ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs My 53-Man heading into Pre-Season Week 2 (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=285740)

OldSchool 08-18-2014 05:42 PM

I'd rather keep an extra WR who has shown promise than an extra DB who will always suck donkey balls.

htismaqe 08-18-2014 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10830049)
I'd rather keep an extra WR who has shown promise than an extra DB who will always suck donkey balls.

Neither Jenkins nor Hemmingway have shown anything at all, let alone "promise".

kccrow 08-18-2014 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 10830012)
I don't see the point in keeping Daniel.

If Smith goes down, we are ****ed. Why not get a young pup in there to see what he has.

Ideally, I agree. It doesn't seem the KC brass is trending that way however. Bray and Murray have both shown me enough to think they could both hold the clipboard as well as Daniel, and would combine to make less than Daniel.

saphojunkie 08-18-2014 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10830049)
I'd rather keep an extra WR who has shown promise than an extra DB who will always suck donkey balls.

Shit I'd rather convert one of those WR to DB. Can't be any worse.

htismaqe 08-18-2014 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 10830064)
Shit I'd rather convert one of those WR to DB. Can't be any worse.

Jenkins has some serious speed, maybe we should try it.

OldSchool 08-18-2014 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10830069)
Jenkins has some serious speed, maybe we should try it.

The knock on him is that he's soft. Not going to work.

I'd rather keep Van Dyke than have the 5th safety on the roster.

kccrow 08-18-2014 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10830057)
Neither Jenkins nor Hemmingway have shown anything at all, let alone "promise".

Agreed.

KC carried 3 RBs and 6 WRs last season. They carried 10 DBs. I see them going a similar route once again.

RB appears to have Charles, Davis and Gray with Thomas as a possible flex (WR primarily)

WR as Bowe, Avery, Thomas (flex RB), and what looks to be Hammond and Lewis to this point. Both Hammond and Lewis have shown me more promise than Jenkins and Hemingway. I'd have to say I might lean towards Hemingway if he could stay out of the tub, but neither have been much of anything.

As for the DBs, I look for KC to once again carry 5 CBs and 5 Safeties. That means the 5th safety spot almost has to go to Sorensen by default unless Amaya somehow steps up and amazes the next couple weeks. Obviously that kid from Georgia can't stay out of the tub. The CB situation is no less troubling, with little promise there. The defensive back situation is a huge mystery at this point.

If ya'll have better ideas on who makes it, rifle them out, its what I posted for


Edit. BTW I have Van Dyke on the 53 over Parker at this point, but if you think Parker would be a better keep than Sorensen, I'm all ears.

htismaqe 08-18-2014 05:56 PM

I wouldn't cut Sorenson, I think he's got good upside as a backup and ST ace.

kc79 08-18-2014 06:46 PM

Move Parker back to S. I'd keep K Williams over AJ Jenkins. I believe A Smith said something about the two of them having a connection

kccrow 08-18-2014 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kc79 (Post 10830261)
Move Parker back to S. I'd keep K Williams over AJ Jenkins. I believe A Smith said something about the two of them having a connection

I might trend towards the Parker over Sorensen move, but Williams has been a non-factor thusfar.

OldSchool 08-18-2014 09:40 PM

Good news for us, bad for the Cards. Darnell Dockett is out for the season, should make it a lot easier for the right side of our line. We still have to deal with Campbell on the left though.

thabear04 08-19-2014 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kc79 (Post 10830261)
Move Parker back to S. I'd keep K Williams over AJ Jenkins. I believe A Smith said something about the two of them having a connection

Thought Parker was a CB with us last season and not a FS or SS?

TEX 08-19-2014 07:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 10830059)
Ideally, I agree. It doesn't seem the KC brass is trending that way however. Bray and Murray have both shown me enough to think they could both hold the clipboard as well as Daniel, and would combine to make less than Daniel.

ROFL "Shown you enough?" This kind of stuff cracks me up. Your limited exposure isn't near enough to make a sound decision.

Omaha 08-19-2014 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 10830012)
I don't see the point in keeping Daniel.

If Smith goes down, we are ****ed. Why not get a young pup in there to see what he has.

This is where I am with it. Add to it his price tag and it seems like a no-brainer.

Omaha 08-19-2014 07:54 AM

I feel like there may be some castoffs from other teams who could start in this OL. They looked just plain awful.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.