Megatron96 |
03-06-2023 12:32 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by BleedingRed
(Post 16839328)
People seem to conflating KNOWNS with UNKNOWNS
Draft - UNKNOWNS
Hopkins - KNOWN
We are talking about potentially adding a KNOWN commodity to our team. Yes would it be nice to have a future HOF WR we draft this year? SURE! but we are never going to be in a position to draft (Can't Miss Players) unless one falls.
The argument is "If we add a top 10 WR to our team on the outside does that make us MORE or LESS likely to repeat in the Super Bowl"
I would argue it makes us MORE.
|
Well, first you have the anti-DHoplytes that have convinced themselves that DHop is barely above average as a WR or that he's washed/too old to play @30yrs of age. Then there's the contingent that believes Veach would destroy the future of the franchise if he spent any resources on a top-tier WR. Like Veach would somehow lose his mind, or do hallucinogens before writing up the deal.
When you can't believe your lying eyes and/or fear calculated risk vs. being open to unimaginable reward, this is where you end up.
I will say that I have no fear that the Chiefs won't be back in the SB conversation/race in 2023, regardless of whether we sign DHop. Or even if KC hangs onto OBJ. I don't think in the end it will matter that much. The team's good enough to repeat as is, even without OBJ.
But the margin is thin, and it wouldn't take that much to lose out on the 1-seed, or stumble just a bit and miss a SB appearance. Some people have become drunk on the idea that Pat will just fix any issue, regardless of who's on the field with him. And that Kelce is 27, not 33.
But it is what it is. At this point, I hope they're right, because as I've been saying, I doubt DHop becomes a Chief due to what he'd asked for in a new contract. If he would somehow play on his existing contract of $19-$14, I'd sign him right the hell now. But that isn't an option, so we'll see.
|