ROFL Nice one!

If Printers = Boerigter, go ahead and cut him now and save the trouble.

I said good fortune

This is ****ing pathetic. This forum will never give Huard a chance and judges him solely on one preseason game.

Huard reminds me of the backup QB in the movie Unnecessary Roughness, the one who begs the ref to blow the whistle the first time he gets in the game.

Can anyone here please justify why you would actually want Huard to be the guy that goes in the game if Green goes down? I will not accept "he knows the playbook" as a valid point of justification. All of these guys will know the playbook by the time the season rolls around.

Hypnosis could not allow me to imagine that Printers would beat out Croyle in camp. I just don't see that happening. And, I think we should face the sad fact that, should Green go down with a major injury, our season is over. We may have a great rushing offense, but we can't run it that much.

With that in mind, I say keep either Huard or Printers but definately keep Croyle. It won't really matter if the worst happens. Neither Huard nor Printers can carry this franchise into the future, in my view.

Also, I'm somewhat uncomfortable with overusing Dante at WR. I really liked having dominant special teams play. What year was that? Oh yeah, the one before we lost Derrick Blaylock.

FAX

Exactly. When it comes to backups, we as fans have no ability to judge them, cause what we see in preseason games and whatnot makes up about 5% of what they actually do. Even if it is the only real-game situations, the coaching staff still knows...

Moooo

In his one season of real action in Miami, he had a 79.8 QBR, 8 TDs, and 4 INTs. That's a far cry better than Printers or Croyle.

Yes.

I'm actually judging him on the crap statistics and the lowlights that I have seen of him in his previous stops around the NFL. The guy sucks. Period

Cut Huard. Keep Printers and Croyle. If they've both "done a nice job of picking up the offence" then who gives a shit if Huard has experience watching it from the bench. Printers of Croyle have too much talent to let one go in favor of Huard.

I'm guessing that's what we said when Bono went down too. You never know where you'll find great talent. I'm sure Vermeil thought the same thing when Green went down once before. You just can't say that for a fact.

why i think we should just roll the dice and cut Huard.


if Green goes down we are toast, so why not double our chances of developing a QBotF.

ROFL

Did you not see the stats I just posted?

I agree we can't judge him on one preseason game. However, do you really believe that the Chiefs are better off with him under center if Trent goes down than Printers or Croyle. I'm inclined to say no. At the very least it's worth the debate.