ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Jaworski rates Chiefs QB at No. 20 among NFL starters (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=274325)

Marcellus 07-12-2013 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9807007)
LMAO

You miss the point.

Alex Smith is not even as good David Krieg and never will be.

And that is sad.

Cant wit to see you user name changed to Alex Smith Nut Hugger after this season.

duncan_idaho 07-12-2013 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 9807042)
Cough McCarron Cough.

How could I forget THAT future stud.

RealSNR 07-12-2013 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maverick91579 (Post 9806799)
I said this before, and Ill say it again.

The chiefs will draft their qbotf this year. There is a lot more depth, and quality at qb upcoming in the draft. This last years draft class was doo doo. DOOOOOOO, DOOOOOOOOO. So bad that Dorsey, and Reid didn't even want to waste a 4th, or 5th rounder on one.

DOOKIE.

Now, lets say this next year, you don't make the playoffs, but you draft 20th.

There will be a qb there, you can take.

Teddy Bridgewater,
Logan Thomas,
Aaron Murray,
Bryn Renner,
Johnny Heisman,
Tahj Boyd,
Braxton Miller- I think hes garbage, but his skill set is the new rage.

that's 7 qbs. One of them will be there at 20.......

"Next year is a much better class of QB"

Guess what? It never ****ing is.

2013, which you called garbage, was poised to be potentially a pretty great one. Because next year's QB class always is.

2014 isn't going to be anything special. Teams may feel safer about drafting guys in the first round, but teams also felt safe about drafting Jake Locker, Brandon Weeden, Ryan Tannehill, and a bunch of other slapdicks in the 1st round.

Messier 07-12-2013 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9807007)
LMAO

You miss the point.

Alex Smith is not even as good David Krieg and never will be.

And that is sad.

This is awfully silly.

aturnis 07-12-2013 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maverick91579 (Post 9806799)
I said this before, and Ill say it again.

The chiefs will draft their qbotf this year. There is a lot more depth, and quality at qb upcoming in the draft. This last years draft class was doo doo. DOOOOOOO, DOOOOOOOOO. So bad that Dorsey, and Reid didn't even want to waste a 4th, or 5th rounder on one.

DOOKIE.

Now, lets say this next year, you don't make the playoffs, but you draft 20th.

There will be a qb there, you can take.

Teddy Bridgewater,
Logan Thomas,
Aaron Murray,
Bryn Renner,
Johnny Heisman,
Tahj Boyd,
Braxton Miller- I think hes garbage, but his skill set is the new rage.

that's 7 qbs. One of them will be there at 20.......

And before last college football season, the 2013 QB class was supposed to be good too. Sorry, none of those names excite me right now. We'll see after the college season plays out I guess.

'Hamas' Jenkins 07-12-2013 11:46 AM

If a QB is available for the Chiefs to pick he's not good enough, because the Chiefs have an opportunity to pick him.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-12-2013 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 9806883)
Don't have to be perfect. But it would be nice if it the QB was at least worthy of being drafted in the 1st round.

You first you stupid hateful ****!

And if YOU were making the ****ing call, we'd be sitting on our hands with our thumbs up our asses from here to eternity.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9806894)
Yes it was just the Jags that passed on Geno in the 1st, that's why he went in the 2nd round. LMAO

Keep posting jr.

As I said, those "real smart" folks at the jags. Do U see what I did there?

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9807334)
If a QB is available for the Chiefs to pick he's not good enough, because the Chiefs have an opportunity to pick him.

This. Most reeruned goddamned NFL franchise I've ever ****ing seen.

RunKC 07-12-2013 02:52 PM

Very excited about what our offense will look like this year.

Reid is going to do exactly what Harbaugh did and give Alex several options to look for in the passing game each passing play, just like how he excelled in SF.

Don't see any reason why he can't have success doing that more often with Andy Reid.

Alex had a 9-3 record with 14 TD's to 7 INT's (3 in his worst game) when he passed the ball 30 or more times the last 2 years. Don't see any reason why he can't continue to have success doing this with a QB friendly system.

DeezNutz 07-12-2013 02:57 PM

Logan Thomas was complete garbage last season, so he'll need a big rebound year to be discussed in the first.

This name isn't popular with some, but I do like Murray a lot, and I believe he might well be available at the back of the first round. If not, we can always package our first and second rounders to...****.

Chief Roundup 07-12-2013 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9807559)
And if YOU were making the ****ing call, we'd be sitting on our hands with our thumbs up our asses from here to eternity.

Hey dumbass think again.
I would have gave the Jags a 3rd rounder and moved up in front of the Dolphins and drafted Tannehill.
But go ahead and keep talking out of your ass. At least it will stink so we will know it is from you for sure.

Chief Roundup 07-12-2013 05:47 PM

I don't want or expect for this franchise to have to lose to be able to draft a good QB. I would rather see us give up multiple picks and move up when a quality player is there.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-12-2013 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9807641)
Very excited about what our offense will look like this year.

Reid is going to do exactly what Harbaugh did and give Alex several options to look for in the passing game each passing play, just like how he excelled in SF.

Don't see any reason why he can't have success doing that more often with Andy Reid.

Alex had a 9-3 record with 14 TD's to 7 INT's (3 in his worst game) when he passed the ball 30 or more times the last 2 years. Don't see any reason why he can't continue to have success doing this with a QB friendly system.

But, but, but Hef says if he throws it 60 times he'll only complete 30 passes...

MagicHef 07-12-2013 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9807641)
Very excited about what our offense will look like this year.

Reid is going to do exactly what Harbaugh did and give Alex several options to look for in the passing game each passing play, just like how he excelled in SF.

Don't see any reason why he can't have success doing that more often with Andy Reid.

Alex had a 9-3 record with 14 TD's to 7 INT's (3 in his worst game) when he passed the ball 30 or more times the last 2 years. Don't see any reason why he can't continue to have success doing this with a QB friendly system.

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9808084)
But, but, but Hef says if he throws it 60 times he'll only complete 30 passes...

30 passes per game is below league average. The average across the league was 35 passes per game.

Alex is 5-13 when he throws at least 35 times.

milkman 07-13-2013 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 9805510)
there's just so much reactionary thinking going on. I'm glad you guys aren't in charge of anything important. Your critical thinking skills are seriously lacking.

Dorsey/Reid does not equal Pioli/Crennel, or Peterson/Edwards.

There was no #1 QB around this year. So they took the highest rated vet.

Both Dorsey and Reid have been around/chosen/groomed franchise QB's. To assume they will now become Carl Peterson and Marty Shottenheimer circa 1990 is absurd.

Neither Dorsey nor Reid give a rat's ass what Pioli or Peterson did because they shouldn't. They are doing what they feel is best with the options they have available to them right NOW. Through that prism, it's pretty easy to be pleased so far.

There are two diiferent lines of thought here.
To preface those, I agree that they aren't concerned with the decisions that previous regimes have made.

That said, the decision to trade for one of two possible reasons.
They believe he can lead this team to a SB, or they simply wanted to stop the bleeding and bring in a QB that simply won't lose games.

Either way, I question the decision.
If it's because they have SB aspirations, then I question their evaluation.
Maybe they prove me wrong, but I just don't see a SB QB.

If they just brought him in to simply stop the bleeding, they could have brought in a cheaper alternative.

Either, unless Smith proves me wrong about his SB potential, they invested too much.

milkman 07-13-2013 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9806896)
It is pretty ironic and hypocritical.

I have seen multiple people post recently "well if we had drafted him he may have ended up a better QB"

Milk still sticks up for the guy.

I think you need to take reading comprehension courses.

I haven't stuck up for Sanchez.

I've stuck up for my position regarding Sanchez.

I have clearly stated that he has sucked since he came up.

I was also very clear in my position that I thought he was a kid with a high ceiling, but that it would be a mistake to start him right away.

Now, does that mean that I'd be right if they did bring him along slowly?

No.

But we'll never know for certain that I was wrong, either.

I've also pointed out that it was at this point in his career that Brees started to realize some of his potential.

I have my doubts that Sanchez will start to get it, because I believed that starting him too early could easily ruin his career.

But the potential for growth does still exist.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.