ChiefsPlanet
Page 50 of 123 « First 4046474849 50 5152535460100 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Eric Berry ‘a bit surprised’ on lack of extension progress (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=300780)

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-17-2016 08:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12319064)
If Berry had proven to be a game changing player...like say a Troy Polamalu or Ed Reed, he could ask to be paid as the best. Right now, after watching every snap of his career...he's not at that level. He's an above average player with an enormous amount of media hype.

Dorsey see's through this bullshit.....he can go back to playing for Pioli...who over-drafted him in the first place. Didn't like the pick then...dont like it now. Beating cancer is the best thing he has done....

Inspirational speeches dont make you the best at your craft.....
More fan-spin bullshit.

But hey, send Poe and Berry out the door and you'll have plenty of money to pay that mediocre scrub LT who tickles your balls so much!

Idiot.

staylor26 07-17-2016 08:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dagnabit (Post 12319126)
More fan-spin bullshit.

But hey, send Poe and Berry out the door and you'll have plenty of money to pay that mediocre scrub LT who tickles your balls so much!

Idiot.
Who said anything about letting Poe AND Berry go?

The point is you can't keep both. You can't sign every single guy when they all want to be the highest paid at their position. You're aware of a thing called the salary cap correct?

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-17-2016 08:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12319140)
Who said anything about letting Poe AND Berry go?

The point is you can't keep both. You can't sign every single guy when they all want to be the highest paid at their position. You're aware of a thing called the salary cap correct?
Uh, Chiefsshrink said let Poe go to pay Fisher. That's what started this.

And it's dumb, dumb, dumb.

Yes?

Yes.

SAUTO 07-17-2016 08:35 AM
If Clark made 220 million this year profit what are s the chiefs worth?

Chiefshrink 07-17-2016 08:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dagnabit (Post 12319146)
Uh, Chiefsshrink said let Poe go to pay Fisher. That's what started this.
Wrong. It's what I "think" will happen not that I want this because I don't.

Perineum Ripper 07-17-2016 09:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12319148)
If Clark made 220 million this year profit what are s the chiefs worth?
Last thing I read was around 1.5 billion..that was in December or January

planetdoc 07-17-2016 09:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12319148)
If Clark made 220 million this year profit what are s the chiefs worth?
where is the 220 million profit number coming from?

http://www.forbes.com/teams/kansas-city-chiefs/

team value: 1.53 billion
Revenue2: $307 M
Operating Income3: $48.6 M
Debt/Value4: 5%
Player Expenses5: $159 M

The green bay packers are the only team that has to disclose financial data and their profit was 75 M. I dont believe the 220 M profit number for the chiefs is accurate.

SAUTO 07-17-2016 09:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mac459 (Post 12319173)
Last thing I read was around 1.5 billion..that was in December or January
That's only 7 years of outfit by that number


Yeah I doubt it

Titty Meat 07-17-2016 09:29 AM
This team has won games without Berry, Houston, Johnson, Charles, etc. Trust what Dorsey is doing.

Marcellus 07-17-2016 09:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by planetdoc (Post 12319184)
where is the 220 million profit number coming from?

http://www.forbes.com/teams/kansas-city-chiefs/

team value: 1.53 billion
Revenue2: $307 M
Operating Income3: $48.6 M
Debt/Value4: 5%
Player Expenses5: $159 M

The green bay packers are the only team that has to disclose financial data and their profit was 75 M. I dont believe the 220 M profit number for the chiefs is accurate.

There is no ****ing way in hell they made $220MM in profit.

RunKC 07-17-2016 09:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 12319212)
There is no ****ing way in hell they made $220MM in profit.
They received $226 million from revenue sharing last year. $222 million this year.

http://m.nydailynews.com/sports/foot...icle-1.2298639

SAUTO 07-17-2016 09:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 12319212)
There is no ****ing way in hell they made $220MM in profit.
I have no ****ing idea where run keeps coming up with that number,


Maybe it's before salaries

SAUTO 07-17-2016 09:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12319240)
They received $226 million from revenue sharing last year. $222 million this year.

http://m.nydailynews.com/sports/foot...icle-1.2298639
That's before salaries dumbass.

SAUTO 07-17-2016 09:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12319240)
They received $226 million from revenue sharing last year. $222 million this year.

http://m.nydailynews.com/sports/foot...icle-1.2298639
Did you READ that article?

Green bay cleared 29.3 million that year even WITH that 226 million

But the chiefs cleared 220 last year?

RunKC 07-17-2016 10:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12319245)
Did you READ that article?

Green bay cleared 29.3 million that year even WITH that 226 million

But the chiefs cleared 220 last year?
That's the point. We have extra money but $2 million is too much? Really?

If the Chiefs don't think that Berry is worth $12 million a year then that's fine. I have no issue with that, but Clark making millions every year and the Chiefs snubbing a small $2 million (at most) premium looks really bad.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:59 AM.
Page 50 of 123 « First 4046474849 50 5152535460100 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.