ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Donovan McNabb Says Stafford Hasn't Earned His Contract (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=274430)

Deberg_1990 07-10-2013 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9804205)

Personally I think Detroit, Baltimore, and Dallas have all now ****ed up and I am fine with it.

What should thy have done that would have improved their teams above where they are at currently? What would you have done? Great young QBs don't exactly grow on trees......

Marcellus 07-10-2013 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9804212)
LMAO

And they will all win more games during the Alex Smith era than the Chiefs.

Betcha.

Dude your shtick is old. Just find another team to follow. You are just another crybaby bitch.

You want to "bet" on whether KC wins more games than any of those 3 teams with Smith as QB you are on. You wont owe up anyway when yo lose.

Hammock Parties 07-10-2013 07:55 PM

It's not really a difficult statement to stand behind.

Alex Smith has had 1.5 winning seasons in his entire career.

Marcellus 07-10-2013 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9804215)
What should thy have done that would have improved their teams above where they are at currently? What would you have done? Great young QBs don't exactly grow on trees......

Let me get this straight, you propose that any QB that has had marginal success (Romo and Stafford) should get a block buster deal when the time comes because Oh shit what else are they going to do?

BTW did you not follow this offseason and draft? CP fully believes any young QB is a talented QB and could have been had in rounds 1 -4 this year and we ****ed up so why not Dallas, Baltimore or Detroit?

This thread is hilarious, its the exact opposite of the predraft threads.

Marcellus 07-10-2013 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9804228)
It's not really a difficult statement to stand behind.

Alex Smith has had 1.5 winning seasons in his entire career.

Stafford?

Keep in mind his injury plagued seasons (oh no Alex Smith is Injury prone)

O.city 07-10-2013 08:00 PM

What McNabb doesn't get here is that, like all free agents, you shouldn't or don't pay for what they've done but what they can do in the future.

Pay for what they can bring not what they've done

Marcellus 07-10-2013 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9804238)
What McNabb doesn't get here is that, like all free agents, you shouldn't or don't pay for what they've done but what they can do in the future.

Pay for what they can bring not what they've done

Is that not why we traded for Alex Smith?

O.city 07-10-2013 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9804242)
Is that not why we traded for Alex Smith?

Obviously it's a little different situation as far as age skill level etc, but pretty much

Marcellus 07-10-2013 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9804249)
Obviously it's a little different situation as far as age skill level etc, but pretty much

Stafford has put up big numbers throwing the ball 675 and over 700 times a season.

He threw the ball over 700x last season with < 60% completion % and they won 4 games.

Give him big $$$$$ he is a stud.

Saul Good 07-10-2013 08:08 PM

I would have traded our first overall pick for Stafford gladly for Stafford. Hell, I'd have thrown in the draft picks we spent on Alex Smith.

Marcellus 07-10-2013 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 9804260)
I would have traded our first overall pick for Stafford gladly for Stafford. Hell, I'd have thrown in the draft picks we spent on Alex Smith.

Why? What has he done to warrant that?

Saul Good 07-10-2013 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9804242)
Is that not why we traded for Alex Smith?

Alex Smith has shown that he can bring about 130 yards a game.

Matt Stafford has shown 5,000 and 40.

Saul Good 07-10-2013 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9804262)
Why? What has he done to warrant that?

He has shown that he is capable of being a superstar. He has that in him. He has something that Alex Smith simply does not have in him.

O.city 07-10-2013 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9804257)
Stafford has put up big numbers throwing the ball 675 and over 700 times a season.

He threw the ball over 700x last season with < 60% completion % and they won 4 games.

Give him big $$$$$ he is a stud.

So you wouldn't have paid him?


I gotta say, your preachy holier than thou shit has gotten pretty old and stale around here. You get upset about people only bitching and moaning about the chiefs when that's all you do about other posters. You rarely talk about football, you just piss and moan that everyone else pisses and moans.

Move on

Mav 07-10-2013 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9804242)
Is that not why we traded for Alex Smith?

Unfortunately Marcellus, you are arguing with some guys who cant use the logic and understanding needed to understand why Alex Smith is the qb of the Chiefs.

So, to try to explain it to them, is just going to leave you with a headache.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.