ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs release KeiVarae Russell (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=302214)

jjchieffan 09-14-2016 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smellway (Post 12426007)
line of scrimmage, clearly

Clearly. Because you have to keep moving the goalposts since you know that it's inevitable that he's going to be a playmaker. You only said a 20 yard pass. Then, after the bet, you said through the air. Now it has to be from the LOS. So now, if Alex drops 5 yards, throws a pass 19 yards past the LOS, and Hill takes it to the house, you still haven't lost. Nice. I should have expected that from you. If you really believed that he was so horrible, you wouldn't keep moving those goalposts. But whatever. Alex went deep several times on Sunday. It's just a matter of time until Hill gets one.

Hammock Parties 09-14-2016 01:41 PM

cool story bro LMAO

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2016 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CupidStunt (Post 12426030)
Over. Again unless he was a bad reach. Because there are way more than 6 teams who have bad enough defenses/secondaries where they'd take a chance on a 3rd round pick.

That's a really poor justification.

Garrett Grayson was a 2015 3rd round pick of the Saints and he was waived earlier this month.

No one claimed him and he's a street free agent. He's not even signed to a Practice Squad.

Being a 3rd round pick that's been waived within the first year is apropos of nothing.

staylor26 09-14-2016 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12426045)
The other implication, that no one has mentioned, is that the Chiefs will most definitely be in the market for another cornerback in the draft, whether it's the 1st, 2nd or 3rd round.

I don't see us taking one in he 1st or 2nd, but 3rd or later I think is pretty much a guarantee.

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2016 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12426053)
I don't see us taking one in he 1st or 2nd, but 3rd or later I think is pretty much a guarantee.

I think it depends on how Gaines, Nelson, White and Acker perform in 2016.

If no one steps up opposite Peters, they'll need to make an early move.

Mr. Flopnuts 09-14-2016 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12426045)
The other implication, that no one has mentioned, is that the Chiefs will most definitely be in the market for another cornerback in the draft, whether it's the 1st, 2nd or 3rd round.

If we're so deep that we can cut 3rd round picks don't they feel that they're good enough at that position? Honestly, I traveled the entire preseason and didn't get a chance to follow the Chiefs this year, but I know you know your shit well enough to take your word on Russell. That said, if they were in the market was Russell really THAT bad?

beach tribe 09-14-2016 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12426053)
I don't see us taking one in he 1st or 2nd, but 3rd or later I think is pretty much a guarantee.

Just depends on who is available. If a guy falls to them in the 1st, I would assume they'll draft him.

That's Dorsey's MO so far.

Mr. Flopnuts 09-14-2016 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12426063)
I think it depends on how Gaines, Nelson, White and Acker perform in 2016.

If no one steps up opposite Peters, they'll need to make an early move.

Good point. If one of those guys aren't quality by the end of the year, it'll be a HIGH priority come draft time next year.

beach tribe 09-14-2016 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 12426064)
If we're so deep that we can cut 3rd round picks don't they feel that they're good enough at that position? Honestly, I traveled the entire preseason and didn't get a chance to follow the Chiefs this year, but I know you know your shit well enough to take your word on Russell. That said, if they were in the market was Russell really THAT bad?

It just means he's the 54th best player they can get, and obviously don't believe he's ever gonna be much more than that.

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2016 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 12426064)
If we're so deep that we can cut 3rd round picks don't they feel that they're good enough at that position? Honestly, I traveled the entire preseason and didn't get a chance to follow the Chiefs this year, but I know you know your shit well enough to take your word on Russell. That said, if they were in the market was Russell really THAT bad?

Russell was invisible during the preseason, save for one play. He was out there with the 3's and 4's all throughout and never flashed.

Clearly, Dave Toub had no interest in keeping him for Special Teams.

I made the observation, which can be found in Preseason thread (I *think*) that if the NFL was a "true* meritocracy, Russell would be cut. Many people disagreed, stating that "he was a 3rd rounder and teams don't cut those guys" or that his "upside" was really high, etc. and so on.

I didn't see him contributing in 2016 and just a few short weeks later, I guess the Chiefs agreed.

Oh, and as to "depth", I think they're still lacking depth but realized that Russell wasn't going to be the answer.

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2016 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 12426077)
It just means he's the 54th best player they can get, and obviously don't believe he's ever gonna be much more than that.

Had it not been for the fact that Dezmon Moses contract would have been guaranteed if he was on the roster Week 1, I think it's likely that Russell would have been waived on September 3rd.

staylor26 09-14-2016 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12426063)
I think it depends on how Gaines, Nelson, White and Acker perform in 2016.

If no one steps up opposite Peters, they'll need to make an early move.

I feel really good about Gaines. He was flying around and looked much more physical than he did in his first two years.

Meatloaf 09-14-2016 01:58 PM

Sorry if Q, but 610 radio just had Matt Miller from Bleacher Report on. He said he had talked to several of his Chiefs contacts as to what might've happened to hasten Russell's release. No one said it was anything specific (like an off field issue). Generally, the take was that he was a bit of a knucklehead who talked way to much for a rookie. Got the impression that the guy thought he was God's gift and wasn't afraid to share that with anyone/everyone. Just didn't fit in. FWIW.

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2016 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12426097)
I feel really good about Gaines. He was flying around and looked much more physical than he did in his first two years.

Gaines just needs to prove he can stay healthy for 16 games

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2016 01:59 PM

Looks to me like Russell knew it was coming 2 days ago...



<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I ain&#39;t dead yet like I&#39;m Bruce Willis ����</p>&mdash; Keivarae Russell (@Keivarae1) <a href="https://twitter.com/Keivarae1/status/775484454496198656">September 13, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

jjchieffan 09-14-2016 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12426081)
Russell was invisible during the preseason, save for one play. He was out there with the 3's and 4's all throughout and never flashed.

Clearly, Dave Toub had no interest in keeping him for Special Teams.

I made the observation, which can be found in Preseason thread (I *think*) that if the NFL was a "true* meritocracy, Russell would be cut. Many people disagreed, stating that "he was a 3rd rounder and teams don't cut those guys" or that his "upside" was really high, etc. and so on.

I didn't see him contributing in 2016 and just a few short weeks later, I guess the Chiefs agreed.

Oh, and as to "depth", I think they're still lacking depth but realized that Russell wasn't going to be the answer.

Yep. And I was one of the ones disagreeing with you. I never felt that he earned his spot. But I just couldn't believe that they would move on from a 3rd round pick so quickly. Kudos. You was right. I was wrong.

RunKC 09-14-2016 02:17 PM

A team would be stupid not to pick up this kid on waivers. I highly doubt he goes through waivers unless he did something truly terrible.

He's a 3rd rd pick with solid coverage ability and top shelf athleticism. A team will take that all day.

Who cares if he was slow to learn the playbook? He's a rookie. Marcus Cooper was someone we took off waivers who never played a game at corner. Someone will take the chance on him, mostly bc of of what that athleticism and also the fact that he's cheap as hell.

RunKC 09-14-2016 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Meatloaf (Post 12426106)
Sorry if Q, but 610 radio just had Matt Miller from Bleacher Report on. He said he had talked to several of his Chiefs contacts as to what might've happened to hasten Russell's release. No one said it was anything specific (like an off field issue). Generally, the take was that he was a bit of a knucklehead who talked way to much for a rookie. Got the impression that the guy thought he was God's gift and wasn't afraid to share that with anyone/everyone. Just didn't fit in. FWIW.

Matt Miller also said this guy would start opposite of Peters this year.

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2016 02:21 PM

http://www.kansascity.com/sports/nfl...e81673707.html

The Chiefs finally signed third-round pick KeiVarae Russell on Friday, according to the NFL’s transaction wire, which means the team now has all nine of its 2016 draft picks under contract.

Though he has not had a contract, Russell has not missed any of the Chiefs’ offseason practices. He participated in all three rookie camp practices and all six voluntary full-team practices that have been held. Practices continue next week.

----------

This article directly contradicts the myth that Russell missed time in the offseason, thus setting him back in terms of the defense and terminology.

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2016 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Meatloaf (Post 12426106)
Sorry if Q, but 610 radio just had Matt Miller from Bleacher Report on. He said he had talked to several of his Chiefs contacts as to what might've happened to hasten Russell's release. No one said it was anything specific (like an off field issue). Generally, the take was that he was a bit of a knucklehead who talked way to much for a rookie. Got the impression that the guy thought he was God's gift and wasn't afraid to share that with anyone/everyone. Just didn't fit in. FWIW.

Which once again, proves that what I said about Russell after Terez Paylor's in depth interview, was spot on (which was, of course, argued).

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12408763)
Let's review:

1. Russell believes he's very smart but he's struggling to learn the terminology. He needs to study extra hours in order to grasp it but is still having problems. "It’s not as easy as people think".

2. Russell has strong self confidence but he's "holding himself back", even though he's studying tape and the playbook.

It sounds to me Russell needs to put his ego aside, buckle down and study his ass off if he wants to make a contribution in 2016.


DaneMcCloud 09-14-2016 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Meatloaf (Post 12426106)
Sorry if Q, but 610 radio just had Matt Miller from Bleacher Report on. He said he had talked to several of his Chiefs contacts as to what might've happened to hasten Russell's release. No one said it was anything specific (like an off field issue). Generally, the take was that he was a bit of a knucklehead who talked way to much for a rookie. Got the impression that the guy thought he was God's gift and wasn't afraid to share that with anyone/everyone. Just didn't fit in. FWIW.

Also, if true, we won't be seeing him back on the Practice Squad

Hog's Gone Fishin 09-14-2016 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Meatloaf (Post 12426106)
Sorry if Q, but 610 radio just had Matt Miller from Bleacher Report on. He said he had talked to several of his Chiefs contacts as to what might've happened to hasten Russell's release. No one said it was anything specific (like an off field issue). Generally, the take was that he was a bit of a knucklehead who talked way to much for a rookie. Got the impression that the guy thought he was God's gift and wasn't afraid to share that with anyone/everyone. Just didn't fit in. FWIW.

If that's the case it's good Dorsey is keeping the locker room cleaned up. Team first.

staylor26 09-14-2016 02:32 PM

Quote:

Watched A Season With Notre Dame. Guy runs his mouth. Might've wore thin with the staff
Somebody posted this on another (general) board. Goes perfectly with the report from Miller. Did Pest or anybody watch this?

The Franchise 09-14-2016 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Meatloaf (Post 12426106)
Sorry if Q, but 610 radio just had Matt Miller from Bleacher Report on. He said he had talked to several of his Chiefs contacts as to what might've happened to hasten Russell's release. No one said it was anything specific (like an off field issue). Generally, the take was that he was a bit of a knucklehead who talked way to much for a rookie. Got the impression that the guy thought he was God's gift and wasn't afraid to share that with anyone/everyone. Just didn't fit in. FWIW.

Weird....didn't hear any of that at ND. He was pretty vocal about his suspension though. Oh well.....act like a dipshit....get cut like a dipshit.

The Franchise 09-14-2016 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12426200)
Somebody posted this on another board. Goes perfectly with the report from Miller. Did Pest or anybody watch this?

I didn't get a chance to watch it, no.

Meatloaf 09-14-2016 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12426167)
Matt Miller also said this guy would start opposite of Peters this year.

Correct, Miller acknowledged that he really like Russell going into the draft. I guess that's why he was trying to find out what happened. He said when you come out liking a guy, and he gets cut, other draft analysts and scouts let you have it. He indicated that after talking to more of those guys, he might have a better idea of what happened with Russell.

Meatloaf 09-14-2016 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12426175)
Which once again, proves that what I said about Russell after Terez Paylor's in depth interview, was spot on (which was, of course, argued).

Yeah, Dane, looks like you nailed this one! Nice take!!!

ct 09-14-2016 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12426181)
Also, if true, we won't be seeing him back on the Practice Squad

unless he takes the opportunity to humble from that (if accurate), you are probably right, take the hit, cut bait, and move on

ct 09-14-2016 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ct (Post 12425907)
Buccaneers receive:
» 2016 second-round pick (No. 59): Roberto Aguayo

Chiefs receive:
» 2016 third-round pick (No. 74): KeiVarae Russell
» 2016 fourth-round pick (No. 106): Eric Murray

2016 NFL Draft trade details

Oh man, combine that with this trade...

Bears receive:
» 2016 first-round pick (No. 9): Leonard Floyd

Buccaneers receive:
» 2016 first-round pick (No. 11): Vernon Hargreaves
» 2016 fourth-round pick (No. 106): Traded to Chiefs

So tampa traded back 2 spots in the 1st, out of the top10 for cryin out loud, so they could move up 15 spots into the late 2nd to take a K. when they likely could have had they K @74 anyway and profitted pick #106.

The Franchise 09-14-2016 02:48 PM

I'll give Dane credit for calling it. I won't be sucking his dick like Billay though.

kccrow 09-14-2016 02:48 PM

I remain flabbergasted... A player at a skill position running his mouth? Imagine that. Kid had talent coming out of college and was a third round pick. There's more to this story than a guy running his mouth, unless he was running his mouth directly at the coaching staff on the daily.

OldSchool 09-14-2016 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 12426246)
I remain flabbergasted... A player at a skill position running his mouth? Imagine that. Kid had talent coming out of college and was a third round pick. There's more to this story than a guy running his mouth, unless he was running his mouth directly at the coaching staff on the daily.

On a team that is probably one of the most player friendly teams with one of the most player friendly coaching staffs in the league, gotta be something more.

Maybe he got caught in the hotel with a room full of hookers and blow, who knows.

Mother****erJones 09-14-2016 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 12425593)
Well, after Marcus Peters. We have terrible CBs...even though I think Chiefs fans underrated Phillip Gaines. Nonetheless, we have a bunch of chodes when we go into the dime and we STILL cut Russell who was a 3rd round pick this year. Speaks volumes about how much the staff was unimpressed by him.

Gaines isn't terrible, Nelson hasn't played a ton, Acker is new for us but had 3 INTs last season for SF.

The Franchise 09-14-2016 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 12426246)
I remain flabbergasted... A player at a skill position running his mouth? Imagine that. Kid had talent coming out of college and was a third round pick. There's more to this story than a guy running his mouth, unless he was running his mouth directly at the coaching staff on the daily.

He was pretty vocal during his suspension at ND. If he felt that his place on the depth chart with the Chiefs was bullshit....then I could see him being vocal about that as well.

Radar Chief 09-14-2016 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12426167)
Matt Miller also said this guy would start opposite of Peters this year.

He mentioned this also, that he thought Russel would be starting by the end of the season.

RunKC 09-14-2016 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 12426246)
I remain flabbergasted... A player at a skill position running his mouth? Imagine that. Kid had talent coming out of college and was a third round pick. There's more to this story than a guy running his mouth, unless he was running his mouth directly at the coaching staff on the daily.

Just listened to Miller's interview. He apparently ran his mouth to the leaders of the team like he was hot shit and they didn't like it at all.

The Franchise 09-14-2016 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12426271)
Just listened to Miller's interview. He apparently ran his mouth to the leaders of the team like he was hot shit and they didn't like it at all.

Russell...you ****ing idiot. :facepalm:

OldSchool 09-14-2016 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12426271)
Just listened to Miller's interview. He apparently ran his mouth to the leaders of the team like he was hot shit and they didn't like it at all.

Sometimes you just have to clean out the bad apple.

Guess we know what the team is going to be drafting next year (unless Gaines continues to show well and the other young guys come along nicely).

rtmike 09-14-2016 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12425351)
We're going to see more and more of this moving forward, as the Chiefs will have more draft picks than spots available due to the quality of the roster.

The magnificent 7 agree.

siberian khatru 09-14-2016 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12426271)
Just listened to Miller's interview. He apparently ran his mouth to the leaders of the team like he was hot shit and they didn't like it at all.

He'll become a Bronco, eventually replace Talib for peanuts and be an All-Pro.

Hog's Gone Fishin 09-14-2016 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12426245)
I'll give Dane credit for calling it. I won't be sucking his dick like Billay though.



But you could see what some really good pussy tastes like. You should reconsider.

Mother****erJones 09-14-2016 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smellway (Post 12425771)
calling Reek and Ehinger hits LMAO

right now they're giving us UDFA play

Stick to gifs and videos because your football acumen is worse than Walter Football.

OldSchool 09-14-2016 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by siberian khatru (Post 12426288)
He'll become a Bronco, eventually replace Talib for peanuts and be an All-Pro.

Nah, he'll want to play a big role. Will probably sign on a crappy team somewhere that he can get early snaps.

staylor26 09-14-2016 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog Farmer (Post 12426292)

But you could see what some really good pussy tastes like. You should reconsider.

ROFL

RunKC 09-14-2016 03:13 PM

All teams have misses on high draft picks.

Packers cut 2nd rd pick Jerel Worthy and 3rd rd pick Khyri Thornton.
Pats got rid of 1st rd pick Dominique Easely.
Broncos 2nd rd pick Montee Ball is in freaking jail and their other 2nd rd pick Cody Latimer is a ST's player doing nothing on offense.
Steelers cut 3rd rd pick Sean Spence

People are obliterating Dorsey on radio. My god.

kccrow 09-14-2016 03:17 PM

I hate derailing a thread on the basis of Clay, but he's not wrong on Ehinger just yet IMO. The guy hasn't looked very good. I openly bashed the pick when it was made, citing that strength would be a huge issue for him and it is. Ehinger is one of those 3-year evaluations though. Like LDT and Fisher, he's going to need a couple years in the weight room before we know for sure. My problem is, he's starting right now and he is the weak link on the O-line.

As for Tyreek Hill, we'll have to just see how he progresses through the season. Speed isn't everything in the NFL. I've never had high hopes for any receiver under 5'10" and statistics back up that they are seldom successful.

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2016 03:18 PM

http://www.kansascity.com/sports/nfl...101759062.html

“Listen, it happens,” Reid said, when asked how difficult it is to move on from such a high pick this early. “I don’t sweat over it either way. I mean, it happened. We’re going to be okay.

Part of the reason Reid said that is the promising play of White, the rookie cornerback who was taken three rounds after Russell but flashed in the preseason. During his lone play Sunday, White read a screen and drilled the receiver, Travis Benjamin, for a 2-yard loss.

“Twenty-four (D.J. White), he’s been playing pretty good, so that’s a positive thing,” Reid said. “Every one of those (picks), they kind of balance out and you go from there.”

Reid reiterated that while it obviously did not work out with Russell, there are no hard feelings from team’s point-of-view, and even left the door open for a return. As a rookie, the 22-year-old will be eligible for the practice squad if he clears waivers.

“I wish him the best of luck,” Reid said of Russell. “I mean, he’s a good kid. And you know never know. In this business, he could be back here. So we’ll see.”

The Franchise 09-14-2016 03:19 PM

I would be ok with humbling his ass by putting him on the practice squad. I wouldn't be hurt if he wasn't brought back though.

Mother****erJones 09-14-2016 03:20 PM

Clay being Clay :facepalm: just ****ing discuss football and not troll. If ya want to troll, go to ****ing Twitter clown.

RunKC 09-14-2016 03:21 PM

While we're giving rep out, props to kccrow for calling his guy DJ White. He hyped him up a lot before the draft and White is clearly a guy who looks like he could be a nice player.

I like our 4 young corners of Peters, Gaines, Nelson and White. Don't draft a CB in the first 3 rds. Use those picks on QB, OLB and WR.

kccrow 09-14-2016 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12426315)
I would be ok with humbling his ass by putting him on the practice squad. I wouldn't be hurt if he wasn't brought back though.

You'd be ecstatic, doing cartwheels, humming "Victory March."

OnTheWarpath15 09-14-2016 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12426303)
All teams have misses on high draft picks.

Packers cut 2nd rd pick Jerel Worthy and 3rd rd pick Khyri Thornton.
Pats got rid of 1st rd pick Dominique Easely.
Broncos 2nd rd pick Montee Ball is in freaking jail and their other 2nd rd pick Cody Latimer is a ST's player doing nothing on offense.
Steelers cut 3rd rd pick Sean Spence

People are obliterating Dorsey on radio. My god.

Were any of those players cut in Week 1 of their rookie seasons, or were they given a shot and then cut?

Thanks for taking my call, I'll hang up and listen.

CapsLockKey 09-14-2016 03:24 PM

Chiefs threw numbers at the cb position. Russell is simply the odd man out thanks to the trade for Acker and DJ White earning his active roster spot. I'm glad the Chiefs made the decision based on what they saw on the field rather than their draft position. I see this more as an indication of how much DJ White has pleasantly surprised and confidence in Gaines health than Russell being a terrible player.

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2016 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 12426311)
I hate derailing a thread on the basis of Clay, but he's not wrong on Ehinger just yet IMO. The guy hasn't looked very good. I openly bashed the pick when it was made, citing that strength would be a huge issue for him and it is. Ehinger is one of those 3-year evaluations though. Like LDT and Fisher, he's going to need a couple years in the weight room before we know for sure. My problem is, he's starting right now and he is the weak link on the O-line.

Ehinger is a 4th round rookie that's been given a chance to start at left guard and grow into the position. He's played one professional game and while he needs to increase his strength, it's better that he gain experience than to sit on the bench.


Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 12426311)
As for Tyreek Hill, we'll have to just see how he progresses through the season. Speed isn't everything in the NFL. I've never had high hopes for any receiver under 5'10" and statistics back up that they are seldom successful.

Steve Smith, Wes Welker and countless other slot receivers disagree

Hoover 09-14-2016 03:25 PM

Hopefully we are trading for Sean Smith.

staylor26 09-14-2016 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 12426325)
Were any of those players cut in Week 1 of their rookie seasons, or were they given a shot and then cut?

You're extremely butthurt over this. We have 4 talented young corners. Just pretend White was the 3rd round pick, and Russell was the 6th rounder. Who cares what round anybody was drafted in at this point? It's over. Our rookie class is still very promising even after cutting our 3rd rounder. Has Dorsey not earned the benefit of the doubt?

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2016 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CapsLockKey (Post 12426329)
Chiefs threw numbers at the cb position. Russell is simply the odd man out thanks to the trade for Acker and DJ White earning his active roster spot. I'm glad the Chiefs made the decision based on what they saw on the field rather than their draft position. I see this more as an indication of how much DJ White has pleasantly surprised and confidence in Gaines health than Russell being a terrible player.

Teams don't cut "good players" after drafting them in the 3rd round of their rookie season.

Russell clearly stated he was having problems with the terminology and playbook, to which Andy Reid confirmed today, along with the reports of an oversized ego.

It would have been nice to see him become an effective player for the Chiefs but now that he's cut, I couldn't give a **** about him.

gblowfish 09-14-2016 03:28 PM

I think Dorsey knows what he's doing. Yeah, Dee Ford was a questionable first round pick, but for the most part, Dorsey's been pretty damn good on talent evaluation. Thank God we're not picking up candy wrappers for Fat Scott any longer!

CapsLockKey 09-14-2016 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12426331)
Ehinger is a 4th round rookie that's been given a chance to start at left guard and grow into the position. He's played one professional game and while he needs to increase his strength, it's better that he gain experience than to sit on the bench.




Steve Smith, Wes Welker and countless other slot receivers disagree

Hell Antonio Brown, the best receiver in the league is only 5'10". OBJ is only an inch taller.

OldSchool 09-14-2016 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 12426332)
Hopefully we are trading for Sean Smith.

Gaines and Nelson both had a better first game than Smith.

RunKC 09-14-2016 03:32 PM

Remember the Cowboys draft board leak? They had Russell as a 3rd rd player. I bet they would take him.

They are 4th of the waiver wire.

Mr. Laz 09-14-2016 03:32 PM

DJ White is one of the few young guy in our secondary that has shown flashes.

Not counting Peters of course, who is still young.

Nelson might be competent but haven't seen anything other than JAG stuff.

White has made some pretty decent plays that looks like he might be a starting guy.

White has done stupid stuff as well but he has a chance.

kccrow 09-14-2016 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12426331)
Ehinger is a 4th round rookie that's been given a chance to start at left guard and grow into the position. He's played one professional game and while he needs to increase his strength, it's better that he gain experience than to sit on the bench.




Steve Smith, Wes Welker and countless other slot receivers disagree


Thus the word "seldom." You've just named 2 of about 10 in the NFL under 5'10".

Hoover 09-14-2016 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 12426351)
Gaines and Nelson both had a better first game than Smith.

Yep, but we know Smith, and he knows our system.

OnTheWarpath15 09-14-2016 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12426334)
You're extremely butthurt over this. We have 4 talented young corners. Just pretend White was the 3rd round pick, and Russell was the 6th rounder. Who cares what round anybody was drafted in at this point? It's over. Our rookie class is still very promising even after cutting our 3rd rounder. Has Dorsey not earned the benefit of the doubt?

8 posts out of 380 is "extremely butthurt"?

Ok, noob.

I do, however, find it comical that the same people that are defending Dorsey here and calling Russel; trash are the same ones that defend players like Dee Ford, Ehinger, etc and say "they need time" or they are "growing into the position."

It's a complete waste of draft capital to just walk away after a week, but then again, I'm arguing with someone who thinks DAT has value on this team when Hill does the same thing and does it better.

This place never disappoints.

staylor26 09-14-2016 03:37 PM

Yea if Hill doesn't pan out it's not going to be because he's an inch too short. The guy has a 40 1/2 inch vert, and is solid as ****. LMAO

I mean, we're talking about the same guy that didn't even have Henry in his top 5 or 10 RB's.

aturnis 09-14-2016 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raybec 4 (Post 12425237)
Don't be surprised to see them try to add a pass rusher and not a corner.

This. The linebacking corp is in dire need of help.

DJ's left nut 09-14-2016 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 12426332)
Hopefully we are trading for Sean Smith.

Oakland structured that deal in a way that makes bringing him back fairly unpalatable.

His contract isn't signing bonus heavy; it has a fair amount of roster bonus and guaranteed salary in there. So if you deal for him, you take on the bulk of that contract (whereas if it were signing bonus heavy, that money would end up on Oakland's cap, not ours).

CapsLockKey 09-14-2016 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12426338)
Teams don't cut "good players" after drafting them in the 3rd round of their rookie season.

Russell clearly stated he was having problems with the terminology and playbook, to which Andy Reid confirmed today, along with the reports of an oversized ego.

It would have been nice to see him become an effective player for the Chiefs but now that he's cut, I couldn't give a **** about him.

I'm not saying he's good, but he may not be trash either. After Sundays game they made a decision to exchange an additional pass rusher over CB. Chiefs apparently saw more potential and immediate help in Nelson, Gaines, Acker and White.

From what he's shown in preseason he's PS material right now. Any team that claims him will be eating an active roster spot for someone that probably won't hit the field this year. Nothing like an Irving situation where he looked like he could contribute for someone right away, and did.

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2016 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 12426354)
Thus the word "seldom." You've just named 2 of about 10 in the NFL under 5'10".

And as mentioned, Antonio Brown is 5'10 and possibly the best WR in NFL.

Golden Tate, Jamison Crowder, Julian Edelman on and on and on.

staylor26 09-14-2016 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 12426360)
8 posts out of 380 is "extremely butthurt"?

Ok, noob.

I do, however, find it comical that the same people that are defending Dorsey here and calling Russel; trash are the same ones that defend players like Dee Ford, Ehinger, etc and say "they need time" or they are "growing into the position."

It's a complete waste of draft capital to just walk away after a week, but then again, I'm arguing with someone who thinks DAT has value on this team when Hill does the same thing and does it better.

This place never disappoints.

I clearly said I wasn't happy about it, but I also have perspective and I'm not really that concerned. I also would've probably cut DAT or Davis. I would've said those same things about Russell if he were still on the team and struggling in the future.

Problem is, I don't know what went on behind the scenes, nor do you. So there might be more to the story (like what Miller said), and I'm willing to give Dorsey the benefit of the doubt. DJ White was a player a lot of people had as a day 2 pick, and he's looked like one so far. So again, why is it a big deal?

OldSchool 09-14-2016 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 12426355)
Yep, but we know Smith, and he knows our system.

Sure. But there is not upside to him. Gaines, Nelson, and the other young CBs have plenty of upside. Plus Smith was just torched by the Saints and benched. (Granted, Cooks will torch many CBs in this league before he's done.)

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2016 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 12426332)
Hopefully we are trading for Sean Smith.

:Lin:

Mr. Laz 09-14-2016 03:42 PM

As long as a WR is strong and skilled enough to get off the press, height doesn't really matter much.

High-pointing the ball is an asset but a specialized one.

kccrow 09-14-2016 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12426373)
And as mentioned, Antonio Brown is 5'10 and possibly the best WR in NFL.

Golden Tate, Jamison Crowder, Julian Edelman on and on and on.

Lots 5'10" and over, that's the benchmark height. I said under. :) Under 5'10" there are very few in the history of the league to do extremely well. Under 5'10", right now, not many. TY Hilton, Edelman, Smith are a few.

DJ's left nut 09-14-2016 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CapsLockKey (Post 12426371)
I'm not saying he's good, but he may not be trash either. After Sundays game they made a decision to exchange an additional pass rusher over CB. Chiefs apparently saw more potential and immediate help in Nelson, Gaines, Acker and White.

From what he's shown in preseason he's PS material right now. Any team that claims him will be eating an active roster spot for someone that probably won't hit the field this year. Nothing like an Irving situation where he looked like he could contribute for someone right away, and did.

If you're the Browns or Rams or a whole slew of other teams that aren't going to play .500 football this year, you don't give any ****s about who your gameday inactives are.

He should be claimed unless his attitude is absolutely poison.

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2016 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 12426360)
I do, however, find it comical that the same people that are defending Dorsey here and calling Russel; trash are the same ones that defend players like Dee Ford, Ehinger, etc and say "they need time" or they are "growing into the position".

What have you seen from Russell that leads you to believe that he's anything other than a wasted roster spot?

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2016 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 12426387)
Lots 5'10" and over, that's the benchmark height. I said under. :) Under 5'10" there are very few in the history of the league to do extremely well. Under 5'10", right now, not many. TY Hilton, Edelman, Smith are a few.

Good grief, man, just stop.

Steve Smith was a monster in Carolina, Golden Tate's been a 1,000 yard receiver, Antonio Brown is lights out and on and on and on.

You're wrong. Give up.

staylor26 09-14-2016 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 12426387)
Lots 5'10" and over, that's the benchmark height. I said under. :) Under 5'10" there are very few in the history of the league to do extremely well. Under 5'10", right now, not many. TY Hilton, Edelman, Smith are a few.

The fact that an inch can be the difference between you believing/not believing in a WR, and you're willing to ignore the vertical, good size, and other traits because of it, makes your opinion pretty worthless IMO.

You're basically saying you also would've never touched any of those guys that HAVE made it for that ridiculous inch. You realize that, right?

kccrow 09-14-2016 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12426399)
The fact that an inch can be the difference between you believing/not believing in a WR, and you're willing to ignore the vertical and good size because of it, makes your opinion pretty worthless IMO.

Go look at history. I didn't say I don't believe in him. Give me the top 100 receivers under 5'10" to ever go for ... oh lets say 750 yards in a season.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.