ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football You guys really have weepy vaginas!!!!!!! (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=276193)

vailpass 09-14-2013 01:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9971925)
Over?

It's just beginning.

Your call man......you know I'm not here to interfere.

beach tribe 09-14-2013 01:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 9971924)
N b4 "Asses in seats"

A Young Franchise QB would sell out the gold section.

Clark is a cheap ass tightwad too.
Remember that one?

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2013 01:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 9971927)
I don't take this shit personally. Why should I? First of all, no here even knows me. Second of all, we're all just a bunch of amateurs making educated guesses at best. Quit flooding the forum with your weeping vag.

LMAO

Again, look in the mirror, dickface.

I'm not the one that hitched my wagons at 1.1 to someone that was unworthy of 1.1.

That would be you.

Try again, Child.

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2013 01:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 9971928)
Your call man......you know I'm not here to interfere.

Too much damage has been done.

It's time to let it ride!

:D

vailpass 09-14-2013 01:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9971931)
Too much damage has been done.

It's time to let it ride!

Then **** shit up, I know how that goes.

keg in kc 09-14-2013 01:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 9971922)
So then IYO Clark would prefer a 30 yr old retread vet over developing a young FQB, and just said that shit cause....****, I dont know, give me a reason why he would say that.

I actually do think the franchise would prefer a 30 year old retread vet over developing a young franchise quarterback.

Want to know why I believe that?

Because that's what they've done to date. When they do something else, then I'll know something else...

Think about it this way: that's Hunt talking - in 2008 - about how he wants to develop a franchise quarterback. Flash forward to 2013 - 5 years later - how many times have we actually done it? Which FQB, as you put it, has this team tried to develop? Because what I see so far are Matt Cassel coming on board in 2009 and now Alex Smith coming on board in 2013.

As far as Hunt being "hands off," as he says in your article from 7 years ago, the reality is that he's admitted, since Reid's hire, that he's learned from his handling of Pioli and Haley, and that he's going to be more hands on from this point forward. Beginning with Reid reporting not to the GM, but to him, directly. Reid runs the coaching side, Dorsey runs the personnel side, Donovan runs the business side and they all report directly to Clark. That's how things are being run today.

That does not mean that Clark makes personnel decisions, but he most definitely is involved, and that does include which direction they go on high draft picks (whether it's using them or trading them).

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2013 01:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 9971932)
Then **** shit up, I know how that goes.

In all seriousness, if SNR gets "drunk" and is allowed by the mods and owner to say the shit he said, all bets are off.

I let it slide a few weeks back but it's clear that he isn't going to back off.

This isn't 2011 and the reason I left then is no longer an issue. If this is the path my "detractors" choose to take, I'm more than happy to oblige.

It's not my first choice but then again, I ain't the one that started it.

vailpass 09-14-2013 02:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9971934)
In all seriousness, if SNR gets "drunk" and is allowed by the mods and owner to say the shit he said, all bets are off.

I let it slide a few weeks back but it's clear that he isn't going to back off.

This isn't 2011 and the reason I left then is no longer an issue. If this is the path my "detractors" choose to take, I'm more than happy to oblige.

It's not my first choice but then again, I ain't the one that started it.

Do what ya gotta do. I'm sitting next to a topless slut sipping Stoli and killing the night.....I just know you to be above this shit. SNR has always seemed a good dude to me barring his baseless comments to you tonight.

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2013 02:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 9971935)
Do what ya gotta do. I'm sitting next to a topless slut sipping Stoli and killing the night.....I just know you to be above this shit. SNR has always seemed a good dude to me barring his baseless comments to you tonight.

Thank the heavens for Romania

vailpass 09-14-2013 02:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9971937)
Thank the heavens for Romania

:D And Scottsdale.

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2013 02:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 9971939)
:D And Scottsdale.

o:-)

beach tribe 09-14-2013 02:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9971933)
I actually do think the franchise would prefer a 30 year old retread vet over developing a young franchise quarterback.

Want to know why I believe that?

Because that's what they've done to date. When they do something else, then I'll know something else...

Think about it this way: that's Hunt talking - in 2008 - about how he wants to develop a franchise quarterback. Flash forward to 2013 - 5 years later - how many times have we actually done it? Which FQB, as you put it, has this team tried to develop? Because what I see so far are Matt Cassel coming on board in 2009 and now Alex Smith coming on board in 2013.

As far as Hunt being "hands off," as he says in your article from 7 years ago, the reality is that he's admitted, since Reid's hire, that he's learned from his handling of Pioli and Haley, and that he's going to be more hands on from this point forward. Beginning with Reid reporting not to the GM, but to him, directly. Reid runs the coaching side, Dorsey runs the personnel side, Donovan runs the business side and they all report directly to Clark. That's how things are being run today.

That does not mean that Clark makes personnel decisions, but he most definitely is involved, and that does include which direction they go on high draft picks (whether it's using them or trading them).

Good Post
I can see where you are coming from.

Was going to say, that the mistake he made, was trusting his execs too much.
He actually said that developing a young franchise QB is the only path to success in this league. I can find the article where he says almost that exact statement if you like.

Carl and Herm thought Croyle was a potential FQB.....and he listened, although a you saw in that post, that Clark stated he wasnt sure they had one yet.
That was the first attempt at developing a YFQB.
Development #1.Croyle.Fail...Carls fault.


He trusted Pioli....and he burned him.
Cassel was Piolis guy, and he believed in late round Qbs....enter Stanzi. Development #2.Stanzi.Fail...Piolis fault.

Reid wanted to hit the ground running.
I dont blame him, but he has made it clear Smith was his call.
Smith is not young, developing, or a franchise QB.
He is no doubt here to win games.
But he is not the young stud that Clark has repeatedly says he wants, and I dont think its a coincidence that Clark brought in guys with a track record of drafting and developing QBs.

Herm came here and did what he does.

Pioli came in and acted like they always knew who they were picking in Brady, and that he could do it again.

I fully expect these guys to do what they have always done, and that is not pass on FQBs in the draft.

Sassy Squatch 09-14-2013 04:27 AM

http://gifrific.com/wp-content/uploa...-Anchorman.gif

Nightfyre 09-14-2013 04:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9971930)
LMAO

Again, look in the mirror, dickface.

I'm not the one that hitched my wagons at 1.1 to someone that was unworthy of 1.1.

That would be you.

Try again, Child.

You have serious reading comprehension issues. Either that or you feel so strongly you have to get the last word to win, that you are willing to respond in a completely non-sequitur fashion. In any case, you are an intolerable ass who is unwilling/unable to actually address the issue at hand. As a result you are compelled to sling elementary school comebacks like "I'm rubber and you're glue, dickface!" and addressing people as "Child" like you are Chad Johnson/Ochocinco or something.
LMAO

Oh and yea, I whiffed on Geno's draft prospects. On the other hand, I actually took the time to watch a couple football games, form an opinion, and distribute it here on this foootball forum. Meanwhile, all dane mccloud does is routinely make a miserable ass of himself trying to make himself out to be a martyr while providing no worthwhile discussion. Get lost, son.

SAUTO 09-14-2013 06:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 9971721)
I dont remember one person saying a QB better come in and light it up day one. NOT ONE.

This off-season, before we chose Smith, every chief fan I know was clammoring about Geno. It was a very small # of dissenters at that point, and most of those wanted to sit him yr one. Myself included.
AFTER smith was picked up. THE MAJORITY STILL wanted Geno 1.1.
It wasnt till after Geno fell, he acted like a bitch, and all the negative comments from team GMs came out that everyone soured.

You are living in the butt hurt of the past.

Dane mccloud
Posted via Mobile Device


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.