ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football I hope the Pats beat the ever living sh*t (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=240224)

2112 01-13-2011 07:11 AM

JD, I like you dude. I think you're a funny poster. but you are acting like a 12 year old in this thread..lol..I mean seriously. no wonder nobody goes over to that shithole PP anymore.

blaise 01-13-2011 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JD10367 (Post 7351039)
And I wish you'd choke on an AIDS-filled penis.

Oh, BTW, take a look at the Great Gazoo Peyton Manning. You want to see someone who whines to the refs like a bitch? Every ****ing play that doesn't go his way, he throws his hands up in the air and gives them Peyton Face.

Come on dude, are you denying that Brady cries for a flag when he's hit? He does it all the time. He's a great QB, and I hope the Pats beat the Jets but Brady definitely campaigns for flags a lot.

BigRichard 01-13-2011 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 7350846)
ROFL

He's unshuttupable.

The good thing about all this is that it helps make the game more interesting. I was just about to stop watching football altogether, but I think I'll dial this one up just to see Rex order his squad to take a team leak on the Pats logo.

FAX

What happens when an unshuttupable fatass comes into contact with a Belichikian force? Does a large wormhole open up in Gillette Stadium? Does the world suddenly implode? :hmmm:

2112 01-13-2011 07:18 AM

JD with a complete meltdown in this thread ROFL this might get real fun!

Hey, can you neg rep me again for bruising your sensitive vagina?

Deberg_1990 01-13-2011 07:21 AM

Rex is nearly a carbon copy of his dad with the Eagles 20 years ago. He used to spout the same rhetoric as well and never won any hardware to back it up.

Bane 01-13-2011 07:26 AM

I really didn't have a dog in this fight at first but after seeing SuckMarte mumble some kinda of gravel mouthed bullshit that I really didn't understand (had to get on espn.com to find out wtf he said),my views have changed.I hope the Pats hang 50 on them and rub the Jets vagina's in it all day long and make them look like the frauds they are.

2112 01-13-2011 07:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bane (Post 7351070)
I really didn't have a dog in this fight at first but after seeing SuckMarte mumble some kinda of gravel mouthed bullshit that I really didn't understand (had to get on espn.com to find out wtf he said),my views have changed.I hope the Pats hang 50 on them and rub the Jets vagina's in it all day long and make them look like the frauds they are.

It's a good thing Im not JD or I would be going hysterical right now pounding my keyboard and hoping you would die in a fire over those comments. ROFL

Like I said earlier in this thread, the Jets talked shit about Bradys wife leading up to that last game. they got their asses kicked and are now crying about getting their asses kicked? :spock: I personally hate all the shit talking and wish they would just stfu. but Im not sure thats ever gonna happen.

Spott 01-13-2011 07:38 AM

The Pats are probably going to beat them by a few touchdowns, but if probably won't stop Ryan from talking. If 45-3 didn't shut him up, I doubt any other losses will.

Amnorix 01-13-2011 07:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kysirsoze (Post 7350736)
This is the last I'll say on it, but there is no way you can make that statement. If it had zero to do with it, they wouldn't have done it. I'm not saying it's why they won their SBs. Just saying they're cheaters.

They violated a rule, were caught, and were punished. It was three years ago, and their winning percentage post-being-caught (under BB) is higher than it was pre-being-caught.

Feel free to hold it against them forever, that's fine, but if you think they were the only ones doing that kind of thing, you are certainly very much mistaken.

Amnorix 01-13-2011 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 7350867)
Yes he is. I can't remember what game it was, but sometime last year he got sacked, whined and cried to the ref for a flag and then pumped his fist when he finally got it. And then him trying to outrun Suzy Kolber for a postgame interview was a complete bitch move too. **** that guy, I wish Pollard would've ended his career.

Stay classy my man. Stay classy.

2112 01-13-2011 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 7351082)
They violated a rule, were caught, and were punished. It was three years ago, and their winning percentage post-being-caught (under BB) is higher than it was pre-being-caught.

Feel free to hold it against them forever, that's fine, but if you think they were the only ones doing that kind of thing, you are certainly very much mistaken.

Look, you have to admit that there have not been any amazing 2nd half adjustments by mumbles since the cameras were taken away. and you can try and justify it all you want, but the bottom line is they havent won a super bowl since 2004. and had they still had cameras during that Giants super bowl and knew what plays were coming I doubt the Giants come back in that game.

Amnorix 01-13-2011 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D2112 (Post 7351089)
Look, you have to admit that there have not been any amazing 2nd half adjustments by mumbles since the cameras were taken away, and you can try and justify it all you want, but the bottom line is they havent won a super bowl since 2004. and had they still had cameras during that Giants super bowl and knew what plays were coming I doubt the Giants come back in that game.



This actually proves that you don't know what you're talking about.

1. The filming of signals couldn't possibly be done, processed, analyzed and then fed back into BB to make analytical use of by halftime for use in the second half. It's just not feasible.

2. Didn't win a Super Bowl? Yeah, they just had an undefeated season and then lost a Super Bowl with some very lucky/fluky plays went against them. Which I have no problem with. Everyone can use some luck, and the Giants played completely out of their minds that game. They were the better team that day. But it's nto like the Patriots have really struggled since the start of 2007 when all this came out. Obviously that's not remotely true.

3. I don't remember the exact details of the game in terms of score changes, but it was neck and neck throughout and the Giants only came back from one score down at the end. Compare to, say, the AFCC game against the Colts, PRE-SPYGATE, when the Colts roared back in the 2nd half after being down 17 points or whatever at halftime to win.

You think you know what you're talking about, but you don't.

2112 01-13-2011 08:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 7351093)
This actually proves that you don't know what you're talking about.

1. The filming of signals couldn't possibly be done, processed, analyzed and then fed back into BB to make analytical use of by halftime for use in the second half. It's just not feasible.

Dude! they were filming the Rams walk through before the Super bowl in 2001. did you know that? it wasnt just the games they were video taping. and whats makes you think theyre gonna tip their hat on what they know in the first half anyways?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 7351093)
2. Didn't win a Super Bowl? Yeah, they just had an undefeated season and then lost a Super Bowl with some very lucky/fluky plays went against them. Which I have no problem with. Everyone can use some luck, and the Giants played completely out of their minds that game. They were the better team that day. But it's nto like the Patriots have really struggled since the start of 2007 when all this came out. Obviously that's not remotely true.

Please, their recent performances in big games have not been all that good. dont you think? Giants super bowl.the Ravens in the playoffs last year? that was unheard of before the cameras were taken away. I wont mension the Colts game because it was 2006.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 7351093)
3. I don't remember the exact details of the game in terms of score changes, but it was neck and neck throughout and the Giants only came back from one score down at the end. Compare to, say, the AFCC game against the Colts, PRE-SPYGATE, when the Colts roared back in the 2nd half after being down 17 points or whatever at halftime to win.

You think you know what you're talking about, but you don't.

You got me on the Colts game. that was the 2006 season. then what happened in that game? :evil:

Chiefnj2 01-13-2011 08:11 AM

Rex is a smart guy.

Everyone is talking about him. What he said, what he justifies. That's exactly, 100% what he wants. Get the media attention on him, and not the players. Don't focus on the whopping they took a few weeks back and the possible cause of it. Don't focus on Sanchez being shaky in New England. Focus on him so his players get off easily.

He's playing the national media.

Amnorix 01-13-2011 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D2112 (Post 7351098)
Dude! they were filming the Rams walk through before the Super bowl in 2001. did you know that? it wasnt just the games they were video taping. and whats makes you think theyre gonna tip their hat on what they know in the first half anyways?

I love it!!

Quote:

The Boston Herald sports writer who reported the New England Patriots taped a pre-Super Bowl walk-through by the St. Louis Rams in 2002 said he will regret the erroneous story for the rest of his life.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3398828

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boston Herald
On Feb. 2, 2008, the Boston Herald reported that a member of the New England Patriots' video staff taped the St. Louis Rams' walk-through on the day before Super Bowl XXXVI. While the Boston Herald based its Feb. 2, 2008, report on sources that it believed to be credible, we now know that this report was false, and that no tape of the walk-through ever existed

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3395152

Quote:

Originally Posted by D2112
Please, their recent performances in big games have not been all that good. dont you think? Giants super bowl.the Ravens in the playoffs last year? that was unheard of before the cameras were taken away. I wont mension the Colts game because it was 2006.

So the 16 games they won to complete a perfect season, with pressure mounting, those weren't big games? The divisional round playoff game wasn't a big game in 2007? The AFC Championship Game in 2007 wasn't a big game? Oh, right, they WON those, so they weren't. It was helmet-catch by now-out-of-football David Tyree and Eli Manning escaping by the skin of his teeth from a fourth down sack -- they lost that so that's a big game. The rest weren't.

The game on MNF when they blew the Jets doors out to seize absolutely control of the AFC East and the entire AFC, getting the #1 seed? That wasn't a big game either of course. Because, you know, they won that one.

2008. Brady's knee

2009. A deeply flawed team with a fair number of character issues. Hell, they went only 10-6 against a pretty soft schedule, and then got blown out at home. It just wasn't a very good team.

Quote:

Originally Posted by D2112
You got me on the Colts game. that was the 2006 season. then what happened in that game? :evil:

The Colts played better. :shrug:

You can't really upset me with this stuff. My father lived to be in his 70s and was a die hard sports fan, especially football and baseball. By the time the Red Sox and Patriots were winning Championships, he didn't know his own name, and died soon thereafter. I've lived to see multiple championships by every Boston sports team there is, except the Bruins who I don't care about anyway.

But you're clearly chock full of incorrect "facts". The Rams taping is like the icing on the cake to prove that.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.