![]() |
Quote:
|
Only thing that actually worries me about this game is Niners play action versus Chiefs defense. We consistently got torched by Titans when they were running it effectively and 49ers offense does much of the same.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Stuff works early because they're still gauging and scouting. By the 3rd drive or so, they're actually putting in adjustments and things change. We've seen it for the last 10 weeks or so. |
Quote:
|
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I’ll be Mic’d up Sunday Night. For Super Bowl 54. There, you hear what I really have to Say. Until then. ✌🏿</p>— Frank Clark (@TheRealFrankC_) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheRealFrankC_/status/1222586209723199493?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 29, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
|
Quote:
Matt "12 inch cock" Moore Matt "**** Kirk Cousins" MOORE!! MIDNIGHT K, I'm done |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
After we beat the Niners Frank Clark is gonna pick up that Lombardi trophy and smash it over Dee Ford's head! Take that you habitual line stepping over piece of shit!
|
I’m just going to repeat what I’ve been saying which is that the Chiefs pass rush will have more impact on Garrapolo than theirs will on Mahomes.
|
Quote:
|
Here’s a potential theory that you can call me a Chiefs homer for if you want but I believe could have traction.
SFs offense uses so much window dressing to confuse the defense and create big plays. Even more than Reid does. Shanahan is more dependent on scheme than Reid is, whereas he can just win a lot of plays with pure talent at his disposal. I think it helps KC to have that extra week to see and practice against all of the funky stuff that SF does. In theory, they may see their plays twice as much as a team would during a normal practice week. And yeah the same can be said for SF against the Chiefs offense but again, we aren’t nearly as dependent on scheme IMHO. Even if you have the play covered perfectly, Mahomes can turn it into a long completion. Could be something that we see play out. |
Quote:
The Chiefs OL has the 4th best sacks allowed rate. The 49ers have the 2nd best sack rate. The 49ers OL has the 15th best sacks allowed rate. The Chiefs have the 10th best sack rate. Chiefs OL and DL had significant injuries through most of the year which affected their rankings, but both are as healthy as they can be now. I know the 49ers has injuries too, but I’m not familiar with the extent. I’ll just assume injuries were a wash for both. Then consider that Mahomes is more mobile than Garrapolo, has better weapons than Garrapolo, makes much better decisions than Garrapolo.... It’s absolutely possible. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The stretch/wide zone is Alex Gibbs' scheme and it relies on OL positioning and cutback lanes. The defensive line needs to be disciplined and patient. We've seen them do it, in fact we saw them do it as early as the Baltimore game when they adequately contained Lamar Jackson. |
Quote:
Every year at OTA’s and camp Andy has a practice dedicated to each divisional team. Denver hired Shannahan’s QB coach Scangarello to be their OC, so we studied that offense knowing Denver would utilize it. We also studied it further when the Vikings came to town. Gary Kubiak went there this year and was running basically the same type of offense. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Dude ran for 50 yards, had 2 big catches (including a TD) and threw their longest pass of the game out of a trick formation. You're gonna call people out for having the 'attention span of a goldfish' when you're sitting there arguing that there's no way Hill could do damage against the Vikings when he actually did. ****ing hell you're stupid. |
I would love to see the Chiefs start with no huddle/tempo on offense with short/quick passes, neutralizing the 49ers’ pass rush.
Would also be a good way to get the offense off to a fast start. |
Quote:
|
If the Falcons can hold the Niners to 22 points, 120 rushing yards, and less than 200 passing yards, then I think the Chiefs have a great shot to do the same. Atlanta was the 20th best DVOA defense overall this year, 14th in DVOA rushing, and 25th in DVOA passing.
Jimmy G was just not good enough to take advantage of Atlanta's biggest weakness - their pass defense. |
Garoppolo toward the top of the league in dropped interceptions this season. Here’s a clip of all of them: https://twitter.com/thestevenruiz/st...883033602?s=21
This guy who tweeted it and Nick Jacobs both have clearly watched a lot of games and the thing they both pointed to was he really just doesn’t throw outside the numbers, almost ever. He loves that MOF. Hoping Spagnuolo and the staff have these guys dialed in on staying disciplined and congesting the middle of the field. Don’t take the eye candy if it’s not your job. Front line needs to win their 1v1s, stay disciplined at the 2nd level, and we will give Garoppolo problems. |
Quote:
They're throws where he simply didn't see the underneath man sinking into the zone. He's routinely hitting guys right in the chest because he flat doesn't pick them up. And if you have an athletic Will like DoD out there patrolling those zones, you could do a lot of drop-zone coverage and make a hash out of his ability to work the middle. Sorensen is probably going to have a big play from that Nickel Linebacker role he plays at some point. Fuller's biggest impact as a Chief may well be allowing Sorensen to play hybrid backer for big chunks of the game. |
Tyrann Mathieu better be ready to catch the football. I think he's probably tied with Garoppolo in dropped INTs.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm not even sure it's low football IQ as much as it is a lack of baseline reliability. He makes some plays where he diagnoses quickly and explodes toward the ballcarrier - it's a 'savvy' play that you generally think comes from someone who's a pretty smart ballplayer. But then he'll just completely airmail an assignment 2 plays later. It's less of a football IQ thing and almost a football maturity thing. He just can't seem to maintain focus terribly well or hold his water. He struggles to play within scheme. That doesn't mean he's not sharp enough to do it but rather that he's just not polished enough for the game to have slowed down for him. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If I’m Spags, I’m playing single high with Landlord in the box playing 5 yards off the LOS. 8 in the box will flood the middle forcing Jimmy G to go outside the numbers and will also help with the run game. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Deebo Samuel will KILL Sorensen downfield if he's left in single-high. If they're commit to that kind of coverage, Fuller needs to be a big part of it w/ Sorensen on the field for Wilson a fair amount. |
Haha Deangelo Hall just said “if the 49ers can’t get home with just 4, it wouldn’t matter if they have Deion, Darren Green, Revis and Rod Woodson out there. These guys in KC are almost impossible to cover for more than a couple seconds”
|
Quote:
|
Damien Wilson told Pelissero that the emphasis is on eye discipline. Great to hear, just what we’ve been talking about on here.
Do your job. The old cliche is a must Sunday. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
CHIEFS DEFENSE VS STATUE QBs:
JACOBY BRISSETT: 19 points JOE FLACCO: 6 points PHILIP RIVERS: 17 points, 21 points TOM BRADY: 16 points |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
So yeah, he’s fairly immobile. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
KC has Frank Clark, Chris Jones, Kpass, Pennel and Nnadi. As long as Spags does what Baltimore did and attack and play as many DL as possible aiming to attack and disrupt the SF line the result should be much different. KC doesn't have to win every time. Just not get run over like Green Bay did and I don't think they will. |
Quote:
|
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/1b7o2HBZS0o" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
|
What blows my mind is how so many think that SF will shut down this offense. Belechick who many think is one of if not the greatest defensive minds in NFL history couldn’t shut this offense down all game. Now Saleh is suddenly going to? This guy almost lost his job after last year. He is not suddenly some defensive guru. He relies on getting pressure with his DL. If they can’t do that then they are not that good. If Reid can outscheme Belechick he is gonna put clown shoes on Saleh.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Grapes is extremely average in both of those areas. He simply doesn't have the burst or agility to elude rushers as well as the more mobile QBs in the league. While Patrick Mahomes is among the top 20 QBs over the last 20 years in both of those drills (18th and 17th, in fact), Jimmy G is keeping time with guys like David Gerrard, Andy Dalton, Paxton Lynch, Christian Hackenburg and Kirk Cousins. There's little in the way of baseline athleticism for Jimmy Garappolo. He's a reasonable accurate, reasonable intelligent game manager and that's about it. |
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...87ade4e15a.jpg
Just saw this beauty parked illegally on the street in SF silently telling SF who is boss. If this isn’t a sign that KC is gonna make SF their bitch I don’t know what is. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
This defense has performed well against QBs with limited mobility. It's one less thing Spags has to gameplan for. SF presents plenty of problems on offense, but a mobile QB is just not one of them.
|
Quote:
I don't believe at all that SF's game-plan includes Jimmy trying to manufacture offense with his legs. Sorry for the misunderstanding. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You just gotta shake your head at some of this stuff. If he plays to his ability, Chiefs win pretty easily. It really is that simple. The kid is simply not someone you shut down unless he's hurt or rattled. Well I've never seen him rattled. So unless the layoff and the pressure of trying to win one for Reid gets to him, he's gonna play his ass off. |
Quote:
Pat hurt his hand in the first quarter (IIRC), but managed to lead the team to 20 points in the first half, against arguably the best secondary in the NFL. If he hadn't hurt his hand one of those FGs if not both are TDs. That game was a blow-out in the making until Pat hurt his hand. |
Quote:
He basically dared the refs to throw flags for defensive holding on every single play last year. And it worked well...for one half. You have to play press man to even deploy that strategy, which the Niners don't really do. |
Quote:
And Bill could get away with more than the Niners secondary will be able to because bill had the McCourtys, Gilmore, and that LB (can't remember his name right now). Those guys all have elite speed. And Pat, Hill, and Kelce shredded them three times. How in the heck is SF's secondary going to even slow our offense down? |
Quote:
The kid's just damn near unflappable. The only variable we haven't seen is the national landscape - the 2 weeks of media attention. We've seen him overamped for prime-time games before. He's not completely immune to emotion. So the only real question is just how long it will take him to calm his nerves, trust his talent and rape some faces. I suspect it won't be long. |
Quote:
He hits the LOS at full speed. No LB is going to track that. It's not an 'elite route', it's basically a fly route from off-tackle. No LB is going to cover that. Williams is no Kamara, but he's damned fast and an excellent receiver. |
Quote:
|
Average sack time is an interesting thing to consider in this game.
https://theramswire.usatoday.com/201...-to-sack-stat/ Since 2016, Aaron Donald has the fastest average sack time amongst DTs in the league at 3.73 seconds. That’s the fastest by 2/10’s of a second (doesn’t sound like much, but it’s significant). With that, we can fairly safely assume the DTs for the 49ers will take at least 3.5 seconds to get to Pat if they can sack him. Bosa and Ford are both pretty quick around the edge, but I would guess Fisher and Schwartz will slow them down even when Bosa/Ford win on occasion. I don’t see Ford having any free runs at the QB like he had against Andre Smith with the Cardinals last year. Schwartz and Fisher are too good to allow that to happen. Donald also led all players in average sack time last year with an average time of 3.6 seconds. Given all of that, we can assume that Mahomes likely won’t be sacked in less than 3.5 seconds in the Super Bowl. Since that’s just an average on plays that result in a sack, Mahomes will have more time than that on pretty much every play. How long can the SF secondary hold up against these receivers and Mahomes’s lightning-quick decision making? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It was the TD against Houston that you're thinking of and that play required a great design from Reid to get him open. It wasn't that he caught it on the move, it was that Kelce went out and rubbed the guy and that was supposed to sink into that zone and then Watkins got in his way on a crosser. It was a brilliantly designed play. That's why I say he can be schemed into dangerous spots. Meanwhile Kamara can damn near line up as a WR and simply use his feet to create space. Williams isn't that. He's faster and more powerful than he's given credit for; his balance is especially surprising (when he's running hard). But like I said, he's a complementary piece more than anything - a system player. He's not someone I think will often go create his own space. |
Quote:
I'm not saying he's anything more than that. I'm saying that if you bracket and blanket everyone else downfield, we can eat you alive on plays just like that one. What I'm saying is that you literally cannot take away everything from this offense. We just have too many ways to beat you. The only way we lose is if we come out like we did against Houston, and just shit down our collective legs for a quarter. I suspect the team was a little tight; trying too hard. I don't think that happens again. |
Think you’ll see plays like this one Sunday. You have no idea what to do as a pass rusher bc the ball could be 3 places in a matter of 2 seconds.
It’s hard as hell to keep track of all of these guys and maintain gap integrity on a play design like this <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Great call! The location of the route and throw were just so funky on this one. <a href="https://t.co/KnAD11lA6M">pic.twitter.com/KnAD11lA6M</a></p>— Nate Tice (@Nate_Tice) <a href="https://twitter.com/Nate_Tice/status/1222578676266463232?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 29, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
Quote:
Watch the Watkins TD - that play was defended well. If the NCB doesn't just !@#$ up the coverage there and fall down, there's just about nothing available on that play. Now granted, it's impossible to just call the right play every time, but do it often enough and you'll force 4-5 punts over the course of a game and it might be enough. You're right - nobody's holding this offense to a significant degree. But if they can just stall things a bit they can call it a win. |
Quote:
We have a nasty defense of our own now. There's just no ****ing way barring a bunch of dropped passes and stupid turnovers that we lose this game. None. Now, that can always happen. It's true. But that's what it would take. |
Quote:
|
Fisher and Mitch nullify top tier pass rushers. Bosa this Bosa that. They have played multiple elite elite edge rushers this year.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
FOCUSED |
I’m surprised we made it here without our best defensive player in BREELAND SPEAKS!!
|
More QB scrambles for 1st downs, pls.
“ What if things do break down, enough to make Mahomes consider bailing out of the pocket altogether? Well, the 49ers allowed the third-most rushing yards to quarterbacks this season, so I have some ideas.” |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.