ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Royals 2014 Royals Repository (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=279729)

RockChalk 01-29-2014 09:48 AM

Besides the fact it would be great to have him in the rotation, I want Ervin to re-sign purely to see Rany's head do this...

http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view4/359...0gif%20320x214

Infidel Goat 01-29-2014 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefspants (Post 10400215)
It would be a travesty if they allow Hoch and Davis' salaries to prevent them from making a serious run at Ervin. Getting into the playoffs with this present rotation is reliant on either a weak division or Yordano having a Lincecum like rookie season.

If the Royals want a serious shot at going deep into the playoffs, than landing Ervin or another starter is a priority, in my opinion.

I agree. If Santana is willing to sign for the 3/$40M range, I would hope that they are looking to move either Hoch or Davis for prospects and a little more monetary flexibility.

I've long advocated working on an extension for Shields, but if he wants a Greinke contract it's not going to happen in KC. Theoretically, signing Santana would give us less flexibility in future years, but if all of our pitching prospects pan out then it still strikes me as a contract that can be moved barring serious injury/terrible performance.

WhawhaWhat 01-29-2014 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infidel Goat (Post 10400298)
I agree. If Santana is willing to sign for the 3/$40M range, I would hope that they are looking to move either Hoch or Davis for prospects and a little more monetary flexibility.

I can't imagine why any team would ever trade a prospect for Hochevar or Davis.

alnorth 01-29-2014 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhawhaWhat (Post 10400310)
I can't imagine why any team would ever trade a prospect for Hochevar or Davis.

I know we're conditioned to hate Hoch (including me a year ago), but he has value as a relief pitcher. We wouldn't get much, but we'd get something even with his 2014 salary.

CaliforniaChief 01-29-2014 11:09 AM

I bet the Dodgers would give us something for Hochevar.

WhawhaWhat 01-29-2014 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 10400408)
I bet the Dodgers would give us something for Hochevar.

Dodger dogs?!? I would be in for that.

RockChalk 01-29-2014 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 10400408)
I bet the Dodgers would give us something for Hochevar.

Sarcasm?

tk13 01-29-2014 12:09 PM

Looks like we have our replacement for Bob Dutton.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>This passes for news: This will be my last week at The Star-Ledger. Excited to cover the Royals for The Kansas City Star.</p>&mdash; Andy McCullough (@McCulloughSL) <a href="https://twitter.com/McCulloughSL/statuses/428579433860304896">January 29, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

alnorth 01-29-2014 12:12 PM

Andy McCullough is the new Royals beat writer for the KC Star. He comes from New Jersey, where he covered the Yankees for the Star-Ledger.

mr. tegu 01-29-2014 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 10400570)
Andy McCullough is the new Royals beat writer for the KC Star. He comes from New Jersey, where he covered the Yankees for the Star-Ledger.

Pfft, what a front-running, band wagon, fairweather writer.

alnorth 01-29-2014 12:47 PM

Royals got Carlos Peguero from Seattle for either a PTBNL or cash

edit: looks like this guy is insurance, helping our outfield depth if someone gets hurt. He destroyed AAA in 2011 and 2012 but struggled in the majors. Last year he didn't do as much in AAA, so he might be a AAAA player.

Overall, thats fine for a PTBNL.

edit2: Everett Teaford was designated for assignment to make room for him.

dallaschiefsfan 01-29-2014 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 10399148)
What a load of crap...that would be worst case scenario for the Royals getting a lower pick if they lose Santana

The pick that another team surrenders for signing Santana has nothing to do with the pick the Royals receive. We will get a sandwich pick between round 1 and 2, regardless of whether the other team is surrendering a 1, 2, 3 or 4.

Add that to our regular #1 pick and our competitive balance pick that we received and we have three late first round-ish picks this year...assuming we don't sign Santana.

tyton75 01-29-2014 01:06 PM

I never even thought Santana was a real option for us to be able to get, but if we are close in the bidding I would be SO happy. Considering Shields will be gone after this season, it'd be nice to have Santana in the rotation with Vargas and Guthrie in the event the younglings aren't up to par... (like most of our homegrown pitching over the years)

siberian khatru 01-29-2014 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr. tegu (Post 10400583)
Pfft, what a front-running, band wagon, fairweather writer.

ROFL :clap:

CaliforniaChief 01-29-2014 01:20 PM

Craig Brown ‏@royalsauthority 8m
So the #Royals DFAd Everett Teaford, who is currently on the Royals Caravan tour at Nellie’s Restaurant in Cameron, MO.

Rany Jazayerli ‏@jazayerli 4m
Awkward.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.