Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Guess what? It never ****ing is. 2013, which you called garbage, was poised to be potentially a pretty great one. Because next year's QB class always is. 2014 isn't going to be anything special. Teams may feel safer about drafting guys in the first round, but teams also felt safe about drafting Jake Locker, Brandon Weeden, Ryan Tannehill, and a bunch of other slapdicks in the 1st round. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
If a QB is available for the Chiefs to pick he's not good enough, because the Chiefs have an opportunity to pick him.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Very excited about what our offense will look like this year.
Reid is going to do exactly what Harbaugh did and give Alex several options to look for in the passing game each passing play, just like how he excelled in SF. Don't see any reason why he can't have success doing that more often with Andy Reid. Alex had a 9-3 record with 14 TD's to 7 INT's (3 in his worst game) when he passed the ball 30 or more times the last 2 years. Don't see any reason why he can't continue to have success doing this with a QB friendly system. |
Logan Thomas was complete garbage last season, so he'll need a big rebound year to be discussed in the first.
This name isn't popular with some, but I do like Murray a lot, and I believe he might well be available at the back of the first round. If not, we can always package our first and second rounders to...****. |
Quote:
I would have gave the Jags a 3rd rounder and moved up in front of the Dolphins and drafted Tannehill. But go ahead and keep talking out of your ass. At least it will stink so we will know it is from you for sure. |
I don't want or expect for this franchise to have to lose to be able to draft a good QB. I would rather see us give up multiple picks and move up when a quality player is there.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Alex is 5-13 when he throws at least 35 times. |
Quote:
To preface those, I agree that they aren't concerned with the decisions that previous regimes have made. That said, the decision to trade for one of two possible reasons. They believe he can lead this team to a SB, or they simply wanted to stop the bleeding and bring in a QB that simply won't lose games. Either way, I question the decision. If it's because they have SB aspirations, then I question their evaluation. Maybe they prove me wrong, but I just don't see a SB QB. If they just brought him in to simply stop the bleeding, they could have brought in a cheaper alternative. Either, unless Smith proves me wrong about his SB potential, they invested too much. |
Quote:
I haven't stuck up for Sanchez. I've stuck up for my position regarding Sanchez. I have clearly stated that he has sucked since he came up. I was also very clear in my position that I thought he was a kid with a high ceiling, but that it would be a mistake to start him right away. Now, does that mean that I'd be right if they did bring him along slowly? No. But we'll never know for certain that I was wrong, either. I've also pointed out that it was at this point in his career that Brees started to realize some of his potential. I have my doubts that Sanchez will start to get it, because I believed that starting him too early could easily ruin his career. But the potential for growth does still exist. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:19 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.