ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Should the Chiefs have drafted Aaron Rodgers over Derrick Johnson? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=188932)

Deberg_1990 01-16-2011 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 7361657)

Shit, we could probably pick a QB on the board from every draft in the last 15 years.

heh, i mainly concentrate on this one because he was one of the only 1st round QB's that CP actually passed on that turned out to be great. Most of the 1st round QB's during CP's regime we never had a chance to draft because we picked too high that particular year.

synthesis2 01-16-2011 07:51 PM

Might be the biggest no brainer of the decade. Absolutly

Deberg_1990 02-06-2011 06:47 PM

Thanks DV and Carl!!

Al Bundy 02-06-2011 06:52 PM

Soren Petro certainly think so. I wonder if the Rodgers wins this game if he will finally announce his Chiefs to Packers fandom change.

Chiefs Pantalones 02-06-2011 06:54 PM

Thanks Carl!

Mr. Laz 02-06-2011 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 7411767)
Thanks DV and Carl!!

omg ... would you stop bumping this stupid ****ing thread.

Rodgers was drafted 24th so 23 teams could be asking themselves the same question. It happens every draft.

-King- 02-06-2011 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 7411767)
Thanks DV and Carl!!

They took Derrick Johnson. A guy who was touted as the best defensive player in college football to fix our shitty defense.

They shouldn't get blamed for shit.

In hindsight, they should have drafted him. But it's not a regrettable decision to not draft Rodgers.

milkman 02-06-2011 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 7411832)
They took Derrick Johnson. A guy who was touted as the best defensive player in college football to fix our shitty defense.

They shouldn't get blamed for shit.

In hindsight, they should have drafted him. But it's not a regrettable decision to not draft Rodgers.

This.

To me, the more pertinent question is how the hell we hire and promte guys like Paul Hackett and Jimmy Raye to coordinate the offense, but let a guy like Mike McCarthy, who was on Marty's staff in the early 90s, move on to other teams?

Al Bundy 02-06-2011 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7411844)
This.

To me, the more pertinent question is how the hell we hire and promte guys like Paul Hackett and Jimmy Raye to coordinate the offense, but let a guy like Mike McCarthy, who was on Marty's staff in the early 90s, move on to other teams?

Because McCarthy wanted to <gasp> throw the ball.

Deberg_1990 02-06-2011 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7411844)
This.

To me, the more pertinent question is how the hell we hire and promte guys like Paul Hackett and Jimmy Raye to coordinate the offense, but let a guy like Mike McCarthy, who was on Marty's staff in the early 90s, move on to other teams?

Actually he was on as late as 98 right? Wasnt he just a TE coach with us? He probably wasnt ready at the time.

keg in kc 02-06-2011 07:19 PM

Good ol boy network.

milkman 02-06-2011 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 7411920)
Actually he was on as late as 98 right? Wasnt he just a TE coach with us? He probably wasnt ready at the time.

He spent three years as the Chiefs QB coach, from 95 to 98.

He was an offensive quality control coach before that for a season.

Deberg_1990 02-06-2011 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7411972)
He spent three years as the Chiefs QB coach, from 95 to 98.

He was an offensive quality control coach before that for a season.

Ah...ok.....well, he got decent production out of Gannon, Grbac and Bono (Regular Season), and probably should get alot of credit for reviving Gannons career.

Pioli Zombie 02-06-2011 09:34 PM

Cassel is better than Rodgers. Rodgers just has better weapons.

wutamess 02-06-2011 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie (Post 7412911)
Cassel is better than Rodgers. Rodgers just has better weapons.


:Pinky:
I'm afraid he's serious

KcMizzou 02-06-2011 09:51 PM

I am really tired of this thread.

Pioli Zombie 02-06-2011 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wutamess (Post 7412935)
:Pinky:
I'm afraid he's serious

Its called sarcasm,dummy.

Mama Hip Rockets 02-06-2011 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dorseybowe (Post 4908503)
Johnson had better value when we were drafting. He still does. Rodgers hasn't proved he can play.

:thumb:

RJ 02-06-2011 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 7412958)
I am really tired of this thread.


It's depressing to read this thread title all the damn time.

L.A. Chieffan 02-06-2011 11:07 PM

we got tjax and matt. we're set.

notorious 02-06-2011 11:10 PM

**** this.


Herm Edwards would have completely ruined Elway, much less Rogers. Rogers would have ended up playing in the Arena League if he had to start his career under that kind of coaching and offensive philosophy.

DaneMcCloud 02-06-2011 11:25 PM

No.

QB's are the debil.

Offensive line, especially left tackle, is the key to championships.

RealSNR 02-07-2011 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 7413201)
**** this.


Herm Edwards would have completely ruined Elway, much less Rogers. Rogers would have ended up playing in the Arena League if he had to start his career under that kind of coaching and offensive philosophy.

Brodie Croyle's still in the NFL

RealSNR 02-07-2011 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv (Post 4908533)
We'll end up with Palmer when he's two years away from retirement.

I hope luv is talking about Chris Palmer

DaneMcCloud 02-07-2011 12:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 7413300)
I hope luv is talking about Chris Palmer

I thought Chris Palmer was the Chiefs new OC?

:rolleyes:

ChiefsCountry 02-07-2011 01:01 AM

We get Brady in 2014 and then we pick up Aaron Rodgers in 2020, then Sanchez in 2023.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-07-2011 01:10 AM

If we pick up Brady, I'll probably just start following the ****ing CFL.

Sweet Daddy Hate 02-07-2011 01:16 AM

Hell no!

Now quit standing around, and go get me a another 4-3 lineman in the first that will be obsolete faster than a "Le Car".

Phobia 02-07-2011 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 7413298)
Brodie Croyle's still in the NFL

Not really. I mean, he probably shows up on the Chiefs roster until the strike but he's going home to sweet Alabama.

Sweet Daddy Hate 02-07-2011 01:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 7413358)
If we pick up Brady, I'll probably just start following the ****ing CFL.

ROFL That's where Pioli and I part company for the duration.

googlegoogle 02-07-2011 01:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROR (Post 7413361)
Hell no!

Now quit standing around, and go get me a another 4-3 lineman in the first that will be obsolete faster than a "Le Car".

haha

Deberg_1990 09-19-2011 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 7413356)
We get Brady in 2014 and then we pick up Aaron Rodgers in 2020, then Sanchez in 2023.

Unfortunatly, this will probably happen.....

Deberg_1990 11-01-2011 05:00 PM

In light of DJ's recent play the last 2 seasons, has anyone changed their opinion on this?

jd1020 11-01-2011 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 8071829)
In light of DJ's recent play the last 2 seasons, has anyone changed their opinion on this?

Arguably the best QB in the league vs an ILB.

Hmmmmm.

Decisions.

-King- 11-01-2011 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 8071829)
In light of DJ's recent play the last 2 seasons, has anyone changed their opinion on this?

No matter what, in hindsight, anyone with a brain will always pick Rodgers.

Thig Lyfe 11-01-2011 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 8071829)
In light of DJ's recent play the last 2 seasons, has anyone changed their opinion on this?

http://i293.photobucket.com/albums/m...BooThisMan.gif

Mama Hip Rockets 11-01-2011 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 8071829)
In light of DJ's recent play the last 2 seasons, has anyone changed their opinion on this?

Seriously?

DJ is awesome, and I love having him on the team, but anybody who would rather have him than Aaron Rodgers is absolutely insane.

Deberg_1990 11-01-2011 06:27 PM

heh

Quote:

Originally Posted by dorseybowe (Post 4908503)
Johnson had better value when we were drafting. He still does. Rodgers hasn't proved he can play.

Quote:

Originally Posted by InChiefsHell (Post 4908516)
No. We needed defense at the time. DJ was the pick. I would have imploded had they picked Rogers...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 4908520)
NO. DJ is primed to come into his own this year. I have no problems with him being the pick.

And there is no way Vermeil would have risked getting on Green's bad side by taking a QB in the first.

Quote:

Originally Posted by thurman merman (Post 8071883)
but anybody who would rather have him than Aaron Rodgers is absolutely insane.


Predarat 11-01-2011 06:39 PM

The Titans should have taken him instead of Pac Man Jones, then this thread would never exist. I wonder how that would effect the space time continuum?

jspchief 11-01-2011 06:41 PM

What a lame ****ing bump. DJ playing his ass off tearing shit up and this still has to come up?

Sent from my ADR6350

Brock 11-01-2011 06:44 PM

wow, it just never gets old.

whoman69 11-01-2011 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Predarat (Post 8072094)
The Titans should have taken him instead of Pac Man Jones, then this thread would never exist. I wonder how that would effect the space time continuum?

But then we might have drafted Pac Man.

BigMeatballDave 11-01-2011 06:51 PM

I ****ing love DJ but I would draft Aaron Rodgers a million times over.

That's not a knock on DJ, a stud QB is that important.

-King- 11-01-2011 06:55 PM

At the time of the draft, DJ was the absolute right pick
Posted via Mobile Device

Deberg_1990 11-01-2011 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 8072122)
At the time of the draft, DJ was the absolute right pick
Posted via Mobile Device

Why? DJ didnt exactly have an immediate impact as far as win totals go. Drafting Rodgers, he could have sat behind Trent Green for a few years and learned.

-King- 11-01-2011 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 8072195)
Why? DJ didnt exactly have an immediate impact as far as win totals go. Drafting Rodgers, he could have sat behind Trent Green for a few years and learned.

DJ was said to be one of the best line backer prospects ever
Posted via Mobile Device

ILChief 11-01-2011 07:59 PM

that first round sucked. DJ may be the 2nd best player drafted. Either him or Demarcus Ware.

Brock 11-01-2011 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 8072195)
Why? DJ didnt exactly have an immediate impact as far as win totals go. Drafting Rodgers, he could have sat behind Trent Green for a few years and learned.

The Chiefs had the least talented defense in the league at the time.

OnTheWarpath15 11-01-2011 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 8072256)
The Chiefs had the least talented defense in the league at the time.

And that's part of why the drafting was shitty. We were always looking at the now instead of to the future, and taking guys based solely on need instead of the best player available.

I don't think you'll ever see a potential 1st overall pick at QB fall that far again. Teams realize how important a franchise QB is. Look at the last few drafts, more and more QB's are going early.

Until we get a franchise QB of our own, this thread will probably continue to get bumped here and there.

MahiMike 11-01-2011 08:54 PM

Derrick Johnson has more interceptions than Aaron Rodgers.

...oh wait...

notorious 11-01-2011 09:04 PM

Rodgers was not an amazing prospect.

Deberg_1990 11-07-2011 09:55 AM

Ouch, it wasnt just the Chiefs that blew this pick......The VIkings way blew it. :facepalm:




Every team that passed on Rodgers in the draft -- Miami, for Ronnie Brown, Minnesota (Troy Williamson), Washington (Carlos Rogers), Minnesota again (Erasmus James), Jacksonville (Matt Jones), and, just one pick before Green Bay, Oakland (Fabian Washington) -- has to be retching right now.

Projecting Rodgers' full season, with an asterisk next to what would be league records: .725* completion percentage, 5,238* passing yards, 48 touchdowns, 6 interceptions; 129.1* passer rating.

Minnesota twice? Fabian Washington? That has to hurt.



Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/201...#ixzz1d2GOUNMw

suds79 11-07-2011 10:02 AM

I think at the time, DJ was the right pick. Based on what he was projected to be and our needs, you can't say drafting him was flawed logic.

Since then the NFL has changed and it's really only about the QB now. (which I think makes the game more boring but what can you do)

So yeah in hindsight or going forward, I'll always lean towards take a shot on a QB. Yeah, now I wish they would have taken Rogers obviously.

Deberg_1990 11-07-2011 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 8088717)
I think at the time, DJ was the right pick. Based on what he was projected to be and our needs, you can't say drafting him was flawed logic.

Since then the NFL has changed and it's really only about the QB now. (which I think makes the game more boring but what can you do)

So yeah in hindsight or going forward, I'll always lean towards take a shot on a QB. Yeah, now I wish they would have taken Rogers obviously.

Yes because the NFL was never about the QB until only 5 or 6 years ago. ROFL
Signed, the 1990's Chiefs

jd1020 11-07-2011 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 8088717)
I think at the time, DJ was the right pick. Based on what he was projected to be and our needs, you can't say drafting him was flawed logic.

Since then the NFL has changed and it's really only about the QB now. (which I think makes the game more boring but what can you do)

So yeah in hindsight or going forward, I'll always lean towards take a shot on a QB. Yeah, now I wish they would have taken Rogers obviously.

Wasn't Rodgers being projected by some as the #1 pick?

Ming the Merciless 11-07-2011 10:39 AM

With Hindsight, of course.

Thats not to say anything bad about DJ, he has developed into a STUD player......Its just that Rodgers is a STUD QB , and looks like he will be in that elite beast mode for 10 years.

suds79 11-07-2011 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 8088812)
Yes because the NFL was never about the QB until only 5 or 6 years ago. ROFL
Signed, the 1990's Chiefs

Don't get me wrong. The QB has always been the most important position on the field for a long time but there were other ways to win a SB.

Take the Bucs in 2003 as an example. So yes, I'd say the change is about as recent as 5-6 years ago.

I don't know what you're looking for people to say with posing this very easy question. Yes we all wish they would have taken Aaron Rogers who is now the game's best QB. Obviously.

KCrockaholic 11-07-2011 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILChief (Post 8072246)
that first round sucked. DJ may be the 2nd best player drafted. Either him or Demarcus Ware.

Are you seriously questioning that Derrick might be better than Ware? I hope not.


Oh and I haven't posted in this massive thread yet, but I'd take Aaron Rodgers every time if we could go back and do that draft again. He's the best QB in the NFL.

SenselessChiefsFan 11-07-2011 11:02 AM

I love revisionist history.

Would I love to have Rodgers now? Absolutely. Although, he probably isn't the same QB for the Chiefs that he is for Green Bay. He had a few years to sit and the Packers worked on his mechanics relentlessly. He has a different release than when he came out of college.

Chiefs had Trent Green go down the following year, so Rodgers may just have been another Jim Tedford QB bust.

Oh, and that reminds me why he slid as far as he did. Rodgers was the fifth QB coached by Tedford to go in the first round. He is the ONLY one that has been elite in the NFL. The second best QB coached by Tedford? Dilfer. Oh, and add in guys like Boller, Akili Smith and Joey Harrington. Oooh.... some, great NFL pedigrees there, huh?

So, looking back, I am still not sure I would want Rodgers only because I don't know that we have had the consistency on the coaching staff that helped him develope into an elite player. This guy wasn't NFL ready coming out and was a project.

SenselessChiefsFan 11-07-2011 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 8072303)
I don't think you'll ever see a potential 1st overall pick at QB fall that far again.


Well, with the new rookie salary cap rules and slotting, I agree. There is much less of a risk to take a QB early. If it fails, it won't set the franchise back years like it used to.

But, a mere two years after Rodgers, Quinn dropped. He was also a 'possible' #1 pick. The reality is that under the old rules, it was most often better to draft a guy with a higher floor than a higher ceiling if you had any doubt at all.

I am very happy for the new rookie wage scale and slotting system, becuase I think it will make for better drafts overall.

L.A. Chieffan 11-07-2011 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 8088885)
I love revisionist history.

Would I love to have Rodgers now? Absolutely. Although, he probably isn't the same QB for the Chiefs that he is for Green Bay. He had a few years to sit and the Packers worked on his mechanics relentlessly. He has a different release than when he came out of college.

Chiefs had Trent Green go down the following year, so Rodgers may just have been another Jim Tedford QB bust.

Oh, and that reminds me why he slid as far as he did. Rodgers was the fifth QB coached by Tedford to go in the first round. He is the ONLY one that has been elite in the NFL. The second best QB coached by Tedford? Dilfer. Oh, and add in guys like Boller, Akili Smith and Joey Harrington. Oooh.... some, great NFL pedigrees there, huh?

So, looking back, I am still not sure I would want Rodgers only because I don't know that we have had the consistency on the coaching staff that helped him develope into an elite player. This guy wasn't NFL ready coming out and was a project.

totally, its like when we drafted tyson jackson. ANY team in our position would have done the same exact thing. jackson was THE next sure thing. NOBODY could have known he might be a bust at the time.

SenselessChiefsFan 11-07-2011 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 8088908)
totally, its like when we drafted tyson jackson. ANY team in our position would have done the same exact thing. jackson was THE next sure thing. NOBODY could have known he might be a bust at the time.

Not sure I agree with that. I didn't love the pick at the time.

He has actually improved a good bit this year. Not enough to justify where he was drafted, but at least a solid starter.

L.A. Chieffan 11-07-2011 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 8088916)
Not sure I agree with that. I didn't love the pick at the time.

He has actually improved a good bit this year. Not enough to justify where he was drafted, but at least a solid starter.

youre just a dumb ****ing mark sanchez lover and not a real fan then i guess...

sedated 11-07-2011 11:19 AM

this thread is completely stupid.

If someone, anyone, legitimately wanted Rodgers before, during, or within 2 years of the 2005 draft, lets see the proof. Chiefs fans were pretty much cuming in their pants after DJ fell to us.

The Franchise 11-07-2011 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sedated (Post 8088925)
this thread is completely stupid.

If someone, anyone, legitimately wanted Rodgers before, during, or within 2 years of the 2005 draft, lets see the proof. Chiefs fans were pretty much cuming in their pants after DJ fell to us.

Pretty much this.

I flipped out when they took DJ.

SenselessChiefsFan 11-07-2011 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 8088922)
youre just a dumb ****ing mark sanchez lover and not a real fan then i guess...

Okay, I don't pay enough attention to who posts what.... so this 'may' be sarcasm....if so, bravo.

If not, then you should know that I don't want Sanchez anymore than I want to wreck my car.

I would have been fine with Stafford or Freeman. Freeman is a project, but has more upside than Sanchez.

Deberg_1990 11-07-2011 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sedated (Post 8088925)
this thread is completely stupid.

If someone, anyone, legitimately wanted Rodgers before, during, or within 2 years of the 2005 draft, lets see the proof. Chiefs fans were pretty much cuming in their pants after DJ fell to us.

Id have to find the 05 draft thread, and I'm not sure I ever posted it but when Rodgers fell, I did want us to take him. He was pretty well thought of that year. It's not like he was a Tom Brady afterthought type. Regardless, at least the chiefs didn't blow the pick like the vikes and raiders did.
Posted via Mobile Device

sedated 11-07-2011 11:49 AM

1 San Francisco 49ers Alex Smith QB Utah
2 Miami Dolphins Ronnie Brown RB Auburn
3 Cleveland Browns Braylon Edwards WR Michigan
4 Chicago Bears Cedric Benson RB Texas
5 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Cadillac Williams RB Auburn
6 Tennessee Titans Pacman Jones CB West Virginia
7 Minnesota Vikings Troy Williamson WR South Carolina
8 Arizona Cardinals Antrel Rolle DB Miami (Fla.)
9 Washington Redskins Carlos Rogers DB Auburn
10 Detroit Lions Mike Williams WR USC
11 Dallas Cowboys DeMarcus Ware OLB Troy State
12 San Diego Chargers Shawne "roidman" Merriman OLB Maryland
13 New Orleans Saints Jammal Brown T Oklahoma
14 Carolina Panthers Thomas Davis DB Georgia
15 Kansas City Chiefs Derrick Johnson OLB Texas
16 Houston Texans Travis Johnson DT Florida State
17 Cincinnati Bengals David Pollack LB Georgia
18 Minnesota Vikings Erasmus James DE Wisconsin
19 St. Louis Rams Alex Barron T Florida State
20 Dallas Cowboys Marcus Spears DE Louisiana State
21 Jacksonville Jaguars Matt Jones WR Arkansas
22 Baltimore Ravens Mark Clayton WR Oklahoma
23 Oakland Raiders Fabian Washington CB Nebraska
24 Green Bay Packers Aaron Rodgers QB California
25 Washington Redskins Jason Campbell QB Auburn
26 Seattle Seahawks Chris Spencer C Mississippi
27 Atlanta Falcons Roddy White WR Alabama-Birmingham
28 San Diego Chargers Luis Castillo DE Northwestern
29 Indianapolis Colts Marlin Jackson DB Michigan
30 Pittsburgh Steelers Heath Miller TE Virginia
31 Philadelphia Eagles Mike Patterson DT USC
32 New England Patriots Logan Mankins G Fresno State


While the pessimists may lament not taking the best player in the draft, we could have done much worse.

The Franchise 11-07-2011 11:50 AM

Good God the top 10 sucked.

sedated 11-07-2011 12:15 PM

That whole first round was down compared to other years. How many consistent pro-bowl/HOF level guys were picked?

DeMarcus Ware, Aaron Rodgers, and Roddy White were the clear winners, while DJ, Logan Mankins, Heath Miller, Luis Castillo, Carlos Rogers, and Cedric Benson make up the 2nd tier, and some of those guys weren't worth the pick that got 'em.

Deberg_1990 09-09-2014 05:16 PM

Bump

One last time. :)

TribalElder 09-09-2014 05:17 PM

I just took a shit

Deberg_1990 01-18-2017 09:33 PM

Do you still feel the same way?

ILChief 01-18-2017 09:36 PM

Was this a real question?

RobBlake 01-19-2017 03:16 AM

20/20?

Nickhead 01-19-2017 04:17 AM

YUP! :D

Lex Luthor 01-19-2017 08:45 AM

https://media.giphy.com/media/cNDrnT2SEJ9Di/giphy.gif

Rain Man 01-19-2017 10:47 AM

Everyone should have drafted Aaron Rodgers over everyone.

Snica 01-19-2017 11:27 AM

Well, isn't this an interesting bump.

I wanted Rodgers then and I would gladly give up what DJ has done for us if we could go back and redraft. I love DJ but QB is the more important position.

Baby Lee 01-19-2017 11:38 AM

Don't know what Rodgers ever did to you guys to curse him so.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.