Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 13167886)

Dont give a shit, when he compiled that record he wasnt playing like he is these days... last night was plenty good enough to win if the defense doesnt roll over like a cheap whore

Originally Posted by Mav (Post 13167864)

Except that every expert said from the get go that of the first round qbs that were drafted that Mahomes would need the most time. But I think you should apply to be on the Chiefs staff. Clearly you know more than anyone else.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by ARROW2 (Post 13167869)

Name another franchise that would give up what they did for Mahomes, watch him look good with his opportunities and then sit him. You won't find it. Never mind KC hasn't taken a first round QB in 34 ****ing years. When they get aggressive and do it, they get scared to play him and take the safe route. What the **** has that gotten us in damn near 50 years?

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13167898)

Tom Brady has never won a SB without a top 10 defense.

Putting this game on Alex is beyond moronic.

Originally Posted by Mav (Post 13167904)

So even though Alex Smith is playing like a top 3 qb in the league through roughly half the season you would sit him? Of the Chiefs were 2-5, you’d have a point. But they are 5-2.....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by ARROW2 (Post 13167900)

Need the most time based on what? Certainly not his preseason performance. highest rated QB in the preseason, vet or rookie.

Originally Posted by ARROW2 (Post 13167907)

I would have started the rookie from the jump. We know how the Smith movie ends. Don't be that aggressive to get Mahomes only to sit him. Makes no ****ing sense. Nobody has EVER been that aggressive to get a project. If that is what they had in mind, they are stupid as ****.

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 13167897)

He didn't lose that game, he just didn't go win it.

Originally Posted by Mav (Post 13167908)

Playing vanilla defenses with scrubs, and against scrubs means very little. For reference, Trubisky who I believe is the best qb in the draft is struggling. There is an adjustment. Andy won’t waste a potentially playoff bound success of a team just to appease a fan base. Right or wrong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Mav (Post 13167913)

I firmly believe 1000 percent that getting Mahomes was a 2018 move.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by ARROW2 (Post 13167905)

Hopefully that is sarcasm with the Mahomes avatar. What did we do with out top 10 defenses in 95 and 97 with Bono and Grbac?

Originally Posted by ARROW2 (Post 13167919)

Then it is stupid to give up what they gave up to get him if that is the case.

Originally Posted by Mav (Post 13167915)

Btw, the Texans were equally aggressive and didn’t start Watson...,


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk