Marcellus |
04-24-2019 02:40 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe
(Post 14225759)
The NFL doesn't have to have proof. You guys simply don't understand how the process works.
|
No the NFL does not have to have the same burden of "proof" that the DA does.
But they do have to have some type of evidence that Hill did something wrong. Zeke was suspended because when they did their investigation they found a ton of evidence Zeke personally did something wrong regarding abuse of women even though charges were not filed. There were multiple incidents with multiple witnesses.
If the NFL suspends Hill it will be because they have evidence he committed this act, if they do not then it doesn't exist.
The NFL can't suspend Hill without some form of actual evidence he did something wrong, you are greatly exaggerating how this works.
|