Mr. Krab |
09-08-2009 11:33 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR
(Post 6045028)
No, it doesn't actually. Do you think David Carr got sacked by the Bengals back when he was playing with the Texans and said, "At least I didn't get hit by the Ravens. Those guys will murder you."
Every hit in the NFL is the same. People who say Cassel is going to die week 1 are insulting Cassel by saying he can't take hits.
Let's say the Ravens hit him 10 times in a game. What if he were playing the Raiders week 1 and got hit only 6 times? Do those 4 extra hits delivered by the Ravens put him in the stretcher?
I know why people think, "the Ravens have a tough defense. We're weak. We're going to lose" and then equate it with our players getting injured. But it's still a ****ing myth. One thing does not lead to the other. If you're going to say he'll die against the Ravens, then you may as well predict Cassel will get injured every time he steps onto the field.
|
That's just beyond stupid. You're assuming that each defense is going to hit Cassel the same amount of times and in the same way, based on our offensive line. Who would you rather be sacked by Monty Beisel or Albert Haynesworth? :spock:
1. The better the defense, the harder it is on the QB
2. The more physical the defense, the more risk for the QB
3. The better the defensive line specifically the worse for us
4. The better the DE's the worse for our QB because of our OT's
5. The better the Defense blitzes the worse for the QB
Hypothetically if a QB could choose which defense he played against every game all year long, not a single QB would pick the Ravens. Why?
OF COURSE THE DEFENSE MAKES A DIFFERENCE, YOU FUGTARD.
|