ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Jaworski rates Chiefs QB at No. 20 among NFL starters (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=274325)

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-08-2013 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maverick91579 (Post 9800234)
Ive never understood this. Tony Romo has choked in EVERY SINGLE big time game he has been in. Yet people fawn over him. I would NOT take him over Alex Smith, in any game that matters. Never.

I think they both suck.

Mav 07-08-2013 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9800240)
I think they both suck.

that's probably a much fairer comparison. I wouldn't trust Romo, in a must win, and I wouldn't trust Alex Smith if he had to carry the team.

Kudos.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-08-2013 11:29 PM

Found a gif of Alex getting pumped-up for practice:

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lm...0yrao1_400.gif

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-08-2013 11:34 PM

Holy Shit! It's Lil' Chiefy!...

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lv...y115o1_500.jpg

Dave Lane 07-08-2013 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter (Post 9794626)
I'll say it first:

If Smith stays healthy, he'll break into the top ten, or close, in Reid's offense.

Meth is legal in South Dakota now?

BossChief 07-09-2013 12:00 AM

It's not completely out of the question for Alex Smith to get into the top ten, but it's highly unlikely.

I agree with Milk when he mentioned the confidence factor hurting Smith. If Alex can continue to pick teams apart on the short and intermediate routes while developing some confidence to "take what the defense gives you" in regards to passes that travel in the air 30 yards or more (once you have forced them to compensate to take away the short stuff) the guy can start to show the potential he showed when he came out as the top pick.

I would also like to see him in the Pistol because that should take advantage of his mobility and decision making ability.

Bowe is almost always open or commanding a double team
Jamaal is gonna rape faces all year if be stays healthy.
Moeaki and Fasano have shown to be able to get open and block well
McCluster has been able to get open (though he lacks playmaking ability after the catch)
This Kelce kid is huge and seems to have playmaking potential. Hopefully the guy hires a DD, though.

That's a pretty good group of guys to be getting the ball to.

Chief Roundup 07-09-2013 06:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by houstonwhodat (Post 9798541)
Jesus,

I shudder the thought of Drew Brees retiring.

The Saints will go back to the Aints again.

houstonwhodat 07-09-2013 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 9800382)
The Saints will go back to the Aints again.

I don't think that will happen.

But the fanbase there is extremely spoiled with Drew Brees, Sean Payton and Mickey Loomis.

May have to give up football when those three hang it up.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-09-2013 07:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pablo (Post 9800214)
LMAO

Yeah. Sure thing.

Why not? They win 10 with Cassel, a buffoon head coach, and less talent. They won 7without Charles and berry with falco. guys are really not factoring in just how bad 40 turnovers sunk this team

MagicHef 07-09-2013 07:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9800403)
Why not? They win 10 with Cassel, a buffoon head coach, and less talent. They won 7without Charles and berry with falco. guys are really not factoring in just how bad 40 turnovers sunk this team

Where exactly are you getting 40 turnovers from?

KCUnited 07-09-2013 07:28 AM

Jaws had Cassel at 22 last year. So according to Jaws, we gave up a 2nd and a 3rd that could become a 2nd to move up 2 spots.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-09-2013 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 9800411)
Where exactly are you getting 40 turnovers from?

Jeez, you are as big a dumb**** as Knowmo. 37 turnovers for a + - of -24. 10 worse in the ratio department than any AFC team.

New England and Baltimore only turned it over 16 times. Houston only 17.

The 5 teams with the fewest turnovers in the NFC all made the postseason as did the best 4 in the AFC.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-09-2013 08:34 AM

The 7 best teams in + - in the NFC all had winning records, so did the Top 4 in the AFC.

Yeah guys taking care of the ball still matters quite a bit.

MagicHef 07-09-2013 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9800465)
Jeez, you are as big a dumb**** as Knowmo. 37 turnovers for a + - of -24. 10 worse in the ratio department than any AFC team.

New England and Baltimore only turned it over 16 times. Houston only 17.

The 5 teams with the fewest turnovers in the NFC all made the postseason as did the best 4 in the AFC.

So Cassel and Quinn are supposed to be responsible for turnovers they didn't commit? Smith had 9 turnovers in 8 games last season. Add his 18 for a full season to the 10 fumbles by the Chiefs non-QBs last season.

28 turnovers would have been 24th in the NFL last season. Sounds like 11 wins to me!

Pasta Little Brioni 07-09-2013 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 9800475)
So Cassel and Quinn are supposed to be responsible for turnovers they didn't commit? Smith had 9 turnovers in 8 games last season. Add his 18 for a full season to the 10 fumbles by the Chiefs non-QBs last season.

28 turnovers would have been 24th in the NFL last season. Sounds like 11 wins to me!

Doesn't work that way dumbass. The focus of this offseason will be ball security. You can bank that on your invisiballs.

In 2010 the Chiefs only had 14 turnovers as a team, so all the extra turnovers may be a fraud anyway.

MagicHef 07-09-2013 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9800479)
Doesn't work that way dumbass. The focus of this offseason will be ball security. You can bank that on your invisiballs.

No, the focus of this offseason so far has been getting Alex to be aggressive with the ball. That's basically the opposite.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-09-2013 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 9800483)
No, the focus of this offseason so far has been getting Alex to be aggressive with the ball. That's basically the opposite.

Oh, for ****'s sake. You can be aggressive with the ball, while still being smart and picking teams apart with the short passing game. See Brady, Tom and Brees, Drew.

Messier 07-09-2013 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCUnited (Post 9800419)
Jaws had Cassel at 22 last year. So according to Jaws, we gave up a 2nd and a 3rd that could become a 2nd to move up 2 spots.

Could be that these ranking are meaningless.

MagicHef 07-09-2013 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9800487)
Oh, for ****'s sake. You can be aggressive with the ball, while still being smart and picking teams apart with the short passing game. See Brady, Tom and Brees, Drew.

LMAO

Yeah, Alex wasn't utilizing the short game enough. That was the problem.

By the way, Brady threw 84 passes of 20+ yards. Brees, 80.

Smith threw 19.

houstonwhodat 07-09-2013 09:00 AM

This is what Alex Smith can't do.


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/W6z8OOh5S7A" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-09-2013 09:01 AM

Dude, no one wants to watch the goddamned Saints on this board. No one.

Sandy Vagina 07-09-2013 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier (Post 9800497)
Could be that these ranking are meaningless.

They really are. They are for lil kids, basically.

There are 5-6 excellent QBs (that still have flaws, but get overhyped) stick around into the mid-high 90's +)

There are over a dozen good QBs (that hover in the mid-low 90's/upper 80's, yet have their occasionally abysmal games)

And then, there are the rest of either unproven, lucky to get into the 80's, flawed but occasionally decent, barely clinging to a job, backups at best and lucky to be a #2.

Sandy Vagina 07-09-2013 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by houstonwhodat (Post 9800514)
This is what Alex Smith can't do.


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/W6z8OOh5S7A" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-h...for-52-yard-TD

52 yard deep bomb to Crabtree from Alex. Ooops... you iz stoopit! nlm

RealSNR 07-09-2013 09:12 AM

I liked the Saints better when they were irrelevant for all those decades.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-09-2013 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 9800509)
LMAO

Yeah, Alex wasn't utilizing the short game enough. That was the problem.

By the way, Brady threw 84 passes of 20+ yards. Brees, 80.

Smith threw 19.

Way to miss the point. There is a difference between reckless and aggressive with the ball. Yeah, he's going to throw the ball downfield more, doesn't mean that it will lead to more turnovers. Damn, you are a horrible poster.

Fat Elvis 07-09-2013 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9800516)
Dude, no one wants to watch the goddamned Saints on this board. No one.

Absolutely. And you are the Saints of Chiefs Planet.

Mr. Laz 07-09-2013 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9800554)
Way to miss the point. There is a difference between reckless and aggressive with the ball. Yeah, he's going to throw the ball downfield more, doesn't mean that it will lead to more turnovers. Damn, you are a horrible poster.

umm ... usually that's exactly what it means.

MagicHef 07-09-2013 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9800487)
Oh, for ****'s sake. You can be aggressive with the ball, while still being smart and picking teams apart with the short passing game. See Brady, Tom and Brees, Drew.

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9800554)
Way to miss the point. There is a difference between reckless and aggressive with the ball. Yeah, he's going to throw the ball downfield more, doesn't mean that it will lead to more turnovers. Damn, you are a horrible poster.

Come on.

Sandy Vagina 07-09-2013 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis (Post 9800563)
Absolutely. And you are the Saints of Chiefs Planet.

+ 1 , DEFINITELY the lousiest shitbag on this site, thus far.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-09-2013 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis (Post 9800563)
Absolutely. And you are the Saints of Chiefs Planet.

Ouch, lol

Hammock Parties 07-09-2013 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 9800509)
By the way, Brady threw 84 passes of 20+ yards. Brees, 80.

Smith threw 19.

No words for how pathetic that is.

duncan_idaho 07-09-2013 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9800554)
Way to miss the point. There is a difference between reckless and aggressive with the ball. Yeah, he's going to throw the ball downfield more, doesn't mean that it will lead to more turnovers. Damn, you are a horrible poster.

Throwing the ball downfield more pretty much inevitably leads to more turnovers, unless you're throwing the ball right on the boundary (and making it an even lower percentage pass). Hard to argue with that.

Especially when all the talk is about getting Smith to be more aggressive and throw into tighter windows. He's avoided turnovers the past two years because he: 1) Takes a lot of sacks; 2) Scrambles for short gains a lot; 3) Checks down a lot; 4) Only throws to receivers who have clear separation (especially downfield - talk to Niners fans that don't love him so much they follow him to other boards about that).

If he starts throwing more passes downfield to receivers who aren't COMPLETELY (as in 2+ strides) wide open, two things will happen: 1) More big plays (assuming he has the arm strength and accuracy necessary); 2) More turnovers.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-09-2013 09:58 AM

Not exactly. Look at Cassel. They didn't stretch the field, so it led to more turnovers in the intermediate passing game, because all the defenders were right in the area to scoop them up. Proper field spacing and making them respect the deep ball will open up the short, intermediate routes and fewer turnovers in minus territory. The ones downfield don't hurt as much.

Sandy Vagina 07-09-2013 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 9800623)
Throwing the ball downfield more pretty much inevitably leads to more turnovers, unless you're throwing the ball right on the boundary (and making it an even lower percentage pass). Hard to argue with that.

Turnovers should go up, but so will the flashy production that the fantasy footballers seem to cherish. Just so long as the ratio stays positive as smart, situational football dictates. No one seems to much mind when Brees throws multiple INTs, because his good production generally outweighs the bad.

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 9800623)
Especially when all the talk is about getting Smith to be more aggressive and throw into tighter windows. He's avoided turnovers the past two years because he: 1) Takes a lot of sacks; 2) Scrambles for short gains a lot; 3) Checks down a lot; 4) Only throws to receivers who have clear separation (especially downfield - talk to Niners fans that don't love him so much they follow him to other boards about that).

If he starts throwing more passes downfield to receivers who aren't COMPLETELY (as in 2+ strides) wide open, two things will happen: 1) More big plays (assuming he has the arm strength and accuracy necessary); 2) More turnovers.

None of what you are saying here is horribly inaccurate. People that are trying to be open minded need to appreciate that Alex became this way (lacking trust) as a necessity of survival. First, look at the cautious-minded coaches instructing him. Then, look back (if you are able) at the receivers running the routes and making the catch efforts. You will be underwhelmed. I agree that a QB needs to trust his targets... but there is no doubt that SF's receivers have done very little to earn that trust. Not all the time.. but many times, and more so in the distant past.. which happens to be when Alex was mostly developing.

Aside from a very rare circus catch, our receivers have never been particularly good at catching the ball away from their bodies or in tight coverage. Many passes on target have been bobbled for INTs or dropped. VD and Crabtree were surprisingly bad, but improved this in recent times due to hard work. Aside from them, there was no one special to really trust. You have to keep in mind when comparing to other good teams.. the 49ers were so often (all) learning a new scheme being implemented on the fly. If receivers are unsure of their routes? That can make a QB pretty damn bad/unsure of where the ball can end up.. so he may have to wait an extra split-second to see if his guys are doing what the play requires.

I can only pray that Bowe and a few others earn that trust quickly.. and that Reid can quickly ease Alex into giving them that trust and then see if it is sustainable.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-09-2013 11:03 AM

Throwing downfield doesn't mean more INT's though. Poor spacing, decision making, and reckless play dictates that a lot more. Look at Rodgers, he throws down field a lot, but takes sacks when needed, and makes good decisions of when to take the shot.

Reid won't be asking him to go full Favre. He'll want him to take the 2-3 extra shots a game to a single covered Bowe or Avery on a Go or Deep Post. I really don't see what's so hard to understand about it.

MagicHef 07-09-2013 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9800733)
Throwing downfield doesn't mean more INT's though. Poor spacing, decision making, and reckless play dictates that a lot more. Look at Rodgers, he throws down field a lot, but takes sacks when needed, and makes good decisions of when to take the shot.

Maybe you should stop using guys like Brady, Brees and Rodgers to describe Smith's play this coming season. It's only going to lead to heartbreak.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-09-2013 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 9800739)
Maybe you should stop using guys like Brady, Brees and Rodgers to describe Smith's play this coming season. It's only going to lead to heartbreak.

You really are dense as ****

ptlyon 07-09-2013 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 9800739)
Maybe you should stop using guys like Brady, Brees and Rodgers to describe Smith's play this coming season. It's only going to lead to heartbreak.

If we had Aaron Rogers, we wouldn't constantly be having this discussion

Hammock Parties 07-09-2013 11:08 AM

It's pretty hilarious, though.

Homers are going HAM on Alex Smith improving his deep game.

Um, no.

Get ready for checkdowns. Lots of checkdowns.

ptlyon 07-09-2013 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9800745)
You really are dense as ****

Homer Rally Cry

Pasta Little Brioni 07-09-2013 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9800747)
It's pretty hilarious, though.

Homers are going HAM on Alex Smith improving his deep game.

Um, no.

Get ready for checkdowns. Lots of checkdowns.

I'm not a homer and you know it. I'm just arguing that poor decision making leads to more turnover than throwing down field a couple of more times a game. It's all about opportunity. How many picks have we seen thrown on short routes because EVERY reciever was within the same areas?

Coogs 07-09-2013 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9800747)
It's pretty hilarious, though.

Homers are going HAM on Alex Smith improving his deep game.

Um, no.

Get ready for checkdowns. Lots of checkdowns.

I'm ok with checkdowns if they work. Wasn't the biggest play of the Ravens regular season a checkdown? 4th and 29. Without that conversion wouldn't they have missed the playoffs? Could be wrong. :shrug:

aturnis 07-09-2013 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs (Post 9800572)
+ 1 , DEFINITELY the lousiest shitbag on this site, thus far.

Nope. That honor belongs to you and the Alexsexuals.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-09-2013 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis (Post 9800563)
Absolutely. And you are the Saints of Chiefs Planet.

And you...are the colostomy bag of Chiefs Planet.

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9800573)
Ouch, lol

Not really. Fat Elvis is about as relevant and intelligent as a 12" Stonehenge.

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 9800877)
Nope. That honor belongs to you and the Alexsexuals.

This.

Fat Elvis 07-09-2013 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9801517)
And you...are the colostomy bag of Chiefs Planet.



Not really. Fat Elvis is about as relevant and intelligent as a 12" Stonehenge.



This.

OK 'Lil Chiefy.

RunKC 07-09-2013 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 9796445)
You said kc has more talent, I said BS. You then said "where do you disagree?" I then pointed out TE as one example. Then you basically pulled your same old BS claiming that Moeaki is some kind of great TE.

I said the Broncos are deeper at TE and then I proved this by pointing out an article from Williamson who has one of the Broncos TEs listed but not Maoeki. Your only defense is to claim Williamson sucks. Which is typical of a tard like yourself when you've just been handed your ass in an argument.

Keep ****ing that chicken, loser.

never said Moeaki was a great TE you stupid idiot. He's basically the same or better than the one you're pimping.

Broncos TE's are not better.

And no Dreessen does not have better hands than Moeaki. Moeaki's hands have always been good. He even made a one handed amazing catch.

RunKC 07-09-2013 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 9796474)
Yes, it means better, as in the entire unit as a whole.

Here's his original post on the subject:



Sorry, but the Broncos are better at the TE position with Tamme and Dreesen, and the young guys like Green and Thomas.

Here's what he said when I pointed out that Dreesen is nice depth:



So RunTard uses our second best TE to somehow prove how great TE Moeaki is? Who the **** cares if Moeaki is better than our second best TE?

Williamson's article does not point out Moeaki as being a anything special but it does say Tamme is one of the top 40 talents in the AFCW.

I don't see where I'm saying Moeaki is a great TE like you're saying. He's just as good as Dreessen.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-09-2013 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9801570)
never said Moeaki was a great TE you stupid idiot. He's basically the same or better than the one you're pimping.

Broncos TE's are not better.

And no Dreessen does not have better hands than Moeaki. Moeaki's hands have always been good. He even made a one handed amazing catch.

His hands are good, but the rest of him needs augmentation and/or implants:

http://www.esperino.com/wp-content/u...gmentation.jpg

houstonwhodat 07-09-2013 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 9800739)
Maybe you should stop using guys like Brady, Brees and Rodgers to describe Smith's play this coming season. It's only going to lead to heartbreak.


Most sensible post on this whole thread.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-09-2013 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9801570)
never said Moeaki was a great TE you stupid idiot. He's basically the same or better than the one you're pimping.

Broncos TE's are not better.

And no Dreessen does not have better hands than Moeaki. Moeaki's hands have always been good. He even made a one handed amazing catch.

RJ and hef make knowmo look like a genius. They are not worth your time.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-09-2013 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by houstonwhodat (Post 9801676)
Most sensible post on this whole thread.

Bullshit. He took what I said completely out of context.

houstonwhodat 07-09-2013 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9801685)
Bullshit. He took what I said completely out of context.


What ya talking about Willis?

There are only 4 elite quarterbacks in the league and Alex Smith ain't one of them.

It's Brady, Brees, Rodgers and P Manning.

Then everyone else.

MagicHef 07-09-2013 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9801685)
Bullshit. He took what I said completely out of context.

Why don't you tell us what you expect out of Alex by using examples of a similar skill level? Examples could include Freeman, Palmer, Ponder, etc.

houstonwhodat 07-09-2013 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 9801750)
Why don't you tell us what you expect out of Alex by using examples of a similar skill level? Examples could include Freeman, Palmer, Ponder, etc.


Smith is definitely in the group of Schaub, etc.

He's today's Trent Dilfer.

Sandy Vagina 07-09-2013 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by houstonwhodat (Post 9801760)
Smith is definitely in the group of Schaub, etc.

He's today's Trent Dilfer.

First sentence is accurate. Second sentence is headed back to stoopit. :doh!:

OnTheWarpath15 07-09-2013 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by houstonwhodat (Post 9801760)
Smith is definitely in the group of Schaub, etc.

He's today's Trent Dilfer.

ROFL

He's in the group with Schaub regarding being injury prone. Otherwise, not even close.

In the 3 seasons Schaub has played all 16 games, he's thrown for at LEAST 4,008 yards and as much as 4,770.

In the 2 seasons Smith has played all 16 games his highest yardage total was 3,144.

One guy can stretch the field, and one guy can't.

Sandy Vagina 07-09-2013 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9801794)
ROFL

He's in the group with Schaub regarding being injury prone. Otherwise, not even close.

In the 3 seasons Schaub has played all 16 games, he's thrown for at LEAST 4,008 yards and as much as 4,770.

In the 2 seasons Smith has played all 16 games his highest yardage total was 3,144.

One guy can stretch the field, and one guy can't.


Fantasy Footballers unite!!!! http://i651.photobucket.com/albums/u...___by_auge.gif

houstonwhodat 07-09-2013 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9801794)
ROFL

He's in the group with Schaub regarding being injury prone. Otherwise, not even close.

In the 3 seasons Schaub has played all 16 games, he's thrown for at LEAST 4,008 yards and as much as 4,770.

In the 2 seasons Smith has played all 16 games his highest yardage total was 3,144.

One guy can stretch the field, and one guy can't.



Dude I see Schaub every home game because I shoot it.

Schaub ****ing sucks the fans here hate him.

He's a checkdown master and Kubiak gives him NO leeway to call audibles, etc.

He throws jump balls and check downs.

When was the last time you saw a highlight with Schaub throwing bombs.

Never.

Sorter 07-09-2013 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs (Post 9801806)

Okay.

Hammock Parties 07-09-2013 06:28 PM

Alex Smith is in the group that has guys like Kyle Orton in it.

Nothing else.

Oh, Kyle Orton actually has 3 winning seasons to his credit instead of 1...and has 11 career 300-yard games instead of 3...

Carry on!

Hammock Parties 07-09-2013 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by houstonwhodat (Post 9801809)
When was the last time you saw a highlight with Schaub throwing bombs.

Do you not watch the NFL or something?

http://www.juanelway.com/wp-content/...son-TD-GIF.gif

http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/1421221/aj80.gif

Sorter 07-09-2013 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9801812)
Alex Smith is in the group that has guys like Kyle Orton in it.

Nothing else.

Oh, Kyle Orton actually has 3 winning seasons to his credit instead of 1...and has 11 career 300-yard games instead of 3...

Carry on!

What does it mean if I miss Kyle? Do you think Dallas would accept our 2nd next year for him?

OnTheWarpath15 07-09-2013 06:32 PM

Yeah, you rack up 4,700 yards throwing check downs.

Holy Christ.

Sorter 07-09-2013 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9801816)

The first gif just seems deep due to the last 5 years.I understand though.

Sorter 07-09-2013 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9801820)
Yeah, you rack up 4,700 yards throwing check downs.

Duh, that's why Alrx and Cassel have 4700+ yard seasons.

OnTheWarpath15 07-09-2013 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9801824)
The first gif just seems deep due to the last 5 years.I understand though.

It's a pass over 20 yards - something Alex does a fraction over once per game.

Hammock Parties 07-09-2013 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9801817)
What does it mean if I miss Kyle? Do you think Dallas would accept our 2nd next year for him?

I wish Kyle Orton was still here, and was our stopgap until a "media and fanbase acceptable" first-round QB came available to us in the first round.

Hammock Parties 07-09-2013 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9801824)
The first gif just seems deep due to the last 5 years.I understand though.

That's the kind of throw Alex Smith NEVER makes.

Sorter 07-09-2013 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9801843)
That's the kind of throw Alex Smith NEVER makes.

There are so many gifs I want to post but cant right now. :(

Chief Roundup 07-09-2013 07:02 PM

Andre Johnson along with the play action off that awesome running game is more responsible for the Houston Texans deep passing game than Schaub.

Hammock Parties 07-09-2013 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 9801923)
Andre Johnson along with the play action off that awesome running game is more responsible for the Houston Texans deep passing game than Schaub.

Call me when Alex Smith throws for 4000 yards, let alone 4700, dumbass.

Matt Schaub > Alex Smith. And it's not close.

BossChief 07-09-2013 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 9801923)
Andre Johnson along with the play action off that awesome running game is more responsible for the Houston Texans deep passing game than Schaub.

Our running game is just as good and Bowe is no slouch.

I don't want to hear excuses.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-09-2013 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 9801750)
Why don't you tell us what you expect out of Alex by using examples of a similar skill level? Examples could include Freeman, Palmer, Ponder, etc.

Why the **** would I compare him to guys that make poor desicions?

RunKC 07-09-2013 07:32 PM

Russell Wilson
RG3
Flacco
Kaepernick (he was not on pace to throw for 4k)

Guess these QB's suck ass too because they didn't throw 4k last year.

Hammock Parties 07-09-2013 07:37 PM

Using rookie QBs in your argument is weak.

And when Alex Smith wins a SB, I'll cut him some slack.

RunKC 07-09-2013 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9802021)
Using rookie QBs in your argument is weak.

And when Alex Smith wins a SB, I'll cut him some slack.

If Alex Smith puts up the #'s that RG3 and Russell Wilson does next year, you will have no choice but to cut him some slack.

Hammock Parties 07-09-2013 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9802035)
If Alex Smith puts up the #'s that RG3 and Russell Wilson does next year, you will have no choice but to cut him some slack.

Incorrect. He has to do more than a couple of ****ing rookies.

Marcellus 07-09-2013 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9801993)
Our running game is just as good and Bowe is no slouch.

I don't want to hear excuses.

People are making excuses for him not performing when he has Bowe and Charles even though we haven't played a snap yet?

OnTheWarpath15 07-09-2013 07:46 PM

It's his eighth ****ing season. Comparing him to young guys still cutting their teeth is chickenshit.

Hammock Parties 07-09-2013 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9802065)
It's his eighth ****ing season. Comparing him to young guys still cutting their teeth is chickenshit.

People spent the last four years comparing Cassel to rookie QBs to make him look good, too.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.