ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Alex Smith Traded to Chiefs (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=270464)

KurtCobain 03-07-2013 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9475064)
It'll all depend on what the mob thinks.

If the mob is still against Alex Smith, so will GoChiefs.

Chiefsplanet is his high school cafeteria and he's the goth kid who has to kiss their ass to get them to notice him.

Using red m&ms for lip stick.

RunKC 03-07-2013 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9475064)
It'll all depend on what the mob thinks.

If the mob is still against Alex Smith, so will GoChiefs.

Chiefsplanet is his high school cafeteria and he's the goth kid who has to kiss their ass to get them to notice him.

This explains why he loves Geno so damn much.

Stat sheet + popular demand. LMAO

-King- 03-07-2013 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9475064)
It'll all depend on what the mob thinks.

If the mob is still against Alex Smith, so will GoChiefs.

Chiefsplanet is his high school cafeteria and he's the goth kid who has to kiss their ass to get them to notice him.

LMAOLMAOLMAO

RunKC 03-07-2013 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9475070)
LMAO The things that have to be perfect for Alex Smith to even have a decent season.

I don't get it.

Charles and Bowe tend to make QB's look good :thumb:

Surely you think Alex Smith is better than Cassel, no?

BossChief 03-07-2013 07:57 PM

I really hope Alex Smith works out. For what we gave up, he needs to play better than he ever has for us to end up winning the trade.

It sure would be nice to actually enjoy watching football again.

Unfortunately, I have a strong feeling that we are putting our dicks back in the meat grinder.

I'd love to be wrong, though.

-King- 03-07-2013 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9475079)
Charles and Bowe tend to make QB's look good :thumb:

Surely you think Alex Smith is better than Cassel, no?

He's better. But very slightly so. Nothing in his 8 year career has made me think he's a good QB. Even in his best seasons most people would agree that he was the 14th - 20th best QB in the league.

If he somehow has a good year/career in KC, I'll be the first to eat crow, but absolutely NOTHING he has done in his career makes me think he'll be anything more than average.

The guy can't even complete seasons. He's only played 16 games twice in his career.

RunKC 03-07-2013 08:00 PM

Alex Smith was on pace for 23 TD's in a restricted game manager role in SF.

Reid is going to have him air it out much more here and surround him with weapons.

Alex Smith will throw 25 TD's next year IMO.

BossChief 03-07-2013 08:03 PM

If Alex Smith averages 25 tds the next two years, and none of the rookies from this class blow up, the trade was good.

Rasputin 03-07-2013 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9475088)
Alex Smith was on pace for 23 TD's in a restricted game manager role in SF.

Reid is going to have him air it out much more here and surround him with weapons.

Alex Smith will throw 25 TD's next year IMO.

Any Alex Smith success would come from a strong running game in JC and some playaction. If Coach Reid wants him to air it out Alex Smith is going get in trouble. He doesn't have the background to be a passer of 35+ times a game. He is ok at 25 times with a running game.

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-07-2013 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9475028)
So you hope the guy we are invested in for the next 2 years gets knocked out of the first snap he takes.

I just can't understand it.

But I'll ****ing guarantee that if he does good things, you'll be a front row cheerleader.

Having this take offers no risk. If he sucks, you can gloat. If he doesn't, no one remembers it.

Yep. And perhaps, just maybe, it will teach this CLEARLY complacent organization that picking up an already-concussed, retread HACK ain't such a hot ****ing idea when you're sitting on the first pick in the draft and trying to set a "new tone"! And you have no idea WHAT the **** I may or may not do, Miss Cleo, so shove that sanctimonious tone right up your Lil Chiefy asshole!
Posted via Mobile Device

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-07-2013 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9475096)
If Alex Smith averages 25 tds the next two years, and none of the rookies from this class blow up, the trade was good.

Barkley and Smith could and will surpass him as rookies.
Posted via Mobile Device

TheUte 03-07-2013 08:13 PM

GENO OR DEATH!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Dick Willie (Post 9475125)
Barkley and Smith could and will surpass him as rookies.
Posted via Mobile Device

wow.

KurtCobain 03-07-2013 08:15 PM

When Alex throws 28 tds next year, gochiefs will be out for three months and a hundred bucks.

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-07-2013 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Dick Willie (Post 9475118)
Yep. And perhaps, just maybe, it will teach this CLEARLY complacent organization that picking up an already-concussed, retread HACK ain't such a hot ****ing idea when you're sitting on the first pick in the draft and trying to set a "new tone"! And you have no idea WHAT the **** I may or may not do, Miss Cleo, so shove that sanctimonious tone right up your Lil Chiefy asshole!
Posted via Mobile Device

http://gifsforum.com/images/gif/mock...a7baf3-212.gif

ChiefsCountry 03-07-2013 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9475074)
This explains why he loves Geno so damn much.

Stat sheet + popular demand. LMAO

Your dumbass is the opposite end of GoChiefs. You are on whatever bandwagon the majority isn't and you look like a ****ing idiot.

Hammock Parties 03-07-2013 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Argo (Post 9475143)
When Alex throws 28 tds next year, gochiefs will be out for three months and a hundred bucks.

LMAO

Hey man you can also win if he throws for 4,300 yards! I'm screwed!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Argo
100 bucks, IP ban for three months, then six months of having to post as a gay man who despises women with no thread starting privileges.

The proposed bet

Alex Smith throws for at least 27 touchdowns and/or at least 4,300 years in the 2013 regular season. Pending he is named the starter at the beginning of the season.


KurtCobain 03-07-2013 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9475160)
LMAO

Hey man you can also win if he throws for 4,300 yards! I'm screwed!

You're so ****ed.

Beeker 03-07-2013 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Dick Willie (Post 9475125)
Barkley and Smith could and will surpass him as rookies.
Posted via Mobile Device

Barkley won't last 6 games. Geno will have 6 TDs and 15 INTS by game 8.

Hammock Parties 03-07-2013 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Argo (Post 9475164)
You're so ****ed.

FYI, Argo, if that's even your real name, no Andy Reid QB has ever thrown for 4300 yards. McNabb had ONE season of 27+ TD.

GOOD LUCK DUMBASS.

Rasputin 03-07-2013 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9475183)
FYI, Argo, if that's even your real name, no Andy Reid QB has ever thrown for 4300 yards. McNabb had ONE season of 27+ TD.

GOOD LUCK DUMBASS.

I wouldn't worry about your bet GC. Alex will be lucky to play beyond 8 games this season.

KurtCobain 03-07-2013 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9475183)
FYI, Argo, if that's even your real name, no Andy Reid QB has ever thrown for 4300 yards. McNabb had ONE season of 27+ TD.

GOOD LUCK DUMBASS.

I know the stats, clay.

You'll see.

Sorter 03-07-2013 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9475183)
FYI, Argo, if that's even your real name, no Andy Reid QB has ever thrown for 4300 yards. McNabb had ONE season of 27+ TD.

GOOD LUCK DUMBASS.

It's Joey

Hammock Parties 03-07-2013 08:33 PM

FYI, I'll waive the 3-month ban in favor of you immediately posting as a gay man for 6 months.

RunKC 03-07-2013 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 9475155)
Your dumbass is the opposite end of GoChiefs. You are on whatever bandwagon the majority isn't and you look like a ****ing idiot.

Not true.I hated losing Carr. I hate Cassel. I hate Pioli. I love the Andy Reid hire. I was for Albert staying. I was for Bowe staying. I was for Colquitt staying.

All majority opinions.

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-07-2013 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 9475187)
I wouldn't worry about your bet GC. Alex will be lucky to play beyond 8 games this season.

Smoooooooooth....the hell out.
Posted via Mobile Device

BigBeauford 03-07-2013 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9475160)
LMAO

Hey man you can also win if he throws for 4,300 yards! I'm screwed!

So Alex would essentially have to pull out of his ass the equivalent of 4 more excellent games or 6 games of about what he usually averages. So the only way you will lose this bet is if between now and then, the NFL changes its schedule to 22 games.

Beeker 03-07-2013 08:35 PM

You're all going to burn in AIDS fire while having antifreeze soaked deer antlers jammed up your asses because you rape your grandmother!!!



:))

Iowanian 03-07-2013 08:36 PM

You better not pitch that shit at me fellers, I only ate the Green M&M's in little league!

Kaepernick 03-07-2013 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 9473996)
W/L Record when opposing teams score 24 or more?

I, too, am tired of that stat. The fact is, most quarterbacks lose facing those odds.

Aaron Rodgers - 12-23
Matt Stafford - 7-22
Eli Manning - 18-44
Ben Roethlisberger - 7 - 25

Obviously, there are guys that are going to have better numbers if they played on teams that lit the scoreboard up. Tom Brady has something like a 31-31 record in this column because he's had both good defenses and great offenses. Some teams rely on good defense and don't build their teams to win by outscoring the opponent in a shootout. Alex Smith has played on one of those teams for his entire career. Hell, look at Eli's numbers. That's a HORRIBLE stat line...no one would bitch if we brought him in. I'm not saying that Alex Smith is half of what Eli Manning is, but I'm pointing out that this stat is more of a reflection of the way that the team is built, rather than the quarterback.

I know better, but I'll play...

Tom Brady...............30 wins/ 28 losses in 58 games = 52%
Joe Flacco................10 wins/12 losses in 22 games = 46%
Matt Ryan................11 wins/17 losses in 28 games = 39%
Peyton Manning........35 wins/ 54 losses in 89 games = 39%
Aaron Rodgers..........11 wins/19 losses in 30 games = 37%
Drew Brees..............27 wins/ 51 losses in 78 games = 35%
Eli Manning, .............18 wins/44 losses in 62 games = 29%
Matthew Stafford........7 wins/ 21 losses in 28 games = 25%
Matt Schaub..............14 wins/43 losses in 57 games = 25%
Matt Cassel...............8 wins/26 losses in 34 games = 24%
Ben Roethilsberger........6 wins/21 losses in 27 games = 22%
Alex Smith..................2 wins/27 losses in 29 games = 7%

What this means to you is up to how much you think an elite QB impacts the team. All I know is, there is a hell of a difference between 7% and even 35% when you are fighting for a playoff berth or trying to navigate to the superbowl. All of those elite/elitish guys are in the 30's on up.

Brady, Manning, Brees and Rodgers are in the top 6, all cleary elite QBs. Flacco is nearly elite. Ryan, I didn't expect. So who knows?

All I know is, it is no secret it is very difficult to win when your Defense allows 24 points. That is why it is a bellweather. That's why they don't use 7 or 14 points as the dividing point. Because giving up 24 means you usually lose. So the key here is, what QBs shoulder their team and give you SOME chance to win when the Defense gives up 24 points.

All of this means exactly jack since it is a team sport, but it does seem indicate that some QBs can step up to generate points when needed and other QBs can't.

Just for fun, here is a how a classic HoFer fared -

Joe Montana...........21 wins/24 losses in 45 games = 46%

Hmm, maybe there is a little something to this metric.

mcaj22 03-07-2013 08:37 PM

there needs to be a thread taking bets on who gets hurt first, Tony Moeaki or Alex Smith.

that's a tough one.

mcaj22 03-07-2013 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaepernick (Post 9475208)
I know better, but I'll play...

Tom Brady...............30 wins/ 28 losses in 58 games = 52%
Joe Flacco................10 wins/12 losses in 22 games = 46%
Matt Ryan................11 wins/17 losses in 28 games = 39%
Peyton Manning........35 wins/ 54 losses in 89 games = 39%
Aaron Rodgers..........11 wins/19 losses in 30 games = 37%
Drew Brees..............27 wins/ 51 losses in 78 games = 35%
Eli Manning, .............18 wins/44 losses in 62 games = 29%
Matthew Stafford........7 wins/ 21 losses in 28 games = 25%
Matt Schaub..............14 wins/43 losses in 57 games = 25%
Matt Cassel...............8 wins/26 losses in 34 games = 24%
Ben Roethilsberger........6 wins/21 losses in 27 games = 22%
Alex Smith..................2 wins/27 losses in 29 games = 7%

What this means to you is up to how much you think an elite QB impacts the team. All I know is, there is a hell of a difference between 7% and even 35% when you are fighting for a playoff berth or trying to navigate to the superbowl. All of those elite/elitish guys are in the 30's on up.

Brady, Manning, Brees and Rodgers are in the top 6, all cleary elite QBs. Flacco is nearly elite. Ryan, I didn't expect. So who knows?

All I know is, it is no secret it is very difficult to win when your Defense allows 24 points. That is why it is a bellweather. That's why they don't use 7 or 14 points as the dividing point. Because giving up 24 means you usually lose. So the key here is, what QBs shoulder their team and give you SOME chance to win when the Defense gives up 24 points.

All of this means exactly jack since it is a team sport, but it does seem indicate that some QBs can step up to generate points when needed and other QBs can't.

Just for fun, here is a how a classic HoFer fared -

Joe Montana...........21 wins/24 losses in 45 games = 46%

Hmm, maybe there is a little something to this metric.


yea eat shit Alex Smith ballwashers

Hammock Parties 03-07-2013 08:39 PM

Amazing how people CONTINUE to slam that statistic when it's the absolute truth.

Matt ****ing Cassel has more wins in that situation than Smith.

That's embarrassing.

There's no defense for being close to 0 in any stat in this league.

SAUTO 03-07-2013 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 9475211)
there needs to be a thread taking bets on who gets hurt first, Tony Moeaki or Alex Smith.

that's a tough one.

Here's hoping they don't hurt each other
Posted via Mobile Device

Sorter 03-07-2013 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9475220)
Here's hoping they don't hurt each other
Posted via Mobile Device

If they do, I hope it is right before the draft.

-King- 03-07-2013 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaepernick (Post 9475208)
I know better, but I'll play...

Tom Brady...............30 wins/ 28 losses in 58 games = 52%
Joe Flacco................10 wins/12 losses in 22 games = 46%
Matt Ryan................11 wins/17 losses in 28 games = 39%
Peyton Manning........35 wins/ 54 losses in 89 games = 39%
Aaron Rodgers..........11 wins/19 losses in 30 games = 37%
Drew Brees..............27 wins/ 51 losses in 78 games = 35%
Eli Manning, .............18 wins/44 losses in 62 games = 29%
Matthew Stafford........7 wins/ 21 losses in 28 games = 25%
Matt Schaub..............14 wins/43 losses in 57 games = 25%
Matt Cassel...............8 wins/26 losses in 34 games = 24%
Ben Roethilsberger........6 wins/21 losses in 27 games = 22%
Alex Smith..................2 wins/27 losses in 29 games = 7%

What this means to you is up to how much you think an elite QB impacts the team. All I know is, there is a hell of a difference between 7% and even 35% when you are fighting for a playoff berth or trying to navigate to the superbowl. All of those elite/elitish guys are in the 30's on up.

Brady, Manning, Brees and Rodgers are in the top 6, all cleary elite QBs. Flacco is nearly elite. Ryan, I didn't expect. So who knows?

All I know is, it is no secret it is very difficult to win when your Defense allows 24 points. That is why it is a bellweather. That's why they don't use 7 or 14 points as the dividing point. Because giving up 24 means you usually lose. So the key here is, what QBs shoulder their team and give you SOME chance to win when the Defense gives up 24 points.

All of this means exactly jack since it is a team sport, but it does seem indicate that some QBs can step up to generate points when needed and other QBs can't.

Just for fun, here is a how a classic HoFer fared -

Joe Montana...........21 wins/24 losses in 45 games = 46%

Hmm, maybe there is a little something to this metric.

OUCH!

Beeker 03-07-2013 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 9475211)
there needs to be a thread taking bets on who gets hurt first, Tony Moeaki or Alex Smith.

that's a tough one.

Let's hope they don't have a Williams/Hunter moment and take each other out!

mcaj22 03-07-2013 08:43 PM

the problem is Alex Smith needs the best elite defense to help him be an acceptable NFL QB

the guy couldnt win when the defense was average, the guy still couldnt win when the defense was good, or very good, that defense had to get top 3 elite maybe even 1st pending who you ask for Alex Smith to start having positive success. That elite defense shut offenses down and sat on leads for Alex Smith and got him a lot of victories the last two years

and that's something we are far from on our defense despite having some good players on it.

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-07-2013 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9475220)
Here's hoping they don't hurt each other
Posted via Mobile Device

bwa-hahahahahaha...
Posted via Mobile Device

Beeker 03-07-2013 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaepernick (Post 9475208)
I know better, but I'll play...

Tom Brady...............30 wins/ 28 losses in 58 games = 52%
Joe Flacco................10 wins/12 losses in 22 games = 46%
Matt Ryan................11 wins/17 losses in 28 games = 39%
Peyton Manning........35 wins/ 54 losses in 89 games = 39%
Aaron Rodgers..........11 wins/19 losses in 30 games = 37%
Drew Brees..............27 wins/ 51 losses in 78 games = 35%
Eli Manning, .............18 wins/44 losses in 62 games = 29%
Matthew Stafford........7 wins/ 21 losses in 28 games = 25%
Matt Schaub..............14 wins/43 losses in 57 games = 25%
Matt Cassel...............8 wins/26 losses in 34 games = 24%
Ben Roethilsberger........6 wins/21 losses in 27 games = 22%
Alex Smith..................2 wins/27 losses in 29 games = 7%

What this means to you is up to how much you think an elite QB impacts the team. All I know is, there is a hell of a difference between 7% and even 35% when you are fighting for a playoff berth or trying to navigate to the superbowl. All of those elite/elitish guys are in the 30's on up.

Brady, Manning, Brees and Rodgers are in the top 6, all cleary elite QBs. Flacco is nearly elite. Ryan, I didn't expect. So who knows?

All I know is, it is no secret it is very difficult to win when your Defense allows 24 points. That is why it is a bellweather. That's why they don't use 7 or 14 points as the dividing point. Because giving up 24 means you usually lose. So the key here is, what QBs shoulder their team and give you SOME chance to win when the Defense gives up 24 points.

All of this means exactly jack since it is a team sport, but it does seem indicate that some QBs can step up to generate points when needed and other QBs can't.

Just for fun, here is a how a classic HoFer fared -

Joe Montana...........21 wins/24 losses in 45 games = 46%

Hmm, maybe there is a little something to this metric.

Just for fun - can you run the numbers on Luck, RGIII, Wilson, and Kaepernick, too?

mcaj22 03-07-2013 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beeker (Post 9475237)
Just for fun - can you run the numbers on Luck, RGIII, Wilson, and Kaepernick, too?

their sample size is one year

... lol

SAUTO 03-07-2013 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beeker (Post 9475237)
Just for fun - can you run the numbers on Luck, RGIII, Wilson, and Kaepernick, too?

They are all in their first years starting.

Small sample size.
Posted via Mobile Device

SAUTO 03-07-2013 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 9475241)
their sample size is one year

... lol

**** you
Posted via Mobile Device

Sorter 03-07-2013 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 9475241)
their sample size is one year

... lol

This. Plus, Kaeps is less than 1 year. Would be exceptionally silly.

Carlota69 03-07-2013 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaepernick (Post 9475208)
I know better, but I'll play...

Tom Brady...............30 wins/ 28 losses in 58 games = 52%
Joe Flacco................10 wins/12 losses in 22 games = 46%
Matt Ryan................11 wins/17 losses in 28 games = 39%
Peyton Manning........35 wins/ 54 losses in 89 games = 39%
Aaron Rodgers..........11 wins/19 losses in 30 games = 37%
Drew Brees..............27 wins/ 51 losses in 78 games = 35%
Eli Manning, .............18 wins/44 losses in 62 games = 29%
Matthew Stafford........7 wins/ 21 losses in 28 games = 25%
Matt Schaub..............14 wins/43 losses in 57 games = 25%
Matt Cassel...............8 wins/26 losses in 34 games = 24%
Ben Roethilsberger........6 wins/21 losses in 27 games = 22%
Alex Smith..................2 wins/27 losses in 29 games = 7%

What this means to you is up to how much you think an elite QB impacts the team. All I know is, there is a hell of a difference between 7% and even 35% when you are fighting for a playoff berth or trying to navigate to the superbowl. All of those elite/elitish guys are in the 30's on up.

Brady, Manning, Brees and Rodgers are in the top 6, all cleary elite QBs. Flacco is nearly elite. Ryan, I didn't expect. So who knows?

All I know is, it is no secret it is very difficult to win when your Defense allows 24 points. That is why it is a bellweather. That's why they don't use 7 or 14 points as the dividing point. Because giving up 24 means you usually lose. So the key here is, what QBs shoulder their team and give you SOME chance to win when the Defense gives up 24 points.

All of this means exactly jack since it is a team sport, but it does seem indicate that some QBs can step up to generate points when needed and other QBs can't.

Just for fun, here is a how a classic HoFer fared -

Joe Montana...........21 wins/24 losses in 45 games = 46%

Hmm, maybe there is a little something to this metric.

How many of Casshats wins were when he was with NE?

Mav 03-07-2013 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9475096)
If Alex Smith averages 25 tds the next two years, and none of the rookies from this class blow up, the trade was good.

if alex smith has to throw for 25 tds, the chiefs are going to be 6-10

Beeker 03-07-2013 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 9475241)
their sample size is one year

... lol

Geez guys, can't I make a (weak) attempt at a joke? Sheesh! At least a couple of you got it.

mcaj22 03-07-2013 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith Fan (Post 9475255)
if alex smith has to throw for 25 tds, the chiefs are going to be 6-10

so your logic is... the less TDs he throws the better we will be? So..............

the less times he drops back to pass and the more times we run, the better we will be?

that's how you defend your QB in today's pass happy NFL?

LOL

Mav 03-07-2013 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Dick Willie (Post 9475125)
Barkley and Smith could and will surpass him as rookies.
Posted via Mobile Device

wanna place a bet on this? especially barkley.

barkley wont. ill bet my membership at chiefs planet on it. you want me gone.

if barkley does, ill leave, if he doesnt, you go. seems simple

RunKC 03-07-2013 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaepernick (Post 9475208)
I know better, but I'll play...

Tom Brady...............30 wins/ 28 losses in 58 games = 52%
Joe Flacco................10 wins/12 losses in 22 games = 46%
Matt Ryan................11 wins/17 losses in 28 games = 39%
Peyton Manning........35 wins/ 54 losses in 89 games = 39%
Aaron Rodgers..........11 wins/19 losses in 30 games = 37%
Drew Brees..............27 wins/ 51 losses in 78 games = 35%
Eli Manning, .............18 wins/44 losses in 62 games = 29%
Matthew Stafford........7 wins/ 21 losses in 28 games = 25%
Matt Schaub..............14 wins/43 losses in 57 games = 25%
Matt Cassel...............8 wins/26 losses in 34 games = 24%
Ben Roethilsberger........6 wins/21 losses in 27 games = 22%
Alex Smith..................2 wins/27 losses in 29 games = 7%

What this means to you is up to how much you think an elite QB impacts the team. All I know is, there is a hell of a difference between 7% and even 35% when you are fighting for a playoff berth or trying to navigate to the superbowl. All of those elite/elitish guys are in the 30's on up.

Brady, Manning, Brees and Rodgers are in the top 6, all cleary elite QBs. Flacco is nearly elite. Ryan, I didn't expect. So who knows?

All I know is, it is no secret it is very difficult to win when your Defense allows 24 points. That is why it is a bellweather. That's why they don't use 7 or 14 points as the dividing point. Because giving up 24 means you usually lose. So the key here is, what QBs shoulder their team and give you SOME chance to win when the Defense gives up 24 points.

All of this means exactly jack since it is a team sport, but it does seem indicate that some QBs can step up to generate points when needed and other QBs can't.

Just for fun, here is a how a classic HoFer fared -

Joe Montana...........21 wins/24 losses in 45 games = 46%

Hmm, maybe there is a little something to this metric.

This is a huge flaw. Look at who Cassel's surrounding cast is in his career and who coached him. Now look at Alex Smith's.

Huge difference.

mcaj22 03-07-2013 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9475264)
This is a huge flaw. Look at who Cassel's surrounding cast is in his career and who coached him. Now look at Alex Smith's.

Huge difference.

Alex Smith has had like a top 20 defense the last 6 years and was still god damn terrible

Cassel has had really bad defenses for the last 4 years sans 1 magical fluke year, and even then it wasnt that good.

Alex Smith has had the better cast and coaching in San Fran, than Cassel has had here, so what is your point. Smith's numbers should be WAY better if he was a QB worth a god damn shit, but he isnt

Hammock Parties 03-07-2013 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carlota69 (Post 9475253)
How many of Casshats wins were when he was with NE?

He had 5 with the Chiefs. In only 4 years.

Alex Smith is a wastoid.

Beeker 03-07-2013 08:53 PM

http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/c...g?t=1351634179

Mav 03-07-2013 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 9475233)
the problem is Alex Smith needs the best elite defense to help him be an acceptable NFL QB

the guy couldnt win when the defense was average, the guy still couldnt win when the defense was good, or very good, that defense had to get top 3 elite maybe even 1st pending who you ask for Alex Smith to start having positive success. That elite defense shut offenses down and sat on leads for Alex Smith and got him a lot of victories the last two years

and that's something we are far from on our defense despite having some good players on it.

you are so so so so stupid.

alex smith was never surrounded with offensive talent until the last two years.

go look it up dumb ass. the niners were specifically built around the defense. check their draft picks. my god people are just dumb.....

Carlota69 03-07-2013 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beeker (Post 9475278)

:LOL:

Beeker 03-07-2013 08:55 PM

http://i1093.photobucket.com/albums/...ps1cf89c53.jpg

SAUTO 03-07-2013 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9475264)
This is a huge flaw. Look at who Cassel's surrounding cast is in his career and who coached him. Now look at Alex Smith's.

Huge difference.

JFC


Enough with the ****ing excuses. We went through this with Cassel. Look how that turned out.
I don't see anyone making excuses for Rodgers, Brady, etc...


Wonder why.


I WANT A QUARTERBACK THAT DOESN'T NEED SOME ****ING ASSHOLE MAKING EXCUSES FOR HIM.


I was the asshole with Cassel. I learned my lesson.


If the quarterback is worth playing no excuses should be needed
Posted via Mobile Device

mcaj22 03-07-2013 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith Fan (Post 9475284)
you are so so so so stupid.

alex smith was never surrounded with offensive talent until the last two years.

go look it up dumb ass. the niners were specifically built around the defense. check their draft picks. my god people are just dumb.....

hes had Frank Gore and Vernon Davis HIS WHOLE ****ING CAREER

you act like those guys are scrubs. That is more than enough

Beeker 03-07-2013 08:57 PM

http://i311.photobucket.com/albums/k...psc7f30228.jpg

Mav 03-07-2013 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 9475261)
so your logic is... the less TDs he throws the better we will be? So..............

the less times he drops back to pass and the more times we run, the better we will be?

that's how you defend your QB in today's pass happy NFL?

LOL

you are extremely simple. i cant help it if you cant figure it out.

SAUTO 03-07-2013 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith Fan (Post 9475284)
you are so so so so stupid.

alex smith was never surrounded with offensive talent until the last two years.

go look it up dumb ass. the niners were specifically built around the defense. check their draft picks. my god people are just dumb.....

Who ****ing cares?


Brady was winning super bowls with a couple piles of shit at wr, and a dead cat at rb.
Posted via Mobile Device

Mav 03-07-2013 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9475296)
JFC


Enough with the ****ing excuses. We went through this with Cassel. Look how that turned out.
I don't see anyone making excuses for Rodgers, Brady, etc...


Wonder why.


I WANT A QUARTERBACK THAT DOESN'T NEED SOME ****ING ASSHOLE MAKING EXCUSES FOR HIM.


I was the asshole with Cassel. I learned my lesson.


If the quarterback is worth playing no excuses should be needed
Posted via Mobile Device

god damn you are dumb. so, aaron rodgers, and tom brady, only have one tight end, and one receiver? cool, do me a favor stupid. compare the 49ers offensive stats with kaep last year, and then take that same sample size with tom brady and aaron rodgers. then please, feel free to get back to me. wtf is wrong with you dumbasses.

Mav 03-07-2013 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9475305)
Who ****ing cares?


Brady was winning super bowls with a couple piles of shit at wr, and a dead cat at rb.
Posted via Mobile Device

thats it, you are officially the stupidest mother ****er on the planet. tom brady was winning with the stats he is now? lol. no, they didnt go out and get him welker, and randy moss, and gronk, and hernandez. no no......he can do it with scrubs. lol.

SAUTO 03-07-2013 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith Fan (Post 9475312)
god damn you are dumb. so, aaron rodgers, and tom brady, only have one tight end, and one receiver? cool, do me a favor stupid. compare the 49ers offensive stats with kaep last year, and then take that same sample size with tom brady and aaron rodgers. then please, feel free to get back to me. wtf is wrong with you dumbasses.

Tom ****ing Brady had less on offense when he was winning super bowls than the niners since Smith was there.

Sorry you don't know much about the nfl
Posted via Mobile Device

Beeker 03-07-2013 09:02 PM

On the left: what the 49ers have. On the right: what the Chiefs have.



http://i.imgur.com/zSdjpb9.jpg

mcaj22 03-07-2013 09:02 PM

Alex Smith had Norv Turner as an OC at one point and people on here we slobbing for Norv as an OC option before Andy was hired.

And Alex Smith was ****ing terrible even under Norv.

RunKC 03-07-2013 09:03 PM

Time to deflate this bullshit for what it really is.

First of all, one of those games was vs the Saints this last year. Charles won that game, NOT Cassel. Cassel didn't do shit.

Another vs the Colts. Worst team in the NFL and 25th ranked defense. Woo!

Seattle is legit. One of the few games he ever looked good in.

Steelers OT win is the other one.

Final game was against Denver in 2009 when Cassel didn't do shit. That was Jamaal's coming out party. He won that game for us.

So basically 2 of those games were impressive. Other 2 were all Jamaal.

SAUTO 03-07-2013 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith Fan (Post 9475321)
thats it, you are officially the stupidest mother ****er on the planet. tom brady was winning with the stats he is now? lol. no, they didnt go out and get him welker, and randy moss, and gronk, and hernandez. no no......he can do it with scrubs. lol.

Has he won since they got him those guys?

No.

He won with the scrubs.

I'm not the dumb one here
Posted via Mobile Device

-King- 03-07-2013 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9475264)
This is a huge flaw. Look at who Cassel's surrounding cast is in his career and who coached him. Now look at Alex Smith's.

Huge difference.

LMAO

Mav 03-07-2013 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9475322)
Tom ****ing Brady had less on offense when he was winning super bowls than the niners since Smith was there.

Sorry you don't know much about the nfl
Posted via Mobile Device

their offense beat down the rams? BULLLLLSHIT, their defense beat down the rams. One of the best offenses in the league got locked up by a young ty law, willie mcginnest, vrabel, richard seymour. before randy moss's first year with the patriots what was tom bradys career high in tds? hmmmm?

Mav 03-07-2013 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 9475325)
Alex Smith had Norv Turner as an OC at one point and people on here we slobbing for Norv as an OC option before Andy was hired.

And Alex Smith was ****ing terrible even under Norv.

who were the receivers? yeah, thats about what i thought.

DaneMcCloud 03-07-2013 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 9475325)
Alex Smith had Norv Turner as an OC at one point and people on here we slobbing for Norv as an OC option before Andy was hired.

And Alex Smith was ****ing terrible even under Norv.

Oh, just shut the **** UP.

And change your avatar, reeruno.

SAUTO 03-07-2013 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith Fan (Post 9475333)
their offense beat down the rams? BULLLLLSHIT, their defense beat down the rams. One of the best offenses in the league got locked up by a young ty law, willie mcginnest, vrabel, richard seymour. before randy moss's first year with the patriots what was tom bradys career high in tds? hmmmm?

what is your point?


The niners have had a defense every bit as good, better, than any the pats had.

Why hasn't Alex Smith won one starting?


Oh and the defense wasn't making late game winning drives to score either.
Posted via Mobile Device

SAUTO 03-07-2013 09:08 PM

You are the goal post movingest mother ****er ever.


You have to be related to black bob
Posted via Mobile Device

opposition 03-07-2013 09:09 PM

I honestly think it's completely fair to expect a lot out of Alex. I don't think you guys should be expecting a guy to come in and play "mediocre" football. I understand the frustration there. I think the expectations should be much more. I think Alex would agree with that as well. I would expect playoffs or at the very least massive improvement.

You spent a decent amount to get the guy. He's been playing well and that's why Andy Reid made the decision. He himself, has a HUGE chip on his shoulder to come in and play well. Alex isn't the type of guy that doesn't want to be successful, if I can guarantee you one thing it will be that Alex will work his ass off.

He has never had a new setting, so just maybe a new change of scenery and coaching philosophy he can up his game up a notch or two. Or maybe many are right, he just may well flop. But I think Alex has a decent chance at becoming a pretty damn good QB. You have some solid pieces, and will only get better through the draft and FA.

SAUTO 03-07-2013 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith Fan (Post 9475337)
who were the receivers? yeah, thats about what i thought.

Receivers don't matter if you don't throw the ball, dumbass
Posted via Mobile Device

Mav 03-07-2013 09:09 PM

just for the record. before 2007, 6 years after he became starter, tom bradys career high in tds was 28........


aaron rodgers has been stockpiled with receivers from day one. The 49ers still dont have the receiving options that come anywhere near green bays, new englands, new orleans. because they are built more on their defense. Sorry that some on this board, are so ****ing slow, to realize how little offensive talent the 49ers had the past 6 years.......

Mav 03-07-2013 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9475351)
Receivers don't matter if you don't throw the ball, dumbass
Posted via Mobile Device

so the 49ers have a top flight receiving corps?

SAUTO 03-07-2013 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by opposition (Post 9475350)
I honestly think it's completely fair to expect a lot out of Alex. I don't think you guys should be expecting a guy to come in and play "mediocre" football. I understand the frustration there. I think the expectations should be much more. I think Alex would agree with that as well. I would expect playoffs or at the very least massive improvement.

You spent a decent amount to get the guy. He's been playing well and that's why Andy Reid made the decision. He himself, has a HUGE chip on his shoulder to come in and play well. Alex isn't the type of guy that doesn't want to be successful, if I can guarantee you one thing it will be that Alex will work his ass off.

He has never had a new setting, so just maybe a new change of scenery and coaching philosophy he can up his game up a notch or two. Or maybe many are right, he just may well flop. But I think Alex has a decent chance at becoming a pretty damn good QB. You have some solid pieces, and will only get better through the draft and FA.

Cassel worked his ass off.

I'm sure Smith will too, why has he been mediocre his whole career? He didn't work hard as a niner?
Posted via Mobile Device

SAUTO 03-07-2013 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith Fan (Post 9475353)
just for the record. before 2007, 6 years after he became starter, tom bradys career high in tds was 28........


aaron rodgers has been stockpiled with receivers from day one. The 49ers still dont have the receiving options that come anywhere near green bays, new englands, new orleans. because they are built more on their defense. Sorry that some on this board, are so ****ing slow, to realize how little offensive talent the 49ers had the past 6 years.......


You are a dumb shit.

Tom Brady won three super bowls with less on offense than Alex Smith ever had as a niner
Posted via Mobile Device

SAUTO 03-07-2013 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith Fan (Post 9475356)
so the 49ers have a top flight receiving corps?

We don't know, they didn't throw the ball much with Alex Smith
Posted via Mobile Device


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.