ChiefsPlanet - Football Browns, Bucs & Lions. Is this shit real?

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

Browns, Bucs & Lions. Is this shit real? (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=280137)

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 10326010)

I think Lovie is a great coach and could work wonders with that team's talent.

They really need to reel in Stafford though. I had read an article on NFL.com that Stafford said he wasn't interested in working with a coach on his mechanics. Said it wasn't his style or some bullshit. Dude will never learn..

Yeah its pretty sad. Reggie Bush tried to call a team meeting during the season when they started losing and Stafford said they didn't need one. The guy isn't a leader and isn't interested in getting better if it isn't on his own terms.
Posted via Mobile Device

Hey Dan Quinn, this is Mike Lombardi. Come for an interview we like what you've done with the seahawks D. Oh by the way, we have the Defense covered with Jim Schwartz coming to take over that side of the ball

this is Cleveland's THIRD go around with Pats frauds. How ****ed is that. How did you not learn with Romeo and Mangini

It's Real.

Real Stupid.

Why?

Even a casual fan of the Browns can tell you that all they needed to do was leave the defense UNTOUCHED and get the offense a playmaker that doesn't have Cameron or Gordon on his jersey.

Ray Horton is a much better DC than Schwartz.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10326247)

this is Cleveland's THIRD go around with Pats frauds. How ****ed is that. How did you not learn with Romeo and Mangini

Unbelievable.

Quote:

Offensive coordinator Norv Turner spoke up when Cleveland Browns owner Jimmy Haslam and CEO Joe Banner talked to the coaching staff Monday about the firing of coach Rob Chudzinski, according to sources familiar with the situation.

Whether it was a challenge or a calm question seems a matter of interpretation. Two sources said Turner was angry and spoke that way, another said he simply stated his concerns as part of a routine discussion that takes place when such moves are made.

Either way, Turner clearly asked why the staff was told the plan was for a long-term rebuild when the commitment from the front office didn't last a year. Turner also detailed his concern that the coaching staff worked with handicaps given the personnel on the field, the sources said.

Among his points were that the staff was told repeatedly the team was building for 2014, that the running back situation was never solved after the trade of Trent Richardson, the roster was constantly juggled, and the team fired a coach after he had to start three different quarterbacks.

The discussion followed Haslam laying out the thinking behind the firing of Chudzinski, which led to questions about the long-term plan for the team. A few seconds of calm followed, and Haslam asked if there were more questions.

Turner then spoke, and brought up the long-term plan and why the coaching staff would not be allowed to see it through. The implication was that coaches felt they went along with decisions all season that pointed to a committed rebuild, then had the lack of success in 2013 used against them.

Haslam and Banner explained the decision the same way they did to the media: The lack of progress late in the season was a downward trajectory the front office did not accept.

Sources said Turner did a slow boil throughout the season at the talent the coaches were given. That Chudzinski was fired given those limits prompted him to speak up.

Turner has been an NFL coach for 30 years, for 14 as a head coach with the Washington Redskins, San Diego Chargers and Oakland Raiders.

He is not expected to stay with the Browns. Banner said the team would allow all the assistants to seek other jobs and that the new hire would determine his staff.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/10...rob-chudzinski

*factory of sadness video*

"Sources said Turner did a slow boil"

I shouldn't have, but I laughed.

****ing Patriot clique.

Haslam will be blowing this thing up in a few years.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 10326249)

if they had any sense they would at least interview horton for the head job and consider throwning some serious cash at some offensive assistants although the ernhart perkins tree is pretty bare

They have a Pioli-led-Chiefs-like environment to their team. Why would any coach want to coach there? Why would any player want to sign there?

I guess this does answer the question. The Browns do indeed have the three stooges running their organization.

good for Norv to have some Balls. He has always seemed like quite the pushover

Browns making sure they follow each stupid decision with an even stupider decision.

Pretty interesting strategy.
Posted via Mobile Device