting an education.

...people have lost their minds.

The teacher should absolutely be FIRED. And if you want to revoke her teaching credentials and ban her from teaching ever again, I'm ok with that also.

But to actually be at risk to go to jail over this? When they were both consenting adults? WTF??

Looks like she was a real witch!

That unequal power relationship can occur in many contexts, and if you're holding grades over someone's head, then it becomes potentially nonconsensual, and therefore rape.

If you interview the student and they're like "oh, no, he/she was totally hot and I was completely down for it. Hell I approached the teacher!" and they're still at risk for jail? I don't see any logic at all behind that.

Legal age by definition means eligible to consent to sex. So the crime is what, exactly, here?

Yes, criminal sanctions. If you want to fire her, that makes perfect sense. It's an inappropriate relationship. If you want to revoke her teaching credentials so she doesn't teach elsewhere, no problem.

JAIL?! Permanent criminal record? Why? That makes no sense at all to me. How

I wouldn't have it include any "civil" remedy either by the student against the teacher, if it was consensual. Where's the logic in that.

Again, the problem is that it's inappropriate for a teacher to have such a relationship with a student due to the power imbalance, but the punishment seems seriously disproportionate to the event if the teacher is threatened with jail.

Precisely this.

If it was purely consensual, there is no crime. Now, from an employment standpoint, what she did is unethical and it should warrant termination.

GUILTY!

Agree with Amnorix.

How is it absurd to have a law against a teacher ****ing their student?
It would be absurd not to have such a law.

Ah, ok. I think I misunderstood your point earlier.
Agreed. No jail time but no teacher's license anymore either.

Agreed. And if it's "put out or fail", then that's at least arguably nonconsensual and rape charges could be filed, or a civil complaint could be filed for damages, no question about it. But if truly consensual by both ADULTS then just strip him/her of their teaching credentials, fire them, and be done with it.

I'm ok with teachers going to jail, even if the kid is 18.

It's an abuse of power and a predatory action.

Guilty as sin.

Not with makeup and a dress. She looks great with her witch outfit.

Yip.

Not guilty by way of the witch outfit.


CP

No kidding, another shot:

https://scallywagandvagabond.com/wp-...ca-Gaeckle.jpg

I really think these laws are dumb. If you are savvy enough to plow your teacher you should receive an award and the teacher granted a pass.

College prof and 22 year old student? Jail?

Post-grad 25 year old MBA student and prof? Jail?

Where does the madness end?

Guilty. Having said that, I have no problem with teachers ****ing their students if the student is of age and I'm the student. I wouldn't have told a soul.

Now that you put it that way....

I'd wear a shirt to school that said " I plowed the teacher. Guess which one"

Guilty

When I student taught, I had lots of students who wanted the bone. I'm not surprised this happens. That being said, jail for a 4, 5 year gap in age is insane.

This is true. Moral to the story is get up and leave before she takes off her makeup.

Wait, I'm rechanging my mind.


Guilty.

GUILTY AS CHARGED

Absolutlely.

It has no place in this setting.

Ok. Same questions for you then:

College prof and 22 year old student? Jail?

Post-grad 25 year old MBA student and prof? Jail?

Where does the madness end?

Doable

Not jail, but many colleges and universities have rules against such things because of the ethics involved. At the college were I work, it's forbidden for faculty or staff to be romantically involved with students. I don't think there would be consequences for the student, but it could cost the employee their job.

This is hyperbolic. There is no madness. High school students are anywhere from 14-18, meaning the vast majority are under 18. Hell, there are a good number of graduating seniors that are under 18. You don't make a rule for 90% of the institution and a weird, unneeded exception for 10%. Here's the real issue. There is NO REASON a high school teacher should be, or needs to be, having sex with a student. None.

The situations in your other examples are completely unethical. They are certainly not illegal. If an educational institution has a regulation on the books making it a violation, then that's another layer. If nothing else, prohibiting teachers from sleeping with students (at all levels) removes the appearance of impropriety. There is no sleeping with a teacher for a better grade, or any other advantage. It's a similar reason to why many companies either frown upon or outright prohibit dating a subordinate.

<iframe seamless="seamless" style="width: 100%; border: none; display: block; max-width: 768px; height: 600px;" src="https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/embed/726e2331-bb60-40ae-8eed-84ca26999231?autoplay=false"> </iframe>

Jail time when it is in highschool, lose your job when it is college. In college it is a power position similar to Moonves. Completely unethical and you should lose your job, but not go to jail. Doing that with a highschool student should constitute jail time.

Do you think it is jail time because the high school student is incapable of consent?

Due to maturity level and there should be a cutoff at some level. That one makes the most sense.

It's very simple -- each state has an age for consent. That age -- whatever it is in that state, determines whether a person is deemed by the law to be an adult and be able to consent to sexual relations.

Whether that person is a student or not shouldn't suddenly render them incapable of legally consenting, and shouldn't render their sexual partner subject to criminal penalties.

Agreed. AND THE SAME IS TRUE FOR A TEACHER OF A STUDENT WHO IS OF LEGAL AGE!

Agreed as to all this also.

Just to be 100% clear:

In May, an 18 year old student (a senior in HS) has sex with his high school teacher (let's call her Mary). That fall, he (still 18 but now a freshman in college, and male) then has sex with his college professor (let's call her Jane).

Under your rules, Mary should go to jail, but Jane should not?

Yeah, agree to disagree on that. Mary and Jane should both be fired, and Mary's teaching certifications should be revoked. College profs usually don't have such things, but if you can put a permanent black mark on her resume, that's cool too.

But JAIL? That's ridiculous in my mind.

The age of consent bright line is at least as arbitrary as the line between high school and post-secondary school of some kind. Day before age of consent, jail, day after, no jail.

Yes, but you already established that bright line for what is age of consent. Now it's: you're old enough to have sex, but if the counterparty is your teacher, then it's illegal. Oh, only public school teacher. Not, like, college teacher. Even if it's a public college? Well, sure. But why?

Cuz that's how it is.

That system makes no sense to me. Has no basis in logic. The power dynamics are no different than many other contexts that are handled either civilly or by workplace rules. It's a random, nonsensical, exception to age of consent laws.

I wonder how often some adult with a teenager does a countdown to the 18th birthday and then celebrates by doing, you know, age of consent stuff. Is there a woman somewhere who got boinked at the age of 18 years and 10 seconds? I have to think there is.

This reminds of an old joke about an 18 year old girl who thinks she's getting a free trip to Florida on her birthday. The punchline is "No Bitch, I said when you turned 18 I was gonna tamper wit'che!"

Reading all of these various opinions indicates to me that our society has a real problem with sex. Really? You are going to throw someone in jail and/or take away their ability to work because they acted on a normal and natural instinctive urge. How much psychological damage is done by making examples out of the kids.

Our society has absolutely no problem showing someone getting their brains blown out however a nipple or a penis is going to scar someone for life. Perhaps if we didn't make everyone think sex and nudity were some sort of horrible thing, we wouldn't have as many problems.

Our society has always had a problem with sex...we are derived from puritans...people so uptight even the British were like you know what get the **** out...

How uptight would that make them...yea you know.

Something doesn't make any logical sense to me: they say girls mature much faster than boys yet the male teachers who have sex with teenage girls get much harsher punishments than females.

Theory says it should be the other way around; young girls are ready for sex and young boys are walking around dumb as a tree stump trying to hump anything they can rub against.

You know why this is too, because men are viewed as crass and vile creature even when they're young and women are viewed as delicate flowers that need protecting even if they may be crass and vile themselves...

I understand your point. The world is a messy complicated place and we can't legislate heaven on earth. At some point you draw a line and hope you've drawn it in the place that does the most good and the least harm.

Why is what you advocated, better than simply using age of consent laws as the cutoff for jail time?

https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/...a791?width=650

Teacher resigns after allegedly sending nudes to student

A high school teacher has been accused of preying on students after allegedly sending nude pictures to a boy and inviting him to play a sick game.

A young high school teacher in the United States has been charged after allegedly targeting a male student and bombarding him with topless pictures.
Kelsie Schmidt, 24, was working as a math teacher at Beulah High School in North Dakota when she allegedly sent the 17-year-old pupil nude selfies over snapchat and invited him to play a game of “naked hide and seek”.

She allegedly sent the student three or four nude images.
She was arrested on January 23 and charged with felony luring minors by computer or other means.
According to police the student received three or four naked photos from Ms Schmidt in August and September last year, with one showing the teacher from her waist up with her breasts partially covered by her hair.
An affidavit alleged the student told the police officer he could “get the math teacher in trouble for pictures she had sent him”.

https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/...630c?width=650


She was in her first year of teaching when the accusations came to light.Source:Facebook
When speaking to the detective, the teacher allegedly admitted to sending the X-rated pictures to the student, The Dickinson Press reported.
Ms Schmidt was in her first year of teaching and was placed on administrative leave before her recent resignation.
Her lawyer, Tom Dickson, described the events as an “unfortunate situation for everyone”.
“Certainly it’s a very serious allegation and we are treating it very seriously,” he said.
Ms Schmidt’s preliminary hearing is set for February 27.