ChiefsPlanet
Page 5 of 6 1234 5 6
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Inactive list (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=214538)

Hammock Parties 09-20-2009 10:34 AM
This is definitely what is going on.

We are loading up with two tight ends and we are going to pound two giant ****ing running backs all day long.

Battle and LJ.

All. ****ing. Day.

Smashmouth mother****ing football.

BigMeatballDave 09-20-2009 10:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baby Got Grbac (Post 6089669)
Yeah...no.
You're not smart

milkman 09-20-2009 10:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6089825)
I usually agree with your takes. This isn't one of those times.
I usually agree with his takes, as well, and this time in no different.

The Bad Guy 09-20-2009 10:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6089831)
You can't agree all the time.

Of course, let's also not forget that being the best of a shit lot doesn't make you a great back.
No, it doesn't.

But I have seen hardly anything out of Charles that would suggest he's better than LJ, even in his broken down state.

Yes, he's a homerun hitter, but 90% of the time, he can't get his feet under him.

Reerun_KC 09-20-2009 10:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baby Got Grbac (Post 6089819)
I wouldn't be surprised to see Larry turn in a...18 carry, 85 yard performance today.
That is fail.

But that would be LJ...

Would take a 26 carry 165 yards and 2 tds...

Hammock Parties 09-20-2009 10:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6089836)
But I have seen hardly anything out of Charles that would suggest he's better than LJ, even in his broken down state.
The Seahawks game he really flashed...

I think people are going to realize he's better when he takes on a guy in the open field by the end of the year.

Pablo 09-20-2009 10:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6089836)
No, it doesn't.

But I have seen hardly anything out of Charles that would suggest he's better than LJ, even in his broken down state.

Yes, he's a homerun hitter, but 90% of the time, he can't get his feet under him.
Charles has vision at least. He can hit his first hole. LJ hasn't done that since 2007. And not to mention, it looks like LJ's wearing concrete boots out there.

Charles is the better back right now IMO.

Hammock Parties 09-20-2009 10:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PostRockPablo (Post 6089840)
. He can hit his first hole. LJ hasn't done that since 2007.
.
OK, this is reeruned.

LJ had a better year last year than 2007.

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-20-2009 10:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6089836)
No, it doesn't.

But I have seen hardly anything out of Charles that would suggest he's better than LJ, even in his broken down state.

Yes, he's a homerun hitter, but 90% of the time, he can't get his feet under him.
And 90% of the time, Larry goes for -1, 0, or 2 yards.

I guess I'll take Adam Dunn over John Buck, even if their average is roughly similar.

milkman 09-20-2009 10:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PostRockPablo (Post 6089840)
Charles has vision at least. He can hit his first hole. LJ hasn't done that since 2007. And not to mention, it looks like LJ's wearing concrete boots out there.

Charles is the better back right now IMO.
That right there is exactly it in a nutshell.

Chiefaholic 09-20-2009 10:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6089650)
35 carries for Larry

pound that ****ing rock

(for 85 yards lol)
Larry got paid... He's no longer "pissed off larry" and NEVER puts the second effort in that he used to. He used to play to get paid, now he plays not to get injured.

Hammock Parties 09-20-2009 10:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefaholic (Post 6089860)
Larry got paid... He's no longer "pissed off larry" and NEVER puts the second effort in that he used to. He used to play to get paid, now he plays not to get injured.
I personally think this isn't true at all.

Haley wouldn't tolerate it.

There's just no running room.

Chiefshrink 09-20-2009 10:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6089665)
We don't know that he's injured.

It might be part of the gameplan. Maybe they want to use Battle.
You have hit the nail on the head with BATTLE!! Battle has probably outperformed Charles this last week in practice and does NOT fumble the ball! Haley sending a strong Parcells type of message to 'the player'!:thumb:

alanm 09-20-2009 10:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6089731)
Jamaal Charles-RB- Chiefs Sep. 20 - 11:54 am et


Chiefs declared RB Jamaal Charles, OG Andy Alleman, TE Brad Cottam, Matt Gutierrez, LB Pierre Walters, CB Ricardo Colclough, WR Terrance Copper, and third QB Tyler Thigpen inactive for Week 2.
Charles' deactivation is a big surprise because he is healthy. The Chiefs may be rolling with only Jackie Battle behind Larry Johnson with plans to attack the Raiders on the ground. Charles is a passing-down specialist.
Jamaal's in the doghouse. :shake:

Reerun_KC 09-20-2009 10:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefaholic (Post 6089860)
Larry got paid... He's no longer "pissed off larry" and NEVER puts the second effort in that he used to. He used to play to get paid, now he plays not to get injured.
Agree 110%

LJ wont be on this team much longer... Probably survive this year... But RB's are a dime a dozen... Especially ones that are hungry to run and prove themselves in the NFL...

LJ has been paid. He is the new Leon...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:31 AM.
Page 5 of 6 1234 5 6
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.