ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs **** The Official Badguy what have you heard thread **** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=282028)

The Bad Guy 03-13-2014 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10489326)
I've never had a sig on here before but if I did I would put this entire quote in it

Thanks man. Respect your football takes a lot on here.

chiefzilla1501 03-13-2014 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10489329)
scrap heap guys aka we were #1 at the waiver priority so we took advantage of what the good NFL teams cut first.

something Fat Scott should have done the four years he was here but he has a Fat Ego. Dorsey was just doing what anyone with a normal brain should do in that position, but because you were never used to it or seen it done under Fat Scott, you think it's some genius strategy that led to taking advantage of being #1 on the waiver and having first dibs on everyone after training camp.

You can keep repeating this comment. It's never going to stop being dumb.

Because Ron Parker, Marcus Cooper, and Sean McGrath were "can't miss" players when Dorsey picked them up. So I guess Dorsey should get no credit for it.

Mother****erJones 03-13-2014 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 10489340)
Thanks man. Respect your football takes a lot on here.

That's what I've been saying. **** the future. This is a win now league. I'm not saying go pay someone haynesworth money but sign Sanders, sign a TE that is competent, get another pass rusher and go get ****ing Alex Mack to anchor our offensive line. We can juggle the money. Winners do it. The ****ing steelers have been in cap hell the past decade.

The Bad Guy 03-13-2014 09:26 PM

There's no way Alex Mack can happen. Cleveland has shitloads of cap space and want to retain him.

BossChief 03-13-2014 09:29 PM

Alex Mack is gonna get a lot more than he's worth.

He's a really good center, but I wouldn't give him more than 5/yr and somebody will offer a lot more than that.

If we want a center, a much more logical choice would be Evan Deitrich Smith.

Mother****erJones 03-13-2014 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 10489359)
There's no way Alex Mack can happen. Cleveland has shitloads of cap space and want to retain him.

I've read his agent are working hard to get him out. Trying to structure it in a certain way (contract)

Mother****erJones 03-13-2014 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 10489361)
Alex Mack is gonna get a lot more than he's worth.

He's a really good center, but I wouldn't give him more than 5/yr and somebody will offer a lot more than that.

If we want a center, a much more logical choice would be Evan Deitrich Smith.

Ok, well insert center name into that and disregard Mack. I'm tired of having a pussy offensive line.

mcaj22 03-13-2014 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10489353)
You can keep repeating this comment. It's never going to stop being dumb.

Because Ron Parker, Marcus Cooper, and Sean McGrath were "can't miss" players when Dorsey picked them up. So I guess Dorsey should get no credit for it.

That's not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is that scrap heap haul from last year was special and beneficial because we were #1 in the waiver wire and Dorsey actually did his job as a GM to pluck talent from deep rosters. Something Fat Scott NEVER did. Dorsey took 7 Fat Scott players he could give a shit less about and cut them for those guys. Fat Scott would never cut 7 of his draft picks for talent from someone else's team, because he had an ego.

You seem to think this is a model we can sustain every year, I'm telling you we are not going to add 7 scrappers and subtract 7 Pioli picks every year like that off the waiver wire.

Dorsey is going to have to creative now that we are winning. We don't get a player like Marcus Cooper sitting 23rd on the waiver after training camp. You seem to think we will, I don't. That's the nature of the business.

Mother****erJones 03-13-2014 09:33 PM

If we take a corner he better be Revis or Sherman-esque

chiefzilla1501 03-13-2014 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 10489338)
I don't care about who we lost either. I didn't think any of them would be back.

I just want upgrades in places and I don't want 2015 to be an excuse as to why we don't get them.

I don't think anybody on CP is saying rebuild or save for 2015. I think we're all acknowledging that building a team through the first wave of free agency is overrated. And the reaction on CP has been nuts. We've spent 5 years flipping out about the low value of Guards, Centers, Right Tackles, and 5-techniques, and now all of a sudden people are freaked out about losing them.

I get what you're saying. I just don't think you have to spend money to do it. I would be a lot more ecstatic if Dorsey brings in a ton of value players than I would if he brought in 1 or 2 players and nobody else. What I'm tired of, is a team that has 5 starters who don't belong on the field and a bench full of 5th stringers. And high priced free agency doesn't solve that problem.

RunKC 03-13-2014 09:47 PM

win now IMO is signing a guy like Sanders and using a draft pick to move up in from 87 to get 2 great players to be cornerstones.

mcaj22 03-13-2014 09:47 PM

we built the team through the first four days of FA last year....

but now it's overrated?

chiefzilla1501 03-13-2014 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10489367)
That's not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is that scrap heap haul from last year was special and beneficial because we were #1 in the waiver wire and Dorsey actually did his job as a GM to pluck talent from deep rosters. Something Fat Scott NEVER did. Dorsey took 7 Fat Scott players he could give a shit less about and cut them for those guys. Fat Scott would never cut 7 of his draft picks for talent from someone else's team, because he had an ego.

You seem to think this is a model we can sustain every year, I'm telling you we are not going to add 7 scrappers and subtract 7 Pioli picks every year like that off the waiver wire.

Dorsey is going to have to creative now that we are winning. We don't get a player like Marcus Cooper sitting 23rd on the waiver after training camp. You seem to think we will, I don't. That's the nature of the business.

Cooper, McGrath, and Parker were complete nobodies. It's not like these guys were known to be extremely talented, proven veterans who just couldn't make a roster. If he makes smart moves there, he can make smart moves again.

Geoff Schwartz and Akeem Jordan were < 1 million dollar players who were solid stopgaps. Anthony Sherman was a complete nobody who was traded for and became a borderline pro bowler. Abdullah, Watkins, and Rishaw Johnson were solid pickups.

That is 6 good players, and 3 backups that were brought in and they combined costed us less than $4M. That's one hell of an offseason scrap haul and most of them had nothing to do with waiver priority. That right there shows that we absolutely can repeat a good offseason picking from the scrap haul.

Mother****erJones 03-13-2014 09:52 PM

I asked Marty from SOC on Twitter about Sanders chances of signing

@1_ChiefsKingdom: @dthomashof Pretty good. Andy wants him.

I asked him his guess on the mystery lineman

@1_ChiefsKingdom: @dthomashof i think it's Penn from TB. Not 100%

OldSchool 03-13-2014 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 10489412)
I asked Marty from SOC on Twitter about Sanders chances of signing

@1_ChiefsKingdom: @dthomashof Pretty good. Andy wants him.

I asked him his guess on the mystery lineman

@1_ChiefsKingdom: @dthomashof i think it's Penn from TB. Not 100%

Holy crap if we can get Penn and he shows up in shape.

BossChief 03-13-2014 09:54 PM

Penn wasnt even released when Mitch made his comment, iirc.

Mother****erJones 03-13-2014 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 10489417)
Penn wasnt even released when Mitch made his comment, iirc.

That's what I was thinking. But he could've had an idea....plus he's on his way to OAK IIRC

Direckshun 03-13-2014 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 10489305)
Just think how nasty this DL could be if we sign Melton and draft Donald.

Wow.

Donald
Poe
Melton

Holy crap.

It moved.

mcaj22 03-13-2014 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10489404)
Cooper, McGrath, and Parker were complete nobodies. It's not like these guys were known to be extremely talented, proven veterans who just couldn't make a roster. If he makes smart moves there, he can make smart moves again.

Geoff Schwartz and Akeem Jordan were < 1 million dollar players who were solid stopgaps. Anthony Sherman was a complete nobody who was traded for and became a borderline pro bowler. Abdullah, Watkins, and Rishaw Johnson were solid pickups.

That is 6 good players, and 3 backups that were brought in and they combined costed us less than $4M. That's one hell of an offseason scrap haul and most of them had nothing to do with waiver priority. That right there shows that we absolutely can repeat a good offseason picking from the scrap haul.

We got McGrath, Cooper, and Parker because of the waiver priority.

and to help prove my argument, from Cooper's AGENT himself:

Quote:


"And this is the part that I just want to tell you about the San Francisco 49ers. A lot of people are dogging them right now because they gave up Marcus Cooper. The truth is they had an idea, they had a plan for Coop. Clearly they didn't think he was going to explode the way he did, but they saw his talent. They saw what was possible with him and they really loved him.

ALL HE NEEDED WAS SOMEONE TO TAKE HIM UNDER HIS WING.

"They wanted to get him behind Nnamdi Asomugha and have him learn how to be a cornerback from a guy with a similar body type, a similar athletic ability, and I think that that really helped him in the preseason. I think he learned a lot.

"As you might be able to tell, he's a quick study; all he needed was someone to take him under his wing. That's what Nnamdi did there and when he got put on waivers I was kind of shocked because I thought I understood where they were going with it. They just kind of hid him in the preseason and they wanted to get him on the cheap, get him on the practice squad and try to get him to learn how to be a cornerback. I heard there were five waiver bids for him and Kansas City had the highest one. Kansas City brought him in and the rest is history."

You can call Marcus Cooper a complete nobody, but the fact is a good team like the 49ers thought they could pull a fast one, keeping a veteran on the team I'm sure they regret doing, because he retired in the middle of the year (hindsight 20/20). Baalke thought he was the smartest guy in the room and sometimes he is. But do you see the most important footnote of that quote? the part where FIVE TEAMS DID THEIR JOB AND PUT IN A WAIVER CLAIM FOR MARCUS COOPER? Or do you miss that part? because that proves we benefited from being FIRST.

And that's my point, if we are waiver claim #23 on the list, we don't get a Marcus Cooper. It becomes a lot harder to get guys like that when you are farther down the list. It's makes your "let's do the 2013 scrap haul model every year" very hard for consistent sustainability.

Iconic 03-13-2014 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 10489376)
If we take a corner he better be Revis or Sherman-esque

Is there even a corner in this draft like that? Gilbert and Dennard look nice but I don't see either falling to us.

Bowser 03-13-2014 10:02 PM

Cooper is going to be a player. The 49ers would probably take a mulligan on releasing him if they could.

chiefzilla1501 03-13-2014 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10489427)
We got McGrath, Cooper, and Parker because of the waiver priority.

and to help prove my argument, from Cooper's AGENT himself:



You can call Marcus Cooper a complete nobody, but the fact is a good team like the 49ers thought they could pull a fast one, keeping a veteran on the team I'm sure they regret doing, because he retired in the middle of the year (hindsight 20/20). Baalke thought he was the smartest guy in the room and sometimes he is. But do you see the most important footnote of that quote? the part where FIVE TEAMS DID THEIR JOB AND PUT IN A WAIVER CLAIM FOR MARCUS COOPER? Or do you miss that part? because that proves we benefited from being FIRST.

And that's my point, if we are waiver claim #23 on the list, we don't get a Marcus Cooper. It becomes a lot harder to get guys like that when you are farther down the list. It's makes your "let's do the 2013 scrap haul model every year" very hard for consistent sustainability.

251 teams in 2013 passed on Marcus Cooper in the draft
The entire NFL passed on Sean McGrath in 2012
Ron Parker was cut 5 times

We are not talking about veteran free agents who were surefire starters. We are talking about unproven guys who were not good enough to make a roster, and who were not good enough to warrant even a bad draft pick.

The fact that you say Dorsey merely "did his job" as if it's easy to pull roster cut guys and turn them into starters is an unbelievable underestimation of what he did. It's great scouting. And you still have not addressed the fact that Jordan, Schwartz, Abdullah, Sherman (via trade), and potentially Watkins and/or Rishaw Johnson also ended up being very solid scrap heap pickups. I'm guessing these guys were brought in because of waiver priority.

mcaj22 03-13-2014 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10489454)
251 teams in 2013 passed on Marcus Cooper in the draft
The entire NFL passed on Sean McGrath in 2012
Ron Parker was cut 5 times

We are not talking about veteran free agents who were surefire starters. We are talking about unproven guys who were not good enough to make a roster, and who were not good enough to warrant even a bad draft pick.

The fact that you say Dorsey merely "did his job" as if it's easy to pull roster cut guys and turn them into starters is an unbelievable underestimation of what he did. It's great scouting. And you still have not addressed the fact that Jordan, Schwartz, Abdullah, Sherman (via trade), and potentially Watkins and/or Rishaw Johnson also ended up being very solid scrap heap pickups. I'm guessing these guys were brought in because of waiver priority.

Watkins - 5th round pick
Sherman - 5th round pick (Who was a special teams captain in Arizona, but you make him seem like he was some scrub there, no he was the same ****ing FB that was on the Chiefs. Benefits from the WCO whereas Arians doesn't use a FB)
Akeem Jordan - Andy Reid, the end
Adbullah - established player who took a year off that they jumped at first. This is just about them doing their job, correctly and being very organized to the fact that they could get a good young player cheap coming off a religious sabbatical, you make it seem like this dude was a scrub on the Vikings.
Schwartz - in case you were living under a rock, Fat Scott also wanted Geoff Schwartz the year prior when he signed with Minnesota, but Fat Scott being Fat Scott didn't get him. Andy Reid being Andy Reid, gets his guy.

as for the rest, it was John Dorsey being a GM and watching the numbers game from Seattle. Whoever Seattle cut he wanted, because he knew that talent was going to leave that team simply by roster bubbles, because they are the DEEPEST ****ING TEAM IN THE NFL THAT WON THE GOD DAMN ****ING SUPER BOWL. THAT EVERYONE WANTS TO COPY. That players 54-61 on Seattle were better than players 46-53 on the Chiefs. No shit they were. Does it take a rocket scientist to figure that one out? No it takes a GM other than Fat Scott to figure it out.

We won't be there first to reap the benefits of Seattle's cuts every year, is my point. You seem to think we will, so let's see who ends up right this year.


It's like you were so invested in Scott Pioli being awful that you think a normal GM doing an actual GM's job is some sort of god send. I understand why you would think that, but this is what normal GMs and coaches do. (hint: which is why there isn't many of them in the NFL.). These guys aren't scrubs in the sense of that they are complete nobodies, most them were scouted ten times over and drafted. Some of them victim of the numbers game by a team much better than the Chiefs. How dare Dorsey take advantage of that.

But you think this is some sustained model. That we can hold out the tip can and wait for whatever the 49ers and Seattle cut every year and reap the benefits. I'm telling you that it is harder than it looks.

Saccopoo 03-13-2014 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iconic (Post 10489436)
Is there even a corner in this draft like that? Gilbert and Dennard look nice but I don't see either falling to us.

Keith McGill, Utah

BossChief 03-13-2014 10:37 PM

I wish I had a dime for every time Sac pimped some slapdick from Utah (I don't know anything about this guy, just saying)

Saccopoo 03-13-2014 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 10489479)
I wish I had a dime for every time Sac pimped some slapdick from Utah (I don't know anything about this guy, just saying)

6'3"
215 lb.
40: 4.51
33 1/4" arms
10 1/4" hands
39" vertical
10'9" broad

Quote:

NFL Media draft analyst Mike Mayock said Tuesday on NFL Network that McGill looks like a combination of Seattle's cornerback duo of Brandon Browner and Richard Sherman.
Quote:

McGill has also been a standout, according to Galko in a report for the Sporting News. "The corner with the highest ceiling looks like Utah’s Keith McGill," he writes. "At 6-3, 214 pounds, he moves with tremendous fluidly through transitions and impressed during T-step redirect drills."
Quote:

Utah cornerback Keith McGill started Senior Bowl week with an impressive Monday as he was one of the standouts from the morning weigh ins and then displayed impressive fluidity in coverage during practice. In press drills against the receivers, he sustains leverage through initial contact and uses his long arms to direct opponents at the line. During the team session, McGill was transitioning through off coverage well and showed impressive click and close ability to throws in front of him.

O.city 03-13-2014 10:48 PM

So I've been out all day, looks like a lot of shit went down.

Somebody fill me in

mcaj22 03-13-2014 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10489489)
So I've been out all day, looks like a lot of shit went down.

Somebody fill me in

Emmanuel Sanders visits Fri. Was suppose to visit Jets next, may or may not have been cancelled in replace of the Chiefs.

Vance Walker here today and tomorrow

Mystery lineman might be Donald Penn in the kitchen with an axe

also, in the mix for Brandon Pettigrew, whatever that means.

also also, some grumblings/interest about Henry Melton if the market plays out.

BossChief 03-13-2014 10:52 PM

And that crap linemen we signed only got a 1 year vet min deal.

Iconic 03-13-2014 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 10489474)
Keith McGill, Utah

He's very raw, he's only played one season at corner back, he's a guy that will need time to develop but certainly there's a lot of upside, he plays the ball well in the air, pursues the ball-carrier well, isn't the greatest tackler, footwork needs some improvement but he was the high-point of a very weak Utah secondary. I've been intrigued by him for awhile, either as a safety or as a corner back but the odds of him falling to us in the third are slim. This guy will flourish in a Pete Carroll defense- I can see teams trying to copy cat Seattle and taking him in the 2nd diminishing his value.

O.city 03-13-2014 10:56 PM

Nice thanks

No word on Clemons?

BossChief 03-13-2014 10:58 PM

Clemons signed somewhere today, bro.

Prayers sent.

JK....I was talking about the guy from Seattle that signed with Jacksonville...

mcaj22 03-13-2014 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 10489498)
Clemons signed somewhere today, bro.

Prayers sent.

Wrong hole

BossChief 03-13-2014 11:01 PM

You caught me before the edit.

I was gonna wait a couple minutes to taste tears, but figured that's not nice to do to a buddy.

mcaj22 03-13-2014 11:03 PM

but seriously how elusive is this other Chris Clemons, I don't even see any reports of him visiting ANY team.

BossChief 03-13-2014 11:04 PM

It sure is weird.

Maybe his price tag is unrealistic and teams are waiting for the agent to drop the demands.

If that's the case, I'd be pissed if I'm Clemons because guys like Antoine Bethea signed for 6/yr iirc and before long, the options for Clemons are gonna be dwindled and he's gonna have to settle for much less.

O.city 03-13-2014 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10489505)
but seriously how elusive is this other Chris Clemons, I don't even see any reports of him visiting ANY team.

Hopeful it's a lot like Sean smiths thing here last year. Our fo seems to keep it pretty low key in terms of fa potentials

O.city 03-13-2014 11:06 PM

Not cool boss, you dirty sob

BossChief 03-13-2014 11:08 PM

:fire:

O.city 03-13-2014 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10489490)
Emmanuel Sanders visits Fri. Was suppose to visit Jets next, may or may not have been cancelled in replace of the Chiefs.

Vance Walker here today and tomorrow

Mystery lineman might be Donald Penn in the kitchen with an axe

also, in the mix for Brandon Pettigrew, whatever that means.

also also, some grumblings/interest about Henry Melton if the market plays out.

So Saunders
Penn
Pettigrew
Bryant
Walker

Would be a nice haul. Add Chris Clemons and I'd be satisfied, extremely

mcaj22 03-13-2014 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10489520)
So Saunders
Penn
Pettigrew
Bryant
Walker

Would be a nice haul. Add Chris Clemons and I'd be satisfied, extremely


I don't think we are getting all of them, I believe the saga of the Mitch Holthus mystery lineman is not over yet. But having our first guess is kind of a fun version of NFL FA Clue game.

BigMeatballDave 03-13-2014 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10489520)
So Saunders
Penn
Pettigrew
Bryant
Walker

Would be a nice haul. Add Chris Clemons and I'd be satisfied, extremely

Clemons signed with Jax.

BossChief 03-13-2014 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 10489525)
Clemons signed with Jax.

Hahahaha

Iconic 03-13-2014 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 10489525)
Clemons signed with Jax.

DE did not the S

chiefzilla1501 03-13-2014 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 10489467)
Watkins - 5th round pick
Sherman - 5th round pick (Who was a special teams captain in Arizona, but you make him seem like he was some scrub there, no he was the same ****ing FB that was on the Chiefs. Benefits from the WCO whereas Arians doesn't use a FB)
Akeem Jordan - Andy Reid, the end
Adbullah - established player who took a year off that they jumped at first. This is just about them doing their job, correctly and being very organized to the fact that they could get a good young player cheap coming off a religious sabbatical, you make it seem like this dude was a scrub on the Vikings.
Schwartz - in case you were living under a rock, Fat Scott also wanted Geoff Schwartz the year prior when he signed with Minnesota, but Fat Scott being Fat Scott didn't get him. Andy Reid being Andy Reid, gets his guy.

as for the rest, it was John Dorsey being a GM and watching the numbers game from Seattle. Whoever Seattle cut he wanted, because he knew that talent was going to leave that team simply by roster bubbles, because they are the DEEPEST ****ING TEAM IN THE NFL THAT WON THE GOD DAMN ****ING SUPER BOWL. THAT EVERYONE WANTS TO COPY. That players 54-61 on Seattle were better than players 46-53 on the Chiefs. No shit they were. Does it take a rocket scientist to figure that one out? No it takes a GM other than Fat Scott to figure it out.

We won't be there first to reap the benefits of Seattle's cuts every year, is my point. You seem to think we will, so let's see who ends up right this year.


It's like you were so invested in Scott Pioli being awful that you think a normal GM doing an actual GM's job is some sort of god send. I understand why you would think that, but this is what normal GMs and coaches do. (hint: which is why there isn't many of them in the NFL.). These guys aren't scrubs in the sense of that they are complete nobodies, most them were scouted ten times over and drafted. Some of them victim of the numbers game by a team much better than the Chiefs. How dare Dorsey take advantage of that.

But you think this is some sustained model. That we can hold out the tip can and wait for whatever the 49ers and Seattle cut every year and reap the benefits. I'm telling you that it is harder than it looks.

Feel free to look at other 1.1's and see how they've done on the waiver wire. I can promise you they don't have many impact starters out of that haul.

Jordan, Schwartz, and Abdullah costed us less than a million. Which means that 31 teams looked at them, and didn't think they were starters, let alone quality backups. Sherman was acquired for pretty much nothing. And it's very possible that Watkins or Rishaw Johnson, or even AJ Jenkins could play a big role this year.

It's beyond me that you are actually making as many excuses as you are to avoid giving credit where credit is due. And actually passing it off as easy to find STARTERS out of waiver wire pickups and < 1M free agent signings.

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-14-2014 06:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 10488962)
Some minor info....Chiefs are monitoring Henry Melton's situation. He's asking for the moon right now, but that price is dropping. If he doesn't sign with Minnesota, they might have him come in over the weekend.

I think the Chiefs will host quite a bit of guys over the weekend. Lots of quality players still available and the market is still settling.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Source: FA DT Henry Melton is on his way this morning to travel for a visit to Seattle.</p>&mdash; Josina Anderson (@JosinaAnderson) <a href="https://twitter.com/JosinaAnderson/statuses/444447424623693824">March 14, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

RunKC 03-14-2014 06:30 AM

Seattle getting MOAR standout DL? Damn it's gonna be ugly playing these guys.

htismaqe 03-14-2014 07:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 10489479)
I wish I had a dime for every time Sac pimped some slapdick from Utah (I don't know anything about this guy, just saying)

McGill is actually a legit prospect. Really good player.

Direckshun 03-14-2014 07:50 AM

Jake Murphy would be a really good depth pick in the late 6th or 7th for TE. He's from Utah State, but still.

htismaqe 03-14-2014 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 10489702)
Jake Murphy would be a really good depth pick in the late 6th or 7th for TE. He's from Utah State, but still.

We don't need anymore practice squad guys.

If they're not going for an Ebron or Amaro, just roll with what we have.

Direckshun 03-14-2014 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10489720)
We don't need anymore practice squad guys.

If they're not going for an Ebron or Amaro, just roll with what we have.

Well, two things:

1. We have two sixth round picks, whether you like it or not.

2. If we've learned anything from Dorsey's love affair for Fasano, Kelce, and now Pettigrew, Dorsey prefers TEs that block like mother****ers and also happen to be decent receivers. That's the template. And I'm not sure if Ebron fits that template, but Amaro sure as **** doesn't.

htismaqe 03-14-2014 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 10489767)
Well, two things:

1. We have two sixth round picks, whether you like it or not.

So two practice squad guys.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 10489767)
2. If we've learned anything from Dorsey's love affair for Fasano, Kelce, and now Pettigrew, Dorsey prefers TEs that block like mother****ers and also happen to be decent receivers. That's the template. And I'm not sure if Ebron fits that template, but Amaro sure as **** doesn't.

Why do you have to be such a ****ing buzzkill?

Martyball FTW!

The Franchise 03-14-2014 09:18 AM

What are they going to do with Penn? Put him at LT and keep Fisher at RT? Put Penn at RG?

salame 03-14-2014 09:20 AM

Our Adam Shefter is slacking

Direckshun 03-14-2014 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10489874)
What are they going to do with Penn? Put him at LT and keep Fisher at RT? Put Penn at RG?

Yup. Penn's a pure LT.

Honestly, and I could get slaughtered for suggesting this, but Stephenson could/should be our incumbent at RT, and Fisher should have to beat him out.

God. I would absolutely wreck shit if our #1 overall pick was a ****ing swing tackle the next two years.

htismaqe 03-14-2014 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 10489999)
Yup. Penn's a pure LT.

Honestly, and I could get slaughtered for suggesting this, but Stephenson could/should be our incumbent at RT, and Fisher should have to beat him out.

God. I would absolutely wreck shit if our #1 overall pick was a ****ing swing tackle the next two years.

The pick is already spent.

If he's a swing tackel, he's a swing tackle. Quite frankly, he was going to be hard-pressed to ever live up to the pick anyway.

The Franchise 03-14-2014 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 10489999)
Yup. Penn's a pure LT.

Honestly, and I could get slaughtered for suggesting this, but Stephenson could/should be our incumbent at RT, and Fisher should have to beat him out.

God. I would absolutely wreck shit if our #1 overall pick was a ****ing swing tackle the next two years.

At this point....it is what it is. Yeah it would suck but it's not like we haven't been through this before.

chiefzilla1501 03-14-2014 11:37 AM

Not crazy at all about this. But I hope they decide to use him at guard, If anything. Maybe at his age, that's not a bad thing.

RealSNR 03-14-2014 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 10489702)
Jake Murphy would be a really good depth pick in the late 6th or 7th for TE. He's from Utah State, but still.

You've been hanging out with Saccopoo too much.

rico 03-14-2014 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10490030)
The pick is already spent.

If he's a swing tackel, he's a swing tackle. Quite frankly, he was going to be hard-pressed to ever live up to the pick anyway.

Vurrrry true...haha that dude probably is stressed as hell knowing that, too. I mean, being an OL and being selected first overall...that has some stigma, for you don't read their stat-lines in the newspaper on Mondays. If that does bother him, hopefully that wussy gets over it or at least, doesn't inadvertently trip over his dick trying to compensate for it.

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-14-2014 12:14 PM

Henry Melton - DL - Bears
Free agent DT Henry Melton will visit the Cowboys after the Seahawks.
Melton isn't expected to sign with Seattle on his visit, unless he his blown away by an offer. Melton has expressed a desire to play for the Cowboys in his home state of Texas. If Jerry Jones can work the money right and fit Melton into the budget, he'd be a much-needed talent for a currently-talentless defensive line.
Related: Cowboys

Direckshun 03-14-2014 12:25 PM

No way in hell the Cowboys can make that work, financially.

They're in about the same place as we are, though. So I shouldn't get my hopes up here, either.

BossChief 03-14-2014 12:33 PM

Jerry Jones is a damn fool.

Sully 03-14-2014 12:36 PM

Maybe it's because I have a 5-year old, but I have completely gone over to pronouncing BadGuy's name as "badgee" like they do in the Muppets Most Wanted trailer.

The Franchise 03-14-2014 12:37 PM

In regards to the Chiefs being interested in Chris Clemons...

Terez A. Paylor ‏@TerezPaylor 10m

I would think so but I haven’t heard anything

Direckshun 03-14-2014 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10490423)
In regards to the Chiefs being interested in Chris Clemons...

Terez A. Paylor ‏@TerezPaylor 10m

I would think so

OMG

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/6Re0aBeOsvA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10490423)
but I haven’t heard anything

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/ap5Sw3xsZhU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

royr17 03-14-2014 10:30 PM

any new update bad guy on sanders or any other free agents ?

DenverChief 03-15-2014 08:15 PM

SO

TBG - whats the word in your ear?

salame 03-15-2014 09:30 PM

blah blah

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-15-2014 09:43 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Meanwhile, <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Seahawks&amp;src=hash">#Seahawks</a> and DT Henry Melton are deep in negotiations tonight, per source. We’ll see if he makes it to Dallas for his visit</p>&mdash; Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapSheet/statuses/445042503125700608">March 16, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Saccopoo 03-15-2014 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10490270)
You've been hanging out with Saccopoo too much.

No he hasn't.

If he had, he'd have realized that Murphy is from Utah, not Utah State.

Pretty good tight end though, regardless.

Fat Elvis 03-15-2014 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 10489767)
Well, two things:

1. We have two sixth round picks, whether you like it or not.

2. If we've learned anything from Dorsey's love affair for Fasano, Kelce, and now Pettigrew, Dorsey prefers TEs that block like mother****ers and also happen to be decent receivers. That's the template. And I'm not sure if Ebron fits that template, but Amaro sure as **** doesn't.

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10489802)
So two practice squad guys.



Why do you have to be such a ****ing buzzkill?

Martyball FTW!

Demetrius Harris, bitches.

ShortRoundChief 03-15-2014 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis (Post 10494269)
Demetrius Harris, bitches.

I thought we cut him.

Bowser 03-16-2014 09:21 AM

So Frank, what's your guy have to say about this whole Emmanuelle Sanders goat ****?

O.city 03-16-2014 02:52 PM

Please just get Chris Clemons in here

royr17 03-16-2014 10:29 PM

any new info from your guy on free agents chiefs are interested in bringin in tbg ?

The Bad Guy 03-16-2014 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by royr17 (Post 10497372)
any new info from your guy on free agents chiefs are interested in bringin in tbg ?

Got nothin' man. Anything I find out, I'll be sure to post it here.

Haven't gotten a response in the last 24 hours.

The Bad Guy 03-16-2014 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 10495076)
So Frank, what's your guy have to say about this whole Emmanuelle Sanders goat ****?

The no-reply is pretty telling. I think this one is going to sting them for a long time.

OldSchool 03-16-2014 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dick Bull (Post 10494274)
I thought we cut him.

Yeah, then we signed him to a max PS contract. That tells me that he showed enough to our Coaching staff to invest a decent chunk of change in him ($100k).

They cut him because he was still too raw, having not played football since high school, and didn't develop fast enough to warrant an actual roster spot.

I remember reading a report that said he looked lost a lot of the times in practice but was still able to make some plays in the passing game.

Mother****erJones 03-16-2014 10:42 PM

Hoping we take a flyer on James Jones, then add a WR in rd 1. This draft, we must find Tamba and Flowers replacements.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.