ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft Geno Smith fans roll call (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=263890)

Saccopoo 11-22-2012 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9141544)
His footwork is almost as bad as (MU QB) Franklin's.

It ****ing drives me nuts when a player has "lazy legs" like that...

WTF are you talking about?

He keeps his feet moving to keep them squared under his shoulders and pointed downfield.

Jesus Christ...I swear to the little baby Jesus that people should watch shit before they post.

Molitoth 11-22-2012 01:39 PM

I think im finally starting to leave my neutral qb position and lean towards geno smith, regardless of his poor second half of the season.

Rausch 11-22-2012 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 9141794)
WTF are you talking about?

He keeps his feet moving to keep them squared under his shoulders and pointed downfield.

Jesus Christ...I swear to the little baby Jesus that people should watch shit before they post.

Example?...

Hammock Parties 11-22-2012 01:41 PM

Footwork is becoming less and less important, IMO.

Watch a lot of the great QBs in today's game. They have to make a lot of tough throws off balance.

If you can't do it (read: Casshole) you are at a disadvantage in today's game.

milkman 11-22-2012 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9141806)
Footwork is becoming less and less important, IMO.

Watch a lot of the great QBs in today's game. They have to make a lot of tough throws off balance.

If you can't do it (read: Casshole) you are at a disadvantage in today's game.

Actually, footwork becomes even more important with more, quicker pressure.

Getting setup prperly and on time makes it easier to get the ball out quicker, and to see and react to the pressure more quickly.

RunKC 11-22-2012 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 9141790)
Actually, the WV offense runs mostly multi-receiver pro routes. It's quite a complicated multiple read offense. They aren't dink and dunk Stoops spread shit.

And he worked out of a pure undercenter pro-style offense as a sophomore.

He's as pro ready as a passer as you are going to find in this day and age. And that's a fact.

That may be, but when Geno Smith says that he learned the entire offense in 3 days, that makes it look like a shitty system.

And that's not Geno's fault at all. It's his shitty coaches fault.

Comparing the an NFL offense to WVU's is like comparing the MCAT to a pop quiz. It's gonna take a bit for Geno to catch onto the game. The speed of the game won't be a big problem for him IMO. The X's and O' are what is going to take him some time to figure out.

But I think Geno will have that down in due time, just not at first.

Saccopoo 11-22-2012 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9141803)
Example?...

Any West Virginia game over the past three years.

Seriously? Lazy feet? Not a chance.

You want to see the difference between happy feet and active feet?

Mark Sanchez versus Geno Smith.

Sanchez has horrible foot work.

Smith is moving his feet in order to keep them shoulder width and to have a quick plant when he throws. With his exceptionally quick release and arm strength, Smith doesn't need to hunker down and plant like Barkley does in order to get the ball downfield. He's moving them to keep mobility in the pocket and keep them square. Two totally different things.

BossChief 11-22-2012 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9141847)
That may be, but when Geno Smith says that he learned the entire offense in 3 days, that makes it look like a shitty system.

And that's not Geno's fault at all. It's his shitty coaches fault.

Comparing the an NFL offense to WVU's is like comparing the MCAT to a pop quiz. It's gonna take a bit for Geno to catch onto the game. The speed of the game won't be a big problem for him IMO. The X's and O' are what is going to take him some time to figure out.

But I think Geno will have that down in due time, just not at first.

The air raid isn't the only offense he mastered quickly.

The kids football IQ is off the charts.

Saccopoo 11-22-2012 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9141847)
That may be, but when Geno Smith says that he learned the entire offense in 3 days...

Maybe he's just that ****ing good.

Bump 11-22-2012 02:04 PM

I think I'm back on the Geno bandwagon. Despite the 5 losses in a row. He looks like he has the best potential. His quick release, footwork and leadership qualities really turn me on.

Rausch 11-22-2012 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 9141900)
I think I'm back on the Geno bandwagon. Despite the 5 losses in a row. He looks like he has the best potential. His quick release, footwork and leadership qualities really turn me on.

LMAO

RunKC 11-22-2012 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 9141890)
Maybe he's just that ****ing good.

Even Geno himself said the system was simple.

Buckweath 11-22-2012 02:27 PM

I really like Geno Smith but I fear so much that the Jaguars are going to take him before we have the chance.

BossChief 11-22-2012 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9141935)
Even Geno himself said the system was simple.

Jordan probably told people it was easy to dunk from the freethrow line, too.

BossChief 11-22-2012 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buckweath (Post 9141939)
I really like Geno Smith but I fear so much that the Jaguars are going to take him before we have the chance.

1) look how they played against Houston once Henne took over at QB

2) look at their upcoming schedule

3) profit

RunKC 11-22-2012 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9141942)
Jordan probably told people it was easy to dunk from the freethrow line, too.

Nothing about Dana Holgorsen leads me to believe his offense is complicated in any way. At all.

BossChief 11-22-2012 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9141970)
Nothing about Dana Holgorsen leads me to believe his offense is complicated in any way. At all.

How about before Dana got there and he had mastery of a pro style offense?

Here's just one highlight video from his sophomore season..

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/uNsvPiZAWZE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

chiefzilla1501 11-22-2012 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9141980)
How about before Dana got there and he had mastery of a pro style offense?

Here's just one highlight video from his sophomore season..

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/uNsvPiZAWZE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Dude, he didn't have "mastery". He ran it reasonably well.

Exaggeration planet.

BossChief 11-22-2012 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9141999)
Dude, he didn't have "mastery". He ran it reasonably well.

Exaggeration planet.

WTF?

Completing 65% of his passes while throwing 24tds to only 7 ints and having a 144 rating isn't showing his mastery of the system?

FFS that was his first year starting and was only 19 years old.

chiefzilla1501 11-22-2012 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9142023)
WTF?

Completing 65% of his passes while throwing 24tds to only 7 ints and having a 144 rating isn't showing his mastery of the system?

FFS that was his first year starting and was only 19 years old.

It shows he can run a pro offense. I don't doubt he has football iq. But if he mastered the system in his first year, he would be considered an elite prospect. Don't make this into more than it is. Hes shown he can run an nfl offense. He hasn't shown nearly enough that he can do it as masterfully as you need to on the pro level. Hence, the risk factor.

hometeam 11-22-2012 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9142038)
It shows he can run a pro offense. I don't doubt he has football iq. But if he mastered the system in his first year, he would be considered an elite prospect. Don't make this into more than it is. Hes shown he can run an nfl offense. He hasn't shown nearly enough that he can do it as masterfully as you need to on the pro level. Hence, the risk factor.

So do you want this guy to Peyton Manning year 7 right out of the gate?

chiefzilla1501 11-22-2012 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hometeam (Post 9142085)
So do you want this guy to Peyton Manning year 7 right out of the gate?

No one will be. No one should be expected him to be.

I believe he will struggle early. I also have confidence his work ethic will enable him to grow as a qb.

It's everyone else here who seem to paint him as this nfl ready prospect who can compete for rookie of the year from the get go. I'm actually the one being realistic here.

Nightfyre 11-22-2012 05:29 PM

I think the same haters who hated RGIII are hating on Geno Smith and for the same reasons, except people thought RGIII was run-first.

Don't tell me he can't run a pro offense. I have seen his ability to diagnose a play at the line of scrimmage. The dude has a high football IQ. He needs to improve at diagnosing as the play develops a little, but Geno has all the tools that aren't coachable and has high coachability.

RealSNR 11-22-2012 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9141720)
You are dead to me...

Sorry dude. This thread has been here awhile. You know how much I love Geno. I see a lot of good qualities in his arm. The same kind of brilliant pocket awareness that 0dd T0dd had

RunKC 11-22-2012 05:36 PM

So what is Geno Smith? A poor man's RG3? A rich man's Russell Wilson?

chiefzilla1501 11-22-2012 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 9142302)
I think the same haters who hated RGIII are hating on Geno Smith and for the same reasons, except people thought RGIII was run-first.

Don't tell me he can't run a pro offense. I have seen his ability to diagnose a play at the line of scrimmage. The dude has a high football IQ. He needs to improve at diagnosing as the play develops a little, but Geno has all the tools that aren't coachable and has high coachability.

The problem with this board is being critical to a popular guy is called hating.

Nobody is hating on geno.

And no... RgIII was a far better prospect. Genos a good one. But rgIII was maybe the best qb prospect we've seen outside of luck in almost 10 years. And most people knew that.

Lets stop the comparisons to rgIII. They are different prospects.

RealSNR 11-22-2012 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9142090)
No one will be. No one should be expected him to be.

I believe he will struggle early. I also have confidence his work ethic will enable him to grow as a qb.

It's everyone else here who seem to paint him as this nfl ready prospect who can compete for rookie of the year from the get go. I'm actually the one being realistic here.

We're not saying that. We're saying he's going to be a really good QB in the NFL.

Quit acting like you're above the fray just because you're willing to shit on Geno for little tiny things.

Geno will be a rookie QB. Luck is a rookie QB and has looked like absolute feces at times. Do people think he's going to be a terrible QB? Hell no. He looks that way because he's a ****ing rookie QB.

Don't paint us all as this dumbass mob. It's disingenuous and ****ing false.

chiefzilla1501 11-22-2012 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9142330)
We're not saying that. We're saying he's going to be a really good QB in the NFL.

Quit acting like you're above the fray just because you're willing to shit on Geno for little tiny things.

Geno will be a rookie QB. Luck is a rookie QB and has looked like absolute feces at times. Do people think he's going to be a terrible QB? Hell no. He looks that way because he's a ****ing rookie QB.

Don't paint us all as this dumbass mob. It's disingenuous and ****ing false.

We've discussed this before. Im cool with you. You told me you are more optimistic about the guy but you understand my concerns. Even if you're his biggest fan.

But when somebody is going to basically call me an idiot because I acknowledge the risk, I'm going to defend myself.

BossChief 11-22-2012 05:43 PM

The only thing I took offense on was saying that he has "major bust potential".

The reasons given for the claim were as silly as Pioli trying to sell the fanbase on Cassel as a franchise qb.

chiefzilla1501 11-22-2012 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9142349)
The only thing I took offense on was saying that he has "major bust potential".

The reasons given for the claim were as silly as Pioli trying to sell the fanbase on Cassel as a franchise qb.

He does have major bust potential. But he also have a very high ceiling, something I don't see in Barkley. Something I never saw in cam and still don't because I still don't believe he is a leader.

I think he's boom bust. Barkley is sure fire "good enough." I'll take boom / bust any day of the week.

Mr. Laz 11-22-2012 05:52 PM

imo Geno Smith is the very definition of Boom or Bust.

HUGE upside ... elite arm ... elite downfield accuracy



or he could be Byron Leftwich


To be fair though, the position has such a high demand on intangibles that just about any QB prospect can bust. It's difficult to judge until they hit the NFL field.

BossChief 11-22-2012 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 9142374)
imo Geno Smith is the very definition of Boom or Bust.

HUGE upside ... elite arm ... elite downfield accuracy



or he could be Byron Leftwich


To be fair though, the position has such a high demand on intangibles that just about any QB prospect can bust. It's difficult to judge until they hit the NFL field.

It keeps getting worse.

Look guys, I wouldbe ok with saying he has significant bust potential IF LEGIT REASONS WERE GIVEN FOR SUCH.

The ONLY comparison Geno has to Leftwich is color.

Hammock Parties 11-22-2012 05:55 PM

Byron Leftwich takes 5 seconds to windup.

Geno has a snap delivery.

SAUTO 11-22-2012 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 9142374)
imo Geno Smith is the very definition of Boom or Bust.

HUGE upside ... elite arm ... elite downfield accuracy



or he could be Byron Leftwich


To be fair though, the position has such a high demand on intangibles that just about any QB prospect can bust. It's difficult to judge until they hit the NFL field.

Leftwich was a player just had absolutely NO mobility and took a beating that ruined him
Posted via Mobile Device

SAUTO 11-22-2012 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9142382)
Byron Leftwich takes 5 seconds to windup.

Geno has a snap delivery.

That's true too.
Posted via Mobile Device

SAUTO 11-22-2012 05:56 PM

Clay paid attention Monday night
Posted via Mobile Device

Ebolapox 11-22-2012 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 9142374)
imo Geno Smith is the very definition of Boom or Bust.

HUGE upside ... elite arm ... elite downfield accuracy



or he could be Byron Leftwich


To be fair though, the position has such a high demand on intangibles that just about any QB prospect can bust. It's difficult to judge until they hit the NFL field.

seriously, byron sandwich? byron leftwich is a statue. byron leftwich has a HUGE arm. byron leftwich has a very slow delivery. byron leftwich did it against shitty competition.

are you saying byron sandwich because they're both black? why not david klingler? that's a more apt comparison if you're gonna go with a QB bust.

Nightfyre 11-22-2012 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9142328)
The problem with this board is being critical to a popular guy is called hating.

Nobody is hating on geno.

And no... RgIII was a far better prospect. Genos a good one. But rgIII was maybe the best qb prospect we've seen outside of luck in almost 10 years. And most people knew that.

Lets stop the comparisons to rgIII. They are different prospects.

This is such a crock of shit. RGIII was not even a first round prospect to most people here until steam picked up towards the end of the season. Further, I KNOW they are different prospects because I probably watched both of them a billion times more than the boobs that come in here spouting ignorant non-sense about them being spread monkeys. But don't pretend people weren't saying the exact same shit last year about RGIII -
1) He doesn't run a pro system, therefore can't learn one
2) He doesn't go through progressions
3) He doesn't make NFL throws

All of it complete bullshit. Same complaints here by the same ignorant people who clearly don't know what they are looking at.

Priest31kc 11-22-2012 07:49 PM

Geno playing tomorrow at Iowa St at 2:30 on ABC!

Hammock Parties 11-22-2012 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Priest31kc (Post 9142691)
Geno playing tomorrow at Iowa St at 2:30 on ABC!

http://i.minus.com/ibx8WWOUoxva9U.gif

Mr. Laz 11-22-2012 08:10 PM

you guys are WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY to hung up on the name leftwich

the name doesn't matter

what matters is whether Smith learns to deal/adapt to pressure and the speed of the NFL.

but hey, i understand ... Chiefs fans are so desperate for a QB that they don't want to hear anything to the contrary.

Hammock Parties 11-22-2012 08:16 PM

Leftwich and Smith aren't comparable in terms of talent though.

Not even.

Leftwich has like the slowest release in NFL history and stone feet + mediocre accuracy and fat face.

Geno is the exact opposite.

Ebolapox 11-22-2012 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 9142730)
you guys are WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY to hung up on the name leftwich

the name doesn't matter

what matters is whether Smith learns to deal/adapt to pressure and the speed of the NFL.

but hey, i understand ... Chiefs fans are so desperate for a QB that they don't want to hear anything to the contrary.

you're a racist sum'bitch, silent bob.

RealSNR 11-22-2012 08:57 PM

You guys are blowing the Smith/Jamarcus Russell comparisons WAAAAAAAAY out of proportion.

The name doesn't matter.

So just let me continue comparing two players who have ****ing nothing in common at all, k? I'd appreciate it if I could spout a bunch of bullshit and not get called out on it.

seamonster 11-22-2012 09:06 PM

Smith at his best reminds me of a matt stafford and at his worst hangs onto the ball and stubmbles around like jason cambell.

Barkley at his best reminds me of marino and and at his lowest points looks like a rex grossman going deep. If I'm the chiefs either quarterback is a mandatory first pick if available. Personally I've seen enough jason cambell over the years to be petrified of choosing smith.

Mr. Laz 11-22-2012 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9142934)
You guys are blowing the Smith/Jamarcus Russell comparisons WAAAAAAAAY out of proportion.

The name doesn't matter.

So just let me continue comparing two players who have ****ing nothing in common at all, k? I'd appreciate it if I could spout a bunch of bullshit and not get called out on it.

could you be anymore of a crying bitch?

anytime someone ever questions a single thing about Smith you start wailing away like you need a bottle.

:shake:

Mr. Laz 11-22-2012 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seamonster (Post 9142971)
Smith at his best reminds me of a matt stafford and at his worst hangs onto the ball and stubmbles around like jason cambell.

Barkley at his best reminds me of marino and and at his lowest points looks like a rex grossman going deep. If I'm the chiefs either quarterback is a mandatory first pick if available. Personally I've seen enough jason cambell over the years to be petrified of choosing smith.

how dare you compare him to jason campbell


racist

RealSNR 11-22-2012 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 9142981)
could you be anymore of a crying bitch?

anytime someone ever questions a single thing about Smith you start wailing away like you need a bottle.

:shake:

Bullshit. I'm cool with people who criticize Smith when it's something legit.

I'm NOT cool with reeruns like you who say, "Could be Byron Leftwich" and then say nothing.

RealSNR 11-22-2012 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 9142983)
how dare you compare him to jason campbell


racist

Once again, "He looks like Jason Campbell" is stupid until the guy can tell me what he does that's Jason Campbell-like.

It's not racism, I don't think. But it IS stupidity.

Mr_Tomahawk 11-22-2012 10:28 PM

Nick Jacobs ‏@Jacobs71
My QB Rankings 1. Geno Smith 2. Tyler Wilson 3. Tyler Bray 4. Mike Glennon 5. Matt Barkley

Nick Jacobs ‏@Jacobs71
My QB Rankings 6. Aaron Murray 7. EJ Manuel 8. Logan Thomas 9. Zac Dysert 10. Landry Jones

Nick Jacobs ‏@Jacobs71
My QB Rankings 11. Ryan Nassib 12. Brad Sorensen 13. Matt Scott 14. Collin Klein

Nick Jacobs ‏@Jacobs71
#Chiefs fans wanting to watch future QBs. Tyler Wilson takes on LSU at 1:30pm on CBS. Geno Smith takes on ISU at 2:30pm on ABC both CT FRI

bigjosh 11-22-2012 11:48 PM

I am excited to see what next year brings. Firings, Hirings, Franchise QBs roster turnover. out of all the negitives this year, but this soap opera will bring you right back next year

Saccopoo 11-22-2012 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9142038)
It shows he can run a pro offense. I don't doubt he has football iq. But if he mastered the system in his first year, he would be considered an elite prospect. Don't make this into more than it is. Hes shown he can run an nfl offense. He hasn't shown nearly enough that he can do it as masterfully as you need to on the pro level. Hence, the risk factor.

If that's your standard then Andrew Luck was a risk. A big risk.

**** dude.

The guy was 19 years old and was kicking the shit out of it as a sophomore. Smith was a Parade All-American as a prep, is a three year starter in two different systems and has put up exceptional numbers every year.

Tom Brady was a 6th round pick because nobody thought he could do it on the next level.

Half the league scouting directors and GM's thought Ryan Leaf was a better prospect than Peyton Manning.

What the **** are you wanting? You want to wait around for the next John Elway/Andrew Luck?

(And I think Smith has a lot of those qualities that those particular two individuals possessed. He's got as many tools for the position at his level as I've seen in the past two decades. I'm ready to take the chance on a guy and Smith is as good as a chance as I've seen that the Chiefs have had in a long, long time.)

Geno Smith has kicked ass every chance he's had and has improved his individual game every single year.

I'll take Smith, right here, right now. If he doesn't work out, so be it, but he's got the tools to be a stud. You never know how it plays out at the next level, but he's a guy you take that chance with.

Reps in the pass game, the accuracy, the release, the pocket presence, the prototype size, the arm, the leadership, the work ethic, the smarts.

No disrespect, but if you don't like Geno Smith as a prospect, especially as a Chiefs fan, whose QB situation sits between dire and destitute, then you are a ****ing moron.

Nightfyre 11-23-2012 12:00 AM

So, who is operating Saccopoo's account this year and should they be investigated for kidnapping?

Hammock Parties 11-23-2012 12:10 AM

Quote:

What the **** are you wanting? You want to wait around for the next John Elway/Andrew Luck?
If you sit around waiting on the next surefire stud QB, you miss out on the next:

Jim Kelly: Pick 14
Dan Marino: Pick 27
Ben Roethlisberger: Pick 11
Aaron Rodgers: Pick 24

AussieChiefsFan 11-23-2012 12:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 9143347)
If that's your standard then Andrew Luck was a risk. A big risk.

**** dude.

The guy was 19 years old and was kicking the shit out of it as a sophomore. Smith was a Parade All-American as a prep, is a three year starter in two different systems and has put up exceptional numbers every year.

Tom Brady was a 6th round pick because nobody thought he could do it on the next level.

Half the league scouting directors and GM's thought Ryan Leaf was a better prospect than Peyton Manning.

What the **** are you wanting? You want to wait around for the next John Elway/Andrew Luck?

(And I think Smith has a lot of those qualities that those particular two individuals possessed. He's got as many tools for the position at his level as I've seen in the past two decades. I'm ready to take the chance on a guy and Smith is as good as a chance as I've seen that the Chiefs have had in a long, long time.)

Geno Smith has kicked ass every chance he's had and has improved his individual game every single year.

I'll take Smith, right here, right now. If he doesn't work out, so be it, but he's got the tools to be a stud. You never know how it plays out at the next level, but he's a guy you take that chance with.

Reps in the pass game, the accuracy, the release, the pocket presence, the prototype size, the arm, the leadership, the work ethic, the smarts.

No disrespect, but if you don't like Geno Smith as a prospect, especially as a Chiefs fan, whose QB situation sits between dire and destitute, then you are a ****ing moron.

Its a real shame I can only REP this post once.

Saccopoo 11-23-2012 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seamonster (Post 9142971)
Smith at his best reminds me of a matt stafford and at his worst hangs onto the ball and stubmbles around like jason cambell.

Barkley at his best reminds me of marino and and at his lowest points looks like a rex grossman going deep. If I'm the chiefs either quarterback is a mandatory first pick if available. Personally I've seen enough jason cambell over the years to be petrified of choosing smith.

Who the **** are you?

Barkley = Marino and Smith = Cambell?

****ing idiot.

http://replygif.net/i/766

Saccopoo 11-23-2012 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 9143352)
So, who is operating Saccopoo's account this year and should they be investigated for kidnapping?

The guy who sees Geno Smith as a ****ing stud...

a guy who also sees the Chiefs with the chance to finally draft a ****ing stud at QB.

Perfect storm.

No Mark "Happy Feet" Sanchez. No Jimmy "Small Hands" Clausen.

They control their own destiny at this point and have a legitimate chance to draft a guy who has as much tools for the QB position as I've seen outside of John Elway and Andrew Luck and he's really close to both IMO.

Geno Smith can play the QB position.

Geno Smith is a ****ing QB stud. He's a gamer. He can put balls in receivers hands like nobody.

****. If we weren't coming off the Andrew Luck shit, this guy would be getting kudos and accolades all day long. Seriously, go watch those three passes in the OP. You go name me a QB who can hit that shit in every single game at any level. Do it. That's elite level skill set. The ****ing guy can play ball.

Draft this guy. Let's win some playoff games. Let's give this team a chance.

AussieChiefsFan 11-23-2012 12:25 AM

http://gickr.com/results3/anim_f56aa...776b92f8b0.gif

Sorter 11-23-2012 12:26 AM

LMAOLMAOLMAO
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 9143352)
So, who is operating Saccopoo's account this year and should they be investigated for kidnapping?


RealSNR 11-23-2012 01:36 AM

Sac found the guy he wanted. He had his (founded and legit) reasons for not wanting Sanchez or Clausen.

(Oh, and I imagine the tackles in this draft aren't exactly all-world. Who's even #1? Fluker from Alabama? I honestly have no idea)

Sorter 11-23-2012 01:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9143477)
Sac found the guy he wanted. He had his (founded and legit) reasons for not wanting Sanchez or Clausen.

(Oh, and I imagine the tackles in this draft aren't exactly all-world. Who's even #1? Fluker from Alabama? I honestly have no idea)

Kid from Texas A&M is a legit prospect. Probably not wortha top 10 pick IMO, but I havent watched him very much. Could be a solid LT though.

Saccopoo 11-23-2012 02:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9143477)
Sac found the guy he wanted. He had his (founded and legit) reasons for not wanting Sanchez or Clausen.

(Oh, and I imagine the tackles in this draft aren't exactly all-world. Who's even #1? Fluker from Alabama? I honestly have no idea)

Barrett Jones is a stud.

All American Freshman and All Conference at Guard as a sophomore. Moves to Left Tackle and earns first team All-America spot and wins the Outland Trophy as a junior. (Outland Trophy is given to the best lineman, regardless of position.) Then he goes to the Center position this year (why, after winning the Outland at left tackle, but whatever) and is killing guys from the pivot.

Has a degree in accounting (graduated with a 4.0 gpa) and is now working on his masters in the same.

That is ultimate versatility and talent and intelligence.

However, Geno Smith is the ultimate goal.

ILChief 11-23-2012 07:57 AM

I'm really wondering if we need to start working Geno into our SOC message. One one hand it seems like we'd be over reaching but I have a horrible feeling they're gonna sign trade for Alex Smith, Mark Sanchez, Michael Vick or some other failed starter and say "We fixed the QB" and draft Mingo, Teo, or someone like that.

Buckweath 11-23-2012 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILChief (Post 9143610)
I'm really wondering if we need to start working Geno into our SOC message. One one hand it seems like we'd be over reaching but I have a horrible feeling they're gonna sign trade for Alex Smith, Mark Sanchez, Michael Vick or some other failed starter and say "We fixed the QB" and draft Mingo, Teo, or someone like that.

I get it that it's hard for some Chiefs fans to believe that, but IMO it is almost a certainty that the Chiefs will draft a QB, especially if they have the #1 overall pick.

This team has drafted Dorsey, Jackson and Berry in the top 5 recently. Look at where those guys have lead us. Sure Berry might become a hall of famer but there's no way the Chiefs pass on a QB early to draft a defensive player.

I swear I'd much much rather get Geno Smith tomorrow on this team, and I'm perfectly conscious of the risk, rather than to get Von Miller or JJ Watt.

Pasta Little Brioni 11-23-2012 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9143369)
If you sit around waiting on the next surefire stud QB, you miss out on the next:

Jim Kelly: Pick 14
Dan Marino: Pick 27
Ben Roethlisberger: Pick 11
Aaron Rodgers: Pick 24

:clap:

But, but, but TOOOOOOOOOOOO RISKYYYYYYYYY!!!!!! Might start a season 1-9 and not have a lead for 2 months

PRIEST 11-23-2012 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 9143347)
If that's your standard then Andrew Luck was a risk. A big risk.

**** dude.

The guy was 19 years old and was kicking the shit out of it as a sophomore. Smith was a Parade All-American as a prep, is a three year starter in two different systems and has put up exceptional numbers every year.

Tom Brady was a 6th round pick because nobody thought he could do it on the next level.

Half the league scouting directors and GM's thought Ryan Leaf was a better prospect than Peyton Manning.

What the **** are you wanting? You want to wait around for the next John Elway/Andrew Luck?

(And I think Smith has a lot of those qualities that those particular two individuals possessed. He's got as many tools for the position at his level as I've seen in the past two decades. I'm ready to take the chance on a guy and Smith is as good as a chance as I've seen that the Chiefs have had in a long, long time.)

Geno Smith has kicked ass every chance he's had and has improved his individual game every single year.

I'll take Smith, right here, right now. If he doesn't work out, so be it, but he's got the tools to be a stud. You never know how it plays out at the next level, but he's a guy you take that chance with.

Reps in the pass game, the accuracy, the release, the pocket presence, the prototype size, the arm, the leadership, the work ethic, the smarts.

No disrespect, but if you don't like Geno Smith as a prospect, especially as a Chiefs fan, whose QB situation sits between dire and destitute, then you are a ****ing moron.



:thumb:

Pasta Little Brioni 11-23-2012 08:57 AM

Smith's a poor man's Dante Culpepper and the next Akili Smith. Kind of a hybrid Dante, McNabb, Akili, Campbell, Doug Williams, Vince Evans combo. Amirite semenmonster???

chiefzilla1501 11-23-2012 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 9143347)
If that's your standard then Andrew Luck was a risk. A big risk.

**** dude.

The guy was 19 years old and was kicking the shit out of it as a sophomore. Smith was a Parade All-American as a prep, is a three year starter in two different systems and has put up exceptional numbers every year.

Tom Brady was a 6th round pick because nobody thought he could do it on the next level.

Half the league scouting directors and GM's thought Ryan Leaf was a better prospect than Peyton Manning.

What the **** are you wanting? You want to wait around for the next John Elway/Andrew Luck?

(And I think Smith has a lot of those qualities that those particular two individuals possessed. He's got as many tools for the position at his level as I've seen in the past two decades. I'm ready to take the chance on a guy and Smith is as good as a chance as I've seen that the Chiefs have had in a long, long time.)

Geno Smith has kicked ass every chance he's had and has improved his individual game every single year.

I'll take Smith, right here, right now. If he doesn't work out, so be it, but he's got the tools to be a stud. You never know how it plays out at the next level, but he's a guy you take that chance with.

Reps in the pass game, the accuracy, the release, the pocket presence, the prototype size, the arm, the leadership, the work ethic, the smarts.

No disrespect, but if you don't like Geno Smith as a prospect, especially as a Chiefs fan, whose QB situation sits between dire and destitute, then you are a ****ing moron.

Jfc. I've said a million times I would draft geno at #1 in a heartbeat. Somehow people get shit around here if you say one thing negative about a guy you like overall. I think he's worth the risk but I'm not going to be unrealistic about the fact that he is a risk.

I'm sorry... But it's idiotic for anyone to throw luck and rgIII into the discussion. Please stop. Those guys were blue chip prospects. Geno is a nice prospect but he isn't anywhere their level. That shouldn't stop the chiefs from drafting them. But let's stop with any bs that any team would in a million years consider drafting geno above either of those two guys.

Pasta Little Brioni 11-23-2012 08:59 AM

Geno Geno Geno Geno Geno

chiefzilla1501 11-23-2012 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9143661)
:clap:

But, but, but TOOOOOOOOOOOO RISKYYYYYYYYY!!!!!! Might start a season 1-9 and not have a lead for 2 months

Pgm... As much shit as I get for saying he's too risky (which isn't even true. I've said he's worth the risk) I have consistently shown that I am very patient to wait for a player to develop under the system while the majority of people on cp throw a guy under the bus if he's not nails right away.

It's because people set these ridiculous expectations. I want the chiefs to draft geno. I expect him to struggle a lot early. Not Andrew luck "I'm going to struggle every now and then." I think it might take 2 or 3 years to grow into the role. Because he isn't as nfl ready as so many people here want to pretend he is. I knew luck and rgIII would produce right away.

Cp is a funny place. They will call dontari Poe a bust because he hasn't been all world in a year we knew he would struggle, yet they will treat mark Sanchez and Ryan tannehill like the next coming of the messiah for very, very average qb play to prove a point that we passed on them.

Pasta Little Brioni 11-23-2012 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9143675)
Pgm... As much shit as I get for saying he's too risky (which isn't even true. I've said he's worth the risk) I have consistently shown that I am very patient to wait for a player to develop under the system while the majority of people on cp throw a guy under the bus if he's not nails right away.

It's because people set these ridiculous expectations. I want the chiefs to draft geno. I expect him to struggle a lot early. Not Andrew luck "I'm going to struggle every now and then." I think it might take 2 or 3 years to grow into the role. Because he isn't as nfl ready as so many people here want to pretend he is. I knew luck and rgIII would produce right away.

Cp is a funny place. They will call dontari Poe a bust because he hasn't been all world in a year we knew he would struggle, yet they will treat mark Sanchez and Ryan tannehill like the next coming of the messiah for very, very average qb play to prove a point that we passed on them.

I wasn't singling you out otherwise I would have quoted you. Their have been many a poster here using the too risky bullshit and was targeting the dumbfoolery.

I agree 100 percent with the last part as Tannehill's balls have been swung on like Tarzan.

DeezNutz 11-23-2012 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9143675)
Pgm... As much shit as I get for saying he's too risky (which isn't even true. I've said he's worth the risk) I have consistently shown that I am very patient to wait for a player to develop under the system while the majority of people on cp throw a guy under the bus if he's not nails right away.

It's because people set these ridiculous expectations. I want the chiefs to draft geno. I expect him to struggle a lot early. Not Andrew luck "I'm going to struggle every now and then." I think it might take 2 or 3 years to grow into the role. Because he isn't as nfl ready as so many people here want to pretend he is. I knew luck and rgIII would produce right away.

Cp is a funny place. They will call dontari Poe a bust because he hasn't been all world in a year we knew he would struggle, yet they will treat mark Sanchez and Ryan tannehill like the next coming of the messiah for very, very average qb play to prove a point that we passed on them.

There's nothing strange about the dislike for Poe on this forum since many view him as a sub-par talent from the jump. Thus, waiting on him to develop is an exercise in futility because he'll never suddenly become more talented.

Buckweath 11-23-2012 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9143682)
There's nothing strange about the dislike for Poe on this forum since many view him as a sub-par talent from the jump. Thus, waiting on him to develop is an exercise in futility because he'll never suddenly become more talented.

About Dontari Poe, some Chiefs fans don't like him because he didn't produce in college but while he was supposed to be really raw in his early NFL career and he is to some extent, he has arguably produced just as much as the likes of Raji and Ngata in their rookie season.

chiefzilla1501 11-23-2012 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buckweath (Post 9143687)
About Dontari Poe, some Chiefs fans don't like him because he didn't produce in college but while he was supposed to be really raw in his early NFL career and he is to some extent, he has arguably produced just as much as the likes of Raji and Ngata in their rookie season.

This. There's a difference between saying he is a bust versus he was a bad pick.

You can't call him a bust until he starts to peak in development. I didn't see any way he'd be good this year even in the rosiest of scenarios.

Sweet Daddy Hate 11-23-2012 10:20 AM

In the Spiritual Realm of the Quarterback Position, Geno is the Truth, The Light, and The Way.

SAUTO 11-23-2012 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9143667)
Jfc. I've said a million times I would draft geno at #1 in a heartbeat. Somehow people get shit around here if you say one thing negative about a guy you like overall. I think he's worth the risk but I'm not going to be unrealistic about the fact that he is a risk.

I'm sorry... But it's idiotic for anyone to throw luck and rgIII into the discussion. Please stop. Those guys were blue chip prospects. Geno is a nice prospect but he isn't anywhere their level. That shouldn't stop the chiefs from drafting them. But let's stop with any bs that any team would in a million years consider drafting geno above either of those two guys.

I don't think you can read, either that our you just make shit up.


I have never seen anyone here say anything remotely close to saying Geno would ever be above RG3 or luck
Posted via Mobile Device

TRR 11-23-2012 11:12 AM

Interested to see what Geno Smith shows today. It is very cold and unbelievably windy in Iowa today. Will be interesting to see how he handles this type of Midwest weather.

Posted via Mobile Device

chiefzilla1501 11-23-2012 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9143801)
I don't think you can read, either that our you just make shit up.


I have never seen anyone here say anything remotely close to saying Geno would ever be above RG3 or luck
Posted via Mobile Device

There are people trying to downplay how much Genos non-rgIII athleticism changes how attractive the prospect is. And there are plenty of people suggesting geno is the same as a pure pocket passer prospect as rgIII. Don't agree with that either. RgIII is constantly brought up in conversations. All the time. Luck not as much, but saccopoo brought him up to say he has downside risk as a pocket passer.

Nobody said geno would be better. But there are lots of people implying that rgIIIs success shows that geno will succeed. Bs. They are different players and geno will need to succeed in a totally different way. We need to stop bringing rgIII into conversations. If they were in the same draft class, rgIII would have been blue chip and geno would be a distant second.

Sweet Daddy Hate 11-23-2012 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9143801)
I don't think you can read, either that our you just make shit up.


I have never seen anyone here say anything remotely close to saying Geno would ever be above RG3 or luck
Posted via Mobile Device

Not me. I'm seeing "Black Elway". Kind of like Issac Hayes was Black Moses, yes.

RealSNR 11-23-2012 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9143847)
There are people trying to downplay how much Genos non-rgIII athleticism changes how attractive the prospect is. And there are plenty of people suggesting geno is the same as a pure pocket passer prospect as rgIII. Don't agree with that either. RgIII is constantly brought up in conversations. All the time. Luck not as much, but saccopoo brought him up to say he has downside risk as a pocket passer.

Nobody said geno would be better. But there are lots of people implying that rgIIIs success shows that geno will succeed. Bs. They are different players and geno will need to succeed in a totally different way. We need to stop bringing rgIII into conversations. If they were in the same draft class, rgIII would have been blue chip and geno would be a distant second.

Only dumb**** TV analysts compare him to RGIII. I agree that they're COMPLETELY different players.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.