ChiefsPlanet
Page 5 of 10 1234 5 6789 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Blob Gretz = IT'S A TOUGH, LONG FIGHT (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=191823)

HemiEd 09-17-2008 10:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5028115)
:doh!:

No offense, Phil, but that was a typical fan response.

Since when do games against the Raiders count for more in the standings?

Would we have gotten credit for 2 wins had we beat them?

Rivalrys are for fans.

The team didn't seem to be prepared, I'll give you that - but you're insinuating that it wouldn't be as big of a deal had it not been against the Raiders.

A loss is a loss, period.

And for crying out loud, Jason Garrett is being paid Head Coach money by Jerry Jones to keep him from taking another job - the job in Dallas is his, as early as next season.

Jason Garrett, Marty Schottenheimer, Bill Cowher.

Cross them off your list. Not coming here.
Last I checked, the FANS pay the bills, and this game is entertainment.

IT IS important to most fans, to beat the Raiders. One more reason why Herm Edwards does not deserve to be the HC of the Chiefs. To not even look respectable against them, should be grounds for firing.

In Chicago, it is the Packers, and Lovie Smith acknowledged that when he was hired. He KNOWS the Packer game means more, and has accepted it.

But no, Herm, refuses to accept any status quo, because of his ULTRA LARGE ****ing EGO. **** Herm ****ing Edwards, I hope a buzzard flies up his ass and out his nose.

OnTheWarpath15 09-17-2008 10:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 5028175)
IT IS important to most fans, to beat the Raiders. One more reason why Herm Edwards does not deserve to be the HC of the Chiefs. To not even look respectable against them, should be grounds for firing.
:rolleyes:

HemiEd 09-17-2008 10:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5028160)
Which would matter if we're a playoff caliber team.

We're obviously not.

So a loss to Oakland isn't any different than a loss to Atlanta. Or New England. Or anyone else.
You got it all twisted. When you suck, you set your goals lower. Beating a hated rival, may be the only success the team has this year.

Hammock Parties 09-17-2008 10:18 AM
How can anyone expect us to beat ANY TEAM with Tyler ****ing Thigpen at QB?

luv 09-17-2008 10:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5028184)
How can anyone expect us to beat ANY TEAM with Tyler ****ing Thigpen at QB?
Chill. He was in because Huard was a wuss and the practice squad didn't work out.

Hammock Parties 09-17-2008 10:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luv (Post 5028192)
Chill. He was in because Huard was a wuss and the practice squad didn't work out.
This "Huard was a wuss" thing is reeruned. The guy got hurt. There's no conspiracy.

luv 09-17-2008 10:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5028195)
This "Huard was a wuss" thing is reeruned. The guy got hurt. There's no conspiracy.
His "stop, drop, and roll" maneuver let him down. :p

OnTheWarpath15 09-17-2008 10:23 AM
Jesus Vermeil went 5-7 against the division in his first 2 years, for comaparison's sake...

HemiEd 09-17-2008 10:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5028178)
:rolleyes:
Obviously, you and I look at the issue differently.

IMO, Herm is the worst coach this franchise has ever had.

HemiEd 09-17-2008 10:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5028205)
Jesus Vermeil went 5-7 against the division in his first 2 years, for comaparison's sake...
This isn't one of Herm's first two years.

Hammock Parties 09-17-2008 10:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5028205)
Jesus Vermeil went 5-7 against the division in his first 2 years, for comaparison's sake...
People are forgetting how HORRIBLE the first half of 2001 was.

Our "bright spot" early that year was running up the score on the Redskins. The rest of the time mostly all we had to look forward to was garbage-time drives that padded the offensive stats. We had TONS of garbage time touchdowns that year. Hell, the coaching staff didn't even know how to use Priest properly until he forced their hand.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 5028211)
This isn't one of Herm's first two years.
It's the same situation. You're blind if you can't see that.

OnTheWarpath15 09-17-2008 10:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 5028211)
This isn't one of Herm's first two years.
Jesus Christ, Ed.

Two years and 2 weeks.

BFD.

And yeah, I guess I'm different.

A win is just as sweet to me if it's against the Topeka School for the Blind or the New England Patriots.

A loss is just as disappointing if it's against either of those two teams as well.

OnTheWarpath15 09-17-2008 10:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5028212)
People are forgetting how HORRIBLE the first half of 2001 was.

Our "bright spot" early that year was running up the score on the Redskins. The rest of the time mostly all we had to look forward to was garbage-time drives that padded the offensive stats. We had TONS of garbage time touchdowns that year. Hell, the coaching staff didn't even know how to use Priest properly until he forced their hand.



It's the same situation. You're blind if you can't see that.
But Vermeil is our HERO!!11!11one!

HemiEd 09-17-2008 10:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5028221)
Jesus Christ, Ed.

Two years and 2 weeks.

BFD.

And yeah, I guess I'm different.

A win is just as sweet to me if it's against the Topeka School for the Blind or the New England Patriots.

A loss is just as disappointing if it's against either of those two teams as well.
Jesus Christ yourself, you are the one that confined DVs division record to the first two years. It wouldn't make a good case to include any part of the third, would it?

So you aren't into the rivalry thing, go it. I detest the Raiders, not as bad as I used to after the Ben Davidsion thing, but I still hate them. So losing to them, sucks more than losing to the Patriots. If that thinking doesn't work for you, sorry.

Hammock Parties 09-17-2008 10:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 5028237)
Jesus Christ yourself, you are the one that confined DVs division record to the first two years. It wouldn't make a good case to include any part of the third, would it?
Why would it? Vermeil's third year is totally irrelevant if we're going to compare the teams right now. Herm has not had a chance to build a team up as Vermeil did. He's JUST NOW STARTING to build a team. Can't you see that?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:23 PM.
Page 5 of 10 1234 5 6789 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.