Notice how his paper arguments are easily brought down and he quickly changes the subject...rinse..repeat.

Rivals updated their rankings this week. Here's the conference breakdown of the Rivals 250:

SEC: 80
ACC: 35
B1G: 23
PAC: 22
Big 12: 16

God damn the Big 12 sucks ass.

my list is from 2013. But who knows who you're even talking about.

But if you guys win the NC the value of the mizzou football will definitely go up. Maybe even crack to top 50.

Nice

I'm interested to hear the Bama fan reaction. Do they still cheer for the West or is the butt hurt too strong ROFL

ROFL Not happening.

As much as the B1G and the ACC suck outside of their top teams, how bad do you have to be to rank that low? Yeeesh

Would Mizzou fans have cheered for KU had they beaten us and advanced to the Big 12 championship in 2007?

Bama fans are pretty loudly in our camp at this point. They hate Auburn as much/more than we hate Kansas.

I wouldn't have felt sorry for the son in that event.

As a Kansas fan I'll admit I'm pulling for Mizzou. Not that I really "want" MU to win more than I am eager to see the absolute cluster**** of a situation that will hit the SEC by a team that is still mostly "Big 12" in recruit and style.

I don't get the feeling that the old boys network is taking to kindly to the fact that a northern school like Missouri can just step in and in two years can take down the whole thing.

So...you're going with the "Mizzou being great somehow makes the Big 12 better by proxy" angle on this one? Pretending that somehow the Big 12's best are now and have always been as good as the best in the SEC? Ignoring the fact that every time anyone has stepped into the ring with the SEC, they've been crushed?

According to your link and the links provided by wsj against yours Mizzou football lost approx 60 million in value from 2012 to 2013....mmkay :rolleyes: Go worry about your clusterf*** of a team and stop trying to troll on the coat tails of your "non rival".