ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football 11 QB's under the gun in '12 (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=262753)

htismaqe 08-23-2012 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8844700)
It just depends on the discussion to fit ones agenda during the conversation.

You hear here all the time that a franchise qb makes the line and wr's better. Then you will turn around and hear that a franchise qb needs better talent around him, etc...

It also depends on who you are talking about... QB A = fans like him vs QB B fans hate him will determine what side of the fence they are on.

And of course, neither side makes their argument in such simplistic terms...

Methinks you're just trying to be difficult. :p

Chiefnj2 08-23-2012 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher (Post 8844728)
but Krieg failed in Buffalo when it counted most after Montana went out with a concussion.

Not really.

First, those Buffalo teams were loaded with talent. A much better team than KC. Second, Buffalo had 229 yards rushing compared to KC who had about 50. IIRC DT was pulled because Buffalo was running right at him and were picking up huge chunks.

Finally, Montana's final stats were 9 of 23 with 0 TD and 1 INT. Krieg was 16 of 29 with 0 TD and 1 INT. It wasn't like Montana was having a good day when he went down.

WhiteWhale 08-23-2012 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8844749)
Not really.

First, those Buffalo teams were loaded with talent. A much better team than KC. Second, Buffalo had 229 yards rushing compared to KC who had about 50. IIRC DT was pulled because Buffalo was running right at him and were picking up huge chunks.

Finally, Montana's final stats were 9 of 23 with 0 TD and 1 INT. Krieg was 16 of 29 with 0 TD and 1 INT. It wasn't like Montana was having a good day when he went down.

True, but I remember a lot of dropped passes in that game.

I clearly remember Kimble Anders dropping an easy TD pass from Montana...

Reerun_KC 08-23-2012 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8844745)
And of course, neither side makes their argument in such simplistic terms...

Methinks you're just trying to be difficult. :p

Not at all, Just saying both sides of the argument are used when talking about a franchise QB.

Its really nothing more than someones personal opinion when it comes to the QB position.

BoneKrusher 08-23-2012 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8844749)
Not really.

First, those Buffalo teams were loaded with talent. A much better team than KC. Second, Buffalo had 229 yards rushing compared to KC who had about 50. IIRC DT was pulled because Buffalo was running right at him and were picking up huge chunks.

Finally, Montana's final stats were 9 of 23 with 0 TD and 1 INT. Krieg was 16 of 29 with 0 TD and 1 INT. It wasn't like Montana was having a good day when he went down.

couldnt remember the stats thanks for posting.
that's the best the Chiefs have done in my lifetime. as a KC Chief fan (making it to the Championship Game.)

vailpass 08-23-2012 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 8844626)
If Cassell leads this team to the playoffs this season you have to admit that the experiment has been a success and he deserves a multi-year extension.

Even if for some reason he doesnt and the year is not a COMPLETE disaster he should be be back for next season regardless because how cheap he is.

I enjoy watching you work.

Frosty 08-23-2012 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8844749)
Not really.

First, those Buffalo teams were loaded with talent. A much better team than KC. Second, Buffalo had 229 yards rushing compared to KC who had about 50. IIRC DT was pulled because Buffalo was running right at him and were picking up huge chunks.

Finally, Montana's final stats were 9 of 23 with 0 TD and 1 INT. Krieg was 16 of 29 with 0 TD and 1 INT. It wasn't like Montana was having a good day when he went down.

I kind of remember Kreig coming into one of the playoff games while the Chiefs were down quite a bit and leading the team on a TD drive and then Montana came back in and tied it up. The Pittsburgh game?

htismaqe 08-23-2012 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8844754)
Not at all, Just saying both sides of the argument are used when talking about a franchise QB.

Its really nothing more than someones personal opinion when it comes to the QB position.

Not really opinion at all.

Great QBs elevate the play of those around them. But they can't turn chicken shit into chicken salad. Pretty simple really.

WhiteWhale 08-23-2012 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8844754)
Not at all, Just saying both sides of the argument are used when talking about a franchise QB.

Its really nothing more than someones personal opinion when it comes to the QB position.

You're saying that people use whichever argument is convenient.

I think you're right.

Although I think both arguments can be used legitimately if one is willing to actually look at the players he's supported by.

This is my opinion, and I don't care who agrees. If you have a stacked offense, then there are probably 40 QB's you can win with. The major problem is that you can't stack teams like that anymore without sacrificing somewhere else. That philosophy won Joe Gibbs quite a few rings prior to the modern FA era.

Obviously it's better to have 1 guy (a QB) making the other 10 look better than they are rather than 10 guys making a QB look good. One has a much longer shelf life.

htismaqe 08-23-2012 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 8844771)
You're saying that people use whichever argument is convenient.

I think you're right.

Although I think both arguments can be used legitimately if one is willing to actually look at the players he's supported by.

This is my opinion, and I don't care who agrees. If you have a stacked offense, then there are probably 40 QB's you can win with. The major problem is that you can't stack teams like that anymore without sacrificing somewhere else. That philosophy won Joe Gibbs quite a few rings prior to the modern FA era.

Obviously it's better to have 1 guy (a QB) making the other 10 look better than they are rather than 10 guys making a QB look good. One has a much longer shelf life.

Yup.

BoneKrusher 08-23-2012 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frosty (Post 8844762)
I kind of remember Kreig coming into one of the playoff games while the Chiefs were down quite a bit and leading the team on a TD drive and then Montana came back in and tied it up. The Pittsburgh game?

yeah, Krieg was streaky.
when he was Bad he was Bad but When he was on he was hard to beat.

Bump 08-23-2012 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8844218)
I would have added Peyton to that list.

He just got released by the only team he's ever played for because of recurring neck problems. Missed all of last season and hasn't been impressive compared to his standards so far in Denver. And they drafted Osweiler in the 2nd.

they released him because he's old and they sucked so much without him they couldn't pass on Luck.

vailpass 08-23-2012 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 8844811)
they released him because he's old and they sucked so much without him they couldn't pass on Luck.

Yep. Lucky sons of bitches.

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-23-2012 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 8844626)
If Cassell leads this team to the playoffs this season you have to admit that the experiment has been a success and he deserves a multi-year extension.

Even if for some reason he doesnt and the year is not a COMPLETE disaster he should be be back for next season regardless because how cheap he is.

Ahem,

**** AND No.

whoman69 08-23-2012 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 8844626)
If Cassell leads this team to the playoffs this season you have to admit that the experiment has been a success and he deserves a multi-year extension.

Even if for some reason he doesnt and the year is not a COMPLETE disaster he should be be back for next season regardless because how cheap he is.

If Cassel doesn't at least lead this team to a playoff win, he shouldn't even come back next year, let alone get an extention.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.