ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   New US church leader says homosexuality no sin (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=142519)

Jesus 06-21-2006 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TitsMagee
Umm, Jesus, if you believed in violence so much, how come you never raised a hand to anyone around you? And how come you asked us to follow you and take up our own crosses and deny ourselves??? And how, I'm just really unclear, am I to love my enemies if I am killing them??

You forgot that whole Temple scene, did you? Besides, you think censors are bad today---think about 2000 years. The Orthodox pressure on the Romans to make literature "family friendly" cleaned up a lot of the stuff.....

Jilly 06-21-2006 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redbrian
If you get killed first it's a little to late to return the favor, know what I mean Vern.

oy vay....

Sully 06-21-2006 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TitsMagee
Umm, Jesus, if you believed in violence so much, how come you never raised a hand to anyone around you? And how come you asked us to follow you and take up our own crosses and deny ourselves??? And how, I'm just really unclear, am I to love my enemies if I am killing them??

And why, when you knew you were going to be killed, did you not defend yourself, rather than allow your own capture and torture?

Jilly 06-21-2006 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus
You forgot that whole Temple scene, did you? Besides, you think censors are bad today---think about 2000 years. The Orthodox pressure on the Romans to make literature "family friendly" cleaned up a lot of the stuff.....

he killed someone in that scene? I must have missed that part.

Calcountry 06-21-2006 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TitsMagee
when did Jesus say if someone tries to kill you, you should kill them first???

From the bible, "As much as it is possible, live at peace with everyone."

Read the verse very closely.

Sometimes, it is IMPOSSIBLE, e.g. when Islamo fascists state that I shall bow down and convert to Islam or die.

It is my opinion, that it is IMPOSSIBLE to ever change the hearts and minds of Islamo fascists, who seek to slaughter me, my family, as though they were the meat birds that I cut heads off of two weeks ago.

AAAAAAAAAAH, thanks for playing, there are some nice parting gifts for you on the way out.

I profess to be a "Christian", saved by the blood of Jesus Christ, as payment in full for ALL of my sins. I do not profess to be perfect, although I try real hard.

So, If you are also a Christian, it is going to be nice spending eternity with you. heehe. We one in the bond of LOVE, we are one in the bond of love, we have joined our spirits with the spirit of God, we are one in the bond of love.

I leave you with this, If you claim to have the light in you, but do not love your brother, then you have made Him out to be a liar and the Truth is not in you.

Perhaps, we should all step back a moment, and think a little before we start spewing so much venom into the seemingly innoucuous void that is the internet? :shrug:

Sully 06-21-2006 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus
Anyone else find it ironic that she questions others for their literal interpretaion of the Word, yet trusts that I was not misquoted? LOL

I think, aside from quotes, the balance of what he did is fairly clear.
Are you claiming, K, that they just decided to leave all of his violent acts out, in a book filled with very graphic violence?

'Hamas' Jenkins 06-21-2006 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY
BS you supported a run and snitch policy in school.

How do you feel about gun legislation?

A school is an area that should be a safe haven for children. It is a public good, and as a public good, they should feel safe. If someone is threatening them, they should let adults know about it, lest another Columbine happen.

Let me tell you a little story about "Running and Snitching"...my junior year of high school, a kid brought a pipe bomb into school. It was a track baton stuffed with mostly blackpowder explosives. He intended to detonate it, but didn't have a fuse for it. One kid found out about it, and went and "snitched" to the administration. Pipe Bomb guy was expelled, and possibly dozens of lives were saved by this "cowardly act".

Until something like that happens to you, I suggest you STFD and STFU.

Of course, I'm sure that you are also aware that if you own a gun, you are more likely to be killed than if you don't, which makes your safety argument moot.

Sully 06-21-2006 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY
OK, you choose to die in glory then. Me, I'll choose to try and live with a good defense. Hell even my girl takes some martial arts and lifts weights and shoots guns. It's actually a lot of fun.

So do you own a gun or not?

It's not about "dying in glory."
It's about not using violence as a tool, or worse, the only tool.

Jilly 06-21-2006 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bunnytrdr
From the bible, "As much as it is possible, live at peace with everyone."

Read the verse very closely.

Sometimes, it is IMPOSSIBLE, e.g. when Islamo fascists state that I shall bow down and convert to Islam or die.

It is my opinion, that it is IMPOSSIBLE to ever change the hearts and minds of Islamo fascists, who seek to slaughter me, my family, as though they were the meat birds that I cut heads off of two weeks ago.

AAAAAAAAAAH, thanks for playing, there are some nice parting gifts for you on the way out.

I profess to be a "Christian", saved by the blood of Jesus Christ, as payment in full for ALL of my sins. I do not profess to be perfect, although I try real hard.

So, If you are also a Christian, it is going to be nice spending eternity with you. heehe. We one in the bond of LOVE, we are one in the bond of love, we have joined our spirits with the spirit of God, we are one in the bond of love.

I leave you with this, If you claim to have the light in you, bo do not love your brother, then you have made him out to be a liar and the truth is not in you.

Perhaps, we should all step back a moment, and think a little before we start spewing so much venom into the seemingly innoucuous void that is the internet? :shrug:

Geez, I really thought I was being fairly nice. I love everyone, I really do, even if we disagree....but you know what I don't love? clowns. I hope Jesus will forgive me.

'Hamas' Jenkins 06-21-2006 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee
I [and you as well] didn't just say 'hate.' I said 'clouded by hate.'
Clear skies here, spittlespark.

And the quote I provided wasn't about your analysis, it was about your recollection of your stance re: giving stuff to people who look like they need it. You said my understanding clouded my analysis of your stances, and all I had to do was quote you to establish my clarity.

Now you're reduced to arguing semantics to avoid the inevitable plunge off the cliff of sanity...

Jesus 06-21-2006 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sully
I think, aside from quotes, the balance of what he did is fairly clear.
Are you claiming, K, that they just decided to leave all of his violent acts out, in a book filled with very graphic violence?

Roman censors were harsh. Nothing above "G." The stories I could tell....

Jesus 06-21-2006 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TitsMagee
Geez, I really thought I was being fairly nice. I love everyone, I really do, even if we disagree....but you know what I don't love? clowns. I hope Jesus will forgive me.

Not a chance, Ma'am.

Sully 06-21-2006 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus
Roman censors were harsh. Nothing above "G." The stories I could tell....

We must be talking about different Bibles then.

Jesus 06-21-2006 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sully
We must be talking about different Bibles then.

Everything is relative. Afterall, we are talking about an age in which Gladiator matinees were considered PG-13.

BIG_DADDY 06-21-2006 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TitsMagee
I don't know until you give me book, chapter, and verse where you find that.... I am serious, though, did Jesus EVER say - if someone tries to kill you, you should kill them first? And more importantly, if we are to follow in Jesus' footsteps, when did he ever practice that mentality??

I am not going to look up a bunch of scripture right now. Anyone who has ever attended church knows about the army of angels and hell wich is the most barbaric creation ever if true. I am not a big bible guy. If someone doesn't know enough to defend themself from somebody when they are attempting to kill you then they never should have wasted the oxygen they breathed being alive in the first place. The only thing more irritating than someone who refuses to defend themself and their family is someone who wants to force others to live that same insanity.

Calcountry 06-21-2006 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TitsMagee
I think the more important question is who did he say he was? And what were his actions while on earth? And what did he ask of us?

All that is rubbish if you cannot answer the question truthfully, and believe it in your heart that it is true. I mean, really dude, true.

Everyone has to answer the question one way or the other, there is no gray area, in fact, Jesus himself asked it of his deciples.

So, I ask you one more time, I won't be wasting much more of it with you, Who do YOU say Jesus was/is?

Calcountry 06-21-2006 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TitsMagee
Umm, Jesus, if you believed in violence so much, how come you never raised a hand to anyone around you? And how come you asked us to follow you and take up our own crosses and deny ourselves??? And how, I'm just really unclear, am I to love my enemies if I am killing them??

He fashioned a whip of rods, and drove the money changers from the temple saying, "My house is to be a house of prayer, and yet you all have turned it into a den of thieves."

He was pretty smokin ticked off.

Of course, I must follow this up with, In your anger do not sin. Which I have done many times, and have a problem with.

Jesus was angry about the unrighteousness(sin) and lawlessness that had abounded to the point of saturation, even within the temple.

Baby Lee 06-21-2006 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
Now you're reduced to arguing semantics to avoid the inevitable plunge off the cliff of sanity...

And you're relying on a superficial reading for people to think being 'reduced' to 'arguing semantics' is the same as 'arguing irrelevancies.'
You posited that hate clouded my judgment, and supported that position by my admitted dislike of you personally. Well that might suffice to establish subordinate issue of 'hate.' But it says nothing about the primary issue of clouded judgment. You've done nothing to prove that, outside of asserting it, and I've provide unequivocal evidence to the contrary.

BIG_DADDY 06-21-2006 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
A school is an area that should be a safe haven for children. It is a public good, and as a public good, they should feel safe. If someone is threatening them, they should let adults know about it, lest another Columbine happen.

Let me tell you a little story about "Running and Snitching"...my junior year of high school, a kid brought a pipe bomb into school. It was a track baton stuffed with mostly blackpowder explosives. He intended to detonate it, but didn't have a fuse for it. One kid found out about it, and went and "snitched" to the administration. Pipe Bomb guy was expelled, and possibly dozens of lives were saved by this "cowardly act".

Until something like that happens to you, I suggest you STFD and STFU.

Of course, I'm sure that you are also aware that if you own a gun, you are more likely to be killed than if you don't, which makes your safety argument moot.

Now you have direct experience with with school terrorists? ROFL OK I guess you don't refer to yourself as Hamas for nothing. ROFL

Your example has nothing to do with defending yourself when being assaulted instead of having to run and snitch or get expelled. What a ludicrous example.

As far as guns go there are 2.5 million successful defensive gun uses in this country every year. There are only 35k deaths by gun in this country every year including cops shootin criminals, gang on gang violence and suicide. I knew you would be on the wrong side of this issue. I think we should start shooting people who try and take our guns away. Forcing us to live through what has happened in England and Australia simply shouldn't be an option.

redbrian 06-21-2006 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TitsMagee
he killed someone in that scene? I must have missed that part.

So David did a bad thing killing that big guy (old school I know but same book).

FAX 06-21-2006 05:01 PM

Mr. bunnytrdr's passage is taken from Romans 12. This is the verse that also later references Deuteronomy 32:35 “Vengeance is mine ...".

The issue is that the dichotomy of Christian faith and violence is one of the oldest and greatest paradoxes in Christianity.

Those who derive their biblical foundation as if they were selecting sandwiches at Subway have a problem with it. In essence, their difficulty stems from ignoring the New Testament’s ubiquitous references to and reliance upon the Old Testament and focusing instead solely on Jesus’ most well-known and oft-quoted or -preached statements.

I sometimes wish that Jesus had been so straightforward as they make him out to be in children’s Sunday School. But, he was not.

If you choose to accept biblical quotes as truth, Jesus believed in and relied heavily upon the law … in Matthew, “Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.”

The law to which Jesus is referring is chock full of advice in respect to violence. Most often in terms of defending oneself and one's possessions.

FAX

Frazod 06-21-2006 05:18 PM

It's really too bad Russ is gone. He'd have a field day with this sonofabitch. It would be the perfect birthday present. :D

Calcountry 06-21-2006 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX
Mr. bunnytrdr's passage is taken from Romans 12. This is the verse that also later references Deuteronomy 32:35 “Vengeance is mine ...".

The issue is that the dichotomy of Christian faith and violence is one of the oldest and greatest paradoxes in Christianity.

Those who derive their biblical foundation as if they were selecting sandwiches at Subway have a problem with it. In essence, their difficulty stems from ignoring the New Testament’s ubiquitous references to and reliance upon the Old Testament and focusing instead solely on Jesus’ most well-known and oft-quoted or -preached statements.

I sometimes wish that Jesus had been so straightforward as they make him out to be in children’s Sunday School. But, he was not.

If you choose to accept biblical quotes as truth, Jesus believed in and relied heavily upon the law … in Matthew, “Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.”

The law to which Jesus is referring is chock full of advice in respect to violence. Most often in terms of defending oneself and one's possessions.

FAX

Amen.

So, Fax. Are you a theologian?

:D

bogie 06-21-2006 05:31 PM

If a criminal breaks in to my house and I'm holding a shot gun in another room and I yell out to the criminal "hey, I have a gun, I don't want to kill you, but in 5 seconds I'm going to!" and then I rack my shot gun really loud and the person runs away, is that protecting myself with violence, or non-violence?

Calcountry 06-21-2006 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod
It's really too bad Russ is gone. He'd have a field day with this sonofabitch. It would be the perfect birthday present. :D

Yeah, what happened to him? KC Wolfman right?

That surely left the conservative right here without a strong voice.

Calcountry 06-21-2006 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bogie
If a criminal breaks in to my house and I'm holding a shot gun in another room and I yell out to the criminal "hey, I have a gun, I don't want to kill you, but in 5 seconds I'm going to!" and then I rack my shot gun really loud and the person runs away, is that protecting myself with violence, or non-violence?

No, but it is protecting yourself with a credible and undeniable threat of violence.

'Hamas' Jenkins 06-21-2006 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee
And you're relying on a superficial reading for people to think being 'reduced' to 'arguing semantics' is the same as 'arguing irrelevancies.'
You posited that hate clouded my judgment, and supported that position by my admitted dislike of you personally. Well that might suffice to establish subordinate issue of 'hate.' But it says nothing about the primary issue of clouded judgment. You've done nothing to prove that, outside of asserting it, and I've provide unequivocal evidence to the contrary.

That is preposterous and you know it. If you were prosecuting a defendent that you had had provable acrimony with before this case, the defense would make a motion to strike you as the prosecuting attorney because of an obvious conflict of interest that would cloud your better judgment. What unequivocal evidence have you proved?? You've shown absolutely nothing.

bogie 06-21-2006 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bunnytrdr
No, but it is protecting yourself with a credible and undeniable threat of violence.

Cool, it's the best of both worlds.

'Hamas' Jenkins 06-21-2006 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY
Now you have direct experience with with school terrorists? ROFL OK I guess you don't refer to yourself as Hamas for nothing. ROFL

Your example has nothing to do with defending yourself when being assaulted instead of having to run and snitch or get expelled. What a ludicrous example.

As far as guns go there are 2.5 million successful defensive gun uses in this country every year. There are only 35k deaths by gun in this country every year including cops shootin criminals, gang on gang violence and suicide. I knew you would be on the wrong side of this issue. I think we should start shooting people who try and take our guns away. Forcing us to live through what has happened in England and Australia simply shouldn't be an option.

How blindly obtuse can you be?? I'm glad you find it so funny that dozens of teenagers were placed in the way of a potentially deadly explosion, yet you find it a damnable offense that a group of people don't want specific dogs in their community.

Show me where I said we should take our guns away, you dumb fuck. I only said that if you use a gun you are more likely to be killed, you then jumped to the conclusion that I am against private ownership of guns. Actually, I have no problem with it. If you get shot because you had a gun in your home, that's a choice that you made that had dangerous ramifications, and you paid the price for it. I'd like to see your source for the 2.5 million successful defensive gun uses, surely that wasn't provided by the NRA. Does shooting at a pack of coyotes going after sheep count as a successful gun defense? Are you really dumb enough to believe that nearly 1% of all Americans fire a gun at someone else to defend themselves every year?? To you have any idea of the sheer mountains of paperwork and litigation that would involve, if in fact it were true, which it no doubt isn't??

Calcountry 06-21-2006 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bogie
Cool, it's the best of both worlds.

Yep, that it is. Nothing like firing a round of shot over the head of some asswipe who doesn't get it when you put the first round in the chamber.

FAX 06-21-2006 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bunnytrdr
Amen.

So, Fax. Are you a theologian?

:D

No, Mr. bunnytrdr. Just a guy relentlessly chasing down truth, justice, and good pie wherever that pursuit may lead.

I don't know why I even posted on this dumbass thread. I guess I've just had a bellyfull of the shallow naiveté laid down by some people in an attempt to present themselves as wise and informed.

My biggest concern right now is coming up with the proof necessary to demonstrate that Tony G. actually has redefined the position of tight end in the NFL.

FAX

Calcountry 06-21-2006 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX
No, Mr. bunnytrdr. Just a guy relentlessly chasing down truth, justice, and good pie wherever that pursuit may lead.

I don't know why I even posted on this dumbass thread. I guess I've just had a bellyfull of the shallow naiveté laid down by some people in an attempt to present themselves as wise and informed.

My biggest concern right now is coming up with the proof necessary to demonstrate that Tony G. actually has redefined the position of tight end in the NFL.

FAX

O.K. Mr. Fax, as you wish.

I believe, that it was a confluence of events, of which Tony G happened to be at the center of, that redefined the position. ;)

FAX 06-21-2006 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bunnytrdr
O.K. Mr. Fax, as you wish.

I believe, that it was a confluence of events, of which Tony G happened to be at the center of, that redefined the position. ;)

That's a pretty interesting thought, actually. Thanks.

I've looked at the stats and, so far at least, am unable to find anything that would reasonably confirm that he did, in fact, redefine the position from a performance standpoint. At first, I thought that he would have had a longer ypc average which would be reflective of greater athleticism, but that's not the case. He's only near the top in that category. Then, I looked at size in the position, but nothing stands out there either.

I hate to admit it, but I think Mr. milkman may turn out to be right about this. Unless, of course, I can construct a compelling argument around your theory.

FAX

noa 06-21-2006 06:49 PM

Hey FAX, where in the New Testament does Jesus talk about homosexuality?

Jesus 06-21-2006 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by noa949
Hey FAX, where in the New Testament does Jesus talk about homosexuality?

I didn't talk about lots of things. I never addressed a whole host of sins, directly. The Old Testament teachings are pretty clear on it already. Because I neglected to address it doesn't mean I approve. Afterall, I only lived 33 yrs. Why should I have been redundant? Whatever I didn't change, stayed the same. Regardless, Paul cleared it up in his letters--in case anyone had any doubts.

Logical 06-21-2006 09:35 PM

Good for Schori, progress is slow but it will happen.:thumb:

|Zach| 06-21-2006 09:52 PM

Quite a thread.

Logical 06-21-2006 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz
bet you would if she was pimping pitbulls.






ROFL ROFL

:clap::clap:

noa 06-21-2006 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus
I didn't talk about lots of things. I never addressed a whole host of sins, directly. The Old Testament teachings are pretty clear on it already. Because I neglected to address it doesn't mean I approve. Afterall, I only lived 33 yrs. Why should I have been redundant? Whatever I didn't change, stayed the same. Regardless, Paul cleared it up in his letters--in case anyone had any doubts.


So I'm confused Jesus. Should we follow what the Old Testament says or not? If we're supposed to follow everything in the Old Testament except what you directly challenged, then I think we're all in a lot of trouble.

Rausch 06-21-2006 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
Now you're reduced to arguing semantics to avoid the inevitable plunge off the cliff of sanity...

We had a good conversation going on last night, is it worth looking back 3-4 pages to keep up?...

Rausch 06-21-2006 10:15 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
How blindly obtuse can you be?? I'm glad you find it so funny that dozens of teenagers were placed in the way of a potentially deadly explosion, yet you find it a damnable offense that a group of people don't want specific dogs in their community.

Show me where I said we should take our guns away, you dumb fuck.


"Gooooooood....I can FEEL your anger...It makes your posts STRONGER..."

BIG_DADDY 06-21-2006 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bogie
If a criminal breaks in to my house and I'm holding a shot gun in another room and I yell out to the criminal "hey, I have a gun, I don't want to kill you, but in 5 seconds I'm going to!" and then I rack my shot gun really loud and the person runs away, is that protecting myself with violence, or non-violence?


The potential for violence insured your safety. I would have just shot you're lucky he didn't have a gun and unload his clip at teh direction your voice was coming from.

BIG_DADDY 06-21-2006 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
How blindly obtuse can you be?? I'm glad you find it so funny that dozens of teenagers were placed in the way of a potentially deadly explosion, yet you find it a damnable offense that a group of people don't want specific dogs in their community.

Show me where I said we should take our guns away, you dumb fuck. I only said that if you use a gun you are more likely to be killed, you then jumped to the conclusion that I am against private ownership of guns. Actually, I have no problem with it. If you get shot because you had a gun in your home, that's a choice that you made that had dangerous ramifications, and you paid the price for it. I'd like to see your source for the 2.5 million successful defensive gun uses, surely that wasn't provided by the NRA. Does shooting at a pack of coyotes going after sheep count as a successful gun defense? Are you really dumb enough to believe that nearly 1% of all Americans fire a gun at someone else to defend themselves every year?? To you have any idea of the sheer mountains of paperwork and litigation that would involve, if in fact it were true, which it no doubt isn't??


No it isn't the NRA. I have the research at work and will post it tomorrow. I believe it was a college study but I could be mistaken. I have one SDGU myself. I'll bet many members here do. On the other I'll bet the only member on the BB that has had exposure to a school pipe bomb terrorist is a member named Hamas.

You continue to not address the run and snitch poilicy when a student is assaulted though. You endorsed that previously with the threat of being expelled. All you could give us was that ridiculous pipe bomb story which has nothing to do with your endorsement of the said policy.

BIG_DADDY 06-21-2006 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Logical
:clap::clap:

I think your losing it dude, seriously.

BIG_DADDY 06-21-2006 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sully
It's not about "dying in glory."
It's about not using violence as a tool, or worse, the only tool.

I appreciate your honest feelings. On a global level I would like you show me one ecomomically superior culture in the history of mankind that controlled their own destiny without the use of violence. Better yet I would like you to show me the fall of any such culture that wasn't somehow related to the saturation of passivism within their own community. This passive culture will eventually lead to our own downfall IMO. People like Denise know this which is why she is for it.

burt 06-21-2006 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
How blindly obtuse can you be??

OBTUSE!!!!! ROFL ROFL ROFL

another word people use to look superior.....

FAX 06-21-2006 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by noa949
Hey FAX, where in the New Testament does Jesus talk about homosexuality?

That's a really good question, Mr. noa949.

I don’t recall, and believe there is not, any reference in the accepted New Testament that represents a quote by Jesus on the specific subject of homosexuality. For my part, I’m certain that Jesus would have viewed homosexuals as both welcome to and worthy of God's grace and mercy. He was anti-sin, though. So, I guess you have to make up your mind as to whether or not you perceive homosexuality as sinful.

I have read many scholars who subscribe to the view that Jesus was more concerned with what was in a person’s heart and mind as opposed to their willingness to conform to a given society’s accepted practices. This seems to be this new bishop’s perspective. There’s a problem with this view though. And again, it is a paradox.

On the one hand, Jesus completely ignored certain aspects of the law (traditional observance of the Sabbath, for example). On the other hand, he was quite clear that he was both a product of and a manifestation of the law and the Covenant. The law, of course, viewed fornication as an “abomination”. That’s a really bad word in Hebrew. In fact, in Leviticus I believe, you’ll find specific references as to the penalty for homosexuality. It is death.

FAX

burt 06-21-2006 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX
In fact, in Leviticus I believe, you’ll find specific references as to the penalty for homosexuality. It is death.

FAX

Isn't death the penality for life? Or Hetrosexuality? Or being conservative? Wait we all die.....

burt 06-21-2006 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY
I appreciate your honest feelings. On a global level I would like you show me one ecomomically superior culture in the history of mankind that controlled their own destiny without the use of violence. Better yet I would like you to show me the fall of any such culture that wasn't somehow related to the saturation of passivism within their own community. This passive culture will eventually lead to our own downfall IMO. People like Denise know this which is why she is for it.

violence....there is a time and place for everything....and I plan on being prepared..... %(/

Rausch 06-21-2006 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY
I appreciate your honest feelings. On a global level I would like you show me one ecomomically superior culture in the history of mankind that controlled their own destiny without the use of violence.

Good point...

Rausch 06-21-2006 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dale Mercer
Isn't death the penality for life? Or Hetrosexuality? Or being conservative? Wait we all die.....

I'll wait until I die, after that I make no promises...

Rausch 06-21-2006 11:33 PM

$#it, killed another thread...

burt 06-21-2006 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch
$#it, killed another thread...

I'll admit it....ya lost me.....

luv 06-21-2006 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch
$#it, killed another thread...

Threadkiller. :shake:

Rausch 06-21-2006 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dale Mercer
I'll admit it....ya lost me.....

I tend to post some smartass BS that no one feels like touching so the thread falls to the 2nd page a lot.

Hammock Parties 06-21-2006 11:44 PM

Its prety dumb how people take so much stock into what the bible says... If i wrote a book and had some stuff in it close to how the bible is, and told everybody to live by it and do everything it says, or you'll go to hell, wouldnt that be considered a cult? In my opinion, thats exactly what people are acting like towards religion and the bible... Its just a set of rules and guidelines that a group of people came up with to get their people to stop acting bad. Laws that are like duh to us, like no killing, no stealing, no cheating on your wife. There is no proof in the bible, and I'd love for anybody to show me some.

burt 06-21-2006 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch
I'll wait until I die, after that I make no promises...


I got that.....ya lost me here......

burt 06-21-2006 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jayhawkerman2001
Its prety dumb how people take so much stock into what the bible says... If i wrote a book and had some stuff in it close to how the bible is, and told everybody to live by it and do everything it says, or you'll go to hell, wouldnt that be considered a cult? In my opinion, thats exactly what people are acting like towards religion and the bible... Its just a set of rules and guidelines that a group of people came up with to get their people to stop acting bad. Laws that are like duh to us, like no killing, no stealing, no cheating on your wife. There is no proof in the bible, and I'd love for anybody to show me some.

shut up n00b..........

Hammock Parties 06-21-2006 11:48 PM

lol, noob eh? funny how when nobody has anything to say, they call somebody a noob...

burt 06-21-2006 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jayhawkerman2001
lol, noob eh? funny how when nobody has anything to say, they call somebody a noob...

I got lots to say....just like to say that......check yer rep....

Rausch 06-21-2006 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dale Mercer
I got that.....ya lost me here......

Ok.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dale Mercer
Wait until we all die.....

...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch
I'll wait until I die, after that I make no promises...

If I have to explain it it's not as humorous... :)

luv 06-21-2006 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jayhawkerman2001
Its prety dumb how people take so much stock into what the bible says... If i wrote a book and had some stuff in it close to how the bible is, and told everybody to live by it and do everything it says, or you'll go to hell, wouldnt that be considered a cult? In my opinion, thats exactly what people are acting like towards religion and the bible... Its just a set of rules and guidelines that a group of people came up with to get their people to stop acting bad. Laws that are like duh to us, like no killing, no stealing, no cheating on your wife. There is no proof in the bible, and I'd love for anybody to show me some.

If you wanted to believe it, you'd try finding it yourself. Following the bible is a choice. You simply choose not to. No need in making others prove the worthiness of their beliefs.

burt 06-21-2006 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch
Ok.



...



If I have to explain it it's not as humorous... :)

I say that a lot................

Rausch 06-21-2006 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jayhawkerman2001
lol, noob eh? funny how when nobody has anything to say, they call somebody a noob...

Oh, I've got plenty to say.

Just ask... :evil:

|Zach| 06-21-2006 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv
No need in making others prove the worthiness of their beliefs.

Yet there is a need to feel on the defensive?

Nobody can make you prove anything. You put yourself in that position.

luv 06-22-2006 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZachKC
Yet there is a need to feel on the defensive?

Nobody can make you prove anything. You put yourself in that position.

No, he was asking to be shown. If he's that interested, he can find it for himself. I'm not a close follower of the bible, but I do have my basic beliefs. People tend to roll their eyes when I talk about something I believe. I'm learning not to mention anything.

Logical 06-22-2006 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY
I think your losing it dude, seriously.

Cmon anybody pimping Pit Bulls gets your support, why would this religious leader get different treatment. It is you pet (pun intended) cause. I thouht he made an amusing point.

|Zach| 06-22-2006 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv
No, he was asking to be shown. If he's that interested, he can find it for himself. I'm not a close follower of the bible, but I do have my basic beliefs. People tend to roll their eyes when I talk about something I believe. I'm learning not to mention anything.

Bah, if someone rolls theirs eyes when I talk about something close to me then let them roll their eyes.

No reason not to go through life deliberately. Tip toeing my way through this world adjusting what I do to other people's opinions? Yuck.

Rausch 06-22-2006 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv
No need in making others prove the worthiness of their beliefs.


Of course there is when it's the only way to justify yours...

Logical 06-22-2006 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY
I appreciate your honest feelings. On a global level I would like you show me one ecomomically superior culture in the history of mankind that controlled their own destiny without the use of violence. Better yet I would like you to show me the fall of any such culture that wasn't somehow related to the saturation of passivism within their own community. This passive culture will eventually lead to our own downfall IMO. People like Denise know this which is why she is for it.

That is very easy, Switzerland meets your criteria without the use of violence.

luv 06-22-2006 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZachKC
Bah, if someone rolls theirs eyes when I talk about something close to me then let them roll their eyes.

No reason not to go through life deliberately. Tip toeing my way through this world adjusting what I do to other people's opinions? Yuck.

People reactions won't stop me from living the way I believe, I just choose not to openly talk about it.

BigMeatballDave 06-22-2006 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY
My girl is Bi.

You lucky bastard!
:)

|Zach| 06-22-2006 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv
People reactions won't stop me from living the way I believe, I just choose not to openly talk about it.

Yes, I don't believe that could change your fundamental beliefs...

But as someone who has read alot of your posts over a good period of time. You seem to spend a lot of time worrying about other people's opinions and then forming your own after that or acting on something. Either that or putting a disclaimer on all your opinions as if they are less valuable or more valuable after guaging how many people do or dont agree with them.

Not an attack at all...

burt 06-22-2006 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Logical
That is very easy, Switzerland meets your criteria without the use of violence.

Logic, I was under the impression that every family with an able male HAS to have 1 male in the military....and MOST homes have a semi automatic in it, because it has a member in the militia. If that is true...which I don't feel impelled to prove or dis prove...it is the threat of violence......oh and I hear the Swiss are tough muthers....

Rausch 06-22-2006 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZachKC
Yet there is a need to feel on the defensive?

Nobody can make you prove anything. You put yourself in that position.

My penis is huge.

It's an empiracle certainty.





Well, based on the English system of measurement...

luv 06-22-2006 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZachKC
Yes, I don't believe that could change your fundamental beliefs...

But as someone who has read alot of your posts over a good period of time. You seem to spend a lot of time worrying about other people's opinions and then forming your own after that or acting on something. Either that or putting a disclaimer on all your opinions as if they are less valuable or more valuable after guaging how many people do or dont agree with them.

Not an attack at all...

I'm a people pleaser with pretty low self-esteem. Something I'm working to overcome. I can be moody, too. There are times when I couldn't care less what other people say. Then there are times when what others say or think really seem to matter. I've just always been that way.

|Zach| 06-22-2006 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv
I'm a people pleaser with pretty low self-esteem. Something I'm working to overcome. I can be moody, too. There are times when I couldn't care less what other people say. Then there are times when what others say or think really seem to matter. I've just always been that way.

I hope you can find your way through that and live more deliberately. Everyone has their challanges. I just think it would be tough to go any other way. Really tough.

Moooo 06-22-2006 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv
I'm a people pleaser with pretty low self-esteem. Something I'm working to overcome. I can be moody, too. There are times when I couldn't care less what other people say. Then there are times when what others say or think really seem to matter. I've just always been that way.

Its a personality trait. About 1 of 5 people match it.

There are plus sides. I bet you are great at cooling a situation down, and keeping a level head.

Moooo

Rausch 06-22-2006 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Logical
That is very easy, Switzerland meets your criteria without the use of violence.

If you fund Nazi Germany you don't count...

burt 06-22-2006 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch
My penis is huge.

It's an empiracle certainty.

Well, based on the English system of measurement...

Dude.....it's "My pen is huge."


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.