ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs trade 34th pick for Cassel and Vrabel (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=203311)

HC_Chief 02-28-2009 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 5537568)
Hamas was just bitching about the Chiefs potentially drafting Monroe...

If they drafted him, they are obviously drafting him to play LT...

Therefore, I was wondering what the Chiefs would do with Albert in this scenario.

I love the sense of entitlement you drafturbators think you deserve on this website.

Move Albert to RT would be my guess.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5537569)
Seems to me it already is shored up for a decade.

Not at RT. Right now we have Albert, who is a solid LT, and nothing at RT. Albert showed versatility in college, playing multiple positions along the OL effectively.

Saul Good 02-28-2009 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 5537751)
Just to be clear.. I am NOT advocating Monroe over Curry or even Crabtree... I am just saying that if we lost Waters and drafted Monroe... moving Albert inside to play next to a guy he has chemistry with... is not as much a tragedy as some here claim.

Taking a different LT would be... on that I agree....

On an unrelated note, I bought a new BMW last year for $45,000. I need to get a pickup truck, and I think that I can probably pick one up for about $15,000. Instead, though, I think that I will buy another BMW for $50,000. Then, I will take my old BMW and cut the roof of of it. That way I can have a BMW and a makeshift pickup truck for $95,000 instead of a BMW and a good pickup truck for $60,000.

bowener 02-28-2009 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 5537706)
Seems to good to be true...

Belichick is hooking up his boy with a starter kit for $0.60 on the $1.

Probably didnt hurt that they wanted to dump the $15 million MC was making.

Can we call Cassell, MC Bomber or something? No more wobble launcher!

Hootie 02-28-2009 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5537778)
Pats fans are furious about this.

would you be furious if your team lost an executive of the year and his former partner hooked up his friend with a starter kit for an AFC team for $0.60 on the $1?

Hell yeah.

I'm not even projecting whether I think this will be a success or an epic fail...but right now, this is a total, unbelievable steal...something that I refuse to believe until I see it.

Brock 02-28-2009 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5537780)
Wht do you mean? Usually we waste this pick on a coach or 1 player. We got 2 starting players for 1 pick. That is a steal

I mean look at the history of traded QBs.

wild1 02-28-2009 12:59 PM

Well, Matt Cassel is QB of the Kansas City Chiefs now. Let's all get behind him.

Blindside58 02-28-2009 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5537763)
The track record on this kind of deal for the Chiefs and frankly the rest of the league hasn't been good.

Please Elaborate -I cannot think of a deal like this???? A Veteran Leader on Defense and a Young QB That got progressively better in his first NFL season of be ing a starter?????

Frosty 02-28-2009 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5537775)
Yeah, the Chiefs can just take on the 14 million dollar deal.

They have a long time to negotiate that down.

Matt Cassel better take Pollard out for a sweet dinner.

They could actually let him play out under that contract to see how he does before giving him big dollars (but probably won't).

Bugeater 02-28-2009 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5537778)
Pats fans are furious about this.

Heh, that makes the deal worth it all on its own.

HC_Chief 02-28-2009 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5537791)
I mean look at the history of traded QBs.

Last one we traded for (Green) worked out pretty well.

Blindside58 02-28-2009 01:00 PM

NFLN is live right now!

Shag 02-28-2009 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultra Peanut (Post 5537712)
I feel kind of weird, because I saw the thread title and I was really upset. Then I saw "second-rounder," and... I just feel weird.

I don't think he's ever going to be a top-tier QB, but he is a 26 year old who's proven that he can be adequate with an elite surrounding cast. So, um. Hmm.

That's pretty much where I'm at, too. While I'm not a big Cassel fan, getting him and Vrabel for a 2nd (which I still doubt) seems like really good value, and much less than I would have anticipated for any Cassel trade...

Brock 02-28-2009 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HC_Chief (Post 5537787)
Not at RT. Right now we have Albert, who is a solid LT, and nothing at RT. Albert showed versatility in college, playing multiple positions along the OL effectively.

You don't have to fill the RT position with any permutation involving a #3 draft pick. My preference obviously is to leave Albert where he is.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-28-2009 01:00 PM

I'm not going to convince anyone who doesn't want to be convinced.

If we paid a high second for him, it's because no one else thought he was worth anything higher.

We will live to regret passing on these two quarterbacks for a guy with mediocre talent who was in a perfect situation.

That's all I'll say.

Brock 02-28-2009 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HC_Chief (Post 5537797)
Last one we traded for (Green) worked out pretty well.

Did it?

Dr. Van Halen 02-28-2009 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 5537788)
On an unrelated note, I bought a new BMW last year for $45,000. I need to get a pickup truck, and I think that I can probably pick one up for about $15,000. Instead, though, I think that I will buy another BMW for $50,000. Then, I will take my old BMW and cut the roof of of it. That way I can have a BMW and a makeshift pickup truck for $95,000 instead of a BMW and a good pickup truck for $60,000.

Ha!

Rausch 02-28-2009 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5537775)

Matt Cassel better take Pollard out for a sweet dinner.

Rausch: "Yeah, Brady? Hi. Uh, here's the deal...um...I hear you need a Tanya Harding for some payback...uh...no. No, I....hello?"

SAUTO 02-28-2009 01:00 PM

i would bet the contract is in place

ChiefsCountry 02-28-2009 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HC_Chief (Post 5537797)
Last one we traded for (Green) worked out pretty well.

How many Super Bowls did we win or get to?

Bob Dole 02-28-2009 01:01 PM

Now saying deal done.

HC_Chief 02-28-2009 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5537801)
You don't have to fill the RT position with any permutation involving a #3 draft pick. My preference obviously is to leave Albert where he is.

If the FO/coaching staff agrees, then the pick will not be Monroe.

We'll grab DL, LB, or WR with the #3 overall

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-28-2009 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HC_Chief (Post 5537797)
Last one we traded for (Green) worked out pretty well.

Clearly much better than staying at 12 and taking Drew Brees, as had been rumored.

FAX 02-28-2009 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5537454)
He takes too many sacks
He has a below average arm
He throws a crappy deep ball
He put up all his stats in about 4 games
He played with an ungodly WR tandem.

Other than that, nothing.

Whatever happened to Clark Hunt saying that if we wanted to compete for a championship we had to draft and develop our own franchise quarterback?

Not to interrupt, but you may want to ease back on the throttle somewhat, Mr. 'Hamas' Jenkins. It sounds as though you're implying that Pioli and Haley don't know how to evaluate quarterbacks. Nothing, obviously, could be further from the truth.

FAX

Hootie 02-28-2009 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5537782)
What 7th round pick has won a Super Bowl? I'll wait for you to google it.

omg STFU...

there is no difference between a 6th round pick and a 7th round pick...or an undrafted guy....who gives a shit about what round someone was picked in...it's amazing a guy who never started in college was even drafted in the first place...

You're a ****ing tool.

doomy3 02-28-2009 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5537791)
I mean look at the history of traded QBs.

Favre, Hasselbeck, Steve Young, Trent Dilfer, Brad Johnson...

It's been done before...

chiefsfan4life1978 02-28-2009 01:01 PM

I think I just shit myself!

thebrad84 02-28-2009 01:01 PM

Peter King reports that the Chiefs send their 2nd round pick only. Is there any one that doesn't like the fact we picked up Mike Vrabel (proven LB leadership) and Matt Cassel (potential solid starting QB) for only a 2nd round pick? That is a helluva steal in my opinion.

chiefzilla1501 02-28-2009 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5537782)
What 7th round pick has won a Super Bowl? I'll wait for you to google it.

Geez, not this shit again. How many 7th rounders were given an opportunity to start?

You don't know the answer to this question because we DON"T KNOW how seventh rounders would fare if they had opportunities to start. WE DON'T KNOW.

HC_Chief 02-28-2009 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5537809)
How many Super Bowls did we win or get to?

#1 offense in the league, 4300+ passing yards, worst defense in the league.

Gee, wonder which of those things kept us from winning a superbowl? :hmmm:

milkman 02-28-2009 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bowener (Post 5537789)
Probably didnt hurt that they wanted to dump the $15 million MC was making.

Can we call Cassell, MC Bomber or something? No more wobble launcher!

Cassel's arm stength isn't all that much better than Huard's.

Randy Moss was quoted as saying he'll be glad when Brady comes back, because he hasn't been used as effectively because Cassel couldn't make all the throws.

Don't have a link.
Just something I heard on ESPN Radio last week.

Bugeater 02-28-2009 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5537803)
Did it?

Oh yeah, don't you remember that one home playoff game? That was great.

HC_Chief 02-28-2009 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thebrad84 (Post 5537817)
Peter King reports that the Chiefs send their 2nd round pick only. Is there any one that doesn't like the fact we picked up Mike Vrabel (proven LB leadership) and Matt Cassel (potential solid starting QB) for only a 2nd round pick? That is a helluva steal in my opinion.

That is just effing crazy.

We have to have surrendered a conditional or two... or maybe a player or two as well.

Shag 02-28-2009 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arc (Post 5537795)
They could actually let him play out under that contract to see how he does before giving him big dollars (but probably won't).

I don't see that as even being an option. If they do that, and he has a big year, they could stand to lose him after just one season. If this deal goes through, I have to think that KC will sign him to a longer term contract...

the Talking Can 02-28-2009 01:03 PM

HOLY SHIT

HOLY SHIT

HOLY SHIT

HOLY SHIT

HOLY SHIT

HOLY SHIT

HOLY SHIT

HOLY SHIT

HOLY SHIT

HOLY SHIT

HOLY SHIT

HOLY SHIT

HOLY SHIT

tk13 02-28-2009 01:03 PM

I can't believe the Pats would give both of those guys up for just a single pick.

Hootie 02-28-2009 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5537812)
Clearly much better than staying at 12 and taking Drew Brees, as had been rumored.

can you link me to this rumor? I believe you, I just want to read something on that...because if that really is the case I guess we certainly did make a mistake in the Green trade.

Brock 02-28-2009 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blindside58 (Post 5537794)
Please Elaborate -I cannot think of a deal like this???? A Veteran Leader on Defense and a Young QB That got progressively better in his first NFL season of be ing a starter?????

Let's set aside the Vrabel part of the trade. That's not really a significant acquisition in the long term. The Chiefs traded for Trent Green, they gave up a lot for him. They got what, 4 good years out of him, if that? That's not what I'm looking for. The last younger QB I can think of that was traded was Matt Schaub. Again, I don't think there is much of a good history for teams that traded for a QB. Perhaps others can think of better examples.

ChiefsCountry 02-28-2009 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 5537814)
omg STFU...

there is no difference between a 6th round pick and a 7th round pick...or an undrafted guy....who gives a shit about what round someone was picked in...it's amazing a guy who never started in college was even drafted in the first place...

You're a ****ing tool.

Bullshit there is go do the history on all of the winning Super Bowl teams turd. 60% of the Super Bowls were won by 1st round QB's. Of the 40% that werent half of that was Montana and Brady. Let that sink in.

doomy3 02-28-2009 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5537821)
Cassel's arm stength isn't all that much better than Huard's.

Randy Moss was quoted as saying he'll be glad when Brady comes back, because he hasn't been used as effectively because Cassel couldn't make all the throws.

Don't have a link.
Just something I heard on ESPN Radio last week.

Neither is Mark Sanchez's.

doomy3 02-28-2009 01:04 PM

NFLN is also reporting it to be a second for both Cassel and Vrabel. Love it.

Blindside58 02-28-2009 01:04 PM

Tom Curran just confirmed it is only the 2nd rounder (35th overall)

PastorMikH 02-28-2009 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thebrad84 (Post 5537817)
Peter King reports that the Chiefs send their 2nd round pick only. Is there any one that doesn't like the fact we picked up Mike Vrabel (proven LB leadership) and Matt Cassel (potential solid starting QB) for only a 2nd round pick? That is a helluva steal in my opinion.



IFthis is true, I'd be happy with it.

Noss 02-28-2009 01:04 PM

NFLN just stated the deal is for the 34th pick (Cheifs second round) for Vrabel and Cassel.

wild1 02-28-2009 01:04 PM

that's what they are talking about on NFL net - "why so little in return?"

Pats will clear $14.5 million for Cassel and close to $5 million for Vrabel

Smed1065 02-28-2009 01:04 PM

For Cassell and Vrabel.

ChiefsCountry 02-28-2009 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 5537830)
can you link me to this rumor? I believe you, I just want to read something on that...because if that really is the case I guess we certainly did make a mistake in the Green trade.

Its on here somewhere, Petro saw Vermeil's draft sheet.

Hootie 02-28-2009 01:05 PM

I'm pissed man! I'd rather have another Turk McBride!

the Talking Can 02-28-2009 01:05 PM

i haven't read the thread or processed this yet

but let me say - as I was not for this - that getting him for a 2nd is palatable....assuming....of course...he isn't Scott Mitchell


Pioli rolls the dice....that's why we brought him in


here we go


wowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowow

Basileus777 02-28-2009 01:05 PM

Considering we only gave up the 34th pick in the draft for him and never had a chance at Stafford anyway....well we aren't really banking our entire future here.

Lex Luthors 02-28-2009 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 5537786)
And who can forget his greatest hits: Bono and Girlbac.

Not that this situation is...any...whe...near....

This is actually much more like the time when the Chiefs traded a draft choice for Trent Green and reunited Green with Vermeil.

Vermeil knew Green. Pioli knows Cassel.

arrowheadnation 02-28-2009 01:05 PM

WOW...the 34th pick for BOTH of them? Even better!

petegz28 02-28-2009 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5537791)
I mean look at the history of traded QBs.

That may be. Wha tI am saying is though is for the Chiefs this is one of the better trades we have made in a long time. We traded a 2nd for Trent Green Right? We traded a pick for Edwards didn't we? And didn't we trade a pick for DV?

I could be wrong...but it seems like we got 2 starters, 1 proven 1 with potential, for 1 pick. That is pretty darn good. And we kept our #3.

Which we will trade down the #3 and get a 2nd round pick before all is said and done.

wild1 02-28-2009 01:05 PM

10-5 as a starter,

63.4%

3,693 yards last year

21 td, 11 INT

buddha 02-28-2009 01:05 PM

Some people on this board such douchebags. I swear! Picking up Cassel for a high 2nd and a conditional next year is incredibly smart. You get a guy who has proven he can play at this level...nobody knows anything about the two top QBs in the draft yet, do they? You get Vrabel who is a proven leader and a guy who will make people around him better. Pioli knows Cassel and he knows EXACTLY what he just traded for. Before anybody else acts like Santa just passed them up again this year, why don't you think before you type. Or better yet, if you're convinced this is a bad deal, why don't you come up with an actual REASON why it is.

DJ's left nut 02-28-2009 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5537821)
Cassel's arm stength isn't all that much better than Huard's.

Randy Moss was quoted as saying he'll be glad when Brady comes back, because he hasn't been used as effectively because Cassel couldn't make all the throws.

Don't have a link.
Just something I heard on ESPN Radio last week.

He can't.

He's an immobile Tyler Thigpen; and I think Tyler Thigpen sucks.

This sucks.

fmylife

SAUTO 02-28-2009 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noss (Post 5537840)
NFLN just stated the deal is for the 34th pick (Cheifs second round) for Vrabel and Cassel.

thats amazing and also said that if next year goes uncapped cassell would be a rfa so he's tied up for at least 2 years we have time to get a contract if ones not in place

Hootie 02-28-2009 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5537844)
Its on here somewhere, Petro saw Vermeil's draft sheet.

Well Brees was considered a bust for the Chargers...so much so they drafted Rivers...who knows how he would have panned out for the Chiefs...

Rausch 02-28-2009 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5537831)
Let's set aside the Vrabel part of the trade. That's not really a significant acquisition in the long term. The Chiefs traded for Trent Green, they gave up a lot for him. They got what, 4 good years out of him, if that? That's not what I'm looking for. The last younger QB I can think of that was traded was Matt Schaub. Again, I don't think there is much of a good history for teams that traded for a QB. Perhaps others can think of better examples.

Favre and Steve Young and not a helluva' lot since...

Blindside58 02-28-2009 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wild1 (Post 5537852)
10-5 as a starter,

63.4%

3,693 yards last year

21 td, 11 INT

Damn. Did you hit pause on the tivo?

HC_Chief 02-28-2009 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5537812)
Clearly much better than staying at 12 and taking Drew Brees, as had been rumored.

I would have preferred that at the time, and especially now with hindsight.

Different scenario: Brees left Purdue after a full collegiate career where he set Big X passing records galore. The fact that he slipped into the second round is incredible.

Stafford, Sanchez, Davis <> Brees. The only potential exception may be Davis; but he's targeted in the second or third round.

So are you upset that we gave up our second round pick & probably cannot now draft Davis?

wild1 02-28-2009 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 5537846)
i haven't read the thread or processed this yet

but let me say - as I was not for this - that getting him for a 2nd is palatable....assuming....of course...he isn't Scott Mitchell


Pioli rolls the dice....that's why we brought him in


here we go


wowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowow

it is crazy to see the team TAKING CHANCES! making bold moves! actually taking risks trying to get better!

Hootie 02-28-2009 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 5537855)
He can't.

He's an immobile Tyler Thigpen; and I think Tyler Thigpen sucks.

This sucks.

fmylife

Cassel is a pretty mobile QB...

|Zach| 02-28-2009 01:07 PM

Welcome to Kansas City Matt.

http://ianonsports.files.wordpress.c...att-cassel.jpg

Smed1065 02-28-2009 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shag (Post 5537825)
I don't see that as even being an option. If they do that, and he has a big year, they could stand to lose him after just one season. If this deal goes through, I have to think that KC will sign him to a longer term contract...

Stated next year is uncapped and would pay him 110% to stay the next year.

melbar 02-28-2009 01:07 PM

News up on espnnews...

Pasquarelli....nothing big

Mike smith...Brady healthy...Other teams made a hard push. Pioli wanted him. Says KC has no long term deal in place yet and Cassel still under 14mil 1 year deal...

SAUTO 02-28-2009 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 5537846)
i haven't read the thread or processed this yet

but let me say - as I was not for this - that getting him for a 2nd is palatable....assuming....of course...he isn't Scott Mitchell


Pioli rolls the dice....that's why we brought him in


here we go


wowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowow

a 2 for him AND vrabel sounds ok. even more palatable, glad youre not on the ledge:D

wild1 02-28-2009 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blindside58 (Post 5537862)
Damn. Did you hit pause on the tivo?

i am a very fast typer!

Brock 02-28-2009 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5537812)
Clearly much better than staying at 12 and taking Drew Brees, as had been rumored.

That would have been horrible!

Rausch 02-28-2009 01:07 PM

If we could find some idiots to have traded a 4th for Donnie Edwards and Thigpen who would you think got the better deal?...

Hootie 02-28-2009 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 5537846)
i haven't read the thread or processed this yet

but let me say - as I was not for this - that getting him for a 2nd is palatable....assuming....of course...he isn't Scott Mitchell


Pioli rolls the dice....that's why we brought him in


here we go


wowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowow

when the talking can has a positive spin on something, you know you're getting a good deal

Duck Dog 02-28-2009 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 5537858)
Favre and Steve Young and not a helluva' lot since...

Steve Bono.



I kid...I kid...

mlyonsd 02-28-2009 01:08 PM

Ironic how we knocked Brady out in the first game, only to see Cassel's abilities show cased for the rest of the season...and then we trade for him. Funny how things work out sometimes.

Bob Dole 02-28-2009 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5537809)
How many Super Bowls did we win or get to?

Did Green play defense? Because THAT is the reason the best offense in the league had no SB wins.

kcfanXIII 02-28-2009 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wild1 (Post 5537792)
Well, Matt Cassel is QB of the Kansas City Chiefs now. Let's all get behind him.

good luck with that.



"we didn't draft him at #3, no way is he our franchise qb, stupid true fan n00b." draftubators.

Red Dawg 02-28-2009 01:08 PM

Scott is the man! If we still have our 1st pick he is a freaklng stud! A young QB that has a year under his belt as a starter. Good job!

milkman 02-28-2009 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thebrad84 (Post 5537817)
Peter King reports that the Chiefs send their 2nd round pick only. Is there any one that doesn't like the fact we picked up Mike Vrabel (proven LB leadership) and Matt Cassel (potential solid starting QB) for only a 2nd round pick? That is a helluva steal in my opinion.

I can only say that I'm happy we didn't give up the farm to bring these guys in.

I don't like the deal because I don't believe that Matt GrCassel is all that good.

Hootie 02-28-2009 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5537873)
That would have been horrible!

well like I said...Brees had a very rough start to his career in San Diego...they drafted a QB #1 overall a few years later...so who knows how he would have turned out in KC.

Red Dawg 02-28-2009 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcFanNindy (Post 5537373)
Cassel traded to Chiefs
The New England Patriots have traded QB Matt Cassel to the Kansas City Chiefs, reports Adam Schefter.


its true! this sucks....was hoping to watch thigpen do good this year!

What?

eazyb81 02-28-2009 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mlyonsd (Post 5537878)
Ironic how we knocked Brady out in the first game, only to see Cassel's abilities show cased for the rest of the season...and then we trade for him. Funny how things work out sometimes.

Ha, that is an interesting point. Weird.

jidar 02-28-2009 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 5537788)
On an unrelated note, I bought a new BMW last year for $45,000. I need to get a pickup truck, and I think that I can probably pick one up for about $15,000. Instead, though, I think that I will buy another BMW for $50,000. Then, I will take my old BMW and cut the roof of of it. That way I can have a BMW and a makeshift pickup truck for $95,000 instead of a BMW and a good pickup truck for $60,000.

oh sweet! I was just sitting here hoping someone would come in and make a reeruned automotive analogy! Thanks!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.