ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football New Orleans is the '99 Rams (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=216485)

TheGuardian 02-08-2010 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 6515034)
Who, as a team, was less talented?

What team can you honestly say was worse from position 1 to 22?...

They have possibly one of the best lines in the entire league. They have a pro bowl end, a pro bowl mike backer, a pro bowl safety (should have two with Harper) and two corners that played about as well as any duo in the league. I think Greer gave up 1 TD all season.

When you factor in Brees and how he can spread the ball around they are far more talented than what you are giving them credit for.

Second, talent doesn't really mean shit if you can't get it done. Everyone called the Chargers the most talented team in the league for years and they never won a damned thing.

The Saints reeled off 13 straight wins this season against GOOD teams, then went through 3 future HoF QB's to win the SB.

This is why some people should be bitch slapped before they post nonsense like you did.

Rausch 02-08-2010 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 6515042)
They have possibly one of the best lines in the entire league. They have a pro bowl end, a pro bowl mike backer, a pro bowl safety (should have two with Harper) and two corners that played about as well as any duo in the league. I think Greer gave up 1 TD all season.

When you factor in Brees and how he can spread the ball around they are far more talented than what you are giving them credit for.

Second, talent doesn't really mean shit if you can't get it done. Everyone called the Chargers the most talented team in the league for years and they never won a damned thing.

The Saints reeled off 13 straight wins this season against GOOD teams, then went through 3 future HoF QB's to win the SB.

This is why some people should be bitch slapped before they post nonsense like you did.

Soooooooo...no one.

What ****ing team do all those mediocre probowlers compare to in SB history?

Who on that team is going to the HOF? Anyone? ONE PLAYER?

TheGuardian 02-08-2010 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 6515052)
Soooooooo...no one.

What ****ing team do all those mediocre probowlers compare to in SB history?

Who on that team is going to the HOF? Anyone? ONE PLAYER?

This is about as dumb a ****ing thing as I've read here. And I've read some dumb shit.

First your argument is that the Saints are HANDS DOWN the worst SB winning team ever.

This is based on? How many hall of fame players they might have on the team.

did your mother have any children that lived?

If the Saints had ran off 13 straight wins playing the leagues softest schedule in the history of the NFL, then went through 3 straight backups at QB you might have a point. But they didn't. They beat a bunch of good teams or teams that were playing at a high level at the time they beat them.

Then they beat Warner, Favre, and Manning in the playoffs to win the title. It doesn't matter if a single ****ing member of that team ever makes the HoF, by no means can you say they are HANDS DOWN the worst SB winner ever. Hell, if anything they could be one of the best single season teams ever you ****ing idiot.

Rausch 02-08-2010 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 6515068)
This is about as dumb a ****ing thing as I've read here. And I've read some dumb shit.

First your argument is that the Saints are HANDS DOWN the worst SB winning team ever.

This is based on? How many hall of fame players they might have on the team.

did your mother have any children that lived?

If the Saints had ran off 13 straight wins playing the leagues softest schedule in the history of the NFL, then went through 3 straight backups at QB you might have a point. But they didn't. They beat a bunch of good teams or teams that were playing at a high level at the time they beat them.

Then they beat Warner, Favre, and Manning in the playoffs to win the title. It doesn't matter if a single ****ing member of that team ever makes the HoF, by no means can you say they are HANDS DOWN the worst SB winner ever. Hell, if anything they could be one of the best single season teams ever you ****ing idiot.

So your argument is "no, I can't refute what you say."

So shut the **** up then. Droning on about the fact that they beat everyone in their path on the way to the super bowl IS ****ING REDUNDANT. SO DID EVERY OTHER SUPER BOWL TEAM.

This does not change the fact that our SB champs this year are the least talented team to ever win a SB...

The_Doctor10 02-08-2010 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 6515104)
So your argument is "no, I can't refute what you say."

So shut the **** up then. Droning on about the fact that they beat everyone in their path on the way to the super bowl IS ****ING REDUNDANT. SO DID EVERY OTHER SUPER BOWL TEAM.

This does not change the fact that our SB champs this year are the least talented team to ever win a SB...

So the team that has been one of the most prolific offensive football clubs in the past 5 years, has no talent?

I'm guessing you also think the three Patriot teams are talentless because the best WR on them was Deion Branch?

L.A. Chieffan 02-08-2010 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 6515104)

This does not change the fact that our SB champs this year are the least talented team to ever win a SB...

:spock:

Mastashake 02-08-2010 01:22 AM

How can beat teams in the PLAYOFFS who have quarterbacks like Warner, Favre, and Manning, and still be considered weak?

What the hell do the Saints have to do in order to be considered great? Does Brees have to throw for 6000 yards, or have a 120 passer rating (since 110 isn't good enough)? Since throwing 6 TD to no INTs (getting a QB rating of 116) in the playoffs isn't good enough, maybe he should have to throw for 12 TDs and negative number of picks.

Or maybe they need to have 10 defensive TDs in a year? I guess eight isn't enough, even though the next closest team only had four.

Its like if you have a good offense without a stellar defense (though with the TOs New Orleans had this year, I'd consider them very good), your wins are demoted. A WIN IS A WIN. If its 40-39, you won just as much as if it were 7-6.

The_Doctor10 02-08-2010 01:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 6515052)
Soooooooo...no one.

What ****ing team do all those mediocre probowlers compare to in SB history?

Who on that team is going to the HOF? Anyone? ONE PLAYER?

PS Sharper and Brees are going to the Hall of Fame. Evans may well one day, he's the best young guards in the NFL. Jonathan Vilma has been to multiple Pro Bowls, and he's got at least 5-6 good years left in him. Sedrick Ellis is 2 years in.

Bottom line, your argument is ****ing reeruned.

L.A. Chieffan 02-08-2010 01:24 AM

Rausch must be wasted

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-08-2010 04:56 AM

Jabari Greer is one of the 5 best CBs in the NFL, and no one knows about him.

Crush 02-08-2010 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6515423)
Jabari Greer is one of the 5 best CBs in the NFL, and no one knows about him.


When you do things right, people won’t be sure you’ve done anything at all.

TheGuardian 02-08-2010 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 6515104)
So your argument is "no, I can't refute what you say."

So shut the **** up then. Droning on about the fact that they beat everyone in their path on the way to the super bowl IS ****ING REDUNDANT. SO DID EVERY OTHER SUPER BOWL TEAM.

This does not change the fact that our SB champs this year are the least talented team to ever win a SB...

I refuted everything you said. you're just too stupid to understand it.

you still haven't shown what makes the Saints the least talented team to ever win a Super Bowl.

The are the second highest scoring offense of all time. They had 6 or 7 pro bowlers on this team from this year.

I believe that the year the Pats won the SB, or one of the years, they didn't have a single pro bowler on the entire team. Does that make them the least talented dynasty ever?

You are the biggest ****ing idiot on this board. HANDS DOWN.

Sully 02-08-2010 09:13 AM

I think the Giants team that beat the Pats was less talented than this Saints team.

OnTheWarpath15 02-08-2010 09:17 AM

1999-present Colts are the 1991-2005 Atlanta Braves.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.