![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
What about giving up 12 1sts and 16 2nds for RGIII? If you say no, then we've established that there is some limit on what people would trade up for to get a 1st round QB. The question is merely where the limit is. And my take is that rather than pay 2 1sts and 2 2nds, let's see who's available with our 1st as it stands. Looking at the ten years from 1997 through 2006 (throwing out the last five years since we don't know career arcs yet), here are the quarterbacks drafted in the first 9 picks: Group 1 Vince Young Alex Smith Eli Manning Phillip Rivers Carson Palmer Byron Leftwich David Carr Joey Harrington Michael Vick Tim Couch Donovan McNabb Akili Smith Peyton Manning Ryan Leaf Here are the quarterbacks drafted in picks 10 through 19: Group 2 Matt Leinert Jay Cutler Ben Roethlisberger Kyle Boller Chad Pennington Daunte Culpepper Cade McNown Here are quarterbacks taken in picks 20 through 31 in that period: Group 3 Jim Druckenmiller Patrick Ramsey Rex Grossman J.P. Losman Aaron Rodgers Jason Campbell Here are quarterbacks taken in the 2nd round in that period: Group 4 Jake Plummer Charlie Batch Shaun King Drew Brees Quincy Carter Marques Tuiasasopo Tarvaris Jackson So would I rather have one pull on the slot machine from Group 1, or would I rather have one pull in Group 2, one in Group 3, and 2 in Group 4? We could probably do the math, but offhand it seems to me like I'd rather have more pulls on the slot machine, because I see some pretty good quarterbacks in that group and I have more tries to get them. I don't know if there's a salary cap deal, but I think mathematically you'd be better off drafting QB after QB with all those picks until one of them works out. Not to mention the fact that if your first or second guy works out then you can redirect the later picks since they're not all happening this year. So the bottom line is that turning down a trade of 2 1sts and 2 2nds isn't a statement that I don't want a franchise QB. It's a statement that there may be a better option for getting one. In this case it would be flooding your roster with QBs using those picks and hoping that one of them is the next Brees or Rodgers or Roethlisberger. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The offense looked like a real offense with Palko at the helm
Cassel exposed all the offense's flaws & Palko just exposed his own flaws Cassel made everything worse |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
LEt them eat Landry Jones
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:54 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.