ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs McCluster definitely moving to RB full-time (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=244416)

kcxiv 04-27-2011 03:34 PM

Some of the posts here are funny. <3 the over reactions on this website. Thats what makes it great.

Rasputin 04-27-2011 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7596316)
You like the idea of McCluster, not McCluster himself.

I like McCluster, I like what he did in college too as he exelled when he played RB.

I like that he HIMSELF is on OUR team the Chiefs. I dooo like the IDEA that McCluster is going to get the opportunity to play at RB with the Chiefs also. I will be more exited watching McCluster makes break away plays that put us Chiefs into better positions to win ball games. I like the IDEA AND I like McCluster for who he is. A tiny yet dynamic RB that has heart & skills to play the position in a way that puts him on another level and for Chiefs. :arrow:

michaelj_58 04-27-2011 03:35 PM

and when we shift him on the play from back to slot receiver he usually get's a linebacker for coverage and that's good news!!!And use him on reverses and third down screens!!!! THAT WILL DO PIG THAT WILL DO!!!

Rasputin 04-27-2011 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by michaelj_58 (Post 7596356)
and when we shift him on the play from back to slot receiver he usually get's a linebacker for coverage and that's good news!!!And use him on reverses and third down screens!!!! THAT WILL DO PIG THAT WILL DO!!!

**** YEA!!! Dex can open up the play book.

Hammock Parties 04-27-2011 03:39 PM

There you have it, Keg.

suzzer99 04-27-2011 03:42 PM

I'd love to see a team run by message board posters. They'd cut 90% of players half way into their rookie season, change QBs 5 times per game, change coaches every 3 games, draft an LT or QB every year with their first round pick, blitz every down on offense and throw deep on offense, and sign every high-priced over-the-hill free agent available.

Hammock Parties 04-27-2011 03:45 PM

Actually, I wouldn't cut McCluster. He has value. Just not very much. I certainly wouldn't waste snaps on him as a wide receiver, which is what the Chiefs appear to have come to terms with.

suzzer99 04-27-2011 03:53 PM

I think if the Chiefs had a viable #2 McCluster would get open in space a lot more and become a lot more valuable.

Bewbies 04-27-2011 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99 (Post 7596415)
I think if the Chiefs had a viable #2 McCluster would get open in space a lot more and become a lot more valuable.

No way, the man has no potential.

Fish 04-27-2011 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99 (Post 7596415)
I think if the Chiefs had a viable #2 McCluster would get open in space a lot more and become a lot more valuable.

McCluster was supposed to be one of the offensive weapons to allow for other guys to get open.

Now we need more weapons for our weapons?

CoMoChief 04-27-2011 03:58 PM

Jones needs to be cut then......Battle needs to be the bruiser back.

Plus....I think Battle is better. (or could be better than Jones given more PT)

Bewbies 04-27-2011 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 7596425)
McCluster was supposed to be one of the offensive weapons to allow for other guys to get open.

Now we need more weapons for our weapons?

Exactly. Just putting him on the field the defense was piss down their legs and surrender.

OnTheWarpath15 04-27-2011 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 7596425)
McCluster was supposed to be one of the offensive weapons to allow for other guys to get open.

Now we need more weapons for our weapons?

LMAO

suds79 04-27-2011 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 7596429)
Jones needs to be cut then......Battle needs to be the bruiser back.

Plus....I think Battle is better. (or could be better than Jones given more PT)

Jones needs cut no matter who's here.

What current RB on the roster couldn't give us 3.7 ypc?

keg in kc 04-27-2011 04:00 PM

A formation with Charles in the backfield, Bowe and a 1/2 round draft pick on the outside, McCluster in the slot/motioning in/out of the backfield and Moeaki at TE is an intriguing fantasy.

DJ's left nut 04-27-2011 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99 (Post 7596415)
I think if the Chiefs had a viable #2 McCluster would get open in space a lot more and become a lot more valuable.

If the Chiefs hadn't wasted a pick on McCluster, they'd have a viable #2.

Then they could've drafted him in the 3rd or someone damn similar to him in the 5th.

DJ's left nut 04-27-2011 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 7596437)
A formation with Charles in the backfield, Bowe and a 1/2 round draft pick on the outside, McCluster in the slot/motioning in/out of the backfield and Moeaki at TE is an intriguing fantasy.

Yes, but Matt Cassel is still your quarterback, which makes it something like having a foursome with Natalie Portman, Scarlett Johannson and your mother.

Yeah - that fantasy sucks.

I think.

CoMoChief 04-27-2011 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 7596425)
McCluster was supposed to be one of the offensive weapons to allow for other guys to get open.

Now we need more weapons for our weapons?

yes, and even they need weapons too.

Hammock Parties 04-27-2011 04:04 PM

According to this board McCluster already opens up the field for Charles...and when he started at wide receiver he opened up the field for Bowe, which is why Bowe went off starting in Houston....

So now we just need someone to open up the field for McCluster and we will have the greatest offense ever.

Hammock Parties 04-27-2011 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 7596437)
A formation with Charles in the backfield, Bowe and a 1/2 round draft pick on the outside, McCluster in the slot/motioning in/out of the backfield and Moeaki at TE is an intriguing fantasy.

McCluster has no value as a slot wide receiver. He can't beat NFL coverage.

Titty Meat 04-27-2011 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7596048)
This argument is moot because he was doing the same shit before the injury. They tried to get him the ball in Indy and Houston and he couldn't make people miss to save his life.

But he did make people miss vs San Fran and Jacksonville.

Hammock Parties 04-27-2011 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 7596447)
But he did make people miss vs San Fran and Jacksonville.

He doesn't do it consistently enough. He doesn't do it against people who have any sort of quickness in the open field. I'm glad he can make 280-pound defensive ends miss, though.

DJ's left nut 04-27-2011 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7596443)
According to this board McCluster already opens up the field for Charles...and when he started at wide receiver he opened up the field for Bowe, which is why Bowe went off starting in Houston....

So now we just need someone to open up the field for McCluster and we will have the greatest offense ever.

They call that a quarterback.

When the man under center is capable of throwing accurately beyond 20 yards, the underneath routes tend to open up a bit.

Alas, our quarterback blows.

Titty Meat 04-27-2011 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7596450)
He doesn't do it consistently enough. He doesn't do it against people who have any sort of quickness in the open field. I'm glad he can make 280-pound defensive ends miss, though.

Keep moving those goal posts.

keg in kc 04-27-2011 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7596446)
McCluster has no value as a slot wide receiver. He can't beat NFL coverage.

Stick to videos, gifs and quoting articles. You're completely out of your element trying to talk about things that happen on the field.

Hammock Parties 04-27-2011 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 7596457)
Stick to videos, gifs and quoting articles. You're completely out of your element trying to talk about things that happen on the field.

Did you watch the games last year? 90 percent of his receptions were crap thrown out of the backfield or bubble screens.

The guy flat out cannot beat NFL coverage consistently to warrant playing time as a slot receiver....and that's why he's now a running back.

Hammock Parties 04-27-2011 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 7596456)
Keep moving those goal posts.

I'm trying to help McCluster score touchdowns.

suzzer99 04-27-2011 04:18 PM

You guys are totally nuts. He's had one rookie season where he was hurt, shown some flashes, and you're all completely writing him off. Seriously, take a deep breath, relax, and try to remember that it really doesn't matter what any of you think. But above all else, if McCluster has a breakout next season, be sure to completely forget this whole thread and move on to the next "certified bust".

Titty Meat 04-27-2011 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red 5 (Post 7596471)
I'm trying to help McCluster score touchdowns.

Then you would advocate moving him to the backfield where he does best. Unless you are willing to wait a few years for a college RB to adjust to being a slot WR.

the Talking Can 04-27-2011 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99 (Post 7596373)
I'd love to see a team run by message board posters. They'd cut 90% of players half way into their rookie season, change QBs 5 times per game, change coaches every 3 games, draft an LT or QB every year with their first round pick, blitz every down on offense and throw deep on offense, and sign every high-priced over-the-hill free agent available.


i'd love to meet a dipshit who wasn't a dipshit...oh well

Hammock Parties 04-27-2011 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 7596478)
Then you would advocate moving him to the backfield where he does best. Unless you are willing to wait a few years for a college RB to adjust to being a slot WR.

Actually, I would kind of like to see him develop as a wide receiver, because I think this sideways passing game bullshit only limits what he can do and what the offense can do.

But if the Chiefs think that's all he can do, so be it.

the Talking Can 04-27-2011 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bewbies (Post 7596252)
Smaller, quicker guys who make people miss and are a threat to score every time they touch the ball. Those kind of players are becoming very, very valuable.

I understand people wanting us to take someone else there though....we had, and still have, a lot of holes. I am interested to see how Cody turns out though, but if you read about his rookie year we got way more out of DMC. :doh!:

and who are those guys?

the Talking Can 04-27-2011 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 7596262)
I wouldn't call him that. Jackie Battle was a STer and partly why he didn't get the reps at RB. I think he could have done better than Jones especially later in the season when Jones was breaking down. Coaches generally tend to play out the older proven vets than giving a kid the opportunity. I think that was the case for Jackie Battle not getting RB reps. It's a brand new season (hopefully) so Jackie Battle better take advantage of the opportunities he gets so he can prove himself. I'd rather watch a younger player struggle but get better than an old vet continue to degress as the season folds.

nah, he's worthless

keg in kc 04-27-2011 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 7596483)
i'd love to meet a dipshit who wasn't a dipshit...oh well

But if you met a dipshit who wasn't a dipshit then you wouldn't have met a dipshit, unless he was a dipshit who was a dipshit, but then he wouldn't be a dipshit who wasn't a dipshit who isn't a dipshit and now I'm all confused.

the Talking Can 04-27-2011 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 7596509)
But if you met a dipshit who wasn't a dipshit then you wouldn't have met a dipshit, unless he was a dipshit who was a dipshit, but then he wouldn't be a dipshit who wasn't a dipshit who isn't a dipshit and now I'm all confused.

i'm working out the kinks for the draft tomorrow...it's like firing up a truck that's been sitting in your driveway for a year...


tomorrow I will unleash holy hell on each and every true fan's mom...those whores are going to get it

Rasputin 04-27-2011 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 7596490)
nah, he's worthless

But not as worthless as Jones? Would you agree?

OnTheWarpath15 04-27-2011 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 7596517)
i'm working out the kinks for the draft tomorrow...it's like firing up a truck that's been sitting in your driveway for a year...


tomorrow I will unleash holy hell on each and every true fan's mom...those whores are going to get it

LMAO

Bewbies 04-27-2011 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 7596486)
and who are those guys?

Charles
Sproles
Welker
Woodhead
DeSean Jackson
Hester
Chris Johnson
CJ Spiller
Percy Harvin

Those types of guys.

Now go ahead and commence the discussion of how I'm off base because of how much one of these guys weigh, or how they are a better WR or RB type player and miss my point.

(not you specifically, but this board in general)

the Talking Can 04-27-2011 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bewbies (Post 7596530)
Charles
Sproles
Welker
Woodhead
DeSean Jackson
Hester
Chris Johnson
CJ Spiller
Percy Harvin

Those types of guys.

Now go ahead and commence the discussion of how I'm off base because of how much one of these guys weigh, or how they are a better WR or RB type player and miss my point.

(not you specifically, but this board in general)

hilarious

Valiant 04-27-2011 04:35 PM

I think it is a better spot for him.. More space between him and the D to catch a pass.. HOpefully our coaches do not try to run him up the middle, then he will just break..

Get rid of Jones is all I ask now and give carries to Battle or another back..

the Talking Can 04-27-2011 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 7596525)
But not as worthless as Jones? Would you agree?

based on the fact that he's accomplished jack ****ing shit as a rb in the nfl, no...

the Talking Can 04-27-2011 04:37 PM

and to more important matters:

who is going to start the official draft thread?

Bewbies 04-27-2011 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 7596533)
hilarious

So McCluster isn't that 'type' of player? What type do you say he is?

the Talking Can 04-27-2011 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bewbies (Post 7596545)
So McCluster isn't that 'type' of player? What type do you say he is?

nothing...just a midget


comparing him to charles and harvin etc is funny though...

Bewbies 04-27-2011 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 7596551)
nothing...just a midget


comparing him to charles and harvin etc is funny though...

He's not a perfect match to any of those guys, maybe closest to Sproles since they're both midgets?

That's my emphasis on type of player, not specific player. Maybe I just see things differently, or I dream of the "fantasy" of McCluster.... LMAO

the Talking Can 04-27-2011 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bewbies (Post 7596574)
He's not a perfect match to any of those guys, maybe closest to Sproles since they're both midgets?

That's my emphasis on type of player, not specific player. Maybe I just see things differently, or I dream of the "fantasy" of McCluster.... LMAO

or maybe you have no idea what you're talking about...

Rasputin 04-27-2011 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 7596538)
based on the fact that he's accomplished jack ****ing shit as a rb in the nfl, no...

So you would want a guy who is on his last leg or on his way out of football than a guy who has time to prove himself and get better for future years to come?

I think last year was the year for Jackie to get some deserving playing time at RB to prove himself. He didn't get that opportunity so can't tell me he wouln't have done a better job than Jones 2.2ypc at the later stage of the season. I want younger guys playing for this team that have potential to make this a better team for a long period of time. Jones is was a rehashed out vet RB that we could have done better with using a guy who can learn with getting experience. I don't have much expectations for Jackie Battle other than hoping that he can beat out Jones for playing time this year. Jackie Battle is not going to replace JC, but he can be value as a back up and get some reps for the long season.

the Talking Can 04-27-2011 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 7596595)
So you would want a guy who is on his last leg or on his way out of football than a guy who has time to prove himself and get better for future years to come?

I think last year was the year for Jackie to get some deserving playing time at RB to prove himself. He didn't get that opportunity so can't tell me he wouln't have done a better job than Jones 2.2ypc at the later stage of the season. I want younger guys playing for this team that have potential to make this a better team for a long period of time. Jones is was a rehashed out vet RB that we could have done better with using a guy who can learn with getting experience. I don't have much expectations for Jackie Battle other than hoping that he can beat out Jones for playing time this year. Jackie Battle is not going to replace JC, but he can be value as a back up and get some reps for the long season.


i think he's Brian Shay with shoe polish....

suzzer99 04-27-2011 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 7596595)
So you would want a guy who is on his last leg or on his way out of football than a guy who has time to prove himself and get better for future years to come?

Are you not listening to the esteemed CP talent evaluators who have accurately capped McCluster's ceiling at below replacement player?

OnTheWarpath15 04-27-2011 04:56 PM

Holy Christ, this is comedy gold.

Read from post 3376 to post 3926 in this thread.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...luster&page=43

Two of my favorite exchanges:

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6704589)
I ****ing hate this team. What a cosmic ****ing fluke that Berry pick was.

Dexter ****ing McCluster.

"Oh New England has their own scouting process"

Well you know what, that process ****ing sucks.

We just drafted a ****ing third string RB and KR at 36 in one of the deepest defensive drafts in history with a ****ing franchise QB on the board, multiple good targets at WR, NT, rush end, safety, just ****

I ****ing hate Scott Pioli so much I want to watch him die in a vat of acid.

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 6704716)
How do you figure he's the third back?

And:


Quote:

Originally Posted by DaWolf (Post 6704623)
Following this on Twitter, sounds like the Eagles wanted McCluster, so the Chiefs pulled the trigger right before them...

Quote:

Originally Posted by rad (Post 6704700)
So? Let them take him and look stupid. What a colossal boner.


Hammock Parties 04-27-2011 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 7596600)
i think he's Brian Shay with shoe polish....

I'll do you one better. He's JJ Moses. In fact, he's exactly the same height and weight as JJ Moses. HE'S SO CUTE AND LIL AND REALLY QUICK AND FAST ULTRA PLAYMAKER FOR SURE!

http://www.vandymania.com/photos/NFL...ric_Miller.jpg

the Talking Can 04-27-2011 04:59 PM

to clarify, i'm talking about battle

i sense some confusion

keg in kc 04-27-2011 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 7596542)
and to more important matters:

who is going to start the official draft thread?

You should start an official "Who should start the official draft thread?" thread with an official poll and everything.

And then you should crucify saccoshit on that poll.

Pasta Little Brioni 04-27-2011 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 7596605)
Holy Christ, this is comedy gold.

Read from post 3376 to post 3926 in this thread.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...luster&page=43

Two of my favorite exchanges:





And:

You are correct. Calling Jimmy Clausen a franchise QB is friggen hilarious ;)

Just to be fair. Folks were swinging from Golden Tate's nutsack and he put up 227 recieving yards as a rook.

the Talking Can 04-27-2011 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 7596640)
You are correct. Calling Jimmy Clausen a franchise QB is friggen hilarious ;)

Just to be fair. Folks were swinging from Golden Tate's nutsack and he put up 227 recieving yards as a rook.

did they move Tate to a 3rd RB and rename him "Sash and Crash" or something?

Pasta Little Brioni 04-27-2011 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 7596651)
did they move Tate to a 3rd RB and rename him "Sash and Crash" or something?

He can be WR1 and if he doesn't produce on the field, it means "jack and shit".

Rasputin 04-27-2011 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99 (Post 7596602)
Are you not listening to the esteemed CP talent evaluators who have accurately capped McCluster's ceiling at below replacement player?

Well I wasn't talking about McCluster in that post, was talking about Jackie Battle who should have had some extra reps at RB rather than Thomas Jones, JMO. Jackie Battle and McCluster are two different type players.

I do get what your saying tho. Some want to give up on guys we picked out of the draft for OLDER rehash guys that crawl to the LOS during plays.

OnTheWarpath15 04-27-2011 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 7596651)
did they move Tate to a 3rd RB and rename him "Sash and Crash" or something?

ROFL

the Talking Can 04-27-2011 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 7596659)
He can be WR1 and if he doesn't produce on the field, it means "jack and shit".

so they didn't give up on him at the position they drafted him for, after 1 year...is what we both just said...

OnTheWarpath15 04-27-2011 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 7596517)
i'm working out the kinks for the draft tomorrow...it's like firing up a truck that's been sitting in your driveway for a year...


tomorrow I will unleash holy hell on each and every true fan's mom...those whores are going to get it

I just read that Mike Mayock and Mike Lombardi expect us to take Danny Watkins at 21.

Better get moving.

ToxSocks 04-27-2011 05:31 PM

Danny Watkins....


Danny Watkins.....


This place will be fun tomorrow.

keg in kc 04-27-2011 05:32 PM

Is that the canadian kid that never played football before college?

Pasta Little Brioni 04-27-2011 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 7596719)
I just read that Mike Mayock and Mike Lombardi expect us to take Danny Watkins at 21.

Better get moving.

:Lin:

Move him to FB and we can have Flash, Dash, and Mash!!!

OnTheWarpath15 04-27-2011 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 7596738)
Is that the canadian kid that never played football before college?

Yep. Who will be TWENTY ****ING SEVEN YEARS OLD in June, IIRC.

the Talking Can 04-27-2011 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 7596719)
I just read that Mike Mayock and Mike Lombardi expect us to take Danny Watkins at 21.

Better get moving.



saw that


i never wanted to have to hunt and kill pioli...

BigMeatballDave 04-27-2011 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 7596719)
I just read that Mike Mayock and Mike Lombardi expect us to take Danny Watkins at 21.

Better get moving.

Didnt Mayock say Bulaga last yr?

These guys are wrong more often than not.

ToxSocks 04-27-2011 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 7596738)
Is that the canadian kid that never played football before college?

Ahem. Not only did he not play it, he didn't eve LIKE football before he "stumbled" upon it.

Yeah. That's the guy.

ToxSocks 04-27-2011 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 7596748)
Didnt Mayock say Bulaga last yr?

These guys are wrong more often than not.

I'm having Tyson Jackson Nostalgia. I feel sick.

OnTheWarpath15 04-27-2011 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 7596748)
Didnt Mayock say Bulaga last yr?

These guys are wrong more often than not.

I don't know what Mayock said, but Lombardi was the one that broke the Tyson Jackson story, if memory serves.

ChiefsCountry 04-27-2011 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 7596754)
I don't know what Mayock said, but Lombardi was the one that broke the Tyson Jackson story, if memory serves.

Lombardi was the one who broke the Cassel contract. I think it was Gossin who broke the Tyson Jackson.

BigMeatballDave 04-27-2011 05:39 PM

Mayock also said Thomas would go before Berry.

ToxSocks 04-27-2011 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 7596765)
Lombardi was the one who broke the Cassel contract. I think it was Gossin who broke the Tyson Jackson.

This.

Still though, talk about sucking the air out of the draft.

Danny Watkins in the 2nd round, I'm all for it. 1st rnd? C'mon now......

OnTheWarpath15 04-27-2011 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 7596775)
This.

Still though, talk about sucking the air out of the draft.

Danny Watkins in the 2nd round, I'm all for it. 1st rnd? C'mon now......

I'm not a fan of taking a 27 year old rookie at any point in the draft.

Especially one that "stumbled into football."

BigMeatballDave 04-27-2011 05:40 PM

If the Chiefs take that G at 21 I'm avoiding this place like the plague.

ToxSocks 04-27-2011 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 7596774)
Mayock also said Thomas would go before Berry.

When these things come out of left field the day before the draft it's kinda concerning.

Either that or Tyson Jackson has me scared for life.

OnTheWarpath15 04-27-2011 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 7596780)
When these things come out of left field the day before the draft it's kinda concerning.

Either that or Tyson Jackson has me scared for life.

All of the above.

the Talking Can 04-27-2011 05:42 PM

how about we just don't draft 27 year old players

ToxSocks 04-27-2011 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 7596778)

Especially one that "stumbled into football."

Which is my only hope that the Chiefs won't draft this guy.

What happened to the Live, breath, die football that the Chiefs put an emphasis on?

DeezNutz 04-27-2011 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 7596719)
I just read that Mike Mayock and Mike Lombardi expect us to take Danny Watkins at 21.

Better get moving.

I refuse to believe that Pioli is this stupid.

OnTheWarpath15 04-27-2011 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 7596783)
how about we just don't draft 27 year old players

Pioli probably leaked this, that way when he takes someone slightly less puzzling, people will say, "Whew. Thank **** it wasn't Danny Watkins."


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.