There's really nothing "Homer" about it. It's legit reasoning IMO. I mean if I did something, like violently break my kids arm, and if I were trying to cover it up, the LAST thing I'd do is post a pic of my kid with a broken arm on social media. :shrug:

Certainly, if he's not willing to talk to them about it, they can suspend him for that.

Let's not forget that Hunt was let go not for fighting but for lying.

Oh I'm tracking you. He'll suspend Hill if he wants to, I just hope the NFLPA can step up and get it removed. Goodell has too much authority and final say, and too little sense to know what to do with it. He's a god awful commissioner, but he's made the owners hundreds of millions of dollars so he isn't going anywhere.

But again in the Zeke case, there was an accuser naming Elliott the entire time. This case is way more cloudy, not that Goodell cares much about that. I guess we'll know in a week or two?

An adult is swatting the child's butt and the kid runs away and goes down the stairs too fast and trips.

discipline + accident = Parent going to jail if they admit to anything, especially with a history of violence.

No way is he getting extended anytime soon and probably never. At best, he plays for essentially free this year, and he gets tagged next, and that's it.

Well there was the fact AP said he did it.

And there were also pics.

So you think suspending people for your "feelings" or "presumptions" is acceptable?

NYET! :rolleyes:

Maybe I'm just in "because Chiefs" mode right now but I think it will be a lot longer than one or two weeks.

And while the NFLPA can fight it, they've not had a great track record of results, including losing a major decision in court. Goodell really has all the power in this case. He can pretty much do whatever he wants.

Exactly what would Hill be suspended over? Brooke and the KC Star wrote a disingenuous hit piece without knowing any facts and published a bunch of nonsense that got a lot of people prejudging Hill. No one knows who the DA thinks is guilty and no one knows if it was just an accident. There is exactly ZERO evidence that Hill did anything wrong.

If the Chiefs already have removed Hill from their future plans, as some reports had said, due to his history and his ongoing legal issues, they'd be looking at having this year left with him, and maybe next year under the tag.

If he's going to be exempt for a while and suspended after that, he may not have many games in a Chiefs uniform left regardless. Cutting him might (save them the issue of tagging him) and PR relief, at the cost of only a handful of games of Tyreek Hill, in their view. And his ongoing legal issues severely diminish his trade value next offseason.

It doesn't matter if it is acceptable.

Goodell absolutely has the power to do it. Period.

This just in Twisted Chief hates Tyreek. Oh wait...

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Here is the Press Release from today&#39;s media conference. <a href="https://t.co/7MCKkHtb2C">pic.twitter.com/7MCKkHtb2C</a></p>&mdash; Johnson County KS DA (@JohnsonCoDA) <a href="https://twitter.com/JohnsonCoDA/status/1121153452619513856?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 24, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

There still has to be some kind of actual evidence Hill did something wrong. The kid having a broken arm is not by itself evidence. Period.